Skip to content

Optical Theorem

For the asymptotic convention

ψk(+)(r)∼eik⋅r+f(θ,ϕ)eikrr,\psi_{\mathbf k}^{(+)}(\mathbf r) \sim e^{i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r} + f(\theta,\phi) \frac{e^{ikr}}{r},

unitarity implies

σtot=4πkIm⁡f(0).\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} = \frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f(0).

The amplitude on the right is the forward elastic amplitude for the incident channel. The cross section on the left is inclusive: it counts elastic scattering and every inelastic, reactive, or absorptive process that removes flux from that incident channel.

If elastic scattering is the only open process,

σtot=σel=∫dΩ ∣f(θ,ϕ)∣2.\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} = \sigma_{\mathrm{el}} = \int d\Omega\, \lvert f(\theta,\phi)\rvert^2.

The derivation from S†S=IS^\dagger S=I belongs to Optical Theorem. This card collects the normalizations, partial-wave identities, perturbative order counting, and practical checks.

SituationIdentity
One elastic channel(4π/k)Im⁡f(0)=∫dΩ ∣f∣2(4\pi/k)\operatorname{Im}f(0)=\int d\Omega\,\lvert f\rvert^2
Several open channels(4π/kα)Im⁡fαα(0)=∑β(vβ/vα)∫dΩ ∣fβα∣2(4\pi/k_\alpha)\operatorname{Im}f_{\alpha\alpha}(0)=\sum_\beta(v_\beta/v_\alpha)\int d\Omega\,\lvert f_{\beta\alpha}\rvert^2
Central partial wavesσtot=(4π/k2)∑ℓ(2ℓ+1)Im⁡aℓ\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}=(4\pi/k^2)\sum_\ell(2\ell+1)\operatorname{Im}a_\ell
Elastic partial waveIm⁡aℓ=∣aℓ∣2=sin⁡2δℓ\operatorname{Im}a_\ell=\lvert a_\ell\rvert^2=\sin^2\delta_\ell
Inelastic diagonal elementIm⁡aℓ−∣aℓ∣2=(1−ηℓ2)/4\operatorname{Im}a_\ell-\lvert a_\ell\rvert^2=(1-\eta_\ell^2)/4
Perturbative second orderIm⁡f(2)(0)=(k/4π)∫dΩ ∣f(1)∣2\operatorname{Im}f^{(2)}(0)=(k/4\pi)\int d\Omega\,\lvert f^{(1)}\rvert^2

The multichannel row assumes the displayed spherical-wave channel normalization. Other state normalizations move velocity and phase-space factors, but the underlying unitarity sum is unchanged.

The total scattered flux is distributed over all angles, so a relation to one forward amplitude can initially seem surprising. The incident plane wave and the outgoing spherical wave overlap coherently in the forward direction. The interference current there measures the depletion of the incident beam.

Probability conservation then requires

forward extinction=flux into every allowed final state.\text{forward extinction} = \text{flux into every allowed final state}.

The theorem is therefore an interference statement as well as a unitarity statement. It is not obtained by evaluating ∣f(0)∣2\lvert f(0)\rvert^2; the relevant quantity is the imaginary part of the complex forward amplitude.

A wave-packet or finite-beam treatment resolves the formal overlap of a plane wave with the narrow forward scattered contribution. The plane-wave result is the limiting cross-section identity.

In a schematic normalization, write

S=I+iT.S=I+i\mathcal T.

Unitarity gives

S†S=I,S^\dagger S=I,

and therefore

i(T†−T)=T†T.i\left( \mathcal T^\dagger-\mathcal T \right) = \mathcal T^\dagger\mathcal T.

Taking a diagonal matrix element in an incoming state ∣i⟩\lvert i\rangle and inserting a complete set of final states gives

2Im⁡Tii=∑f∣Tfi∣2.2\operatorname{Im}\mathcal T_{ii} = \sum_f \lvert\mathcal T_{fi}\rvert^2.

For continuum states, the sum includes energy-conserving delta functions and phase-space integrals. Converting this equation to the spherical-wave amplitude and dividing by incident flux produces the optical theorem.

This T\mathcal T is schematic. The chapter’s normalization-specific transition operator uses

S=I−2πi δ(Ef−Ei)T,S = I - 2\pi i\, \delta(E_f-E_i) T,

and the nonrelativistic ff is proportional to −T-T. Do not combine signs or 2π2\pi factors from the two conventions. The exact transition-operator identity is at Unitarity.

For a short-range central potential,

f(θ)=1k∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)aℓPℓ(cos⁡θ),f(\theta) = \frac{1}{k} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) a_\ell P_\ell(\cos\theta),

where

aℓ=Sℓ−12i.a_\ell = \frac{S_\ell-1}{2i}.

In a purely elastic channel,

Sℓ=e2iδℓ,aℓ=eiδℓsin⁡δℓ.S_\ell=e^{2i\delta_\ell}, \qquad a_\ell=e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell.

Since Pℓ(1)=1P_\ell(1)=1,

f(0)=1k∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)eiδℓsin⁡δℓ.f(0) = \frac{1}{k} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell.

The imaginary part is

Im⁡f(0)=1k∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)sin⁡2δℓ.\operatorname{Im}f(0) = \frac{1}{k} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) \sin^2\delta_\ell.

Multiplication by 4π/k4\pi/k gives

4πkIm⁡f(0)=4πk2∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)sin⁡2δℓ=σel.\frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f(0) = \frac{4\pi}{k^2} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) \sin^2\delta_\ell = \sigma_{\mathrm{el}}.

Equivalently, elastic unitarity holds channel by channel:

Im⁡aℓ=∣aℓ∣2.\operatorname{Im}a_\ell = \lvert a_\ell\rvert^2.

The identity is especially useful in a numerical phase-shift calculation: the independently integrated angular cross section and the forward partial sum must agree at the same angular-momentum cutoff.

When other channels are open, parameterize the diagonal elastic partial wave as

Sℓ=ηℓe2iδℓ,0≤ηℓ≤1.S_\ell = \eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, \qquad 0\le\eta_\ell\le1.

For

aℓ=Sℓ−12i,a_\ell = \frac{S_\ell-1}{2i},

one has

Im⁡aℓ=1−Re⁡Sℓ2\operatorname{Im}a_\ell = \frac{1-\operatorname{Re}S_\ell}{2}

and

Im⁡aℓ−∣aℓ∣2=1−ηℓ24.\operatorname{Im}a_\ell - \lvert a_\ell\rvert^2 = \frac{1-\eta_\ell^2}{4}.

The three partial-wave contributions are

σℓel=πk2(2ℓ+1)∣Sℓ−1∣2,\sigma_\ell^{\mathrm{el}} = \frac{\pi}{k^2} (2\ell+1) \lvert S_\ell-1\rvert^2, σℓreac=πk2(2ℓ+1)(1−∣Sℓ∣2),\sigma_\ell^{\mathrm{reac}} = \frac{\pi}{k^2} (2\ell+1) \left(1-\lvert S_\ell\rvert^2\right),

and

σℓtot=σℓel+σℓreac=2πk2(2ℓ+1)(1−Re⁡Sℓ)=4πk2(2ℓ+1)Im⁡aℓ.\begin{aligned} \sigma_\ell^{\mathrm{tot}} &= \sigma_\ell^{\mathrm{el}} + \sigma_\ell^{\mathrm{reac}} \\ &= \frac{2\pi}{k^2} (2\ell+1) \left( 1-\operatorname{Re}S_\ell \right) \\ &= \frac{4\pi}{k^2} (2\ell+1) \operatorname{Im}a_\ell. \end{aligned}

Summing over ℓ\ell proves

σtot=4πkIm⁡fαα(0)\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} = \frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f_{\alpha\alpha}(0)

even though the observed elastic element has ∣Sℓ∣<1\lvert S_\ell\rvert<1. The full multichannel SS matrix remains unitary; the deficit in the elastic element is carried by the other channels.

Let the component in outgoing channel β\beta have asymptotic form

ψβ(r)∼δβαeikα⋅r+fβα(Ω)eikβrr.\psi_\beta(\mathbf r) \sim \delta_{\beta\alpha} e^{i\mathbf k_\alpha\cdot\mathbf r} + f_{\beta\alpha}(\Omega) \frac{e^{ik_\beta r}}{r}.

With

vγ=ℏkγμγ,v_\gamma = \frac{\hbar k_\gamma}{\mu_\gamma},

current conservation gives

4πkαIm⁡fαα(0)=∑β openvβvα∫dΩ ∣fβα(Ω)∣2.\frac{4\pi}{k_\alpha} \operatorname{Im} f_{\alpha\alpha}(0) = \sum_{\beta\ \mathrm{open}} \frac{v_\beta}{v_\alpha} \int d\Omega\, \lvert f_{\beta\alpha}(\Omega)\rvert^2.

The β=α\beta=\alpha term is elastic. Every other open channel contributes to the reaction or inelastic total. Closed channels modify amplitudes virtually but carry no asymptotic flux and do not appear as final states in this sum.

If the channel states have been normalized to unit flux, the velocity factors are absorbed into the amplitudes. If additional final-state variables are continuous, the right-hand side also includes their phase-space integrals. Always compare formulas only after matching the channel normalization.

Neglect effective-range corrections and write the unitary scattering-length amplitude as

f0(k)=1−1/a−ik=−a1+ika.f_0(k) = \frac{1}{-1/a-ik} = - \frac{a}{1+ika}.

Its real and imaginary parts are

f0(k)=−a1+k2a2+ika21+k2a2.f_0(k) = - \frac{a}{1+k^2a^2} + i \frac{ka^2}{1+k^2a^2}.

Therefore

Im⁡f0=ka21+k2a2=k∣f0∣2.\operatorname{Im}f_0 = \frac{ka^2}{1+k^2a^2} = k\lvert f_0\rvert^2.

The optical theorem gives

σtot=4πkIm⁡f0=4πa21+k2a2,\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} = \frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f_0 = \frac{4\pi a^2}{1+k^2a^2},

which equals 4π∣f0∣24\pi\lvert f_0\rvert^2. At ∣a∣→∞\lvert a\rvert\to\infty, the result reaches the ss-wave unitarity limit 4π/k24\pi/k^2.

This example shows why replacing the denominator by its leading real value, f0≈−af_0\approx-a, gives the leading low-kk cross section but not exact unitarity.

Introduce a coupling parameter and expand

f=λf(1)+λ2f(2)+O(λ3).f = \lambda f^{(1)} + \lambda^2f^{(2)} + O(\lambda^3).

For one-channel elastic scattering, the optical theorem becomes

Im⁡f(0)=k4π∫dΩ ∣f(Ω)∣2.\operatorname{Im}f(0) = \frac{k}{4\pi} \int d\Omega\, \lvert f(\Omega)\rvert^2.

At order λ\lambda,

Im⁡f(1)(0)=0\operatorname{Im}f^{(1)}(0)=0

for a Hermitian first-order interaction. At order λ2\lambda^2,

Im⁡f(2)(0)=k4π∫dΩ ∣f(1)(Ω)∣2.\operatorname{Im}f^{(2)}(0) = \frac{k}{4\pi} \int d\Omega\, \lvert f^{(1)}(\Omega)\rvert^2.

This is why a real first Born amplitude can produce the correct leading cross section even though it does not satisfy the exact optical theorem by itself. The second Born term supplies the required on-shell imaginary part.

For several channels, the second-order right-hand side is a sum over all first-order open-channel amplitudes with their flux factors. Omitting an intermediate open channel breaks perturbative unitarity.

An optical potential often represents eliminated reaction channels by

V(r)=U(r)−iW(r),W(r)≥0.V(\mathbf r) = U(\mathbf r) - iW(\mathbf r), \qquad W(\mathbf r)\ge0.

The reduced elastic SS matrix is then subunitary. For a unit-amplitude incident wave with speed vv, the continuity equation gives the absorbed cross section

σabs=2ℏv∫d3r W(r)∣ψ(+)(r)∣2.\sigma_{\mathrm{abs}} = \frac{2}{\hbar v} \int d^3r\, W(\mathbf r) \lvert\psi^{(+)}(\mathbf r)\rvert^2.

The generalized flux balance is

σtot=σel+σabs=4πkIm⁡f(0).\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} = \sigma_{\mathrm{el}} + \sigma_{\mathrm{abs}} = \frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f(0).

The missing elastic probability has not disappeared from the underlying closed system; it represents channels removed from the effective model.

Given an amplitude and independently summed cross sections, define

ΔOT=4πkIm⁡f(0)−σtot.\Delta_{\mathrm{OT}} = \frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f(0) - \sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}.

A dimensionless residual is

ϵOT=∣ΔOT∣max⁡(σtot,4πk∣Im⁡f(0)∣,σscale),\epsilon_{\mathrm{OT}} = \frac{ \lvert\Delta_{\mathrm{OT}}\rvert }{ \max\left( \sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}, \frac{4\pi}{k}\lvert\operatorname{Im}f(0)\rvert, \sigma_{\mathrm{scale}} \right) },

where σscale>0\sigma_{\mathrm{scale}}>0 prevents an unstable relative error near a true zero. Report the chosen scale.

A nonzero residual can reveal:

  • a mismatched amplitude or state normalization;
  • omitted open channels or spin sums;
  • an insufficient partial-wave cutoff;
  • inaccurate forward-angle extrapolation;
  • inconsistent quadrature between the angular and forward calculations;
  • a lost i0i0 prescription or on-shell imaginary part;
  • an approximation being tested beyond the order it retains.

Passing the optical-theorem test establishes consistency with unitarity in the represented space. It does not prove that the dynamics, potential, or channel model is physically accurate.

For an unscreened Coulomb potential, the usual plane-wave plus spherical-wave asymptotic form is modified and the forward amplitude is singular. The ideal total cross section also diverges. The short-range formula should not be applied without screening, a Coulomb-distorted formulation, or a finite experimental angular resolution.

Unitarity applies to correctly symmetrized asymptotic states. Direct and exchange amplitudes, spin channels, and the one-count-per-final-pair rule must be incorporated before constructing the inclusive channel sum. Blindly inserting f(θ)±f(π−θ)f(\theta)\pm f(\pi-\theta) into a distinguishable-particle optical theorem can double count states.

The theorem returns the full inclusive total cross section. It does not equate the forward amplitude to a detector’s acceptance-limited integral. Detector cuts belong in a separate observable calculation.

A truncated or phenomenological amplitude can violate the theorem. The meaningful question is whether it satisfies unitarity through its claimed order or whether its explicit loss term accounts for the deficit.

  1. Write the asymptotic amplitude, state normalization, and incident wave number.
  2. Identify the forward elastic matrix element for the prepared incident channel.
  3. List every open final channel and its velocity, spin, and phase-space factors.
  4. Compute the inclusive total independently from the outgoing channels.
  5. Compare it with (4π/k)Im⁡fαα(0)(4\pi/k)\operatorname{Im}f_{\alpha\alpha}(0).
  6. In a partial-wave calculation, use the same ℓmax⁡\ell_{\max} on both sides before taking a convergence limit.
  7. For a perturbative result, compare equal orders in the coupling expansion.
  8. Treat Coulomb tails, identical particles, absorption, and detector acceptance with their own conventions.
  • Using ∣f(0)∣2\lvert f(0)\rvert^2 instead of Im⁡f(0)\operatorname{Im}f(0).
  • Equating the forward theorem with an angular average of ff.
  • Calling the elastic angular integral σtot\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}} when reaction channels are open.
  • Omitting velocity or phase-space factors in a multichannel sum.
  • Mixing S=I+iTS=I+i\mathcal T with a differently normalized TT matrix.
  • Demanding exact optical-theorem equality from a first-order Born amplitude.
  • Comparing different partial-wave cutoffs on the two sides.
  • Treating an acceptance-limited cross section as the inclusive total.
  • Applying the short-range formula to unscreened Coulomb scattering.
  • Ignoring identical-particle final-state counting.
  • Assuming that a small unitarity residual proves the interaction model is correct.
  1. Use elastic partial waves to derive the optical theorem.
Solution

At θ=0\theta=0, Pℓ(1)=1P_\ell(1)=1, so

f(0)=1k∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)eiδℓsin⁡δℓ.f(0) = \frac{1}{k} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell.

Because

Im⁡(eiδℓsin⁡δℓ)=sin⁡2δℓ,\operatorname{Im} \left( e^{i\delta_\ell}\sin\delta_\ell \right) = \sin^2\delta_\ell,

one obtains

4πkIm⁡f(0)=4πk2∑ℓ=0∞(2ℓ+1)sin⁡2δℓ.\frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f(0) = \frac{4\pi}{k^2} \sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty} (2\ell+1) \sin^2\delta_\ell.

The right-hand side is the integrated elastic partial-wave cross section.

  1. For Sℓ=ηℓe2iδℓS_\ell=\eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}, verify that the elastic and reaction pieces add to the forward total.
Solution

The sum of the two partial cross sections is

πk2(2ℓ+1)[∣Sℓ−1∣2+1−∣Sℓ∣2]=πk2(2ℓ+1)[2−2Re⁡Sℓ]=2πk2(2ℓ+1)(1−Re⁡Sℓ).\begin{aligned} &\frac{\pi}{k^2}(2\ell+1) \left[ \lvert S_\ell-1\rvert^2 + 1-\lvert S_\ell\rvert^2 \right] \\ &\qquad= \frac{\pi}{k^2}(2\ell+1) \left[ 2-2\operatorname{Re}S_\ell \right] \\ &\qquad= \frac{2\pi}{k^2}(2\ell+1) \left( 1-\operatorname{Re}S_\ell \right). \end{aligned}

Since

Im⁡aℓ=1−Re⁡Sℓ2,\operatorname{Im}a_\ell = \frac{1-\operatorname{Re}S_\ell}{2},

this equals

4πk2(2ℓ+1)Im⁡aℓ,\frac{4\pi}{k^2} (2\ell+1) \operatorname{Im}a_\ell,

the partial-wave contribution to (4π/k)Im⁡f(0)(4\pi/k)\operatorname{Im}f(0).

  1. Verify the optical theorem for f0=−a/(1+ika)f_0=-a/(1+ika) and identify the unitarity limit.
Solution

The magnitude and imaginary part are

∣f0∣2=a21+k2a2,Im⁡f0=ka21+k2a2.\lvert f_0\rvert^2 = \frac{a^2}{1+k^2a^2}, \qquad \operatorname{Im}f_0 = \frac{ka^2}{1+k^2a^2}.

Thus

4πkIm⁡f0=4π∣f0∣2=4πa21+k2a2.\frac{4\pi}{k} \operatorname{Im}f_0 = 4\pi\lvert f_0\rvert^2 = \frac{4\pi a^2}{1+k^2a^2}.

As ∣a∣→∞\lvert a\rvert\to\infty at fixed kk,

σ⟶4πk2,\sigma\longrightarrow\frac{4\pi}{k^2},

the elastic ss-wave unitarity limit.

  1. A real first Born amplitude is order λ\lambda. At what order do the total cross section and the forward imaginary part first appear?
Solution

The leading cross section is

σ(2)=λ2∫dΩ ∣f(1)∣2,\sigma^{(2)} = \lambda^2 \int d\Omega\, \lvert f^{(1)}\rvert^2,

so it begins at order λ2\lambda^2. The order-λ\lambda forward imaginary part vanishes for a Hermitian first-order interaction. Unitarity requires

Im⁡f(2)(0)=k4π∫dΩ ∣f(1)∣2.\operatorname{Im}f^{(2)}(0) = \frac{k}{4\pi} \int d\Omega\, \lvert f^{(1)}\rvert^2.

The first nonzero forward imaginary part is therefore also order λ2\lambda^2 and comes from the second Born term or its equivalent on-shell intermediate-state contribution.

  • J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover, 2006, Chs. 3–4.
  • R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd ed., Springer, 1982, Chs. 5 and 10.
  • M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, Collision Theory, Wiley, 1964, Chs. 3–4.
  • C. J. Joachain, Quantum Collision Theory, 3rd ed., North-Holland, 1983, Chs. 3 and 7.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020, Ch. 7.
  • M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, 1995, Sec. 7.3.