Skip to content

Fourier Transforms

This table collects continuous Fourier-transform pairs and operational rules used in wave mechanics. Every entry is tied to a declared exponential sign and normalization; changing convention changes factors of 2π2\pi, factors of ℏ\hbar, and sometimes signs.

For derivations and functional-analytic context, use the canonical Fourier Transform page. For a guided comparison of physics conventions, use Fourier Transform Conventions.

Included here:

  • the asymmetric mathematical convention in the wavenumber kk;
  • the unitary position–momentum convention in the momentum pp;
  • common transform pairs for functions and tempered distributions;
  • differentiation, translation, scaling, convolution, and Parseval rules;
  • the position–momentum operator dictionary;
  • the multidimensional extension.

Discrete Fourier transforms, Fourier series, numerical FFT ordering, and boundary-adapted transforms require their own grids and normalization conventions and are outside this table.

Unless a row is explicitly labeled otherwise, define

F(k)=F[f](k)=∫−∞∞f(x)e−ikx dxF(k)=\mathcal F[f](k) =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x)e^{-ikx}\,dx

and

f(x)=F−1[F](x)=12π∫−∞∞F(k)eikx dk.f(x)=\mathcal F^{-1}[F](x) =\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F(k)e^{ikx}\,dk.

The exponent uses angular wavenumber kk, not cyclic spatial frequency. The inverse transform carries the full 1/(2π)1/(2\pi) factor.

For ordinary manipulations, one may begin with Schwartz functions f∈S(R)f\in\mathcal S(\mathbb R), where differentiating and integrating by parts are well controlled. The Plancherel theorem extends the transform to L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R), and duality extends it to tempered distributions S′(R)\mathcal S'(\mathbb R).

The delta normalization consistent with this convention is

∫−∞∞eikx dk=2πδ(x).\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{ikx}\,dk =2\pi\delta(x).

Position and momentum wavefunctions are related by the unitary pair

ϕ(p)=12πℏ∫−∞∞e−ipx/ℏψ(x) dx\phi(p) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ipx/\hbar}\psi(x)\,dx

and

ψ(x)=12πℏ∫−∞∞eipx/ℏϕ(p) dp.\psi(x) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{ipx/\hbar}\phi(p)\,dp.

Consequently,

∫−∞∞∣ψ(x)∣2 dx=∫−∞∞∣ϕ(p)∣2 dp.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \lvert\psi(x)\rvert^2\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \lvert\phi(p)\rvert^2\,dp.

If ψ\psi is normalized, its dimensions are

[ψ]=L−1/2,[ϕ]=P−1/2.[\psi]=L^{-1/2}, \qquad [\phi]=P^{-1/2}.

The connection with the mathematical transform is

ϕ(p)=12πℏ F(pℏ),p=ℏk,dp=ℏ dk.\phi(p) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\, F\left(\frac{p}{\hbar}\right), \qquad p=\hbar k, \qquad dp=\hbar\,dk.
NameForward transformInverse transform
Asymmetric angular-wavenumberF(k)=∫f(x)e−ikx dxF(k)=\int f(x)e^{-ikx}\,dxf(x)=12π∫F(k)eikx dkf(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int F(k)e^{ikx}\,dk
Symmetric angular-wavenumberf^(k)=12π∫f(x)e−ikx dx\widehat f(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int f(x)e^{-ikx}\,dxf(x)=12π∫f^(k)eikx dkf(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int\widehat f(k)e^{ikx}\,dk
Cyclic frequencyf‾(ν)=∫f(x)e−i2πνx dx\overline f(\nu)=\int f(x)e^{-i2\pi\nu x}\,dxf(x)=∫f‾(ν)ei2πνx dνf(x)=\int\overline f(\nu)e^{i2\pi\nu x}\,d\nu
Quantum momentumϕ(p)=12πℏ∫ψ(x)e−ipx/ℏ dx\phi(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\int\psi(x)e^{-ipx/\hbar}\,dxψ(x)=12πℏ∫ϕ(p)eipx/ℏ dp\psi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\int\phi(p)e^{ipx/\hbar}\,dp

For the first two rows,

f^(k)=F(k)2π.\widehat f(k)=\frac{F(k)}{\sqrt{2\pi}}.

For cyclic frequency, k=2πνk=2\pi\nu. For momentum, p=ℏkp=\hbar k. These variable changes bring Jacobians as well as renamed arguments.

The table below uses the asymmetric mathematical convention.

f(x)f(x)F(k)F(k)Conditions
δ(x−a)\delta(x-a)e−ikae^{-ika}Tempered distribution
δ(n)(x−a)\delta^{(n)}(x-a)(ik)ne−ika(ik)^n e^{-ika}Distributional derivative
112πδ(k)2\pi\delta(k)Tempered distribution
eik0xe^{ik_0x}2πδ(k−k0)2\pi\delta(k-k_0)Tempered distribution
cos⁡(k0x)\cos(k_0x)π[δ(k−k0)+δ(k+k0)]\pi[\delta(k-k_0)+\delta(k+k_0)]Tempered distribution
sin⁡(k0x)\sin(k_0x)−iπ[δ(k−k0)−δ(k+k0)]-i\pi[\delta(k-k_0)-\delta(k+k_0)]Tempered distribution
PV⁡(1/x)\operatorname{PV}(1/x)−iπ sgn⁡(k)-i\pi\,\operatorname{sgn}(k)Principal-value distribution
f(x)f(x)F(k)F(k)Conditions
e−ax2e^{-ax^2}π/a e−k2/(4a)\sqrt{\pi/a}\,e^{-k^2/(4a)}Re⁡a>0\operatorname{Re}a>0; consistent square-root branch
e−a∣x∣e^{-a\lvert x\rvert}2aa2+k2\frac{2a}{a^2+k^2}a>0a>0
1x2+a2\frac{1}{x^2+a^2}πae−a∣k∣\frac{\pi}{a}e^{-a\lvert k\rvert}a>0a>0
aπ(x2+a2)\frac{a}{\pi(x^2+a^2)}e−a∣k∣e^{-a\lvert k\rvert}Normalized Cauchy profile, a>0a>0

Define

sinc⁡u≡{sin⁡uu,u≠0,1,u=0,\operatorname{sinc}u\equiv \begin{cases} \dfrac{\sin u}{u},&u\ne0,\\[4pt] 1,&u=0, \end{cases}

and let rect⁡(x/L)\operatorname{rect}(x/L) equal 11 for ∣x∣<L/2\lvert x\rvert<L/2 and 00 for ∣x∣>L/2\lvert x\rvert>L/2. Endpoint values do not affect the ordinary integral.

f(x)f(x)F(k)F(k)Conditions
rect⁡(x/L)\operatorname{rect}(x/L)L sinc⁡(kL/2)L\,\operatorname{sinc}(kL/2)L>0L>0
sin⁡(Kx)πx\frac{\sin(Kx)}{\pi x}1{∣k∣<K}\mathbf 1_{\lbrace\lvert k\rvert<K\rbrace}Distributional endpoint value 1/21/2 at ∣k∣=K\lvert k\rvert=K
1Lrect⁡(x/L)\frac{1}{L}\operatorname{rect}(x/L)sinc⁡(kL/2)\operatorname{sinc}(kL/2)Unit integral

The rectangle–sinc pair is a quick diagnostic for convention errors: the argument must be dimensionless, and the value at k=0k=0 must equal the integral of the original function.

Let F=F[f]F=\mathcal F[f] and G=F[g]G=\mathcal F[g]. The rules assume sufficient decay and regularity or a valid distributional interpretation.

Operation in position spaceTransform in wavenumber spaceComment
αf+βg\alpha f+\beta gαF+βG\alpha F+\beta GLinearity
f(n)(x)f^{(n)}(x)(ik)nF(k)(ik)^nF(k)Boundary terms vanish or are distributional
xnf(x)x^n f(x)in dnF/dkni^n\,d^nF/dk^nMultiplication becomes differentiation
f(x−a)f(x-a)e−ikaF(k)e^{-ika}F(k)Translation
eik0xf(x)e^{ik_0x}f(x)F(k−k0)F(k-k_0)Modulation
f(ax)f(ax)1∣a∣F(k/a)\frac{1}{\lvert a\rvert}F(k/a)Real a≠0a\ne0
f(−x)f(-x)F(−k)F(-k)Reflection
f∗(x)f^\ast(x)F∗(−k)F^\ast(-k)Complex conjugation
(f∗g)(x)(f*g)(x)F(k)G(k)F(k)G(k)Convolution as defined below
f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x)12π(F∗G)(k)\frac{1}{2\pi}(F*G)(k)Product–convolution duality

The convolution definitions are

(f∗g)(x)=∫−∞∞f(y)g(x−y) dy(f*g)(x) =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(y)g(x-y)\,dy

and

(F∗G)(k)=∫−∞∞F(q)G(k−q) dq.(F*G)(k) =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F(q)G(k-q)\,dq.

For the asymmetric convention,

∫−∞∞f∗(x)g(x) dx=12π∫−∞∞F∗(k)G(k) dk.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f^\ast(x)g(x)\,dx = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} F^\ast(k)G(k)\,dk.

Setting g=fg=f gives

∫∣f(x)∣2 dx=12π∫∣F(k)∣2 dk.\int\lvert f(x)\rvert^2\,dx =\frac{1}{2\pi} \int\lvert F(k)\rvert^2\,dk.

The factor disappears in the symmetric convention and in the unitary position–momentum convention.

Under the unitary quantum convention:

Position-space objectMomentum-space image
ψ(x)\psi(x)ϕ(p)\phi(p)
xψ(x)x\psi(x)iℏ ∂pϕ(p)i\hbar\,\partial_p\phi(p)
xnψ(x)x^n\psi(x)(iℏ)n∂pnϕ(p)(i\hbar)^n\partial_p^n\phi(p)
−iℏ ∂xψ(x)-i\hbar\,\partial_x\psi(x)pϕ(p)p\phi(p)
(−iℏ ∂x)nψ(x)(-i\hbar\,\partial_x)^n\psi(x)pnϕ(p)p^n\phi(p)
ψ(x−a)\psi(x-a)e−iap/ℏϕ(p)e^{-iap/\hbar}\phi(p)
eip0x/ℏψ(x)e^{ip_0x/\hbar}\psi(x)ϕ(p−p0)\phi(p-p_0)
(f∗g)(x)(f*g)(x)2πℏ ϕ(p)χ(p)\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}\,\phi(p)\chi(p)
f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x)12πℏ(ϕ∗χ)(p)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}(\phi*\chi)(p)

In the last two rows, ϕ\phi and χ\chi are the unitary momentum transforms of ff and gg, and the momentum convolution uses

(ϕ∗χ)(p)=∫−∞∞ϕ(q)χ(p−q) dq.(\phi*\chi)(p) =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \phi(q)\chi(p-q)\,dq.

The operator correspondences

x⟷iℏ∂∂p,p⟷px\longleftrightarrow i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial p}, \qquad p\longleftrightarrow p

are representation statements, not substitutions between classical numbers. Their domains and boundary behavior matter.

With

⟨x∣p⟩=12πℏeipx/ℏ,\langle x\vert p\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}e^{ipx/\hbar},

one has

⟨p∣p′⟩=δ(p−p′),∫−∞∞∣p⟩⟨p∣ dp=I.\langle p\vert p'\rangle=\delta(p-p'), \qquad \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \lvert p\rangle\langle p\rvert\,dp=I.

A plane wave is therefore delta-normalized and is not an element of L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R).

Consider the normalized packet

ψ(x)=1(2πσx2)1/4exp⁡[−(x−x0)24σx2+ip0xℏ].\psi(x) =\frac{1}{(2\pi\sigma_x^2)^{1/4}} \exp\left[ -\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{4\sigma_x^2} +\frac{ip_0x}{\hbar} \right].

Its transform is

ϕ(p)=(2σx2πℏ2)1/4exp⁡[−σx2(p−p0)2ℏ2]×exp⁡[−i(p−p0)x0ℏ].\begin{aligned} \phi(p) =\left( \frac{2\sigma_x^2}{\pi\hbar^2} \right)^{1/4} &\exp\left[ -\frac{\sigma_x^2(p-p_0)^2}{\hbar^2} \right] \\ &\times \exp\left[ -\frac{i(p-p_0)x_0}{\hbar} \right]. \end{aligned}

The probability densities have standard deviations

Δx=σx,Δp=ℏ2σx,Δx Δp=ℏ2.\Delta x=\sigma_x, \qquad \Delta p=\frac{\hbar}{2\sigma_x}, \qquad \Delta x\,\Delta p=\frac{\hbar}{2}.

The factors of 22 depend on whether a quoted width belongs to the amplitude or the probability density. Writing the full Gaussian before comparing widths avoids that ambiguity.

In dd dimensions, the asymmetric mathematical convention is

F(k)=∫Rdf(x)e−ik⋅x ddxF(\boldsymbol k) =\int_{\mathbb R^d} f(\boldsymbol x)e^{-i\boldsymbol k\cdot\boldsymbol x}\,d^d x

and

f(x)=1(2π)d∫RdF(k)eik⋅x ddk.f(\boldsymbol x) =\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d} \int_{\mathbb R^d} F(\boldsymbol k)e^{i\boldsymbol k\cdot\boldsymbol x}\,d^d k.

The main differential rules become

F[∇f]=ikF,F[xf]=i∇kF,F[∇2f]=−∥k∥2F,F[δ(d)(x−a)]=e−ik⋅a.\begin{aligned} \mathcal F[\nabla f] &=i\boldsymbol k F, & \mathcal F[\boldsymbol x f] &=i\nabla_{\boldsymbol k}F, \\ \mathcal F[\nabla^2f] &=-\lVert\boldsymbol k\rVert^2F, & \mathcal F[\delta^{(d)}(\boldsymbol x-\boldsymbol a)] &=e^{-i\boldsymbol k\cdot\boldsymbol a}. \end{aligned}

The unitary position–momentum kernel is (2πℏ)−d/2eip⋅x/ℏ(2\pi\hbar)^{-d/2}e^{i\boldsymbol p\cdot\boldsymbol x/\hbar}, with ddp=ℏd ddkd^dp=\hbar^d\,d^dk.

Several rows cannot be interpreted as absolutely convergent integrals. Instead, a tempered distribution TT is transformed by duality against a Schwartz test function. This gives precise meaning to entries such as

1⟷2πδ(k),PV⁡1x⟷−iπsgn⁡(k).1\longleftrightarrow2\pi\delta(k), \qquad \operatorname{PV}\frac1x \longleftrightarrow -i\pi\operatorname{sgn}(k).

Distributional differentiation preserves the same rule F[T′](k)=ik F[T](k)\mathcal F[T'](k)=ik\,\mathcal F[T](k). Principal values, delta terms, and endpoint half-values should not be discarded merely because they occur on a set of ordinary measure zero; they encode the distribution itself.

  1. Identify the transform pair, exponential sign, and transformed variable.
  2. Check whether the source uses kk, cyclic frequency, or momentum pp.
  3. Translate both the argument and the integration measure.
  4. Determine whether the entry is an ordinary function, an L2L^2 equivalence class, or a distribution.
  5. Apply operational rules from the same normalization convention.
  6. Check dimensions, the value at zero, inverse transformation, and Parseval normalization.
  • Mixing pp and kk without using p=ℏkp=\hbar k and dp=ℏ dkdp=\hbar\,dk.
  • Taking transform pairs from one normalization and convolution rules from another.
  • Reversing the sign of a translation or modulation phase.
  • Forgetting the absolute value in the scaling rule for real negative aa.
  • Treating constants and plane waves as square-integrable functions on the full line.
  • Dropping principal-value or delta contributions in distributional transforms.
  • Confusing amplitude width with probability-density standard deviation.
  • Using cyclic frequency ν\nu while retaining an angular-frequency derivative rule.
  • Applying integration by parts without checking boundary terms or distributional contributions.

The table is editorially maintained rather than generated. Each pair can be checked through at least one of the following:

  • direct integration in its convergence domain;
  • differentiation, scaling, or translation from a known pair;
  • inverse transformation against a test function;
  • the value F(0)=∫f(x) dxF(0)=\int f(x)\,dx when the integral exists;
  • Parseval normalization;
  • dimensional analysis in the position–momentum convention.

The rectangle–sinc, Gaussian–Gaussian, and Cauchy–exponential pairs provide independent checks of normalization and scaling. Last reviewed: 2026-08-19.

Exercise 1: Translating from wavenumber to momentum

Section titled “Exercise 1: Translating from wavenumber to momentum”

Let F(k)=∫ψ(x)e−ikx dxF(k)=\int\psi(x)e^{-ikx}\,dx. Derive the relation between F(k)F(k) and the unitarily normalized momentum wavefunction ϕ(p)\phi(p), including the change of measure.

Solution

Set p=ℏkp=\hbar k, so k=p/ℏk=p/\hbar and dp=ℏ dkdp=\hbar\,dk. Comparing definitions gives

ϕ(p)=12πℏ F(pℏ).\phi(p) =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\, F\left(\frac{p}{\hbar}\right).

Then

∫∣ϕ(p)∣2 dp=12πℏ∫∣F(pℏ)∣2dp=12π∫∣F(k)∣2 dk=∫∣ψ(x)∣2 dx.\begin{aligned} \int\lvert\phi(p)\rvert^2\,dp &= \frac{1}{2\pi\hbar} \int \left\lvert F\left(\frac{p}{\hbar}\right) \right\rvert^2dp \\ &= \frac{1}{2\pi} \int\lvert F(k)\rvert^2\,dk \\ &= \int\lvert\psi(x)\rvert^2\,dx. \end{aligned}

The second line uses dp=ℏ dkdp=\hbar\,dk, and the last uses Parseval in the asymmetric convention.

Under the mathematical convention, find the transform of g(x)=f(x−a)g(x)=f(x-a). Then use the answer to determine how translating a state by positive aa changes its momentum-space phase.

Solution

Substitute y=x−ay=x-a:

F[g](k)=∫f(x−a)e−ikx dx=∫f(y)e−ik(y+a) dy=e−ikaF(k).\begin{aligned} \mathcal F[g](k) &=\int f(x-a)e^{-ikx}\,dx \\ &=\int f(y)e^{-ik(y+a)}\,dy \\ &=e^{-ika}F(k). \end{aligned}

For momentum, k=p/ℏk=p/\hbar, so

ϕ(p)⟼e−iap/ℏϕ(p).\phi(p)\longmapsto e^{-iap/\hbar}\phi(p).

This is consistent with the active translation operator T(a)=e−iap/ℏT(a)=e^{-iap/\hbar}.

Read the position and momentum variances from the Gaussian pair above and verify the minimum-uncertainty product.

Solution

The position density is proportional to

exp⁡[−(x−x0)22σx2],\exp\left[ -\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{2\sigma_x^2} \right],

so its variance is σx2\sigma_x^2. The momentum density is proportional to

exp⁡[−2σx2(p−p0)2ℏ2]=exp⁡[−(p−p0)22σp2],\exp\left[ -\frac{2\sigma_x^2(p-p_0)^2}{\hbar^2} \right] = \exp\left[ -\frac{(p-p_0)^2}{2\sigma_p^2} \right],

which gives

σp2=ℏ24σx2.\sigma_p^2=\frac{\hbar^2}{4\sigma_x^2}.

Therefore

Δx Δp=σxℏ2σx=ℏ2.\Delta x\,\Delta p =\sigma_x\frac{\hbar}{2\sigma_x} =\frac{\hbar}{2}.
  • G. B. Folland, Fourier Analysis and Its Applications, American Mathematical Society, 1992.
  • E. M. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Fourier Analysis: An Introduction, Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • M. J. Lighthill, Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.