Skip to content

Operators and Commutators Formulas

These cards collect the operator identities most often needed in undergraduate quantum calculations: canonical brackets, commutator algebra, uncertainty bounds, exponentials of noncommuting operators, projection identities, and unitary transformations.

Each card is a lookup layer. It states assumptions, useful special cases, failure modes, and a link to the one canonical explanation or derivation.

NeedCardCore statement
Identify a canonical pair or representationCanonical Commutation Relations[Xi,Pj]=iℏδijI[X_i,P_j]=i\hbar\delta_{ij}I
Expand or simplify a commutatorCommutator Identities[A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C][A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C]
Bound two outcome spreadsUncertainty RelationsΔρA ΔρB≥12∣⟨[A,B]⟩ρ∣\Delta_\rho A\,\Delta_\rho B\geq\frac12\left\lvert\langle[A,B]\rangle_\rho\right\rvert
Combine or conjugate exponentialsBaker–Campbell–Hausdorfflog⁡(eAeB)=A+B+12[A,B]+⋯\log(e^Ae^B)=A+B+\frac12[A,B]+\cdots
Select a subspace or spectral sectorProjection IdentitiesP2=P=P†P^2=P=P^\dagger
Check or transform a reversible mapUnitary IdentitiesU−1=U†U^{-1}=U^\dagger

The cards form a common calculation chain.

  1. Specify the operator class. Decide whether the object is self-adjoint, unitary, projective, positive, bounded, or merely a formal expression.
  2. Fix the algebra. State canonical commutators and use product, inverse, power, and Jacobi identities without changing operator order.
  3. Extract a physical consequence. A commutator expectation can bound variances; a projector expectation can give a yes–no probability.
  4. Build finite transformations. Hermitian generators exponentiate to unitaries, and BCH controls products or conjugations of noncommuting exponentials.
  5. Check domains and convergence. Finite matrix algebra is not automatically valid for unbounded differential operators.

For example, begin with

[X,P]=iℏI.[X,P]=i\hbar I.

The commutator card gives

[X,Pn]=niℏPn−1[X,P^n] = ni\hbar P^{n-1}

on a suitable common domain. The uncertainty card gives

ΔX ΔP≥ℏ2.\Delta X\,\Delta P\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}.

The BCH and unitary cards give the finite translation

eiaP/ℏXe−iaP/ℏ=X+aI.e^{iaP/\hbar}Xe^{-iaP/\hbar} = X+aI.

These are related results, but their canonical derivations belong to different pages.

The commutator convention is

[A,B]≡AB−BA.[A,B]\equiv AB-BA.

It is bilinear, antisymmetric, and obeys the product rules

[A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C],[A,BC] = [A,B]C+B[A,C], [AB,C]=A[B,C]+[A,C]B.[AB,C] = A[B,C]+[A,C]B.

The Jacobi identity is

[A,[B,C]]+[B,[C,A]]+[C,[A,B]]=0.[A,[B,C]] +[B,[C,A]] +[C,[A,B]] = 0.

These identities are exact in any associative algebra. For unbounded operators they are meaningful only on vectors for which all displayed products are defined, or on a specified common invariant core.

Exponentiation converts infinitesimal generators into finite transformations. When [A,B]≠0[A,B]\ne0,

eA+B≠eAeBe^{A+B}\ne e^Ae^B

in general. BCH supplies the correction:

log⁡(eAeB)=A+B+12[A,B]+⋯ .\log(e^Ae^B) = A+B+\frac12[A,B]+\cdots.

For conjugation, use Hadamard’s lemma directly:

eABe−A=B+[A,B]+12![A,[A,B]]+⋯ .e^ABe^{-A} = B+[A,B] +\frac1{2!}[A,[A,B]] +\cdots.

Projectors and unitaries encode two different geometric operations.

An orthogonal projector selects a subspace:

P2=P=P†.P^2=P=P^\dagger.

It generally loses information because components in ker⁡P\ker P are removed. For a state ρ\rho,

p=Tr⁡(ρP)p=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho P)

is the Born probability of the corresponding sharp alternative.

A unitary preserves the entire Hilbert-space geometry:

U†U=UU†=I.U^\dagger U=UU^\dagger=I.

It is reversible and preserves inner products:

⟨Uϕ∣Uψ⟩=⟨ϕ∣ψ⟩.\langle U\phi\vert U\psi\rangle = \langle\phi\vert\psi\rangle.

A nontrivial orthogonal projector is therefore not unitary. A projector keeps one sector; a unitary rotates or phases the whole space without discarding a sector.

The two classes interact through conjugation:

P′=UPU†.P'=UPU^\dagger.

The transformed P′P' remains a projector and selects the transformed subspace U(Ran⁡P)U(\operatorname{Ran}P).

For self-adjoint AA and BB in a normalized state ρ\rho, first define

δρA=A−⟨A⟩ρI,δρB=B−⟨B⟩ρI.\delta_\rho A=A-\langle A\rangle_\rho I, \qquad \delta_\rho B=B-\langle B\rangle_\rho I.

The full two-observable bound is

(ΔρA)2(ΔρB)2≥Cρ(A,B)2+14∣⟨[A,B]⟩ρ∣2.\begin{aligned} (\Delta_\rho A)^2(\Delta_\rho B)^2 &\geq C_\rho(A,B)^2 \\ &\quad+ \frac14 \left\lvert \langle[A,B]\rangle_\rho \right\rvert^2. \end{aligned}

Use the shorter Robertson form when only a lower bound is needed:

ΔρA ΔρB≥12∣⟨[A,B]⟩ρ∣.\Delta_\rho A\,\Delta_\rho B \geq \frac12 \left\lvert \langle[A,B]\rangle_\rho \right\rvert.

Use the covariance-aware form when testing saturation or studying correlated Gaussian states. A vanishing commutator expectation in one state does not imply that the operators commute.

For finite matrices, the following checks are quick and decisive.

ObjectPrimary checksSecondary diagnostics
Self-adjoint observable AAA†=AA^\dagger=AReal eigenvalues; orthogonal eigenspaces
Orthogonal projector PPP2=PP^2=P and P†=PP^\dagger=PEigenvalues 0,10,1; Tr⁡P=rank⁡P\operatorname{Tr}P=\operatorname{rank}P
Unitary UUU†U=UU†=IU^\dagger U=UU^\dagger=ISingular values one; ∣det⁡U∣=1\lvert\det U\rvert=1
Commutator C=[A,B]C=[A,B]C=AB−BAC=AB-BATr⁡C=0\operatorname{Tr}C=0
Density operator ρ\rhoρ†=ρ\rho^\dagger=\rho, ρ≥0\rho\geq0, Tr⁡ρ=1\operatorname{Tr}\rho=1Eigenvalues nonnegative and sum to one

Secondary diagnostics do not replace the defining tests. In particular,

∣det⁡U∣=1\lvert\det U\rvert=1

does not prove unitarity, and

Tr⁡P∈Z\operatorname{Tr}P\in\mathbb Z

does not prove idempotence.

For floating-point matrices, use residual norms such as

ϵP=∥P2−P∥,\epsilon_P = \lVert P^2-P\rVert, ϵU=∥U†U−I∥,\epsilon_U = \lVert U^\dagger U-I\rVert,

and scale tolerances to the matrix norm, dimension, conditioning, and machine precision.

Three cautions recur throughout this category.

For unbounded AA and BB, the formal expressions ABAB, BABA, and [A,B][A,B] may have different domains. An algebraic identity is usable only on a common domain where every term exists.

An infinite sum of projectors may converge strongly without converging in operator norm. A BCH series may be a formal local series rather than a global operator identity. State the mode of convergence.

In infinite dimension,

U†U=IU^\dagger U=I

does not alone imply UU†=IUU^\dagger=I. The first identity defines an isometry; unitarity also requires surjectivity, equivalently both adjoint identities.

These are structural qualifications, not technical decorations. Ignoring them can turn a correct finite-matrix manipulation into a false operator claim.

Before using a formula, confirm:

  • the commutator convention is [A,B]=AB−BA[A,B]=AB-BA;
  • products act on states from right to left;
  • canonical variables include the factor of ℏ\hbar used here;
  • generators are dimensionless inside exponentials;
  • active and passive unitary conventions are identified;
  • projectors are orthogonal unless oblique projection is explicitly intended;
  • the state used in an uncertainty bound is normalized;
  • approximation orders in BCH are counted with one common small parameter.

Dimensional analysis is especially useful for exponentials:

e−itH/ℏe^{-itH/\hbar}

has a dimensionless exponent, while e−itHe^{-itH} silently assumes ℏ=1\hbar=1.

  • Looking up a canonical commutator when the real task is a domain or boundary condition problem.
  • Using the uncertainty card to discuss apparatus error or disturbance.
  • Using BCH for a time-ordered continuous evolution without checking the time-ordering problem.
  • Multiplying two projectors and calling the result an intersection without checking commutation.
  • Treating a positive POVM effect as a projector.
  • Calling a norm-preserving antilinear symmetry unitary rather than antiunitary.
  • Using an active operator transformation where a passive basis change was intended.
  • Assuming finite-dimensional row, determinant, or trace tests extend unchanged to infinite-dimensional operators.
  • Reproducing a long derivation from a card instead of following its canonical link.
TopicCanonical home
Canonical bracketsCanonical Commutation Relations
Commutator meaningCommutators
General uncertainty derivationGeneral Uncertainty Relations
Position–momentum specializationPosition–Momentum Uncertainty
BCH derivation and applicationsBaker–Campbell–Hausdorff Formula
Projection linear algebraProjectors
Quantum meaning of projectorsProjectors in Core Formalism
Unitary linear algebraUnitary Operators
Closed-system evolutionUnitary Time Evolution
  • P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • B. C. Hall, Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, 2013.
  • R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Volume I: Functional Analysis, revised and enlarged ed., Academic Press, 1980.