For the one-dimensional oscillator
H = p 2 2 m + 1 2 m ω 2 x 2 , [ x , p ] = i ℏ , H
=
\frac{p^2}{2m}
+
\frac12m\omega^2x^2,
\qquad
[x,p]=i\hbar, H = 2 m p 2 + 2 1 m ω 2 x 2 , [ x , p ] = i ℏ ,
define the oscillator length
ℓ = ℏ m ω \ell
=
\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}} ℓ = mω ℏ
and the dimensionless ladder operators
a = 1 2 ( x ℓ + i ℓ p ℏ ) , a
=
\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\left(
\frac{x}{\ell}
+
\frac{i\ell p}{\hbar}
\right), a = 2 1 ( ℓ x + ℏ i ℓ p ) ,
a † = 1 2 ( x ℓ − i ℓ p ℏ ) . a^\dagger
=
\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\left(
\frac{x}{\ell}
-
\frac{i\ell p}{\hbar}
\right). a † = 2 1 ( ℓ x − ℏ i ℓ p ) .
They satisfy
[ a , a † ] = I , [a,a^\dagger]=I, [ a , a † ] = I ,
and factor the Hamiltonian as
H = ℏ ω ( N + 1 2 I ) , N = a † a . H
=
\hbar\omega
\left(
N+\frac12I
\right),
\qquad
N=a^\dagger a. H = ℏ ω ( N + 2 1 I ) , N = a † a .
The full algebraic proof of the spectrum is at
Ladder-Operator Solution: First Encounter .
This card collects the identities needed after the construction is known.
Task Formula Lower a number state a ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n − 1 ⟩ a\lvert n\rangle=\sqrt n\lvert n-1\rangle a ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n − 1 ⟩ Raise a number state a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 ∣ n + 1 ⟩ a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle=\sqrt{n+1}\lvert n+1\rangle a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 ∣ n + 1 ⟩ Build a number state ∣ n ⟩ = ( a † ) n ∣ 0 ⟩ / n ! \lvert n\rangle=(a^\dagger)^n\lvert0\rangle/\sqrt{n!} ∣ n ⟩ = ( a † ) n ∣ 0 ⟩ / n ! Count quanta N ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n ⟩ N\lvert n\rangle=n\lvert n\rangle N ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n ⟩ Write the spectrum E n = ℏ ω ( n + 1 / 2 ) E_n=\hbar\omega(n+1/2) E n = ℏ ω ( n + 1/2 ) Recover position x = ℓ ( a + a † ) / 2 x=\ell(a+a^\dagger)/\sqrt2 x = ℓ ( a + a † ) / 2 Recover momentum p = ℏ ( a − a † ) / ( i ℓ 2 ) p=\hbar(a-a^\dagger)/(i\ell\sqrt2) p = ℏ ( a − a † ) / ( i ℓ 2 ) Evolve a ladder operator a H ( t ) = e − i ω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) a_H(t)=e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0) a H ( t ) = e − iω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) Ground-state condition a ∣ 0 ⟩ = 0 a\lvert0\rangle=0 a ∣ 0 ⟩ = 0
The number label starts at n = 0 n=0 n = 0 . The lowering formula gives zero on the
vacuum because its coefficient is 0 \sqrt0 0 .
The equivalent expressions are
a = m ω 2 ℏ x + i 2 m ℏ ω p , a
=
\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\,x
+
\frac{i}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\,p, a = 2ℏ mω x + 2 m ℏ ω i p ,
a † = m ω 2 ℏ x − i 2 m ℏ ω p . a^\dagger
=
\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\,x
-
\frac{i}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}\,p. a † = 2ℏ mω x − 2 m ℏ ω i p .
Every term is dimensionless. The inverse relations are
x = ℓ 2 ( a + a † ) , x
=
\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}(a+a^\dagger), x = 2 ℓ ( a + a † ) ,
p = ℏ i ℓ 2 ( a − a † ) = − i m ℏ ω 2 ( a − a † ) . p
=
\frac{\hbar}{i\ell\sqrt2}(a-a^\dagger)
=
-i\sqrt{\frac{m\hbar\omega}{2}}
(a-a^\dagger). p = i ℓ 2 ℏ ( a − a † ) = − i 2 m ℏ ω ( a − a † ) .
Changing the sign of the momentum term exchanges the roles of the displayed
a a a and a † a^\dagger a † . A different convention is acceptable only when every
commutator, vacuum condition, and ladder action is changed consistently.
From [ x , p ] = i ℏ [x,p]=i\hbar [ x , p ] = i ℏ ,
[ a , a † ] = I . [a,a^\dagger]=I. [ a , a † ] = I .
Consequently,
a a † = N + I , a † a = N . aa^\dagger=N+I,
\qquad
a^\dagger a=N. a a † = N + I , a † a = N .
The number-operator commutators are
[ N , a ] = − a , [ N , a † ] = a † . [N,a]=-a,
\qquad
[N,a^\dagger]=a^\dagger. [ N , a ] = − a , [ N , a † ] = a † .
Since H = ℏ ω ( N + I / 2 ) H=\hbar\omega(N+I/2) H = ℏ ω ( N + I /2 ) ,
[ H , a ] = − ℏ ω a , [H,a]
=
-\hbar\omega a, [ H , a ] = − ℏ ω a ,
[ H , a † ] = ℏ ω a † . [H,a^\dagger]
=
\hbar\omega a^\dagger. [ H , a † ] = ℏ ω a † .
Thus a a a and a † a^\dagger a † are spectrum-generating operators. They do not
commute with H H H and are not conserved observables.
Choose normalized number states with phases fixed so that the ladder
coefficients are positive real numbers:
a ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n − 1 ⟩ , a\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt n\,\lvert n-1\rangle, a ∣ n ⟩ = n ∣ n − 1 ⟩ ,
a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 ∣ n + 1 ⟩ . a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt{n+1}\,\lvert n+1\rangle. a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 ∣ n + 1 ⟩ .
Repeated lowering gives
a r ∣ n ⟩ = n ! ( n − r ) ! ∣ n − r ⟩ , 0 ≤ r ≤ n , a^r\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt{\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}}
\lvert n-r\rangle,
\qquad
0\leq r\leq n, a r ∣ n ⟩ = ( n − r )! n ! ∣ n − r ⟩ , 0 ≤ r ≤ n ,
and
a r ∣ n ⟩ = 0 , r > n . a^r\lvert n\rangle=0,
\qquad
r\gt n. a r ∣ n ⟩ = 0 , r > n .
Repeated raising gives
( a † ) r ∣ n ⟩ = ( n + r ) ! n ! ∣ n + r ⟩ . (a^\dagger)^r\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt{\frac{(n+r)!}{n!}}
\lvert n+r\rangle. ( a † ) r ∣ n ⟩ = n ! ( n + r )! ∣ n + r ⟩ .
Starting from the vacuum,
∣ n ⟩ = ( a † ) n n ! ∣ 0 ⟩ . \lvert n\rangle
=
\frac{(a^\dagger)^n}{\sqrt{n!}}
\lvert0\rangle. ∣ n ⟩ = n ! ( a † ) n ∣ 0 ⟩ .
The basis is orthonormal and complete:
⟨ m ∣ n ⟩ = δ m n , ∑ n = 0 ∞ ∣ n ⟩ ⟨ n ∣ = I . \langle m\vert n\rangle=\delta_{mn},
\qquad
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
\lvert n\rangle\langle n\rvert=I. ⟨ m ∣ n ⟩ = δ mn , n = 0 ∑ ∞ ∣ n ⟩ ⟨ n ∣ = I .
Multiplication in the stated order gives
a † a = 1 2 ( x 2 ℓ 2 + ℓ 2 p 2 ℏ 2 − I ) . a^\dagger a
=
\frac12
\left(
\frac{x^2}{\ell^2}
+
\frac{\ell^2p^2}{\hbar^2}
-I
\right). a † a = 2 1 ( ℓ 2 x 2 + ℏ 2 ℓ 2 p 2 − I ) .
Therefore
H = ℏ ω ( a † a + 1 2 I ) . H
=
\hbar\omega
\left(
a^\dagger a+\frac12I
\right). H = ℏ ω ( a † a + 2 1 I ) .
On ∣ n ⟩ \lvert n\rangle ∣ n ⟩ ,
H ∣ n ⟩ = ℏ ω ( n + 1 2 ) ∣ n ⟩ . H\lvert n\rangle
=
\hbar\omega
\left(n+\frac12\right)
\lvert n\rangle. H ∣ n ⟩ = ℏ ω ( n + 2 1 ) ∣ n ⟩ .
The 1 / 2 1/2 1/2 term comes from operator noncommutativity. Replacing
a † a a^\dagger a a † a by a a † aa^\dagger a a † without compensating for their commutator
shifts every energy by ℏ ω \hbar\omega ℏ ω .
The inverse relations and ladder actions give
⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ = ℓ 2 [ n δ m , n − 1 + n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] , \begin{aligned}
\langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle
&=
\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}
\left[
\sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1}
+
\sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1}
\right],
\end{aligned} ⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ = 2 ℓ [ n δ m , n − 1 + n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] ,
and
⟨ m ∣ p ∣ n ⟩ = ℏ i ℓ 2 [ n δ m , n − 1 − n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] . \begin{aligned}
\langle m\rvert p\lvert n\rangle
&=
\frac{\hbar}{i\ell\sqrt2}
\left[
\sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1}
-
\sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1}
\right].
\end{aligned} ⟨ m ∣ p ∣ n ⟩ = i ℓ 2 ℏ [ n δ m , n − 1 − n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] .
Both connect only adjacent number states:
Δ n = ± 1. \Delta n=\pm1. Δ n = ± 1.
This is the ideal-oscillator selection rule for a perturbation linear in
x x x or p p p . A selection rule identifies zeros of matrix elements; whether a
nonzero transition is resonant also depends on the perturbation’s time and
frequency content.
Squaring the position operator gives
x 2 = ℓ 2 2 [ a 2 + ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] . x^2
=
\frac{\ell^2}{2}
\left[
a^2+(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I
\right]. x 2 = 2 ℓ 2 [ a 2 + ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] .
Therefore
⟨ m ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ = ℓ 2 2 [ n ( n − 1 ) δ m , n − 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) δ m n + ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) δ m , n + 2 ] . \begin{aligned}
\langle m\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle
&=
\frac{\ell^2}{2}
\bigl[{}
\sqrt{n(n-1)}\,\delta_{m,n-2}\\
&\quad+(2n+1)\delta_{mn}\\
&\quad+\sqrt{(n+1)(n+2)}\,\delta_{m,n+2}
\bigr].
\end{aligned} ⟨ m ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ = 2 ℓ 2 [ n ( n − 1 ) δ m , n − 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) δ mn + ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) δ m , n + 2 ] .
Likewise,
p 2 = ℏ 2 2 ℓ 2 [ − a 2 − ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] , p^2
=
\frac{\hbar^2}{2\ell^2}
\left[
-a^2-(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I
\right], p 2 = 2 ℓ 2 ℏ 2 [ − a 2 − ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] ,
so
⟨ m ∣ p 2 ∣ n ⟩ = ℏ 2 2 ℓ 2 [ − n ( n − 1 ) δ m , n − 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) δ m n − ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) δ m , n + 2 ] . \begin{aligned}
\langle m\rvert p^2\lvert n\rangle
&=
\frac{\hbar^2}{2\ell^2}
\bigl[{}
-\sqrt{n(n-1)}\,\delta_{m,n-2}\\
&\quad+(2n+1)\delta_{mn}\\
&\quad-\sqrt{(n+1)(n+2)}\,\delta_{m,n+2}
\bigr].
\end{aligned} ⟨ m ∣ p 2 ∣ n ⟩ = 2 ℓ 2 ℏ 2 [ − n ( n − 1 ) δ m , n − 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) δ mn − ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) δ m , n + 2 ] .
A quadratic perturbation therefore has
Δ n = 0 , ± 2. \Delta n=0,\pm2. Δ n = 0 , ± 2.
For every number state,
⟨ x ⟩ n = 0 , ⟨ p ⟩ n = 0. \langle x\rangle_n=0,
\qquad
\langle p\rangle_n=0. ⟨ x ⟩ n = 0 , ⟨ p ⟩ n = 0.
The second moments are
⟨ x 2 ⟩ n = ℓ 2 ( n + 1 2 ) , \langle x^2\rangle_n
=
\ell^2
\left(n+\frac12\right), ⟨ x 2 ⟩ n = ℓ 2 ( n + 2 1 ) ,
⟨ p 2 ⟩ n = ℏ 2 ℓ 2 ( n + 1 2 ) = m ℏ ω ( n + 1 2 ) . \langle p^2\rangle_n
=
\frac{\hbar^2}{\ell^2}
\left(n+\frac12\right)
=
m\hbar\omega
\left(n+\frac12\right). ⟨ p 2 ⟩ n = ℓ 2 ℏ 2 ( n + 2 1 ) = m ℏ ω ( n + 2 1 ) .
Thus
( Δ x ) n ( Δ p ) n = ℏ ( n + 1 2 ) . (\Delta x)_n(\Delta p)_n
=
\hbar
\left(n+\frac12\right). ( Δ x ) n ( Δ p ) n = ℏ ( n + 2 1 ) .
Only the vacuum reaches the lower bound:
( Δ x ) 0 = ℓ 2 , ( Δ p ) 0 = ℏ ℓ 2 , (\Delta x)_0
=
\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2},
\qquad
(\Delta p)_0
=
\frac{\hbar}{\ell\sqrt2}, ( Δ x ) 0 = 2 ℓ , ( Δ p ) 0 = ℓ 2 ℏ ,
( Δ x ) 0 ( Δ p ) 0 = ℏ 2 . (\Delta x)_0(\Delta p)_0
=
\frac{\hbar}{2}. ( Δ x ) 0 ( Δ p ) 0 = 2 ℏ .
The kinetic and potential expectations are equal:
⟨ T ⟩ n = ⟨ V ⟩ n = E n 2 . \langle T\rangle_n
=
\langle V\rangle_n
=
\frac{E_n}{2}. ⟨ T ⟩ n = ⟨ V ⟩ n = 2 E n .
This is the oscillator virial theorem in the number basis.
In position representation,
p = − i ℏ d d x , p=-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}, p = − i ℏ d x d ,
so
a = 1 2 ( x ℓ + ℓ d d x ) . a
=
\frac{1}{\sqrt2}
\left(
\frac{x}{\ell}
+
\ell\frac{d}{dx}
\right). a = 2 1 ( ℓ x + ℓ d x d ) .
The vacuum condition a ∣ 0 ⟩ = 0 a\lvert0\rangle=0 a ∣ 0 ⟩ = 0 becomes
( x ℓ + ℓ d d x ) ψ 0 ( x ) = 0. \left(
\frac{x}{\ell}
+
\ell\frac{d}{dx}
\right)
\psi_0(x)=0. ( ℓ x + ℓ d x d ) ψ 0 ( x ) = 0.
Its normalized solution is
ψ 0 ( x ) = ( 1 π ℓ 2 ) 1 / 4 e − x 2 / ( 2 ℓ 2 ) . \psi_0(x)
=
\left(
\frac{1}{\pi\ell^2}
\right)^{1/4}
e^{-x^2/(2\ell^2)}. ψ 0 ( x ) = ( π ℓ 2 1 ) 1/4 e − x 2 / ( 2 ℓ 2 ) .
Repeated application of a † a^\dagger a † generates the normalized Hermite-function
eigenstates. Their explicit formula is collected in
Number States .
For the time-independent oscillator Hamiltonian,
d a H d t = i ℏ [ H , a H ] = − i ω a H . \frac{da_H}{dt}
=
\frac{i}{\hbar}[H,a_H]
=
-i\omega a_H. d t d a H = ℏ i [ H , a H ] = − iω a H .
Hence
a H ( t ) = e − i ω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) , a_H(t)
=
e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0), a H ( t ) = e − iω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) ,
a H † ( t ) = e i ω ( t − t 0 ) a H † ( t 0 ) . a_H^\dagger(t)
=
e^{i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H^\dagger(t_0). a H † ( t ) = e iω ( t − t 0 ) a H † ( t 0 ) .
Substituting into x x x and p p p gives
x H ( t ) = x H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) + p H ( t 0 ) m ω sin ( ω τ ) , x_H(t)
=
x_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau)
+
\frac{p_H(t_0)}{m\omega}
\sin(\omega\tau), x H ( t ) = x H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) + mω p H ( t 0 ) sin ( ω τ ) ,
p H ( t ) = p H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) − m ω x H ( t 0 ) sin ( ω τ ) , p_H(t)
=
p_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau)
-
m\omega x_H(t_0)
\sin(\omega\tau), p H ( t ) = p H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) − mω x H ( t 0 ) sin ( ω τ ) ,
where τ = t − t 0 \tau=t-t_0 τ = t − t 0 . These are exact operator identities.
A coherent state is an eigenstate of a a a :
a ∣ α ⟩ = α ∣ α ⟩ . a\lvert\alpha\rangle
=
\alpha\lvert\alpha\rangle. a ∣ α ⟩ = α ∣ α ⟩ .
Its number-basis expansion is
∣ α ⟩ = e − ∣ α ∣ 2 / 2 ∑ n = 0 ∞ α n n ! ∣ n ⟩ . \lvert\alpha\rangle
=
e^{-\lvert\alpha\rvert^2/2}
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}
\frac{\alpha^n}{\sqrt{n!}}
\lvert n\rangle. ∣ α ⟩ = e − ∣ α ∣ 2 /2 n = 0 ∑ ∞ n ! α n ∣ n ⟩ .
Under oscillator evolution, the eigenvalue rotates:
α ( t ) = α ( 0 ) e − i ω t \alpha(t)=\alpha(0)e^{-i\omega t} α ( t ) = α ( 0 ) e − iω t
up to the common state phase. The dedicated coherent-state formula card is
the next entry in this category; the canonical treatment is at
Coherent States .
For a single particle in an external quadratic potential, a † a^\dagger a † raises
the oscillator excitation and a a a lowers it. They do not create or destroy
the particle. In field and many-body applications, each normal mode has the
same oscillator algebra, and its ladder operators may acquire a particle or
quasiparticle interpretation.
x x x , p p p , a a a , and a † a^\dagger a † are unbounded. Their products and formal
commutators require a common domain. The Schwartz space and finite linear
combinations of number states provide standard invariant cores for the
displayed algebra. A normalized vector need not belong to the domain of every
power of a ladder operator.
Quantity Dimensions a a a , a † a^\dagger a † , N N N dimensionless ℓ \ell ℓ length x x x length p p p momentum H H H , ℏ ω \hbar\omega ℏ ω energy
Fast checks are
[ a , a † ] = I , [a,a^\dagger]=I, [ a , a † ] = I ,
∥ a ∣ n ⟩ ∥ 2 = n , ∥ a † ∣ n ⟩ ∥ 2 = n + 1 , \lVert a\lvert n\rangle\rVert^2=n,
\qquad
\lVert a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle\rVert^2=n+1, ∥ a ∣ n ⟩ ∥ 2 = n , ∥ a † ∣ n ⟩ ∥ 2 = n + 1 ,
and Hermiticity of the reconstructed x x x and p p p .
Dropping a factor of m m m , ω \omega ω , or ℏ \hbar ℏ so that a a a is not
dimensionless.
Reversing the sign of the momentum term in only one formula.
Treating a a a and a † a^\dagger a † as commuting numbers.
Replacing a † a a^\dagger a a † a by a a † aa^\dagger a a † without the identity term.
Omitting the zero-point energy.
Starting number-state labels at n = 1 n=1 n = 1 .
Dropping the square-root coefficients in ladder actions.
Applying the factorial lowering formula when r > n r\gt n r > n instead of returning
the zero vector.
Calling a a a or a † a^\dagger a † Hermitian observables.
Calling a † a^\dagger a † a particle-creation operator in the single-particle
oscillator without qualification.
Using Δ n = ± 1 \Delta n=\pm1 Δ n = ± 1 for an x 2 x^2 x 2 perturbation.
Ignoring domains for unbounded operator products.
Starting from the dimensional definitions of a a a and a † a^\dagger a † , show that
[ a , a † ] = I [a,a^\dagger]=I [ a , a † ] = I .
Solution
Write
a = α x + i β p , a † = α x − i β p , a=\alpha x+i\beta p,
\qquad
a^\dagger=\alpha x-i\beta p, a = α x + i β p , a † = α x − i β p ,
where
α = m ω 2 ℏ , β = 1 2 m ℏ ω . \alpha=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}},
\qquad
\beta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2m\hbar\omega}}. α = 2ℏ mω , β = 2 m ℏ ω 1 .
Then
[ a , a † ] = − i α β [ x , p ] + i α β [ p , x ] = 2 α β ℏ I . \begin{aligned}
[a,a^\dagger]
&=
-i\alpha\beta[x,p]
+i\alpha\beta[p,x]\\
&=
2\alpha\beta\hbar I.
\end{aligned} [ a , a † ] = − i α β [ x , p ] + i α β [ p , x ] = 2 α β ℏ I .
Since 2 α β ℏ = 1 2\alpha\beta\hbar=1 2 α β ℏ = 1 , the result is
[ a , a † ] = I . [a,a^\dagger]=I. [ a , a † ] = I .
Compute ⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ \langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle ⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ and state the selection rule.
Solution
Use
x = ℓ 2 ( a + a † ) . x=\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}(a+a^\dagger). x = 2 ℓ ( a + a † ) .
The two terms give
⟨ m ∣ a ∣ n ⟩ = n δ m , n − 1 , \langle m\rvert a\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1}, ⟨ m ∣ a ∣ n ⟩ = n δ m , n − 1 ,
⟨ m ∣ a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 δ m , n + 1 . \langle m\rvert a^\dagger\lvert n\rangle
=
\sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1}. ⟨ m ∣ a † ∣ n ⟩ = n + 1 δ m , n + 1 .
Therefore
⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ = ℓ 2 [ n δ m , n − 1 + n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] . \langle m\rvert x\lvert n\rangle
=
\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}
\left[
\sqrt n\,\delta_{m,n-1}
+
\sqrt{n+1}\,\delta_{m,n+1}
\right]. ⟨ m ∣ x ∣ n ⟩ = 2 ℓ [ n δ m , n − 1 + n + 1 δ m , n + 1 ] .
It vanishes unless m = n ± 1 m=n\pm1 m = n ± 1 .
Show that x 2 x^2 x 2 connects only Δ n = 0 , ± 2 \Delta n=0,\pm2 Δ n = 0 , ± 2 and compute
⟨ n ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ \langle n\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle ⟨ n ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ .
Solution
Square x = ℓ ( a + a † ) / 2 x=\ell(a+a^\dagger)/\sqrt2 x = ℓ ( a + a † ) / 2 :
x 2 = ℓ 2 2 [ a 2 + a a † + a † a + ( a † ) 2 ] . x^2
=
\frac{\ell^2}{2}
\left[
a^2+aa^\dagger+a^\dagger a+(a^\dagger)^2
\right]. x 2 = 2 ℓ 2 [ a 2 + a a † + a † a + ( a † ) 2 ] .
Using a a † = N + I aa^\dagger=N+I a a † = N + I gives
x 2 = ℓ 2 2 [ a 2 + ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] . x^2
=
\frac{\ell^2}{2}
\left[
a^2+(a^\dagger)^2+2N+I
\right]. x 2 = 2 ℓ 2 [ a 2 + ( a † ) 2 + 2 N + I ] .
The first and second terms change n n n by − 2 -2 − 2 and + 2 +2 + 2 , while N N N and I I I
are diagonal. Hence Δ n = 0 , ± 2 \Delta n=0,\pm2 Δ n = 0 , ± 2 . On a number state,
⟨ n ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ = ℓ 2 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) = ℓ 2 ( n + 1 2 ) . \langle n\rvert x^2\lvert n\rangle
=
\frac{\ell^2}{2}(2n+1)
=
\ell^2\left(n+\frac12\right). ⟨ n ∣ x 2 ∣ n ⟩ = 2 ℓ 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) = ℓ 2 ( n + 2 1 ) .
Derive a H ( t ) = e − i ω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) a_H(t)=e^{-i\omega(t-t_0)}a_H(t_0) a H ( t ) = e − iω ( t − t 0 ) a H ( t 0 ) and use it to recover
x H ( t ) x_H(t) x H ( t ) .
Solution
The Heisenberg equation and [ H , a ] = − ℏ ω a [H,a]=-\hbar\omega a [ H , a ] = − ℏ ω a give
a ˙ H = i ℏ [ H , a H ] = − i ω a H . \dot a_H
=
\frac{i}{\hbar}[H,a_H]
=
-i\omega a_H. a ˙ H = ℏ i [ H , a H ] = − iω a H .
Therefore
a H ( t ) = e − i ω τ a H ( t 0 ) , τ = t − t 0 . a_H(t)
=
e^{-i\omega\tau}a_H(t_0),
\qquad
\tau=t-t_0. a H ( t ) = e − iω τ a H ( t 0 ) , τ = t − t 0 .
Taking the adjoint gives
a H † ( t ) = e i ω τ a H † ( t 0 ) . a_H^\dagger(t)
=
e^{i\omega\tau}a_H^\dagger(t_0). a H † ( t ) = e iω τ a H † ( t 0 ) .
Substitute these into x H = ℓ ( a H + a H † ) / 2 x_H=\ell(a_H+a_H^\dagger)/\sqrt2 x H = ℓ ( a H + a H † ) / 2 and rewrite the
initial ladder operators in terms of x H ( t 0 ) x_H(t_0) x H ( t 0 ) and p H ( t 0 ) p_H(t_0) p H ( t 0 ) . The result is
x H ( t ) = x H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) + p H ( t 0 ) m ω sin ( ω τ ) . x_H(t)
=
x_H(t_0)\cos(\omega\tau)
+
\frac{p_H(t_0)}{m\omega}\sin(\omega\tau). x H ( t ) = x H ( t 0 ) cos ( ω τ ) + mω p H ( t 0 ) sin ( ω τ ) .
R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 2nd ed., Springer, 1994,
Ch. 7.
D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics ,
3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018, Ch. 2.
J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics , 3rd ed.,
Cambridge University Press, 2020, Sec. 2.3.
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics , Vol. 1,
Wiley, 1977.
M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics , Cambridge University
Press, 1997.