Skip to content

Harmonic Chain

The harmonic chain is a periodic array of equal masses coupled by quadratic nearest-neighbor springs, exactly reducible to independent phonon modes plus a free center-of-mass coordinate whose zero frequency must not be quantized as an oscillator.

This dossier fixes one reproducible monatomic-chain convention, its exactness claims, limiting regimes, observables, and matrix benchmark. Phonons as Many-Body Excitations owns the general crystal-lattice construction, phonon interpretation, scattering response, and anharmonic extensions. Coupled Oscillators: First Encounter owns the elementary two-mode change of coordinates.

Unless a variant is named explicitly, this dossier uses the following model.

FieldBaseline choice
sitesN≥3N\geq3 equal masses labeled n=0,…,N−1n=0,\ldots,N-1
geometryone-dimensional periodic chain of reference spacing aa
coordinateone scalar displacement unu_n per site
momentumcanonical momentum pnp_n
massM>0M>0
couplingnearest-neighbor spring constant K>0K>0
boundary conditionun+N=unu_{n+N}=u_n and pn+N=pnp_{n+N}=p_n
onsite pinningabsent
anharmonicityabsent
equilibrium ensemblefixed N,a,M,KN,a,M,K and temperature TT
thermodynamic limitN→∞N\to\infty at fixed a,M,Ka,M,K
zero-mode conventioncenter of mass retained unless explicitly fixed

The site label is periodic, but the scalar displacement itself is not silently compactified. Uniformly shifting every unu_n costs no spring energy and produces a free center-of-mass degree of freedom. A pinned chain, an open chain, a diatomic chain, and an anharmonic chain are different model records.

The microscopic canonical algebra is

[un,pm]=iℏδnm,[un,um]=0,[pn,pm]=0.\begin{aligned} [u_n,p_m] &= i\hbar\delta_{nm}, \\ [u_n,u_m] &= 0, \\ [p_n,p_m] &= 0. \end{aligned}

Before separating the uniform translation, the coordinate representation is

H=L2(RN).\mathcal H = L^2(\mathbb R^N).

Define the center-of-mass displacement and total momentum by

X=1N∑n=0N−1un,P=∑n=0N−1pn.X = \frac1N \sum_{n=0}^{N-1}u_n, \qquad P = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1}p_n.

They satisfy

[X,P]=iℏ.[X,P] = i\hbar.

After an orthogonal normal-coordinate transformation, the Hilbert space factors as

H≃L2(RX)⊗⨂λ=1N−1L2(RQλ).\mathcal H \simeq L^2(\mathbb R_X) \otimes \bigotimes_{\lambda=1}^{N-1} L^2(\mathbb R_{Q_\lambda}).

The first factor is a free coordinate. The remaining N−1N-1 factors are harmonic oscillators. If the center of mass is fixed, the first factor is removed by a stated constraint rather than by treating its frequency as a small positive number.

The baseline Hamiltonian is

H=∑n=0N−1[pn22M+K2(un+1−un)2].H = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} \left[ \frac{p_n^2}{2M} + \frac{K}{2} (u_{n+1}-u_n)^2 \right].

Writing u=(u0,…,uN−1)T\mathbf u=(u_0,\ldots,u_{N-1})^{\mathsf T} and similarly for p\mathbf p gives

H=12MpTp+12uTCu,H = \frac{1}{2M} \mathbf p^{\mathsf T}\mathbf p + \frac12 \mathbf u^{\mathsf T}C\mathbf u,

with the periodic stiffness matrix

Cnm=K(2δnm−δn,m+1−δn,m−1).C_{nm} = K \left( 2\delta_{nm} - \delta_{n,m+1} - \delta_{n,m-1} \right).

All indices in this expression are understood modulo NN. Every row sums to zero:

∑mCnm=0.\sum_m C_{nm} = 0.

Consequently, the uniform vector

e0=1N(1,1,…,1)T\mathbf e_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt N} (1,1,\ldots,1)^{\mathsf T}

is an exact zero eigenvector. For K>0K>0, CC is positive semidefinite and this is its only zero direction. For K<0K<0, nonuniform directions are unstable, so the usual oscillator quantization does not define a lower-bounded Hamiltonian.

Allowed wave numbers are

qm=2πmNa,q_m = \frac{2\pi m}{Na},

chosen once in a first Brillouin zone. Define

uq=1N∑ne−iqnaun,pq=1N∑ne−iqnapn.\begin{aligned} u_q &= \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_n e^{-iqna}u_n, \\ p_q &= \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_n e^{-iqna}p_n. \end{aligned}

Hermiticity gives

uq†=u−q,pq†=p−q,u_q^{\dagger} = u_{-q}, \qquad p_q^{\dagger} = p_{-q},

and the transformed commutator is

[uq,pq′]=iℏδq+q′,0.[u_q,p_{q'}] = i\hbar \delta_{q+q',0}.

The Hamiltonian becomes

H=12∑q[pqp−qM+Mωq2uqu−q],H = \frac12 \sum_q \left[ \frac{p_qp_{-q}}{M} + M\omega_q^2u_qu_{-q} \right],

where

ωq2=4KMsin⁡2(qa2).\omega_q^2 = \frac{4K}{M} \sin^2\left( \frac{qa}{2} \right).

Thus

ωq=2KM∣sin⁡qa2∣.\omega_q = 2\sqrt{\frac KM} \left| \sin\frac{qa}{2} \right|.

For q≠0q\ne0, introduce bosonic mode operators. One full-zone convention is

un=X+1N∑q≠0ℏ2Mωq×(bqeiqna+bq†e−iqna),\begin{aligned} u_n ={}& X + \frac{1}{\sqrt N} \sum_{q\ne0} \sqrt{ \frac{\hbar}{2M\omega_q} } \\ &\quad\times \left( b_qe^{iqna} + b_q^{\dagger}e^{-iqna} \right), \end{aligned}

and

pn=PN−iN∑q≠0ℏMωq2×(bqeiqna−bq†e−iqna).\begin{aligned} p_n ={}& \frac PN - \frac{i}{\sqrt N} \sum_{q\ne0} \sqrt{ \frac{\hbar M\omega_q}{2} } \\ &\quad\times \left( b_qe^{iqna} - b_q^{\dagger}e^{-iqna} \right). \end{aligned}

The mode algebra is

[bq,bq′†]=δqq′.[b_q,b_{q'}^{\dagger}] = \delta_{qq'}.

With the zero coordinate separated,

H=P22NM+∑q≠0ℏωq(bq†bq+12).H = \frac{P^2}{2NM} + \sum_{q\ne0} \hbar\omega_q \left( b_q^{\dagger}b_q + \frac12 \right).

There are N−1N-1 positive-frequency oscillator modes, not 2(N−1)2(N-1). Summing qq over the full discrete Brillouin zone gives one traveling-wave oscillator for each allowed nonzero qq. A real standing-wave convention instead combines each generic pair qq and −q-q into cosine and sine oscillators. Mixing the two conventions causes double counting.

The baseline model has:

  • continuous uniform-shift symmetry un↦un+cu_n\mapsto u_n+c, generated by PP;
  • cyclic lattice translation n↦n+1n\mapsto n+1, giving crystal momentum modulo 2πℏ/a2\pi\hbar/a;
  • reflection symmetry n↦−nn\mapsto-n;
  • time-reversal symmetry with pn↦−pnp_n\mapsto-p_n;
  • conservation of the energy in every nonzero normal mode;
  • conservation of total momentum PP.

For the exactly harmonic Hamiltonian,

nq=bq†bqn_q = b_q^{\dagger}b_q

commutes with HH for every q≠0q\ne0. The total phonon occupation also commutes with this quadratic Hamiltonian, but it is not a microscopic conserved charge protected by a fundamental U(1)U(1) symmetry. Anharmonic terms can create and destroy phonons while preserving the actual energy and crystal-momentum constraints.

The degeneracy ωq=ω−q\omega_q=\omega_{-q} follows from inversion and time-reversal symmetry. A perturbation that breaks those symmetries can alter that relation without changing the number of microscopic coordinates.

The spring timescale and band-edge frequency are

t∗=MK,ωmax⁡=2KM.t_* = \sqrt{\frac MK}, \qquad \omega_{\max} = 2\sqrt{\frac KM}.

At long wavelength,

ωq=c∣q∣[1−(qa)224+O((qa)4)],\omega_q = c|q| \left[ 1- \frac{(qa)^2}{24} +O((qa)^4) \right],

with sound speed

c=aKM.c = a\sqrt{\frac KM}.

The smallest nonzero frequency is

ωmin⁡=2KMsin⁡(πN)≃2πcNa.\omega_{\min} = 2\sqrt{\frac KM} \sin\left( \frac{\pi}{N} \right) \simeq \frac{2\pi c}{Na}.

Useful dimensionless quantities are

qa,kBTℏωmax⁡,N,qa, \qquad \frac{k_{\mathrm B}T}{\hbar\omega_{\max}}, \qquad N,

together with a strain criterion that tests the harmonic approximation. For example, the model should not be extrapolated to a microscopic lattice unless

⟨(un+1−un)2⟩≪a.\sqrt{ \left\langle (u_{n+1}-u_n)^2 \right\rangle } \ll a.

This inequality is a validity test, not a consequence of writing a quadratic Hamiltonian. The harmonic model itself has no parameter that describes the neglected cubic and quartic force constants.

The harmonic chain is exactly solvable after its stiffness matrix is diagonalized, but the claim has boundaries.

QuantityStatusCaveat
finite-chain normal frequencies and eigenvectorsexact discrete Fourier solutionrequires the stated periodic, monatomic, nearest-neighbor record
center-of-mass motionexact free-particle solutionit is not a harmonic oscillator and has no normalizable ground state on R\mathbb R
relative-coordinate spectrumexact product of N−1N-1 oscillator spectrazero mode must be fixed, pinned, or retained separately
Gaussian correlation functionsexact within the harmonic Hamiltonianabsolute displacement observables can be infrared divergent
equilibrium oscillator occupationsexact Bose factors for positive-frequency modesequilibrium phonon chemical potential is zero
real-time harmonic dynamicsexact coherent mode propagationno damping, mode mixing, or thermalization occurs
low-wave-number continuum theorycontrolled asymptotic limitlattice dispersion and Brillouin-zone periodicity are discarded
material phonon spectrumnot predicted by the toy model aloneforce constants, basis atoms, dimensions, and electronic effects are missing
transport coefficientsnot generically finite in the ideal chainintegrability and absent scattering make ordinary relaxation assumptions fail

For a fixed center of mass, an exact eigenstate is labeled by occupations nq=0,1,2,…n_q=0,1,2,\ldots:

E{nq}=∑q≠0ℏωq(nq+12).E_{\{n_q\}} = \sum_{q\ne0} \hbar\omega_q \left( n_q+\frac{1}{2} \right).

The free dynamics is

bq(t)=e−iωqtbq(0).b_q(t) = e^{-i\omega_qt} b_q(0).

Exact propagation does not imply irreversible equilibration. It instead preserves every nqn_q indefinitely.

With the center of mass fixed, the relative partition function is

Zrel=∏q≠012sinh⁡(βℏωq/2).Z_{\mathrm{rel}} = \prod_{q\ne0} \frac{1} {2\sinh(\beta\hbar\omega_q/2)}.

The Bose occupation of a positive-frequency mode is

n‾q=1eβℏωq−1.\overline n_q = \frac{1} {e^{\beta\hbar\omega_q}-1}.

The relative internal energy and heat capacity are

Urel=∑q≠0ℏωq(n‾q+12),U_{\mathrm{rel}} = \sum_{q\ne0} \hbar\omega_q \left( \overline n_q+\frac{1}{2} \right),

and

CV,rel=kB∑q≠0(βℏωq)2×eβℏωq(eβℏωq−1)2.\begin{aligned} C_{V,\mathrm{rel}} ={}& k_{\mathrm B} \sum_{q\ne0} (\beta\hbar\omega_q)^2 \\ &\times \frac{e^{\beta\hbar\omega_q}} {(e^{\beta\hbar\omega_q}-1)^2}. \end{aligned}

In the thermodynamic limit, the vibrational density of states per chain length L=NaL=Na is

g(ω)L=2πaωmax⁡11−(ω/ωmax⁡)2,\frac{g(\omega)}{L} = \frac{2} {\pi a\omega_{\max}} \frac{1} {\sqrt{1-(\omega/\omega_{\max})^2}},

for 0<ω<ωmax⁡0<\omega<\omega_{\max}. It approaches

g(ω)L⟶1πc\frac{g(\omega)}{L} \longrightarrow \frac{1}{\pi c}

at low frequency and has a one-dimensional van Hove divergence at the band edge.

The thermodynamic-limit zero-point energy per site is

EzpN=ℏωmax⁡π=2ℏπKM.\frac{E_{\mathrm{zp}}}{N} = \frac{\hbar\omega_{\max}}{\pi} = \frac{2\hbar}{\pi} \sqrt{\frac KM}.

In the acoustic quantum window

ℏωmin⁡≪kBT≪ℏωmax⁡,\hbar\omega_{\min} \ll k_{\mathrm B}T \ll \hbar\omega_{\max},

the thermal energy density and heat capacity are

U(T)−U(0)L=π6(kBT)2ℏc,\frac{U(T)-U(0)}{L} = \frac{\pi}{6} \frac{(k_{\mathrm B}T)^2} {\hbar c},

and

CVL=πkB2T3ℏc.\frac{C_V}{L} = \frac{\pi k_{\mathrm B}^2T} {3\hbar c}.

At high temperature, every fixed-center oscillator approaches classical equipartition:

CV,rel⟶(N−1)kB.C_{V,\mathrm{rel}} \longrightarrow (N-1)k_{\mathrm B}.

For a finite chain at temperatures below ℏωmin⁡/kB\hbar\omega_{\min}/k_{\mathrm B}, the nonzero modes freeze out exponentially. The linear-TT law therefore requires a thermodynamic or sufficiently large-system window.

For a fixed center of mass, the absolute displacement variance is

⟨(un−X)2⟩T=ℏ2MN∑q≠01ωq×coth⁡(βℏωq2).\begin{aligned} \left\langle (u_n-X)^2 \right\rangle_T ={}& \frac{\hbar}{2MN} \sum_{q\ne0} \frac{1}{\omega_q} \\ &\times \coth\left( \frac{\beta\hbar\omega_q}{2} \right). \end{aligned}

Because ωq∼c∣q∣\omega_q\sim c|q|, this quantity grows as log⁡N\log N at T=0T=0 and as NN at any fixed T>0T>0. The unpinned one-dimensional chain therefore does not support size-independent absolute localization around the chosen reference sites in the thermodynamic limit.

Relative displacements behave better. The variance of

Bn=un+1−unB_n = u_{n+1}-u_n

contains an additional factor 4sin⁡2(qa/2)4\sin^2(qa/2) that removes the acoustic infrared divergence. Local bond strain can remain finite even when absolute displacements wander. This distinction is central when deciding which observables survive the thermodynamic limit.

Limit or modificationResultMain caution
q→0q\to0$\omega_q\simeq cq
N→∞N\to\inftycontinuous acoustic bandabsolute displacement fluctuations diverge in one dimension
K→0+K\to0^+all frequencies collapsethe system approaches NN free masses, not NN soft oscillators with fixed Fock normalization
M→∞M\to\inftyvibrational frequencies vanishthermal and quantum limits must be reordered carefully
weak onsite pinningacoustic branch gains a gapuniform-shift symmetry is explicitly broken
continuum limitfree elastic scalar fieldlattice cutoff and Brillouin-zone structure are lost
high temperature(N−1)kB(N-1)k_{\mathrm B} relative heat capacitythe free center of mass requires its own ensemble
weak anharmonicityfinite shifts, scattering, and lifetimesmode occupations cease to be exact constants

For the continuum limit, define mass density and elastic coefficient

ρ=Ma,κ=Ka.\rho = \frac Ma, \qquad \kappa = Ka.

Then c2=κ/ρc^2=\kappa/\rho, and the relative Hamiltonian approaches

H=∫dx[π(x)22ρ+κ2(∂xu)2].H = \int dx \left[ \frac{\pi(x)^2}{2\rho} + \frac{\kappa}{2} (\partial_xu)^2 \right].

Harmonic Oscillator to Fields owns the broader free-field dictionary.

The q=0q=0 sector is

H0=P22NM.H_0 = \frac{P^2}{2NM}.

On X∈RX\in\mathbb R, it has continuous spectrum and no normalizable ground state. Its unconstrained canonical position integral is proportional to the available translation length and diverges if no physical volume or gauge-like fixing is supplied.

Three common choices define different finite systems:

  1. Retain the center of mass. Quantize H0H_0 as a free particle and specify the allowed range or wave-packet state of XX.
  2. Fix the center of mass. Impose X=0X=0 and P=0P=0, leaving N−1N-1 relative oscillators.
  3. Pin the chain. Add an onsite potential
Hpin=MΩ22∑nun2,H_{\mathrm{pin}} = \frac{M\Omega^2}{2} \sum_n u_n^2,

which changes the dispersion to

ωq2=Ω2+4KMsin⁡2(qa2).\omega_q^2 = \Omega^2 + \frac{4K}{M} \sin^2\left( \frac{qa}{2} \right).

The limits N→∞N\to\infty, Ω→0\Omega\to0, and T→0T\to0 need not commute for infrared-sensitive observables. A numerical diagonalizer that replaces the exact zero by a small positive eigenvalue has implicitly chosen a pinning or rounding model and must report it.

For even NN, the zone-boundary momentum q=π/aq=\pi/a is its own negative modulo a reciprocal vector. Generic qq and −q-q form degenerate pairs, but this self-conjugate point contributes only one oscillator. Correct mode counting always returns N−1N-1 positive-frequency modes after the center of mass is fixed.

Natural observables include:

  • displacement and momentum covariances;
  • bond strain Bn=un+1−unB_n=u_{n+1}-u_n;
  • normal-mode occupations nqn_q;
  • vibrational energy and heat capacity;
  • group velocity and wave-packet propagation;
  • dynamical structure factors and spectral functions;
  • local energy density and energy current.

Inside 0<q<π/a0<q<\pi/a, the group velocity is

vg(q)=dωqdq=ccos⁡(qa2).v_g(q) = \frac{d\omega_q}{dq} = c\cos\left( \frac{qa}{2} \right).

It approaches cc near the zone center and vanishes at the band edge. The existence of a normal mode does not guarantee that a particular probe sees it: scattering intensity also depends on polarization, form factors, and operator selection rules. Structure Factors owns those response conventions.

Take N=4N=4. The allowed momenta may be represented by

q∈{0,π2a,−π2a,πa}.q \in \left\{ 0, \frac{\pi}{2a}, -\frac{\pi}{2a}, \frac{\pi}{a} \right\}.

The frequencies are

ω0=0,ω±π/(2a)=2KM,ωπ/a=2KM.\begin{aligned} \omega_0 &= 0, \\ \omega_{\pm\pi/(2a)} &= \sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}}, \\ \omega_{\pi/a} &= 2\sqrt{\frac KM}. \end{aligned}

The q=0q=0 eigenvector is uniform. The zone-boundary eigenvector is proportional to (1,−1,1,−1)(1,-1,1,-1). The q=±π/(2a)q=\pm\pi/(2a) traveling waves are degenerate and can be replaced by real sine and cosine standing waves.

After fixing the center of mass, the ground energy is

E0,rel=ℏKM(1+2).E_{0,\mathrm{rel}} = \hbar\sqrt{\frac KM} \left( 1+\sqrt2 \right).

The exact relative partition function is

Zrel=[2sinh⁡(βℏ22KM)]−2×[2sinh⁡(βℏKM)]−1.\begin{aligned} Z_{\mathrm{rel}} ={}& \left[ 2\sinh\left( \frac{\beta\hbar}{2} \sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}} \right) \right]^{-2} \\ &\times \left[ 2\sinh\left( \beta\hbar \sqrt{\frac KM} \right) \right]^{-1}. \end{aligned}

This four-site example already exposes the zero coordinate, a generic q,−qq,-q pair, a self-conjugate zone-boundary mode, and the correct count of three relative oscillators.

The teaching derivation is A Monatomic Chain Benchmark. For a compact matrix validation, use

N=8,M=K=a=ℏ=1.N=8, \qquad M=K=a=\hbar=1.

Diagonalize the mass-weighted stiffness matrix

Dnm=2δnm−δn,m+1−δn,m−1.D_{nm} = 2\delta_{nm} - \delta_{n,m+1} - \delta_{n,m-1}.

The analytic eigenvalues and frequencies are

Mode labels mmDegeneracyωm2\omega_m^2ωm\omega_m
00110000
1,71,7222−22-\sqrt22−2\sqrt{2-\sqrt2}
2,62,622222\sqrt2
3,53,5222+22+\sqrt22+2\sqrt{2+\sqrt2}
44114422

Useful decimal frequencies are

2−2=0.7653668647301795…,2=1.4142135623730951…,2+2=1.8477590650225735….\begin{aligned} \sqrt{2-\sqrt2} &= 0.7653668647301795\ldots, \\ \sqrt2 &= 1.4142135623730951\ldots, \\ \sqrt{2+\sqrt2} &= 1.8477590650225735\ldots. \end{aligned}

Independent matrix invariants are

D1=0,tr⁡D=16,D\mathbf1 = 0, \qquad \operatorname{tr}D = 16,

and

pdet⁡D=∏λj>0λj=64.\operatorname{pdet}D = \prod_{\lambda_j>0}\lambda_j = 64.

The fixed-center zero-point energy is

Ezp=1+2+2−2+2+2=5.027339492125848….\begin{aligned} E_{\mathrm{zp}} ={}& 1+\sqrt2 +\sqrt{2-\sqrt2} \\ &+\sqrt{2+\sqrt2} \\ =& 5.027339492125848\ldots. \end{aligned}

For the lowest nonzero mode in a sequence of chain lengths,

ω1c∣q1∣=sin⁡(π/N)π/N=1−π26N2+O(N−4).\frac{\omega_1}{c|q_1|} = \frac{\sin(\pi/N)}{\pi/N} = 1- \frac{\pi^2}{6N^2} +O(N^{-4}).

A valid implementation should:

  1. construct periodic neighbors without duplicating or omitting the wraparound spring;
  2. verify row sums and the exact null vector before diagonalization;
  3. compare eigenvalues, degeneracies, trace, and pseudodeterminant;
  4. form frequencies only after classifying negative, zero, and positive eigenvalues;
  5. compare eigenvector subspaces rather than individual vectors inside degenerate pairs;
  6. state whether the zero mode is retained, fixed, or pinned;
  7. test the N−2N^{-2} acoustic convergence rather than only one chain length.

This is a dossier-local analytic benchmark, not currently an MB-B entry or a claimed executable notebook. A future artifact should enter the documented inventory and validation workflow before being described as reproducible output.

Open, free-end, and fixed-end chains have standing-wave spectra and different zero-mode structure. Reusing periodic wave numbers for them gives the wrong mode count and endpoint behavior.

The onsite term proportional to Ω2\Omega^2 gaps the acoustic branch and renders absolute displacement fluctuations infrared finite. It also explicitly breaks uniform-shift symmetry, so it is not a harmless numerical regulator unless the Ω→0\Omega\to0 limit is audited.

A diatomic or multi-atom unit cell produces several branches. Acoustic and optical labels refer to long-wavelength displacement patterns, while exact frequencies require a matrix-valued dynamical problem. The general treatment belongs to Phonons as Many-Body Excitations.

Translation-invariant longer-range springs change ωq\omega_q but preserve Fourier diagonalization. Random masses or spring constants destroy momentum as an exact label and can localize vibrational modes.

Cubic and quartic displacement terms couple normal modes. They generate thermal expansion, frequency shifts, finite lifetimes, and scattering. The harmonic occupations nqn_q then cease to be exact constants of motion.

Several displacement polarizations and lattice directions produce a dynamical matrix at every crystal momentum. The long-wavelength continuum becomes an elastic field theory rather than a single scalar field.

This dossier owns:

  • the periodic monatomic nearest-neighbor baseline record;
  • the explicit center-of-mass and zero-mode audit;
  • the full-zone versus standing-wave counting convention;
  • the quantity-specific exactness statement;
  • the N=4N=4 minimal example and N=8N=8 matrix benchmark;
  • the principal boundary, pinning, continuum, and anharmonic handoffs.

It does not rederive:

  • Calling q=0q=0 a harmonic oscillator with frequency zero.
  • Deleting the uniform mode without declaring a fixed-center constraint.
  • Adding a tiny positive eigenvalue numerically without admitting that it pins the chain.
  • Counting both full-zone traveling modes and separate sine/cosine modes.
  • Treating qq and q+2π/aq+2\pi/a as different crystal momenta.
  • Forgetting that q=π/aq=\pi/a is self-conjugate for even NN.
  • Inferring instability from a tiny negative eigenvalue before checking row-sum and numerical tolerances.
  • Quantizing a genuinely negative ωq2\omega_q^2 as an ordinary bosonic mode.
  • Calling phonon number a fundamental conserved particle number.
  • Assuming exact harmonic dynamics produces damping or equilibration.
  • Applying the linear acoustic dispersion at the Brillouin-zone edge.
  • Using absolute displacement variance when only relative displacement is infrared well defined.
  • Claiming a material prediction from a scalar nearest-neighbor toy model.

Insert a plane wave un(t)=uqei(qna−ωt)u_n(t)=u_qe^{i(qna-\omega t)} into the classical equations of motion and derive the exact lattice dispersion.

Solution

Hamilton’s equations give

Mu¨n=K(un+1+un−1−2un).M\ddot u_n = K \left( u_{n+1}+u_{n-1}-2u_n \right).

For the plane wave,

−Mω2=K(eiqa+e−iqa−2).-M\omega^2 = K \left( e^{iqa}+e^{-iqa}-2 \right).

Using 2−2cos⁡qa=4sin⁡2(qa/2)2-2\cos qa=4\sin^2(qa/2) yields

ωq2=4KMsin⁡2(qa2).\omega_q^2 = \frac{4K}{M} \sin^2\left( \frac{qa}{2} \right).

The nonnegative frequency is therefore

ωq=2KM∣sin⁡qa2∣.\omega_q = 2\sqrt{\frac KM} \left| \sin\frac{qa}{2} \right|.

Show that the uniform Fourier coordinate gives H0=P2/(2NM)H_0=P^2/(2NM) and explain why its oscillator ground-state formula is invalid.

Solution

The normalized zero-mode variables are

u0=1N∑nun=NX,u_0 = \frac1{\sqrt N} \sum_nu_n = \sqrt N X,

and

p0=1N∑npn=PN.p_0 = \frac1{\sqrt N} \sum_np_n = \frac P{\sqrt N}.

The spring term vanishes for a uniform displacement. The kinetic contribution is

H0=p0p02M=P22NM.H_0 = \frac{p_0p_0}{2M} = \frac{P^2}{2NM}.

This is a free-particle Hamiltonian in XX. Its spectrum is continuous on R\mathbb R, and it has no normalizable state with the oscillator energy ℏω0/2=0\hbar\omega_0/2=0. The factors 1/ω01/\sqrt{\omega_0} in oscillator coordinates also diverge. One must retain, fix, or pin this coordinate explicitly.

Exercise 3: Audit the four-site mode count

Section titled “Exercise 3: Audit the four-site mode count”

For N=4N=4, find the allowed momenta, frequencies, and fixed-center ground energy. Explain why the two modes at q=±π/(2a)q=\pm\pi/(2a) are not double counting.

Solution

The allowed momenta are 00, π/(2a)\pi/(2a), −π/(2a)-\pi/(2a), and π/a\pi/a. Substitution into the dispersion gives

ω={0,2KM,2KM,2KM}.\omega = \left\{ 0, \sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}}, \sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}}, 2\sqrt{\frac KM} \right\}.

After fixing the zero coordinate, there are three oscillators. Their zero-point energies sum to

E0,rel=ℏ2[22KM+2KM]=ℏKM(1+2).\begin{aligned} E_{0,\mathrm{rel}} &= \frac{\hbar}{2} \left[ 2\sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}} + 2\sqrt{\frac KM} \right] \\ &= \hbar\sqrt{\frac KM} (1+\sqrt2). \end{aligned}

The qq and −q-q traveling waves are independent directions of propagation. Equivalently, their two-dimensional degenerate subspace has independent cosine and sine standing waves. Either basis contains two oscillators, not four.

Exercise 4: Derive the low-temperature heat capacity

Section titled “Exercise 4: Derive the low-temperature heat capacity”

Use the acoustic dispersion and thermodynamic-limit mode density to derive the leading thermal energy and heat capacity per length.

Solution

Both signs of qq contribute. With ω=c∣q∣\omega=c|q|,

U(T)−U(0)L=1π∫0∞dq ℏcqeβℏcq−1.\frac{U(T)-U(0)}{L} = \frac1\pi \int_0^\infty dq\, \frac{\hbar cq} {e^{\beta\hbar cq}-1}.

Set x=βℏcqx=\beta\hbar cq. Then

U(T)−U(0)L=(kBT)2πℏc∫0∞dx xex−1.\frac{U(T)-U(0)}{L} = \frac{(k_{\mathrm B}T)^2} {\pi\hbar c} \int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{x}{e^x-1}.

Using

∫0∞dx xex−1=π26\int_0^\infty dx\, \frac{x}{e^x-1} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

gives

U(T)−U(0)L=π6(kBT)2ℏc.\frac{U(T)-U(0)}{L} = \frac{\pi}{6} \frac{(k_{\mathrm B}T)^2} {\hbar c}.

Differentiating at fixed length yields

CVL=πkB2T3ℏc.\frac{C_V}{L} = \frac{\pi k_{\mathrm B}^2T} {3\hbar c}.

The derivation requires ℏωmin⁡≪kBT\hbar\omega_{\min}\ll k_{\mathrm B}T so that the momentum sum may be replaced by an integral.

Exercise 5: Compare absolute and relative fluctuations

Section titled “Exercise 5: Compare absolute and relative fluctuations”

Use the low-qq form of the covariance to determine the infrared scaling of ⟨(un−X)2⟩\langle(u_n-X)^2\rangle at zero and nonzero temperature. Explain why the bond variance does not have the same divergence.

Solution

At zero temperature, the long-wavelength contribution is proportional to

∫qmin⁡dqωq∼1c∫qmin⁡dqq∼log⁡N.\int_{q_{\min}} \frac{dq}{\omega_q} \sim \frac1c \int_{q_{\min}} \frac{dq}{q} \sim \log N.

At fixed T>0T>0 and sufficiently small qq,

coth⁡(βℏcq2)∼2kBTℏcq.\coth\left( \frac{\beta\hbar cq}{2} \right) \sim \frac{2k_{\mathrm B}T} {\hbar cq}.

The integrand is then proportional to 1/q21/q^2, so

∫qmin⁡dqq2∼1qmin⁡∝N.\int_{q_{\min}} \frac{dq}{q^2} \sim \frac1{q_{\min}} \propto N.

For a bond displacement, Fourier transformation supplies

∣eiqa−1∣2=4sin⁡2(qa2)∼q2a2.|e^{iqa}-1|^2 = 4\sin^2\left( \frac{qa}{2} \right) \sim q^2a^2.

This factor cancels enough of the small-qq singularity to make the local bond variance infrared finite. Absolute positional order and local elastic strain therefore have different thermodynamic behavior.

  1. M. Born and K. Huang, Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, Oxford University Press (1954).
  2. A. A. Maradudin, E. W. Montroll, G. H. Weiss, and I. P. Ipatova, Theory of Lattice Dynamics in the Harmonic Approximation, 2nd ed., Academic Press (1971).
  3. N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1976).
  4. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed., Wiley (2004).
  5. P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press (1995).
  6. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension, Oxford University Press (2004).
  7. P. Debye, “Zur Theorie der spezifischen Wärmen”, Annalen der Physik 344, 789–839 (1912).
  8. Z. Rieder, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. Lieb, “Properties of a harmonic crystal in a stationary nonequilibrium state”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 8, 1073–1078 (1967).
  9. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed., Springer (2000).
  10. S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, “Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory”, Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 515–562 (2001).