Skip to content

Many-Body and Quantum Statistical Mechanics Formulas

These cards support three recurring tasks:

  1. compute equilibrium occupations of ideal bosonic or fermionic modes;
  2. lift a one-particle operator into number-conserving Fock-space form;
  3. identify and convert among equal-time, ordered, response, thermal, and spectral correlation functions.

They are lookup pages, not canonical derivations. Each card links to the page that owns the proof, interpretation, model scope, and specialist extensions.

TaskCardFirst formula
Occupy an ideal fermionic modeFermi–Dirac Distributionfi=[eβ(ϵi−μ)+1]−1f_i=[e^{\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)}+1]^{-1}
Occupy an ideal bosonic modeBose–Einstein Distributionbi=[eβ(ϵi−μ)−1]−1b_i=[e^{\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)}-1]^{-1}
Convert a one-particle matrix to Fock spaceSecond-Quantized One-Body OperatordΓ(A)=∑ijAijdi†djd\Gamma(A)=\sum_{ij}A_{ij}d_i^\dagger d_j
Select an equal-time or dynamical correlatorCorrelation FunctionsCAB>(t)=⟨A(t)B(0)⟩C_{AB}^{>}(t)=\langle A(t)B(0)\rangle

If the question asks for a Hamiltonian rather than a formula, use the Model Encyclopedia. If it asks for a theorem, use the Theorems and Results Index.

SymbolMeaning
TTAbsolute temperature
β\beta1/(kBT)1/(k_{\mathrm B}T)
μ\muChemical potential associated with a conserved number or charge
ϵi\epsilon_iEnergy of complete one-particle mode ii
di,di†d_i,d_i^\daggerAnnihilation and creation operators in the declared mode basis
n^i\widehat n_idi†did_i^\dagger d_i
N^\widehat N∑in^i\sum_i\widehat n_i
AijA_{ij}⟨φi∣A∣φj⟩\langle\varphi_i\vert A\vert\varphi_j\rangle
⟨X⟩\langle X\rangleExpectation in the stated pure state, density operator, or ensemble
D(ϵ)D(\epsilon)One-particle density of states with its volume and degeneracy convention declared

The mode index can include position or momentum, spin, band, orbital, species, polarization, and branch labels. A suppressed label can turn a correct formula into a degeneracy error.

For a grand-canonical ideal mode,

⟨ni⟩=1eβ(ϵi−μ)∓1,\langle n_i\rangle = \frac{1}{ e^{\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)} \mp 1 },

where the upper minus sign in the displayed denominator applies to bosons and the lower plus sign applies to fermions. Writing the two formulas separately is often safer:

bi=1eβ(ϵi−μ)−1,fi=1eβ(ϵi−μ)+1.b_i = \frac{1}{ e^{\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)}-1 }, \qquad f_i = \frac{1}{ e^{\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)}+1 }.

Their common classical limit is

bi≃fi≃e−β(ϵi−μ)b_i \simeq f_i \simeq e^{-\beta(\epsilon_i-\mu)}

when the relevant occupations are small.

CheckBosonsFermions
Allowed mode counts0,1,2,…0,1,2,\ldots0,10,1
Mean range0≤bi<∞0\leq b_i<\infty0≤fi≤10\leq f_i\leq1
Finite-mode convergenceμ<ϵ0\mu<\epsilon_0No analogous upper bound
One-mode variancebi(1+bi)b_i(1+b_i)fi(1−fi)f_i(1-f_i)
Statistical correction to dilute occupationEnhancedSuppressed
Zero-temperature fixed-density structurePossible condensate-mode separationFermi sea and surface
Typical nonconserved excitationPhoton or phonon with μ=0\mu=0Not the standard setting

The plus or minus sign is not an effective attractive or repulsive force. It follows from the allowed occupation algebra in a thermal ensemble.

For independent modes,

N=∑i⟨ni⟩,U=∑iϵi⟨ni⟩.N = \sum_i \langle n_i\rangle, \qquad U = \sum_i \epsilon_i \langle n_i\rangle.

In a continuum approximation,

N=∫D(ϵ)⟨n(ϵ)⟩ dϵ,N = \int D(\epsilon) \langle n(\epsilon)\rangle \,d\epsilon,

and similarly for UU with an extra factor of ϵ\epsilon. Before using the integral, check:

  • whether DD is total or per volume;
  • whether it includes spin, polarization, or branch degeneracy;
  • whether a discrete bosonic ground mode must be separated;
  • whether level spacing is small compared with the thermal scale;
  • whether the dispersion and dimensionality match the quoted density of states.

At fixed NN, the number equation determines μ(T)\mu(T). At fixed μ\mu, it determines the mean particle number. Those are different thermodynamic problems.

Choose an orthonormal one-particle basis {∣φi⟩}\{\lvert\varphi_i\rangle\}. For

Aij=⟨φi∣A∣φj⟩,A_{ij} = \langle\varphi_i\vert A \vert\varphi_j\rangle,

the additive number-conserving lift is

A^=dΓ(A)=∑ijAijdi†dj.\widehat A = d\Gamma(A) = \sum_{ij} A_{ij} d_i^\dagger d_j.

The bilinear removes one particle from jj and creates one in ii. Diagonal terms weight occupations; off-diagonal terms transfer particles or internal quantum numbers.

Essential checks are

dΓ(I1)=N^,d\Gamma(I_1) = \widehat N, dΓ(A)†=dΓ(A†),d\Gamma(A)^\dagger = d\Gamma(A^\dagger), [N^,dΓ(A)]=0,[\widehat N,d\Gamma(A)] = 0,

and

[dΓ(A),dΓ(B)]=dΓ([A,B]).[d\Gamma(A),d\Gamma(B)] = d\Gamma([A,B]).

For a one-body reduced density matrix defined by

γij=⟨dj†di⟩,\gamma_{ij} = \langle d_j^\dagger d_i\rangle,

one-body expectations are

⟨A^⟩=Tr⁡1(Aγ).\langle\widehat A\rangle = \operatorname{Tr}_1(A\gamma).

This does not imply that γ\gamma determines Var⁡(A^)\operatorname{Var}(\widehat A) or the full many-body state; those generally contain two-body information.

FormMeaning
Aijdi†djA_{ij}d_i^\dagger d_jNumber-conserving additive one-body lift
ηidi†+ηi∗di\eta_i d_i^\dagger+\eta_i^*d_iSource term; changes particle number
Δijdi†dj†+h.c.\Delta_{ij}d_i^\dagger d_j^\dagger+\mathrm{h.c.}Pairing term; quadratic but not an additive lift
Vij;kldi†dj†dldkV_{ij;kl}d_i^\dagger d_j^\dagger d_l d_kTwo-body interaction

Hopping between two sites is one-body because one particle moves. A density product is two-body because two occupations enter simultaneously.

Correlation notation chooses a physical question as much as an algebraic expression. In the convention used by this category:

CAB>(t)=⟨A(t)B(0)⟩,CAB<(t)=⟨B(0)A(t)⟩.C_{AB}^{>}(t) = \langle A(t)B(0)\rangle, \qquad C_{AB}^{<}(t) = \langle B(0)A(t)\rangle.

The connected function subtracts one-point products:

CABc(t)=⟨A(t)B(0)⟩−⟨A⟩⟨B⟩.C_{AB}^{c}(t) = \langle A(t)B(0)\rangle - \langle A\rangle\langle B\rangle.

For the source convention

Hpert(t)=−f(t)B,H_{\mathrm{pert}}(t) = - f(t)B,

the retarded response is

χABR(t)=iℏθ(t)⟨[A(t),B(0)]⟩.\chi_{AB}^{\mathrm R}(t) = \frac{i}{\hbar} \theta(t) \langle[A(t),B(0)]\rangle.

The real-time Fourier pair is

F(ω)=∫dt eiωtF(t),F(t)=∫dω2π e−iωtF(ω).\begin{aligned} F(\omega) &= \int dt\, e^{i\omega t}F(t), \\ F(t) &= \int \frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\, e^{-i\omega t}F(\omega). \end{aligned}

Do not combine a correlator from one convention with a response or spectral identity from another until factors of ii, ℏ\hbar, 2π2\pi, volume, and the Fourier sign have been translated.

QuestionObject
Are fluctuations correlated beyond their means?Connected correlator
Is there one-body coherence?⟨di†dj⟩\langle d_i^\dagger d_j\rangle or ⟨ψ†(x)ψ(y)⟩\langle\psi^\dagger(x)\psi(y)\rangle
What is the pair-coincidence or bunching signal?Normally ordered G(2)G^{(2)} or g(2)g^{(2)}
How does a source change an observable?Retarded susceptibility
Which transitions carry ordered spectral weight?Lehmann or ordered spectrum
What does a scattering probe resolve in momentum and energy?Dynamic structure factor plus the probe forward model
What is computed in finite-temperature imaginary time?Matsubara correlator
What adds or removes one particle?Single-particle Green function

Connected, symmetrized, time ordered, retarded, and Matsubara are not synonyms.

State whether did_i describes exact particles, projected orbitals, quasiparticles, normal modes, or another effective basis. A formula diagonal in quasiparticles need not be diagonal in bare-particle operators.

Declare pure state, canonical, grand canonical, generalized equilibrium, or nonequilibrium preparation. Equilibrium occupations and detailed-balance relations do not follow from stationarity alone.

Specify which number or charge couples to each chemical potential. For a number-changing operator, state whether time evolution uses HH or H−μNH-\mu N.

List all mode labels. State orthonormality, lattice versus continuum normalization, box volume, Fourier convention, and whether density of states or spectra are intensive.

Write the operator product explicitly before abbreviating it as a Green function or spectrum. Fermionic exchanges produce signs; observable response uses an ordinary commutator.

Useful checks include

0≤fi≤1,0\leq f_i\leq1, μ<ϵ0for a finite ideal Bose system,\mu<\epsilon_0 \quad \text{for a finite ideal Bose system}, dΓ(I1)=N^,d\Gamma(I_1)=\widehat N, χR(t<0)=0,\chi^{\mathrm R}(t<0)=0,

and recovery of equal-time spectral weight by frequency integration.

The following statements are structural:

  • bosonic and fermionic canonical operator algebras;
  • the additive lift dΓ(A)d\Gamma(A) in a declared orthonormal basis;
  • identities following algebraically from a defined correlator;
  • Lehmann representations for a specified Hamiltonian and stationary spectral decomposition.

The following require physical assumptions:

  • Fermi–Dirac or Bose–Einstein occupations require thermal equilibrium and independent modes or a justified quasiparticle approximation;
  • continuum densities of states require a thermodynamic or semiclassical replacement of discrete sums;
  • fluctuation–dissipation requires Gibbs equilibrium and compatible conventions;
  • quasiparticle poles, lifetimes, Wick factorization, and mean-field bilinears require their own approximation regimes;
  • condensation formulas depend on dimension, dispersion, geometry, interactions, ensemble, and order of limits.

Compact notation should not hide which of these levels is being used.

  • Using the Fermi or Bose distribution for an arbitrary nonequilibrium mode population.
  • Counting spin or polarization both in the mode sum and in a degeneracy factor.
  • Treating a mean mode occupation as an allowed fractional number eigenvalue.
  • Setting bosonic μ=ϵ0\mu=\epsilon_0 inside a finite grand partition function.
  • Mixing one-particle matrix elements with ladder operators from another basis.
  • Calling every quadratic expression a one-body lift.
  • Assuming a one-body density matrix determines pair correlations.
  • Dropping connected subtraction when testing clustering or structure factors.
  • Calling a time-ordered propagator retarded.
  • Comparing spectral plots without converting normalization and energy-frequency units.
  • Treating artificial broadening as a physical lifetime.
  • Inferring that an ideal Bose condensate is automatically a superfluid.
  • A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Dover, 2003.
  • G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed., Springer, 2000.
  • J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems, Westview Press, 1998.
  • M. Kardar, Statistical Physics of Particles, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale, Statistical Mechanics, 4th ed., Academic Press, 2021.