Term Symbol Reference
A term symbol is compressed state metadata. It can report spin multiplicity, angular momentum, spatial symmetry, inversion behavior, reflection behavior, or an empirical ordering label. It does not by itself report an electron configuration, an energy, a complete wavefunction, or the Hamiltonian under which all of its labels are exact.
The safest way to read a symbol is therefore not to memorize its typography. Ask which operator each token refers to and whether that operator commutes with the Hamiltonian being used. The degree sign on an atomic term, the subscript of a centrosymmetric molecule, the superscript of a linear molecule, and an rovibronic label all encode different symmetry statements.
This page is a lookup and translation layer. The derivation of allowed atomic terms belongs to Atomic Term Symbols, the coupling limits belong to LS Coupling and jj Coupling, and the group-theoretic construction of molecular labels belongs to Molecular Symmetry.
Canonical Scope
Section titled “Canonical Scope”This page owns:
- a compact grammar for atomic LS, atomic jj, linear-molecule, and nonlinear-molecule labels;
- a dictionary of multiplicity, parity, inversion, reflection, and projection symbols;
- examples that translate a printed symbol into physical statements;
- tests for deciding which labels are exact, approximate, or merely conventional; and
- cautions for moving between databases, papers, and effective Hamiltonians.
It does not own:
- microstate counting or antisymmetrization for equivalent electrons;
- derivations of LS-to-jj recoupling coefficients;
- molecular character tables or projection operators;
- Hund-case Hamiltonians and their matrix elements;
- line-strength formulas or complete selection-rule derivations; or
- assignments of a particular measured spectrum.
Follow the linked canonical page whenever one of those tasks matters.
Four-Pass Decoder
Section titled “Four-Pass Decoder”Read any unfamiliar label in four passes.
| Pass | Question | Typical answer |
|---|---|---|
| physical object | Is this an orbital, configuration, term, fine-structure level, rovibronic level, or hyperfine level? | atomic is a level; molecular names an electronic term |
| symmetry domain | Is the system an atom, a linear molecule, or a nonlinear molecule in a specified point group? | means for an atom, while means $ |
| token grammar | Which angular momenta, projections, and symmetry eigenvalues are printed? | , , , , or a point-group irrep |
| validity | Which printed labels commute with the stated Hamiltonian, and which only identify a dominant basis component? | and parity may remain exact after and cease to be exact |
A compact comparison is:
| System and regime | Common skeleton | Central symmetry content |
|---|---|---|
| atom, LS coupling | total , total , total , spatial parity | |
| atom, jj coupling | subshell or group values coupled to total , spatial parity | |
| linear molecule | , with applicable and labels | axial projections and linear-molecule symmetry |
| nonlinear molecule | spin multiplicity and a point-group irrep |
Here stands for additional labels needed to distinguish states, is a configuration label, is an empirical electronic-state label such as or , and is an irreducible representation. Not every slot is present in every source.
Atomic Structural Hierarchy
Section titled “Atomic Structural Hierarchy”Atomic spectroscopy distinguishes four nested objects. Keeping them separate prevents most degeneracy and selection-rule mistakes.
| Object | Schematic label | What is fixed |
|---|---|---|
| configuration | orbital occupations | |
| term | configuration, total , total , parity, and any extra labels | |
| level | a particular total within the term | |
| magnetic state | a particular projection |
For an isolated field-free atom with rotational invariance,
The level contains magnetic states before an external field or another anisotropy resolves them:
The symbol or is deliberately unspecific. Two distinct levels can have the same and parity, so those labels are not always a complete state identifier.
Term, level, and state in data tables
Section titled “Term, level, and state in data tables”Database columns often separate configuration, term, and . A row displaying
refers to the level conventionally written
In formatted NIST Atomic Spectra Database output, a degree sign marks odd parity. In ASCII output, the same information is represented by an asterisk. The typography changes; the parity does not.
Atomic LS Grammar
Section titled “Atomic LS Grammar”In the Russell–Saunders or LS limit, individual orbital angular momenta first form a total orbital angular momentum and individual spins form a total spin:
Those totals then couple to
A full level label can be organized as
| Token | Meaning | Diagnostic |
|---|---|---|
| parent terms, seniority, or other distinguishing information | needed when the visible labels are not unique | |
| electron configuration | occupations, not a term | |
| spin multiplicity | singlet, doublet, triplet, quartet, and so on | |
| total electronic orbital angular momentum | encoded by an uppercase spectroscopic letter | |
| total electronic angular momentum | labels a fine-structure level | |
| spatial inversion parity | even or odd |
Spectroscopic letters
Section titled “Spectroscopic letters”The atomic letter code is:
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| term letter | S | P | D | F | G | H | I | K | L |
The letter J is skipped to avoid confusion with total angular momentum . Lowercase label one-electron orbital angular momentum ; uppercase S, P, D, F, label the many-electron total .
For fixed and , angular-momentum addition permits
Thus a term has and , and contains
This statement identifies possible values. It does not determine their energy ordering.
Multiplicity is not total degeneracy
Section titled “Multiplicity is not total degeneracy”The left superscript is
the number of spin projections for a pure spin- object. It is not the number of fine-structure levels and not the degeneracy of one level.
For a pure LS term, the uncoupled dimension is
The same dimension appears after coupling:
For ,
while the three fine-structure levels have degeneracies
Atomic parity
Section titled “Atomic parity”The spatial parity of an electron configuration is
Closed subshells contribute even powers and therefore do not change the result. Common notations are:
| Parity | Formatted term | Other common forms |
|---|---|---|
| even | or when the convention is explicit | |
| odd | ; an ASCII database may use 3P*2 or separate the column |
The absence of a degree sign conventionally means even parity in many atomic tables. That convention should not be transferred blindly to nuclear, molecular, or condensed-matter notation.
Atomic examples
Section titled “Atomic examples”| Label | Reading |
|---|---|
| He | , , , even parity |
| He | , , , odd parity |
| Na | one valence electron, , , , odd parity |
| C | triplet P level, , even parity because is even |
| an alkali level | doublet S, , even parity |
For the Na example,
The degree sign is independently required by
The configuration is what makes the parity check possible; the bare label does not identify which radial orbital is occupied.
Atomic jj and Intermediate Coupling
Section titled “Atomic jj and Intermediate Coupling”The LS symbol records the order
In the jj limit, each electron or relativistic subshell instead forms
and the resulting values are coupled:
The notation must therefore expose different intermediate angular momenta.
One-electron and subshell labels
Section titled “One-electron and subshell labels”For an electron with spin ,
except that has only . A relativistic subshell is written
so a shell splits into and subshells. An equivalent electron group can be written
The subscript on is a one-electron , whereas the final subscript outside a coupled configuration is the total . Their positions are part of the grammar.
Coupled-group labels
Section titled “Coupled-group labels”For two groups with angular momenta and ,
A schematic level label is
Authors omit brackets or redundant intermediate labels when the coupling order is clear. For example,
states that two equivalent electrons occupy the subshell and couple to total . The Pauli principle still restricts which total values are allowed; the triangle rule alone is not sufficient for equivalent electrons.
LS and jj labels are basis statements
Section titled “LS and jj labels are basis statements”The same exact field-free level can be expanded in either basis:
or
The basis changes; the exact , , and parity labels do not. A named LS or jj label is exact only in an ideal coupling limit. In intermediate coupling, it normally identifies the largest component or a historically assigned parent.
| Label in a rotationally invariant, parity-conserving atomic model | Typical status |
|---|---|
| and | exact in zero field, with basis-dependent inside a degenerate level |
| parity | exact if the Hamiltonian preserves spatial inversion |
| and | exact in the nonrelativistic electrostatic LS limit; approximate with spin-dependent relativistic terms |
| individual or subshell | exact only in the corresponding jj or group-coupling limit |
| configuration | approximate when configuration interaction is retained |
A responsible assignment can report a leading component,
while calling the level “predominantly .” The percentages are basis-dependent and should be accompanied by the basis and calculation.
Molecular Electronic-State Grammar
Section titled “Molecular Electronic-State Grammar”For a molecule, the spatial part of an electronic state is classified by an irreducible representation of the molecular symmetry group appropriate to the geometry and model. The atomic letter is generally not a molecular quantum number because the nuclear framework is not spherically symmetric.
The two principal grammars are:
with applicable inversion and reflection labels, and
The empirical state label , the symmetry label, and the spin multiplicity answer different questions. A state may require all three.
Linear Molecules
Section titled “Linear Molecules”Choose the internuclear or molecular axis as the body-fixed axis. The electronic orbital projection is
and the electronic spin projection is
In a Hund-case-(a) description, the projection of total electronic angular momentum is
These are body-fixed projections, not the atomic magnitudes , , and .
Projection letters
Section titled “Projection letters”| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| electronic term | |||||
| one-electron orbital |
The uppercase letter labels the many-electron electronic state. A lowercase letter labels a molecular orbital. Thus is part of a configuration, whereas is a term symmetry.
Multiplicity and spin–orbit components
Section titled “Multiplicity and spin–orbit components”The left superscript remains
For a term,
so the case-(a) components are
They may be written
An subscript is most informative when the molecular-axis projection is nearly good. If rotation or other couplings strongly mix , the subscript becomes an approximate component label.
Empirical state letters
Section titled “Empirical state letters”The conventional electronic-state prefix is separate from the term symbol:
| Prefix | Conventional use |
|---|---|
| ground electronic state | |
| excited states of the same multiplicity as , in increasing energy order | |
| excited states of a different multiplicity |
For polyatomic molecules, a tilde is customarily added, , to distinguish empirical state names from point-group irreps. Historical literature contains exceptions and reassignments, so the prefix is an empirical identifier, not a theorem about the Hamiltonian.
Inversion labels g and u
Section titled “Inversion labels g and u”If the fixed-nuclei molecular Hamiltonian has a center of inversion, an electronic eigenfunction may satisfy
The corresponding labels are
For a homonuclear diatomic, the electronic term may therefore be written
A heteronuclear diatomic such as CO has no inversion center that leaves the Hamiltonian invariant, so is not an allowed exact label. “Bonding” and “antibonding” are not replacements for and .
Reflection labels plus and minus
Section titled “Reflection labels plus and minus”For a electronic state, reflection through any plane containing the molecular axis can return the wavefunction with eigenvalue or :
This is denoted by a right superscript:
For , the degenerate and partners are interchanged by such a reflection, so a single electronic-term superscript is generally not used in the same way. Rotation and other interactions can later produce parity doublets, which are instead labeled .
Representative linear-molecule labels
Section titled “Representative linear-molecule labels”| Label | Decode |
|---|---|
| ground electronic state; ; ; gerade under inversion; even under a plane containing the axis | |
| ground state; singlet; ; reflection-even; no label | |
| ground state; doublet; $ | |
| ground state; triplet; ; gerade electronic inversion symmetry; reflection-odd electronic symmetry |
The minus sign in for oxygen is not a negative energy, not symmetry, and not by itself the total parity of every rotational level.
Nonlinear Molecules
Section titled “Nonlinear Molecules”For a nonlinear equilibrium geometry, the electronic spatial label is an irrep of a point group:
Examples include
and a schematic octahedral triplet
| Token | Meaning |
|---|---|
| empirical ground-state name | |
| spin multiplicity | |
| or | irrep in the declared point group |
| , prime/double-prime, or numeric subscripts | parts of the point-group irrep, when that group has the relevant operations |
The same letters can carry very different meanings in different point groups. in and in are not universal state types; each is defined by a particular character table and axis convention.
Geometry and model are part of the label
Section titled “Geometry and model are part of the label”A point-group label is attached to a geometry and a symmetry model. At a distorted geometry, a degenerate irrep can split into irreps of a subgroup. Isotopic substitution can also reduce the symmetry of the full nuclear Hamiltonian even when the clamped-nuclei electronic potential retains a visually symmetric geometry.
For large-amplitude motion, tunneling, or rovibronic coupling, the exact labels may belong to a molecular symmetry or permutation–inversion group rather than the equilibrium point group. A bare assignment is then insufficient unless its group is stated.
Orbital, configuration, and state labels
Section titled “Orbital, configuration, and state labels”For a nonlinear molecule, a one-electron orbital may transform as , , or , while a many-electron electronic state transforms as , , or . A configuration such as
does not by itself determine the total many-electron state symmetry when open shells are present. The occupied orbitals must be coupled, antisymmetrized, and decomposed into total spin and spatial irreps.
Parity and Symmetry Dictionary
Section titled “Parity and Symmetry Dictionary”The word “parity” is used at several layers. The operator, not the placement of the sign, determines the meaning.
| Printed label | Operator or transformation | Eigenvalue statement | Typical domain |
|---|---|---|---|
| atomic or odd degree sign | inversion of all electronic spatial coordinates through the nucleus | atom | |
| molecular | inversion through a molecular center | centrosymmetric molecule | |
| linear-molecule | reflection in a plane containing the molecular axis | electronic state | |
| total field-free parity correlated with | convention defined below | linear-molecule rovibronic level | |
| prime/double prime | reflection in the horizontal plane in groups such as | even/odd under | point-group irrep |
| explicit level parity | full spatial inversion of the specified total state | convention must identify included degrees of freedom | atomic, molecular, nuclear, or particle context |
These labels can coexist because they refer to different transformations. A centrosymmetric linear molecule can have both a electronic label and a total rovibronic parity.
The e/f convention
Section titled “The e/f convention”Field-free rotational levels of a linear molecule often occur in opposite-parity pairs. The Brown–Hougen convention labels the two parity classes independently of the Hund coupling case.
For integral ,
For half-integral ,
Here excludes nuclear spin. Consequently, does not universally mean even parity and does not universally mean odd parity. Their parity alternates with .
For example, at ,
The labels also do not mean “lower” and “upper” member of a doublet. Level ordering can change with , perturbations, and effective-Hamiltonian parameters while the assignment remains tied to parity.
Electronic symmetry versus total parity
Section titled “Electronic symmetry versus total parity”The electronic label acts on the clamped-nuclei electronic wavefunction. The parity of a rovibronic level also includes rotational and vibrational transformation properties. Therefore,
for an arbitrary total molecular level. Nuclear-spin permutation symmetry can add yet another independent classification.
Molecular Angular-Momentum Dictionary
Section titled “Molecular Angular-Momentum Dictionary”Molecular papers often use several angular momenta in one label or Hamiltonian. Record the author’s definitions before translating.
| Symbol | Common meaning |
|---|---|
| total electronic orbital angular momentum | |
| magnitude of the body-fixed projection of | |
| total electronic spin | |
| signed body-fixed projection of | |
| magnitude of the body-fixed projection in the case-(a) picture | |
| mechanical rotation of the nuclear framework | |
| angular momentum excluding electron spin; often | |
| total angular momentum excluding nuclear spin | |
| total nuclear spin, or a specified nuclear spin | |
| total angular momentum including nuclear spin, commonly |
Conventions for and vary in rovibronic problems, especially when vibrational angular momentum is present. The defining vector equation is more reliable than the letter alone.
Hund cases are regimes, not species
Section titled “Hund cases are regimes, not species”In a simplified Hund-case-(a) hierarchy, electronic orbital and spin projections are strongly tied to the molecular axis:
schematically, so , , and are useful labels. In a case-(b) hierarchy, remains tied to the axis but spin is more weakly coupled; first describes rotation excluding spin and then couples to :
Cases (c), (d), and (e) describe other limiting orders. Real states can move between cases with , vibrational excitation, electronic perturbations, or external fields. A Hund-case label says which basis organizes the spectrum; it does not create an exact symmetry.
Exactness Test
Section titled “Exactness Test”For a proposed label , the mathematical question is whether an operator exists such that
and
Three outcomes should be distinguished:
| Status | Meaning | Reporting language |
|---|---|---|
| exact | symmetry enforces the label for the declared Hamiltonian | “the level has and odd parity” |
| approximate | the label is nearly conserved because off-diagonal couplings are small | “predominantly in the stated LS basis” |
| empirical | a conventional name tracks a state through observations or calculations | “the state” |
Degeneracy is not required for exactness. Conversely, near-degeneracy does not prove that two levels share a symmetry.
What common interactions preserve
Section titled “What common interactions preserve”| Interaction or model change | Labels often preserved | Labels that can fail |
|---|---|---|
| atomic spin–orbit coupling in zero field | total , as a basis label, parity | separate and |
| atomic configuration interaction | , parity | configuration and pure LS parentage |
| static electric field | projection about the field axis when axial symmetry remains | field-free parity; often total |
| static magnetic field | projection about the field axis when axial symmetry remains | time-reversal degeneracy; often total |
| molecular rotation | total and full parity in zero field | exact body-fixed in intermediate cases |
| vibronic coupling | exact total symmetry of the coupled problem | separate electronic and vibrational irreps |
| isotopic substitution | angular momentum and symmetries retained by the isotopologue | exchange or point-group labels lost by mass asymmetry |
The Common Atomic Hamiltonians and Common Molecular Hamiltonians pages identify the operators behind these statements.
Worked Translations
Section titled “Worked Translations”Atomic LS level
Section titled “Atomic LS level”Consider
Read it left to right:
- is the configuration.
- , so .
- means total .
- The displayed fine-structure level has .
- No odd-parity mark appears, and independently .
- The level contains magnetic substates before field splitting.
The whole term contains , but this symbol names only the level.
Atomic jj level
Section titled “Atomic jj level”Consider the schematic label
It says:
- each occupied one-electron state belongs to a relativistic subshell;
- two equivalent electrons occupy that subshell;
- the allowed pair shown here has total ; and
- the configuration has even parity because two electrons contribute .
It does not claim or . Those are LS-basis questions, and the recoupled state can contain more than one LS component when the relevant sector permits it.
Hydrogen molecular ion
Section titled “Hydrogen molecular ion”Consider
The prefix identifies the ground electronic state. The multiplicity gives . The letter gives . The subscript says that the electronic wavefunction is even under inversion through the molecular center. The superscript says that it is even under reflection in a plane containing the internuclear axis.
The canonical construction of its bonding and antibonding states is in the H₂⁺ Ion article.
Hydroxyl spin–orbit component
Section titled “Hydroxyl spin–orbit component”Consider
The state is a doublet with and . The subscript selects the spin–orbit component. OH is heteronuclear, so no exact label applies. Each rotational level can be further resolved into opposite-parity components and labeled ; those labels are not already contained in the bare electronic term symbol.
Molecular oxygen
Section titled “Molecular oxygen”Consider
This combines three distinct statements:
It also states
The subscript and superscript therefore cannot be collapsed into one notion of “even” or “odd.”
Consider
The tilde-bearing is the empirical ground-state name. The state is a singlet. Its electronic spatial wavefunction transforms as the irrep of for the declared equilibrium geometry and axis convention. No , , or slot belongs in this nonlinear-molecule label.
Assignment Workflow
Section titled “Assignment Workflow”1. Copy the label exactly
Section titled “1. Copy the label exactly”Preserve superscripts, subscripts, parentheses, primes, degree signs, tildes, and capitalization. Plain-text export can erase the very distinctions being interpreted.
2. Identify the object
Section titled “2. Identify the object”Ask whether the source labels an orbital, configuration, electronic term, fine-structure level, rotational level, rovibronic level, or hyperfine level. Do not infer this from one symbol in isolation; read the table headings and Hamiltonian definitions.
3. State the symmetry domain
Section titled “3. State the symmetry domain”Record atom versus molecule, linear versus nonlinear geometry, point group, isotopologue, field configuration, and whether nuclear spin is included in the reported total angular momentum.
4. Expand every token
Section titled “4. Expand every token”Write a ledger:
| Token | Operator or convention | Value | Exactness |
|---|---|---|---|
| example: | approximate if spin is strongly mixed | ||
| example: | exact in a rotationally invariant field-free model | ||
| example: | inversion | exact only when inversion is a symmetry | |
| example: | empirical ordering | first same-multiplicity excited state by convention | conventional |
5. Check allowed ranges
Section titled “5. Check allowed ranges”Use angular-momentum triangle rules, parity from the configuration, allowed point-group labels, and equivalent-particle restrictions. A syntactically valid symbol can still describe an impossible state.
6. Check the Hamiltonian
Section titled “6. Check the Hamiltonian”List retained interactions and test which labels commute with them. If the calculation reports mixing coefficients, state the basis and leading percentage rather than presenting a mixed label as exact.
7. Cross-check observables
Section titled “7. Cross-check observables”Energy intervals, Zeeman factors, hyperfine patterns, polarization, branch structure, isotope shifts, and relative line strengths can challenge an assignment. Agreement with one line position is not sufficient.
8. Preserve source conventions
Section titled “8. Preserve source conventions”When importing a database row, record the database version or query date, formatted versus ASCII notation, configuration, term, , parity, and any uncertainty or leading-percentage field. Translate into house notation only after retaining the original.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”Treating the multiplicity as a level degeneracy
Section titled “Treating the multiplicity as a level degeneracy”counts spin projections in a spin- representation. A particular atomic level has magnetic degeneracy in zero field.
Reading atomic P and molecular Pi as the same quantum number
Section titled “Reading atomic P and molecular Pi as the same quantum number”Atomic means the magnitude . Molecular means the axial projection . A molecule need not have a good total .
Reading an orbital label as a term label
Section titled “Reading an orbital label as a term label”Lowercase or labels a one-electron orbital class. Uppercase or labels a many-electron term.
Calling every sign “parity”
Section titled “Calling every sign “parity””Atomic inversion, molecular , reflection, point-group prime/double-prime labels, and rovibronic classes refer to distinct operations.
Assigning g or u to a heteronuclear diatomic
Section titled “Assigning g or u to a heteronuclear diatomic”The inversion operation exchanges unlike nuclei and is not a symmetry of the fixed-nuclei Hamiltonian. A heteronuclear diatomic therefore has no exact electronic classification.
Interpreting e and f as even and odd
Section titled “Interpreting e and f as even and odd”The parity alternates with . Use the defining formulas, and remember that excludes nuclear spin in this convention.
Interpreting e and f as lower and upper
Section titled “Interpreting e and f as lower and upper”They are parity classes, not energy-order labels. A perturbation can reverse the ordering without changing the labels.
Treating LS or jj parentage as exact
Section titled “Treating LS or jj parentage as exact”In intermediate coupling, and parity may be exact while LS and jj components are basis-dependent. Report leading percentages and the chosen basis.
Omitting the point group
Section titled “Omitting the point group”, , and acquire meaning only within a declared group and axis convention.
Assuming X, A, and B are symmetry labels
Section titled “Assuming X, A, and B are symmetry labels”They are empirical electronic-state names. The symmetry information follows in the term symbol.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Exercise 1: Decode an atomic level
Section titled “Exercise 1: Decode an atomic level”Decode
and state the multiplicity, , , parity, number of magnetic substates, and other fine-structure levels in the same ideal LS term.
Solution
The multiplicity is three, so
The letter P gives , and the right subscript gives . The degree sign states odd parity, consistent with
The displayed level has
magnetic substates. Coupling and also permits and , so the ideal term contains , , and .
Exercise 2: Multiplicity and dimension
Section titled “Exercise 2: Multiplicity and dimension”How many magnetic basis states belong to a pure term? Into which fine-structure levels do they organize?
Solution
For a quartet,
For a D term, . The uncoupled dimension is
The allowed total angular momenta are
Their dimensions sum to
Exercise 3: Parity audit
Section titled “Exercise 3: Parity audit”Find the parity of the configurations , , , and . Which ones would conventionally carry an odd degree sign on an atomic term?
Solution
Use
Therefore,
Terms of and have odd parity and conventionally carry the degree sign. Terms of and are even.
Exercise 4: LS label for a mixed level
Section titled “Exercise 4: LS label for a mixed level”A calculated , even-parity atomic level has LS-basis weights in , in , and in other components. Which labels are exact in a zero-field parity-conserving calculation, and how should the level be described?
Solution
Total and even parity are exact under the stated symmetries. Neither pure nor pure describes the eigenvector. A defensible description is:
an even-parity level, predominantly with 54% weight and a substantial 41% component in the stated LS basis.
Calling it simply an exact level would hide the intermediate coupling. The basis and calculation should accompany the percentages.
Exercise 5: Decode a linear-molecule symbol
Section titled “Exercise 5: Decode a linear-molecule symbol”Decode
Which molecular class can carry every printed label, and which information is not supplied?
Solution
names the ground electronic state. The multiplicity gives . gives . The subscript means odd electronic behavior under inversion through the molecular center, and the superscript means even behavior under reflection in a plane containing the molecular axis.
All of these labels can apply to a centrosymmetric linear molecule, notably a homonuclear diatomic. The symbol does not supply a vibrational quantum number, rotational , total parity, component, nuclear spin, hyperfine , energy, or electronic configuration.
Exercise 6: Why oxygen’s minus sign is not u
Section titled “Exercise 6: Why oxygen’s minus sign is not u”For
identify the two symmetry operations associated with and . Could the same electronic state have and instead without changing the meaning of ?
Solution
The label is the eigenvalue of inversion through the molecular center:
The label is the eigenvalue of reflection in a plane containing the molecular axis:
They refer to independent symmetry operations. A different electronic state could indeed be : changing the reflection eigenvalue would not alter the meaning of the inversion label .
Exercise 7: Compute e/f parity
Section titled “Exercise 7: Compute e/f parity”For a linear-molecule level with , find the parity of its and components. Repeat for integral .
Solution
For half-integral ,
At ,
so
For integral ,
At ,
Thus neither letter has one fixed parity for all .
Exercise 8: Classify molecular labels
Section titled “Exercise 8: Classify molecular labels”For
classify , the left superscript, and as empirical, angular-momentum, or symmetry information. Explain why replacing by would be inappropriate.
Solution
is an empirical electronic-state name. The left superscript gives angular-momentum information:
is the spatial irrep of the electronic wavefunction in . Water is nonlinear, so it has no unique molecular axis supporting a linear molecule’s classification. would therefore use the wrong symmetry group and the wrong body-fixed projection grammar.
Key Takeaways
Section titled “Key Takeaways”- Identify the physical object before decoding the typography.
- Atomic and molecular are different: a magnitude versus an axial projection.
- The multiplicity , a level degeneracy , and the number of fine-structure levels are different counts.
- In intermediate atomic coupling, and parity can remain exact while LS and jj names become dominant-component labels.
- Molecular , , point-group primes, and rovibronic labels refer to different transformations.
- labels are coupling-case independent parity classes, not universal synonyms for even/odd or lower/upper.
- A nonlinear molecular term symbol is incomplete unless its point group and geometry convention are known.
- The Hamiltonian determines which labels are exact.
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Atomic Term Symbols derives the atomic configuration–term–level hierarchy and works through microstate checks.
- LS Coupling develops the electrostatic coupling limit, fine structure, magnetic diagnostics, and intermediate-coupling tests.
- jj Coupling constructs relativistic subshell labels and LS-to-jj recoupling.
- Molecular Symmetry develops point groups, irreps, direct products, and selection rules.
- Common Molecular Hamiltonians defines , , , , spin–rotation, hyperfine, and field terms.
- Electronic Spectroscopy connects state labels to vibronic bands, intensities, and assignments.
- Selection Rule Tables gives a qualified lookup for atomic, molecular, rotational, vibrational, and Raman transitions.
References
Section titled “References”- International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, “Term symbols”, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 5th ed. (2025).
- E. R. Cohen et al., Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed., IUPAC and RSC Publishing (2007), Sec. 2.6.3; searchable IUPAC edition.
- W. C. Martin and W. L. Wiese, Atomic Spectroscopy: An Introduction, National Institute of Standards and Technology, especially “Hierarchy of Atomic Structure” and “Notations for Different Coupling Schemes.”
- A. Kramida et al., NIST Atomic Spectra Database help and notation guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- C. J. H. Schutte et al., “Notations and conventions in molecular spectroscopy: Part 2. Symmetry notation (IUPAC Recommendations 1997),” Pure and Applied Chemistry 69, 1641–1650 (1997), doi:10.1351/pac199769081641.
- J. M. Brown et al., “The labeling of parity doublet levels in linear molecules,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 55, 500–503 (1975), doi:10.1016/0022-2852(75)90291-X.
- F. J. Lovas, NIST Molecular Spectral Databases: list of symbols and quantum-number conventions, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
- J. M. Brown and A. Carrington, Rotational Spectroscopy of Diatomic Molecules, Cambridge University Press (2003).
- H. Lefebvre-Brion and R. W. Field, The Spectra and Dynamics of Diatomic Molecules, Elsevier (2004).
- P. F. Bernath, Spectra of Atoms and Molecules, 4th ed., Oxford University Press (2020).