Skip to content

Kramers Degeneracy

If an antiunitary time-reversal operator TT satisfies

T2=−IT^2=-I

and commutes with the Hamiltonian,

THT−1=H,THT^{-1}=H,

then every nondegenerate energy eigenstate is forbidden. Each eigenstate ∣ψ⟩\lvert\psi\rangle has a distinct orthogonal partner T∣ψ⟩T\lvert\psi\rangle with the same energy.

  • TT is antiunitary.
  • T2=−IT^2=-I on the Hilbert space sector considered.
  • The Hamiltonian is time-reversal invariant.
  • The eigenstate is a normalizable discrete eigenstate or lies in a setting where the eigenspace statement is meaningful.
  • Perturbations that break the relevant time-reversal symmetry can lift the degeneracy.

If

H∣ψ⟩=E∣ψ⟩,H\lvert\psi\rangle=E\lvert\psi\rangle,

then, using THT−1=HTHT^{-1}=H,

H(T∣ψ⟩)=E(T∣ψ⟩).H(T\lvert\psi\rangle) = E(T\lvert\psi\rangle).

The partner is orthogonal to ∣ψ⟩\lvert\psi\rangle because T2=−IT^2=-I is incompatible with a one-dimensional invariant subspace.

Kramers degeneracy is central for systems with an odd number of spin-1/21/2 degrees of freedom and time-reversal symmetry. It underlies Kramers doublets in atomic, molecular, and condensed-matter settings.

The result is antiunitary. It is not the same as an ordinary unitary symmetry degeneracy, and its assumptions are sensitive to magnetic fields and other time-reversal-breaking terms.

  • Applying Kramers degeneracy when T2=+IT^2=+I.
  • Treating antiunitary time reversal like an ordinary unitary operator.
  • Forgetting that a magnetic field generally breaks time-reversal symmetry.
  • Assuming every degeneracy in a time-reversal-invariant system is a Kramers degeneracy.
  • Ignoring which Hilbert-space sector carries T2=−IT^2=-I.

Why can a state not be proportional to its own Kramers partner when T2=−IT^2=-I?

Solution

If T∣ψ⟩=c∣ψ⟩T\lvert\psi\rangle=c\lvert\psi\rangle, antiunitarity gives T2∣ψ⟩=c∗T∣ψ⟩=∣c∣2∣ψ⟩T^2\lvert\psi\rangle=c^*T\lvert\psi\rangle=\lvert c\rvert^2\lvert\psi\rangle. This cannot equal −∣ψ⟩-\lvert\psi\rangle. Thus T∣ψ⟩T\lvert\psi\rangle is a distinct state.

  • H. A. Kramers, “Théorie générale de la rotation paramagnétique dans les cristaux,” Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences 33, 959-972, 1930.
  • E. P. Wigner, Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra, Academic Press, 1959.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter, Springer, 2008.