Optical Theorem
Purpose
Section titled “Purpose”For the asymptotic convention
unitarity implies
The amplitude on the right is the forward elastic amplitude for the incident channel. The cross section on the left is inclusive: it counts elastic scattering and every inelastic, reactive, or absorptive process that removes flux from that incident channel.
If elastic scattering is the only open process,
The derivation from belongs to Optical Theorem. This card collects the normalizations, partial-wave identities, perturbative order counting, and practical checks.
At a glance
Section titled “At a glance”| Situation | Identity |
|---|---|
| One elastic channel | |
| Several open channels | |
| Central partial waves | |
| Elastic partial wave | |
| Inelastic diagonal element | |
| Perturbative second order |
The multichannel row assumes the displayed spherical-wave channel normalization. Other state normalizations move velocity and phase-space factors, but the underlying unitarity sum is unchanged.
Why the forward direction appears
Section titled “Why the forward direction appears”The total scattered flux is distributed over all angles, so a relation to one forward amplitude can initially seem surprising. The incident plane wave and the outgoing spherical wave overlap coherently in the forward direction. The interference current there measures the depletion of the incident beam.
Probability conservation then requires
The theorem is therefore an interference statement as well as a unitarity statement. It is not obtained by evaluating ; the relevant quantity is the imaginary part of the complex forward amplitude.
A wave-packet or finite-beam treatment resolves the formal overlap of a plane wave with the narrow forward scattered contribution. The plane-wave result is the limiting cross-section identity.
Operator origin
Section titled “Operator origin”In a schematic normalization, write
Unitarity gives
and therefore
Taking a diagonal matrix element in an incoming state and inserting a complete set of final states gives
For continuum states, the sum includes energy-conserving delta functions and phase-space integrals. Converting this equation to the spherical-wave amplitude and dividing by incident flux produces the optical theorem.
This is schematic. The chapter’s normalization-specific transition operator uses
and the nonrelativistic is proportional to . Do not combine signs or factors from the two conventions. The exact transition-operator identity is at Unitarity.
Elastic partial-wave check
Section titled “Elastic partial-wave check”For a short-range central potential,
where
In a purely elastic channel,
Since ,
The imaginary part is
Multiplication by gives
Equivalently, elastic unitarity holds channel by channel:
The identity is especially useful in a numerical phase-shift calculation: the independently integrated angular cross section and the forward partial sum must agree at the same angular-momentum cutoff.
Inelasticity and reaction cross sections
Section titled “Inelasticity and reaction cross sections”When other channels are open, parameterize the diagonal elastic partial wave as
For
one has
and
The three partial-wave contributions are
and
Summing over proves
even though the observed elastic element has . The full multichannel matrix remains unitary; the deficit in the elastic element is carried by the other channels.
Multichannel form
Section titled “Multichannel form”Let the component in outgoing channel have asymptotic form
With
current conservation gives
The term is elastic. Every other open channel contributes to the reaction or inelastic total. Closed channels modify amplitudes virtually but carry no asymptotic flux and do not appear as final states in this sum.
If the channel states have been normalized to unit flux, the velocity factors are absorbed into the amplitudes. If additional final-state variables are continuous, the right-hand side also includes their phase-space integrals. Always compare formulas only after matching the channel normalization.
Low-energy s-wave example
Section titled “Low-energy s-wave example”Neglect effective-range corrections and write the unitary scattering-length amplitude as
Its real and imaginary parts are
Therefore
The optical theorem gives
which equals . At , the result reaches the -wave unitarity limit .
This example shows why replacing the denominator by its leading real value, , gives the leading low- cross section but not exact unitarity.
Perturbative unitarity
Section titled “Perturbative unitarity”Introduce a coupling parameter and expand
For one-channel elastic scattering, the optical theorem becomes
At order ,
for a Hermitian first-order interaction. At order ,
This is why a real first Born amplitude can produce the correct leading cross section even though it does not satisfy the exact optical theorem by itself. The second Born term supplies the required on-shell imaginary part.
For several channels, the second-order right-hand side is a sum over all first-order open-channel amplitudes with their flux factors. Omitting an intermediate open channel breaks perturbative unitarity.
Effective absorption
Section titled “Effective absorption”An optical potential often represents eliminated reaction channels by
The reduced elastic matrix is then subunitary. For a unit-amplitude incident wave with speed , the continuity equation gives the absorbed cross section
The generalized flux balance is
The missing elastic probability has not disappeared from the underlying closed system; it represents channels removed from the effective model.
Numerical diagnostic
Section titled “Numerical diagnostic”Given an amplitude and independently summed cross sections, define
A dimensionless residual is
where prevents an unstable relative error near a true zero. Report the chosen scale.
A nonzero residual can reveal:
- a mismatched amplitude or state normalization;
- omitted open channels or spin sums;
- an insufficient partial-wave cutoff;
- inaccurate forward-angle extrapolation;
- inconsistent quadrature between the angular and forward calculations;
- a lost prescription or on-shell imaginary part;
- an approximation being tested beyond the order it retains.
Passing the optical-theorem test establishes consistency with unitarity in the represented space. It does not prove that the dynamics, potential, or channel model is physically accurate.
Scope limits
Section titled “Scope limits”Long-range Coulomb scattering
Section titled “Long-range Coulomb scattering”For an unscreened Coulomb potential, the usual plane-wave plus spherical-wave asymptotic form is modified and the forward amplitude is singular. The ideal total cross section also diverges. The short-range formula should not be applied without screening, a Coulomb-distorted formulation, or a finite experimental angular resolution.
Identical particles
Section titled “Identical particles”Unitarity applies to correctly symmetrized asymptotic states. Direct and exchange amplitudes, spin channels, and the one-count-per-final-pair rule must be incorporated before constructing the inclusive channel sum. Blindly inserting into a distinguishable-particle optical theorem can double count states.
Finite acceptance
Section titled “Finite acceptance”The theorem returns the full inclusive total cross section. It does not equate the forward amplitude to a detector’s acceptance-limited integral. Detector cuts belong in a separate observable calculation.
Nonunitary approximations
Section titled “Nonunitary approximations”A truncated or phenomenological amplitude can violate the theorem. The meaningful question is whether it satisfies unitarity through its claimed order or whether its explicit loss term accounts for the deficit.
Calculation workflow
Section titled “Calculation workflow”- Write the asymptotic amplitude, state normalization, and incident wave number.
- Identify the forward elastic matrix element for the prepared incident channel.
- List every open final channel and its velocity, spin, and phase-space factors.
- Compute the inclusive total independently from the outgoing channels.
- Compare it with .
- In a partial-wave calculation, use the same on both sides before taking a convergence limit.
- For a perturbative result, compare equal orders in the coupling expansion.
- Treat Coulomb tails, identical particles, absorption, and detector acceptance with their own conventions.
Common mistakes
Section titled “Common mistakes”- Using instead of .
- Equating the forward theorem with an angular average of .
- Calling the elastic angular integral when reaction channels are open.
- Omitting velocity or phase-space factors in a multichannel sum.
- Mixing with a differently normalized matrix.
- Demanding exact optical-theorem equality from a first-order Born amplitude.
- Comparing different partial-wave cutoffs on the two sides.
- Treating an acceptance-limited cross section as the inclusive total.
- Applying the short-range formula to unscreened Coulomb scattering.
- Ignoring identical-particle final-state counting.
- Assuming that a small unitarity residual proves the interaction model is correct.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Use elastic partial waves to derive the optical theorem.
Solution
At , , so
Because
one obtains
The right-hand side is the integrated elastic partial-wave cross section.
- For , verify that the elastic and reaction pieces add to the forward total.
Solution
The sum of the two partial cross sections is
Since
this equals
the partial-wave contribution to .
- Verify the optical theorem for and identify the unitarity limit.
Solution
The magnitude and imaginary part are
Thus
As at fixed ,
the elastic -wave unitarity limit.
- A real first Born amplitude is order . At what order do the total cross section and the forward imaginary part first appear?
Solution
The leading cross section is
so it begins at order . The order- forward imaginary part vanishes for a Hermitian first-order interaction. Unitarity requires
The first nonzero forward imaginary part is therefore also order and comes from the second Born term or its equivalent on-shell intermediate-state contribution.
Canonical links
Section titled “Canonical links”- Unitarity
- Optical Theorem
- Probability Current and Flux
- Partial-Wave Cross Sections
- Born Series
- Scattering Cross Section Formula Card
References
Section titled “References”- J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover, 2006, Chs. 3–4.
- R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd ed., Springer, 1982, Chs. 5 and 10.
- M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, Collision Theory, Wiley, 1964, Chs. 3–4.
- C. J. Joachain, Quantum Collision Theory, 3rd ed., North-Holland, 1983, Chs. 3 and 7.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020, Ch. 7.
- M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, 1995, Sec. 7.3.