Skip to content

Ehrenfest Theorem

For a Hamiltonian

H=p22m+V(x),H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+V(x),

Ehrenfest theorem gives

ddt⟨x⟩=⟨p⟩m,ddt⟨p⟩=−⟨V′(x)⟩.\frac{d}{dt}\langle x\rangle = \frac{\langle p\rangle}{m}, \qquad \frac{d}{dt}\langle p\rangle = -\langle V'(x)\rangle.

Equivalently,

md2dt2⟨x⟩=−⟨V′(x)⟩.m\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\langle x\rangle = -\langle V'(x)\rangle.

For an operator A(t)A(t) with possible explicit time dependence,

ddt⟨A⟩=iℏ⟨[H,A]⟩+⟨∂A∂t⟩,\frac{d}{dt}\langle A\rangle = \frac{i}{\hbar}\langle[H,A]\rangle + \left\langle \frac{\partial A}{\partial t} \right\rangle,

when the domains and differentiability assumptions are satisfied.

  • The system evolves under closed-system Schrödinger dynamics.
  • xx, pp, HH, and the commutators are meaningful on the states considered.
  • Boundary terms vanish when differential-operator manipulations are used.
  • Replacing ⟨V′(x)⟩\langle V'(x)\rangle by V′(⟨x⟩)V'(\langle x\rangle) requires an additional approximation.

The theorem is exact for the stated Hamiltonian. It becomes a classical equation for the mean only when

⟨V′(x)⟩≈V′(⟨x⟩).\langle V'(x)\rangle \approx V'(\langle x\rangle).

This equality is exact for potentials at most quadratic in xx and approximate for sufficiently narrow wave packets in slowly varying forces.

  • Saying the theorem proves that particles follow classical trajectories.
  • Replacing ⟨V′(x)⟩\langle V'(x)\rangle by V′(⟨x⟩)V'(\langle x\rangle) without checking localization.
  • Ignoring packet spreading, splitting, or interference.
  • Treating expectation values as a complete description of a quantum state.
  • Forgetting domains and boundary conditions for unbounded operators.

For a harmonic oscillator potential V(x)=mω2x2/2V(x)=m\omega^2x^2/2, why does the mean position obey the exact classical oscillator equation?

Solution

Here V′(x)=mω2xV'(x)=m\omega^2x, so ⟨V′(x)⟩=mω2⟨x⟩\langle V'(x)\rangle=m\omega^2\langle x\rangle. Ehrenfest theorem gives

d2dt2⟨x⟩+ω2⟨x⟩=0.\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\langle x\rangle+\omega^2\langle x\rangle=0.
  • P. Ehrenfest, “Bemerkung über die angenäherte Gültigkeit der klassischen Mechanik innerhalb der Quantenmechanik,” Zeitschrift für Physik 45, 455-457, 1927.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.