Skip to content

Reference and Data

Reference material is useful when it shortens a lookup without hiding the conditions that make the answer true. This chapter is the AMO checking layer: use it to translate a scale, identify a model, qualify a selection rule, locate a Hamiltonian, interpret a spectroscopic quantity, or find an evaluated data source. Then follow the linked canonical page whenever a derivation or validity argument affects the result.

A table entry is not a free-standing law of nature. Numerical constants have release dates, line strengths have convention choices, term labels depend on coupling regimes, and “linewidth” can mean several different widths. Reliable lookup means recording those choices rather than relying on a familiar symbol.

This chapter owns:

  • compact AMO-specific tables, conversion workflows, nomenclature, and routing indexes;
  • a common protocol for versioning numerical data and conventions;
  • links from reference entries to the one canonical derivation for each subject;
  • quick distinctions among quantities that are often conflated; and
  • reproducibility requirements for database and literature lookups.

It does not own the full derivation of atomic structure, molecular motion, transition rates, line shapes, laser dynamics, or quantum-optical models. Those remain in their subject chapters. The site-wide Reference Library owns cross-volume formulas, operators, model cards, theorems, symbols, and conventions.

If you need to…Start hereFollow for depth
convert among joules, eV, hertz, inverse centimetres, kelvin, or atomic unitsConstants and ConversionsUnits and Constants
identify a Hartree-unit quantity, convert it to SI, or diagnose a Hartree–Rydberg mismatchAtomic UnitsAtomic Units and Scales
decide whether an E1, M1, E2, rotational, vibrational, or Raman transition is symmetry-allowedSelection Rule TablesSelection Rules in Spectroscopy
choose among two-level, optical Bloch, Rabi, Jaynes–Cummings, Dicke, Hubbard, or Gross–Pitaevskii modelsAMO Model Indexthe canonical page linked in its model row
identify the terms, units, symmetries, and validity regime of a standard atomic HamiltonianCommon Atomic Hamiltoniansthe hydrogenic, multi-electron, fine-, hyperfine-, Stark, Zeeman, or Rydberg page linked from its operator row
identify the electronic, nuclear, rotational, rovibrational, spin–rotation, and hyperfine pieces of a molecular HamiltonianCommon Molecular Hamiltoniansthe Coulomb, Born–Oppenheimer, vibration, rotation, and rovibrational pages linked from its operator rows
decode an atomic or molecular term symbol, parity marker, or coupling labelTerm Symbol ReferenceAtomic Term Symbols, LS Coupling, jj Coupling, and Molecular Symmetry
distinguish Lorentzian, Gaussian, and Voigt conventions or natural, Doppler, collisional, transit-time, and power broadeningLine Shape ReferenceLine Shapes and Broadening and the mechanism-specific sources cited there
translate ff, gfgf, log⁡(gf)\log(gf), line strength, dipole matrix elements, radiative rates, or integrated absorptionOscillator Strength ReferenceOscillator Strengths and Transition Rates
connect Einstein coefficients, lifetimes, branching, stimulated processes, oscillator strengths, and radiation densityEinstein Coefficient ReferenceEinstein Coefficients and Spontaneous Emission
check wavelength, wavenumber, absorbance, optical depth, branch, or linewidth languageSpectroscopy NomenclatureSpectroscopy and Constants and Conversions
check gain, threshold, finesse, QQ, mode volume, coherence, detuning, Rabi-frequency, or saturation languageLaser NomenclatureLasers, Optical Cavities, and Optical Bloch Equations
compare the record, observable, inference, and limitation of an AMO landmarkAMO Experiment Indexthe canonical experiment page, the site-wide Experiment and Historical Index, and the primary sources
choose an AMO textbook, review, primary paper, database, or computational sourceAMO Bibliography and Reading Guidethe site-wide Bibliography and Reading Guides and the subject page’s references
verify a numerical constant, level, wavelength, or transition probabilitythe versioned sources belowthe source record and primary references attached to the evaluated value

The shortest trustworthy route is

name the physical object↓fix units, symbols, and conventions↓state the model and approximation regime↓record source and version↓check a limit, identity, or benchmark↓follow the canonical derivation if needed.\begin{gathered} \text{name the physical object} \\ \downarrow \\ \text{fix units, symbols, and conventions} \\ \downarrow \\ \text{state the model and approximation regime} \\ \downarrow \\ \text{record source and version} \\ \downarrow \\ \text{check a limit, identity, or benchmark} \\ \downarrow \\ \text{follow the canonical derivation if needed}. \end{gathered}

Decide whether the requested number is an energy, cyclic frequency, angular frequency, vacuum wavelength, medium wavelength, spectroscopic wavenumber, decay rate, half-width, full width, oscillator strength, cross section, integrated intensity, or fitted parameter. Several of these can share the same dimension while answering different questions.

Write a quantity as a numerical value times a unit,

Q={Q}[Q] [Q].Q = \{Q\}_{[Q]}\,[Q].

Changing the unit changes {Q}[Q]\{Q\}_{[Q]}, not QQ. A symbol alone is not a convention. For example, ν\nu, ff, and ω\omega are used inconsistently across subfields, so the defining equation is safer:

E=hν=ℏω,ω=2πν.E = h\nu = \hbar\omega, \qquad \omega=2\pi\nu.

A transition wavelength calculated from a nonrelativistic clamped-nucleus Hamiltonian and one measured in a field-shifted, hyperfine-resolved sample do not refer to the same model quantity. Record the isotope, charge state, electronic level, angular-momentum labels, external fields, and retained corrections.

For a database value, save:

  • database or compilation name;
  • version, release, or last-update identifier;
  • query date;
  • species, isotope, state labels, and search filters;
  • displayed value and uncertainty;
  • units and air/vacuum convention where applicable;
  • source reference attached to the entry.

A screenshot without this metadata is not a reproducible lookup.

Use dimensional analysis, normalization, a sum rule, detailed balance, a known limit, or an independent unit conversion. A value can be copied perfectly from the wrong row.

Constants and Conversions owns AMO translations among energy, frequency, wavenumber, wavelength, temperature-equivalent energy, magnetic moments, and dipole units. It distinguishes exact SI defining constants from measured CODATA quantities.

Atomic Units owns the AMO lookup contract: the Hartree convention, versioned SI multipliers, dimensional restoration, and Hartree–Rydberg diagnostics. Atomic Units and Scales derives the system and explains why atomic energies, lengths, times, fields, and polarizabilities acquire natural scales. Use the site-wide Atomic Units translator when moving a formula across volumes.

The universal energy identity is

E=hν=ℏω=hcν~=kBTE.E = h\nu = \hbar\omega = hc\tilde\nu = k_{\mathrm B}T_E.

TET_E is an energy-equivalent temperature. It is not automatically the thermodynamic temperature of an ensemble.

The Common Atomic Hamiltonians entry compares hydrogenic, many-electron, central-field, relativistic, hyperfine, external-field, and Rydberg operators. It records the Hilbert space, unit, exact-label, perturbative-regime, and double-counting checks that must accompany a compact formula.

The Common Molecular Hamiltonians entry follows the corresponding molecular reduction from the all-particle Coulomb operator through clamped-nuclei surfaces, nuclear vibration, rotation–vibration coupling, and spin-resolved effective Hamiltonians. It also separates electronic spin–rotation from nuclear spin–rotation and declares the angular-momentum and unit conventions needed to compare fitted constants.

The AMO Model Index begins from retained degrees of freedom rather than model names. It routes internal-structure, molecular, light–matter, cavity, laser, cooling, trapping, lattice, and condensate models to their canonical homes.

A Hamiltonian lookup should identify at least

(H, H, θ, S, A),\left( \mathcal H,\, H,\, \boldsymbol\theta,\, \mathcal S,\, \mathcal A \right),

where H\mathcal H is the Hilbert space, θ\boldsymbol\theta is the parameter set, S\mathcal S lists symmetries, and A\mathcal A records approximations. Two equations with the same operator pattern can represent different physical models if these entries differ.

Selection Rule Tables answer whether symmetry forces a matrix element to vanish under stated assumptions. They do not predict the magnitude of every allowed line.

For an operator O^\hat O,

Mfi=⟨f∣O^∣i⟩.\mathcal M_{fi} = \langle f|\hat O|i\rangle.

A selection rule may show Mfi=0\mathcal M_{fi}=0. If it does not, radial integrals, reduced matrix elements, state mixing, population, geometry, and detector response still determine the observed strength.

Oscillator strengths, Einstein coefficients, line strengths, transition dipoles, cross sections, and integrated absorbances are related quantities, not interchangeable names. Translate them only after matching degeneracy, polarization, SI/cgs, angular-frequency, and spectral-density conventions.

A measured spectrum is not merely a list of energy differences. A useful forward model separates

Sobs(x)=[Sstick∗ϕphysical∗Rinstrument](x)+B(x),S_{\mathrm{obs}}(x) = \left[ S_{\mathrm{stick}} * \phi_{\mathrm{physical}} * R_{\mathrm{instrument}} \right](x) + B(x),

where xx is a declared spectral coordinate, ϕphysical\phi_{\mathrm{physical}} collects physical broadening, RinstrumentR_{\mathrm{instrument}} is the instrument response, and BB is background. The convolution symbol does not imply every mechanism is stationary or independent; that assumption must be checked.

Use Line Shapes and Broadening for Lorentzian, Gaussian, Voigt, natural, Doppler, collisional, power, transit- time, and instrumental effects. Use Precision Spectroscopy when line-center estimation and uncertainty budgets matter.

Record all of the following that apply:

  • cyclic frequency ν\nu or angular frequency ω\omega;
  • vacuum or in-medium wavelength;
  • air or vacuum wavelength for tabulated optical lines;
  • spectroscopic wavenumber ν~=1/λvac\tilde\nu=1/\lambda_{\mathrm{vac}} or wavevector magnitude k=2π/λk=2\pi/\lambda;
  • ordinary hertz or angular-frequency linewidth.

For a simple exponentially decaying excited-state population,

Pe(t)=Pe(0)e−Γt,τ=Γ−1.P_e(t) = P_e(0)e^{-\Gamma t}, \qquad \tau=\Gamma^{-1}.

The corresponding natural line has convention-dependent width statements. Before using “Γ\Gamma is the linewidth,” specify the spectral coordinate and whether the width is HWHM or FWHM. Coherence decay can also contain pure dephasing and need not equal the population-decay rate.

Term symbols are meaningful only in a stated coupling regime. Distinguish exact quantum numbers from dominant-component labels, and record whether parity, inversion parity, reflection labels, hyperfine FF, or field-dressed projections remain good quantum numbers.

Absorbance, optical depth, transmittance, absorption coefficient, cross section, and molar absorptivity use different normalizations. In particular,

T=II0,OD=−ln⁡T,A10=−log⁡10T.T = \frac{I}{I_0}, \qquad \mathrm{OD} = -\ln T, \qquad A_{10} = -\log_{10}T.

Thus OD=(ln⁡10)A10\mathrm{OD}=(\ln10)A_{10}. Reporting “absorbance” without the logarithm base can create a factor of ln⁡10\ln10.

Use the current BIPM SI Brochure for SI definitions. Use a named NIST/CODATA release for recommended measured constants. Do not mix values from different adjustments merely because they have more displayed digits.

The NIST Atomic Spectra Database is an evaluated starting point for atomic levels, lines, and transition probabilities. Its records can combine measurements, calculations, and critical evaluations. Follow the record’s references when method provenance or uncertainty matters.

The NIST Chemistry WebBook provides evaluated and compiled thermochemical, spectroscopic, and related molecular data. The IUPAC Gold Book is an authority for chemical terminology, not a substitute for a measured spectrum or a derivation.

Source typeBest useMain caution
standards bodydefinitions, units, metrological conventionsedition and effective date matter
evaluated databaserecommended or critically assessed numerical datainspect flags, uncertainties, and source records
primary paperoriginal method, measurement, or theoretical resultlater corrections or re-evaluations may supersede a number
review articlefield map and synthesisnot every tabulated value is independently re-evaluated
textbook or monographdurable derivation and notationconventions may differ from current databases or SI practice
software documentationimplementation contract and version behaviordocumentation does not validate the physical model
StatusMeaning in a reference entry
exact definitionfixed by a declared mathematical or metrological convention
defining constantnumerical value fixed by the SI
recommended valueevaluated estimate with uncertainty and release identifier
measured datumresult tied to an experiment, calibration, and uncertainty model
calculated datumresult tied to a Hamiltonian, method, basis, and convergence record
fitted parametervalue conditional on a model, dataset, and fitting protocol
scaling estimateorder-of-magnitude guide, not a recommended datum
active interpretationevidence is developing or competing models remain viable

Precision without status is misleading. A fitted line center with twelve digits is not an exact constant; an exact conversion factor does not make its measured input exact.

For a calculation or publication, retain a compact record.

FieldExample of what to state
quantityvacuum transition frequency between fully specified levels
value and uncertaintycentral value, standard uncertainty, and coverage convention
unit and coordinateHz, rad s⁻¹, cm⁻¹, vacuum nm, or another declared coordinate
system identityisotope, charge state, electronic configuration, term, hyperfine level
environmentfield, pressure, temperature, trap, polarization, and reference frame
sourcedatabase or paper with version, table/record, DOI, and access date
transformationconstants and equations used to convert the source value
model statusmeasured, evaluated, calculated, fitted, or estimated
validationindependent conversion, sum rule, residual, or benchmark

If uncertainty is transformed through a nonlinear function y=f(x)y=f(x), use the appropriate covariance propagation or a documented numerical method. For a single small uncertainty,

uy≃∣dfdx∣ux.u_y \simeq \left| \frac{df}{dx} \right| u_x.

Do not attach the source’s original uncertainty unchanged after inverting a wavelength or combining correlated constants.

The value cannot be reproduced or updated systematically. Record the adjustment, database version, and access date.

The difference can exceed a precision experiment’s uncertainty by many orders of magnitude. Record the refractive-index convention and environmental conditions.

Treating an allowed transition as a strong transition

Section titled “Treating an allowed transition as a strong transition”

Selection permission is only one factor. Evaluate the matrix element, population, polarization, branching, broadening, and detection chain.

Reading a fitted parameter as an observable

Section titled “Reading a fitted parameter as an observable”

A Lorentzian width, quantum defect, rotational constant, or effective temperature can depend on the fitting model and interval. Report the model and residuals with the number.

Combining incompatible degeneracy conventions

Section titled “Combining incompatible degeneracy conventions”

Oscillator strengths, Einstein coefficients, and line strengths may be averaged over initial substates or summed over final substates. Match those conventions before applying a conversion formula.

When signs, domains, approximations, or uncertainty depend on the reasoning, follow the canonical page. A reference table is a map back to that reasoning.

A transition is reported as a cyclic frequency ν\nu. State the equations needed to express it as angular frequency, photon energy, and spectroscopic wavenumber.

Solution

Use

ω=2πν,E=hν,ν~=νc.\omega=2\pi\nu, \qquad E=h\nu, \qquad \tilde\nu=\frac{\nu}{c}.

The last relation gives inverse metres; divide by 100100 to express the result in cm−1\mathrm{cm^{-1}}. The symbol ν~\tilde\nu is spectroscopic wavenumber, not the wavevector magnitude k=2πν~k=2\pi\tilde\nu.

An E1 transition passes the angular-momentum and parity rules but is absent from a measured spectrum. List four checks before calling the selection rule wrong.

Solution

Check the reduced and radial matrix elements or configuration mixing; initial population; polarization and geometry; branching and competing decay; line overlap or broadening; detector sensitivity; and whether the assigned quantum numbers remain valid in the applied fields. Selection rules are normally necessary conditions, not guaranteed line-strength predictions.

One source defines Γ\Gamma through population decay, while another calls γ\gamma the optical-coherence HWHM in angular frequency. Can the symbols be equated directly?

Solution

No. Derive the coherence equation in each convention. For an isolated radiative two-level system without pure dephasing, the coherence decays at Γ/2\Gamma/2, but extra dephasing changes that relation. Also verify whether the reported width is HWHM or FWHM and whether it uses ω\omega or ν\nu.

You record a NIST wavelength in a notebook. What minimum metadata should accompany it?

Solution

Record the database name and version or update identifier, access date, species and isotope, charge state, both level labels, vacuum or air convention, displayed value and uncertainty, units, query filters, and the source reference attached to the record. Also save any conversion performed after the lookup.

A calculation needs the steady fluorescence of a driven transition with spontaneous emission. Should the selection-rule table or model index be the first stop?

Solution

Use both for different questions. The selection-rule table checks whether the chosen coupling is symmetry-permitted. The AMO Model Index then routes the dissipative driven problem to the optical Bloch equations. Neither the permission rule nor the model name alone supplies the dipole matrix element, decay branching, collection efficiency, and detector response needed for absolute counts.