Skip to content

Harmonic Oscillator Ladder Operators

For the one-dimensional oscillator

H=p22m+12mω2x2,[x,p]=iℏ,H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac12m\omega^2x^2, \qquad [x,p]=i\hbar,

define the oscillator length

ℓ=ℏmω\ell = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}

and the dimensionless ladder operators

a=12(xℓ+iℓpℏ),a = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \frac{x}{\ell} + \frac{i\ell p}{\hbar} \right), a†=12(xℓ−iℓpℏ).a^\dagger = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \frac{x}{\ell} - \frac{i\ell p}{\hbar} \right).

They satisfy

[a,a†]=I,[a,a^\dagger]=I,

and factor the Hamiltonian as

H=ℏω(N+12I),N=a†a.H = \hbar\omega \left( N+\frac12I \right), \qquad N=a^\dagger a.

The full algebraic proof of the spectrum is at Ladder-Operator Solution: First Encounter. This card collects the identities needed after the construction is known.

TaskFormula
Lower a number statea∣n⟩=n∣n−1⟩a\lvert n\rangle=\sqrt n\lvert n-1\rangle
Raise a number statea†∣n⟩=n+1∣n+1⟩a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}\lvert n+1\rangle
Build a number state∣n⟩=(a†)n∣0⟩/n!\lvert n\rangle=(a^\dagger)^n\lvert0\rangle/\sqrt{n!}
Count quantaN∣n⟩=n∣n⟩N\lvert n\rangle=n\lvert n\rangle
Write the spectrumEn=ℏω(n+1/2)E_n=\hbar\omega(n+1/2)
Recover positionx=ℓ(a+a†)/2x=\ell(a+a^\dagger)/\sqrt2
Recover momentump=ℏ(a−a†)/(iℓ2)p=\hbar(a-a^\dagger)/(i\ell\sqrt2)
Evolve a ladder operatoraH(t)=e−iω(t−t0)aH(t0)a_H(t)=e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0)
Ground-state conditiona∣0⟩=0a\lvert0\rangle=0

The number label starts at n=0n=0. The lowering formula gives zero on the vacuum because its coefficient is 0\sqrt0.

The equivalent expressions are

a=mω2ℏ x+i2mℏω p,a = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\,x + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\,p, a†=mω2ℏ x−i2mℏω p.a^\dagger = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\,x - \frac{i}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\,p.

Every term is dimensionless. The inverse relations are

x=ℓ2(a+a†),x = \frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}(a+a^\dagger), p=ℏiℓ2(a−a†)=−imℏω2(a−a†).p = \frac{\hbar}{i\ell\sqrt2}(a-a^\dagger) = -i\sqrt{\frac{m\hbar\omega}{2}} (a-a^\dagger).

Changing the sign of the momentum term exchanges the roles of the displayed aa and a†a^\dagger. A different convention is acceptable only when every commutator, vacuum condition, and ladder action is changed consistently.

From [x,p]=iℏ[x,p]=i\hbar,

[a,a†]=I.[a,a^\dagger]=I.

Consequently,

aa†=N+I,a†a=N.aa^\dagger=N+I, \qquad a^\dagger a=N.

The number-operator commutators are

[N,a]=−a,[N,a†]=a†.[N,a]=-a, \qquad [N,a^\dagger]=a^\dagger.

Since H=ℏω(N+I/2)H=\hbar\omega(N+I/2),

[H,a]=−ℏωa,[H,a] = -\hbar\omega a, [H,a†]=ℏωa†.[H,a^\dagger] = \hbar\omega a^\dagger.

Thus aa and a†a^\dagger are spectrum-generating operators. They do not commute with HH and are not conserved observables.

Choose normalized number states with phases fixed so that the ladder coefficients are positive real numbers:

a∣n⟩=n ∣n−1⟩,a\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt n\,\lvert n-1\rangle, a†∣n⟩=n+1 ∣n+1⟩.a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}\,\lvert n+1\rangle.

Repeated lowering gives

ar∣n⟩=n!(n−r)!∣n−r⟩,0≤r≤n,a^r\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}} \lvert n-r\rangle, \qquad 0\leq r\leq n,

and

ar∣n⟩=0,r>n.a^r\lvert n\rangle=0, \qquad r\gt n.

Repeated raising gives

(a†)r∣n⟩=(n+r)!n!∣n+r⟩.(a^\dagger)^r\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{(n+r)!}{n!}} \lvert n+r\rangle.

Starting from the vacuum,

∣n⟩=(a†)nn!∣0⟩.\lvert n\rangle = \frac{(a^\dagger)^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \lvert0\rangle.

The basis is orthonormal and complete:

⟨m∣n⟩=δmn,∑n=0∞∣n⟩⟨n∣=I.\langle m\vert n\rangle=\delta_{mn}, \qquad \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \lvert n\rangle\langle n\rvert=I.

Multiplication in the stated order gives

a†a=12(x2ℓ2+ℓ2p2ℏ2−I).a^\dagger a = \frac12 \left( \frac{x^2}{\ell^2} + \frac{\ell^2p^2}{\hbar^2} -I \right).

Therefore

H=ℏω(a†a+12I).H = \hbar\omega \left( a^\dagger a+\frac12I \right).

On ∣n⟩\lvert n\rangle,

H∣n⟩=ℏω(n+12)∣n⟩.H\lvert n\rangle = \hbar\omega \left(n+\frac12\right) \lvert n\rangle.

The 1/21/2 term comes from operator noncommutativity. Replacing a†aa^\dagger a by aa†aa^\dagger without compensating for their commutator shifts every energy by ℏω\hbar\omega.

The inverse relations and ladder actions give

⟨m∣x∣n⟩=ℓ2[n δm,n−1+n+1 δm,n+1],\begin{aligned} \langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle &= \frac{\ell}{\sqrt2} \left[ \sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1} + \sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1} \right], \end{aligned}

and

⟨m∣p∣n⟩=ℏiℓ2[n δm,n−1−n+1 δm,n+1].\begin{aligned} \langle m\rvert p\lvert n\rangle &= \frac{\hbar}{i\ell\sqrt2} \left[ \sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1} - \sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1} \right]. \end{aligned}

Both connect only adjacent number states:

Δn=±1.\Delta n=\pm1.

This is the ideal-oscillator selection rule for a perturbation linear in xx or pp. A selection rule identifies zeros of matrix elements; whether a nonzero transition is resonant also depends on the perturbation’s time and frequency content.

Squaring the position operator gives

x2=ℓ22[a2+(a†)2+2N+I].x^2 = \frac{\ell^2}{2} \left[ a^2+(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I \right].

Therefore

⟨m∣x2∣n⟩=ℓ22[n(n−1) δm,n−2+(2n+1)δmn+(n+1)(n+2) δm,n+2].\begin{aligned} \langle m\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle &= \frac{\ell^2}{2} \bigl[{} \sqrt{n(n-1)}\,\delta_{m,n-2}\\ &\quad+(2n+1)\delta_{mn}\\ &\quad+\sqrt{(n+1)(n+2)}\,\delta_{m,n+2} \bigr]. \end{aligned}

Likewise,

p2=ℏ22ℓ2[−a2−(a†)2+2N+I],p^2 = \frac{\hbar^2}{2\ell^2} \left[ -a^2-(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I \right],

so

⟨m∣p2∣n⟩=ℏ22ℓ2[−n(n−1) δm,n−2+(2n+1)δmn−(n+1)(n+2) δm,n+2].\begin{aligned} \langle m\rvert p^2\lvert n\rangle &= \frac{\hbar^2}{2\ell^2} \bigl[{} -\sqrt{n(n-1)}\,\delta_{m,n-2}\\ &\quad+(2n+1)\delta_{mn}\\ &\quad-\sqrt{(n+1)(n+2)}\,\delta_{m,n+2} \bigr]. \end{aligned}

A quadratic perturbation therefore has

Δn=0,±2.\Delta n=0,\pm2.

For every number state,

⟨x⟩n=0,⟨p⟩n=0.\langle x\rangle_n=0, \qquad \langle p\rangle_n=0.

The second moments are

⟨x2⟩n=ℓ2(n+12),\langle x^2\rangle_n = \ell^2 \left(n+\frac12\right), ⟨p2⟩n=ℏ2ℓ2(n+12)=mℏω(n+12).\langle p^2\rangle_n = \frac{\hbar^2}{\ell^2} \left(n+\frac12\right) = m\hbar\omega \left(n+\frac12\right).

Thus

(Δx)n(Δp)n=ℏ(n+12).(\Delta x)_n(\Delta p)_n = \hbar \left(n+\frac12\right).

Only the vacuum reaches the lower bound:

(Δx)0=ℓ2,(Δp)0=ℏℓ2,(\Delta x)_0 = \frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}, \qquad (\Delta p)_0 = \frac{\hbar}{\ell\sqrt2}, (Δx)0(Δp)0=ℏ2.(\Delta x)_0(\Delta p)_0 = \frac{\hbar}{2}.

The kinetic and potential expectations are equal:

⟨T⟩n=⟨V⟩n=En2.\langle T\rangle_n = \langle V\rangle_n = \frac{E_n}{2}.

This is the oscillator virial theorem in the number basis.

In position representation,

p=−iℏddx,p=-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx},

so

a=12(xℓ+ℓddx).a = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \frac{x}{\ell} + \ell\frac{d}{dx} \right).

The vacuum condition a∣0⟩=0a\lvert0\rangle=0 becomes

(xℓ+ℓddx)ψ0(x)=0.\left( \frac{x}{\ell} + \ell\frac{d}{dx} \right) \psi_0(x)=0.

Its normalized solution is

ψ0(x)=(1πℓ2)1/4e−x2/(2ℓ2).\psi_0(x) = \left( \frac{1}{\pi\ell^2} \right)^{1/4} e^{-x^2/(2\ell^2)}.

Repeated application of a†a^\dagger generates the normalized Hermite-function eigenstates. Their explicit formula is collected in Number States.

For the time-independent oscillator Hamiltonian,

daHdt=iℏ[H,aH]=−iωaH.\frac{da_H}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar}[H,a_H] = -i\omega a_H.

Hence

aH(t)=e−iω(t−t0)aH(t0),a_H(t) = e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0), aH†(t)=eiω(t−t0)aH†(t0).a_H^\dagger(t) = e^{i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H^\dagger(t_0).

Substituting into xx and pp gives

xH(t)=xH(t0)cos⁡(ωτ)+pH(t0)mωsin⁡(ωτ),x_H(t) = x_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau) + \frac{p_H(t_0)}{m\omega} \sin(\omega\tau), pH(t)=pH(t0)cos⁡(ωτ)−mωxH(t0)sin⁡(ωτ),p_H(t) = p_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau) - m\omega x_H(t_0) \sin(\omega\tau),

where τ=t−t0\tau=t-t_0. These are exact operator identities.

A coherent state is an eigenstate of aa:

a∣α⟩=α∣α⟩.a\lvert\alpha\rangle = \alpha\lvert\alpha\rangle.

Its number-basis expansion is

∣α⟩=e−∣α∣2/2∑n=0∞αnn!∣n⟩.\lvert\alpha\rangle = e^{-\lvert\alpha\rvert^2/2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\alpha^n}{\sqrt{n!}} \lvert n\rangle.

Under oscillator evolution, the eigenvalue rotates:

α(t)=α(0)e−iωt\alpha(t)=\alpha(0)e^{-i\omega t}

up to the common state phase. The dedicated coherent-state formula card is the next entry in this category; the canonical treatment is at Coherent States.

For a single particle in an external quadratic potential, a†a^\dagger raises the oscillator excitation and aa lowers it. They do not create or destroy the particle. In field and many-body applications, each normal mode has the same oscillator algebra, and its ladder operators may acquire a particle or quasiparticle interpretation.

xx, pp, aa, and a†a^\dagger are unbounded. Their products and formal commutators require a common domain. The Schwartz space and finite linear combinations of number states provide standard invariant cores for the displayed algebra. A normalized vector need not belong to the domain of every power of a ladder operator.

QuantityDimensions
aa, a†a^\dagger, NNdimensionless
ℓ\elllength
xxlength
ppmomentum
HH, ℏω\hbar\omegaenergy

Fast checks are

[a,a†]=I,[a,a^\dagger]=I, ∥a∣n⟩∥2=n,∥a†∣n⟩∥2=n+1,\lVert a\lvert n\rangle\rVert^2=n, \qquad \lVert a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle\rVert^2=n+1,

and Hermiticity of the reconstructed xx and pp.

  • Dropping a factor of mm, ω\omega, or ℏ\hbar so that aa is not dimensionless.
  • Reversing the sign of the momentum term in only one formula.
  • Treating aa and a†a^\dagger as commuting numbers.
  • Replacing a†aa^\dagger a by aa†aa^\dagger without the identity term.
  • Omitting the zero-point energy.
  • Starting number-state labels at n=1n=1.
  • Dropping the square-root coefficients in ladder actions.
  • Applying the factorial lowering formula when r>nr\gt n instead of returning the zero vector.
  • Calling aa or a†a^\dagger Hermitian observables.
  • Calling a†a^\dagger a particle-creation operator in the single-particle oscillator without qualification.
  • Using Δn=±1\Delta n=\pm1 for an x2x^2 perturbation.
  • Ignoring domains for unbounded operator products.

Starting from the dimensional definitions of aa and a†a^\dagger, show that [a,a†]=I[a,a^\dagger]=I.

Solution

Write

a=αx+iβp,a†=αx−iβp,a=\alpha x+i\beta p, \qquad a^\dagger=\alpha x-i\beta p,

where

α=mω2ℏ,β=12mℏω.\alpha=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}, \qquad \beta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}.

Then

[a,a†]=−iαβ[x,p]+iαβ[p,x]=2αβℏI.\begin{aligned} [a,a^\dagger] &= -i\alpha\beta[x,p] +i\alpha\beta[p,x]\\ &= 2\alpha\beta\hbar I. \end{aligned}

Since 2αβℏ=12\alpha\beta\hbar=1, the result is

[a,a†]=I.[a,a^\dagger]=I.

Compute ⟨m∣x∣n⟩\langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle and state the selection rule.

Solution

Use

x=ℓ2(a+a†).x=\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}(a+a^\dagger).

The two terms give

⟨m∣a∣n⟩=n δm,n−1,\langle m\rvert a\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1}, ⟨m∣a†∣n⟩=n+1 δm,n+1.\langle m\rvert a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1}.

Therefore

⟨m∣x∣n⟩=ℓ2[n δm,n−1+n+1 δm,n+1].\langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle = \frac{\ell}{\sqrt2} \left[ \sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1} + \sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1} \right].

It vanishes unless m=n±1m=n\pm1.

Show that x2x^2 connects only Δn=0,±2\Delta n=0,\pm2 and compute ⟨n∣x2∣n⟩\langle n\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle.

Solution

Square x=ℓ(a+a†)/2x=\ell(a+a^\dagger)/\sqrt2:

x2=ℓ22[a2+aa†+a†a+(a†)2].x^2 = \frac{\ell^2}{2} \left[ a^2+aa^\dagger+a^\dagger a+(a^\dagger)^2 \right].

Using aa†=N+Iaa^\dagger=N+I gives

x2=ℓ22[a2+(a†)2+2N+I].x^2 = \frac{\ell^2}{2} \left[ a^2+(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I \right].

The first and second terms change nn by −2-2 and +2+2, while NN and II are diagonal. Hence Δn=0,±2\Delta n=0,\pm2. On a number state,

⟨n∣x2∣n⟩=ℓ22(2n+1)=ℓ2(n+12).\langle n\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle = \frac{\ell^2}{2}(2n+1) = \ell^2\left(n+\frac12\right).

Derive aH(t)=e−iω(t−t0)aH(t0)a_H(t)=e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0) and use it to recover xH(t)x_H(t).

Solution

The Heisenberg equation and [H,a]=−ℏωa[H,a]=-\hbar\omega a give

a˙H=iℏ[H,aH]=−iωaH.\dot a_H = \frac{i}{\hbar}[H,a_H] = -i\omega a_H.

Therefore

aH(t)=e−iωτaH(t0),τ=t−t0.a_H(t) = e^{-i\omega\tau}a_H(t_0), \qquad \tau=t-t_0.

Taking the adjoint gives

aH†(t)=eiωτaH†(t0).a_H^\dagger(t) = e^{i\omega\tau}a_H^\dagger(t_0).

Substitute these into xH=ℓ(aH+aH†)/2x_H=\ell(a_H+a_H^\dagger)/\sqrt2 and rewrite the initial ladder operators in terms of xH(t0)x_H(t_0) and pH(t0)p_H(t_0). The result is

xH(t)=xH(t0)cos⁡(ωτ)+pH(t0)mωsin⁡(ωτ).x_H(t) = x_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau) + \frac{p_H(t_0)}{m\omega}\sin(\omega\tau).
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994, Ch. 7.
  • D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018, Ch. 2.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020, Sec. 2.3.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1, Wiley, 1977.
  • M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, 1997.