Free Particle Hamiltonian
The free-particle Hamiltonian describes nonrelativistic motion without position-dependent potential energy or external fields. Its compact expression is
This formula fixes the local kinetic energy, but not the complete operator. The configuration space, Hilbert space, domain, and boundary conditions determine whether the momentum is continuous or discrete, which symmetries survive, and whether the spectrum contains only scattering states.
The canonical solution, including wave packets, currents, and normalization, lives at Free Particle. This page is the compact Hamiltonian card.
Quick Reference
Section titled “Quick Reference”| Property | Standard full-space realization |
|---|---|
| Degrees of freedom | One spinless particle in Euclidean dimensions |
| Hilbert space | |
| Hamiltonian | |
| Position representation | |
| Momentum representation | |
| Natural domain | Sobolev space |
| Spectrum | , purely continuous |
| Generalized eigenstates | Momentum plane waves |
| Dispersion relation | |
| Solvability | Exactly diagonalized by the Fourier transform |
| Main symmetries | Translations, rotations, parity, and spinless time reversal |
If an uncoupled spin degree of freedom is retained, the Hamiltonian is . Spin then supplies a degeneracy but does not alter the spatial evolution.
Definition and Parameters
Section titled “Definition and Parameters”In one Cartesian dimension,
In Cartesian dimensions,
| Symbol | Meaning | SI units | Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Particle mass | in this nonrelativistic model | ||
| Canonical momentum | Self-adjoint realization depends on geometry | ||
| Reduced Planck constant | Exact SI defining constant through | ||
| Cartesian Laplacian | Domain and boundary data are required |
The displayed Hamiltonian assumes:
- a nonrelativistic dispersion relation;
- no position-dependent scalar potential;
- no electromagnetic vector potential;
- no spin-dependent coupling;
- a fixed background geometry;
- no interactions with other particles or an environment.
A spatially constant offset gives
For one isolated fixed sector, it changes evolution only by the global phase . It can still matter in thermodynamics, comparisons between sectors, and couplings for which the relative energy convention is physical.
Domain and Self-Adjointness
Section titled “Domain and Self-Adjointness”On , the standard free Hamiltonian is the self-adjoint operator
In momentum space this is multiplication by , with domain
The Fourier transform makes self-adjointness and nonnegativity transparent. For every state in the domain,
On an interval, half-line, ring, torus, or region with a boundary, the differential expression does not by itself define a self-adjoint operator. Endpoint or boundary conditions are part of the Hamiltonian. The Boundary Conditions page develops that point.
Representations
Section titled “Representations”Position representation
Section titled “Position representation”With ,
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is
Momentum representation
Section titled “Momentum representation”The Hamiltonian is diagonal:
Consequently, exact evolution multiplies each momentum component by a phase,
The momentum probability density is constant in time. Position-space spreading comes from the momentum-dependent phase, not from any change in .
Generalized momentum basis
Section titled “Generalized momentum basis”With the convention
the generalized eigenstates satisfy
They provide the spectral resolution
These plane waves are generalized eigenstates, not square-normalizable vectors in . See Plane Waves and Delta Normalization for the rigged-Hilbert-space interpretation and normalization conventions.
Spectrum and Degeneracy
Section titled “Spectrum and Degeneracy”For the standard full-space realization,
The spectrum is continuous and the Hamiltonian has no normalizable energy eigenvectors. In one dimension, every corresponds to two momentum branches,
In , fixed positive energy corresponds to the momentum-space sphere
The degeneracy is therefore associated with propagation direction. In three dimensions it is naturally resolved by momentum direction or by angular-momentum partial waves.
There are no negative-energy states in the standard full-space realization because . The lower spectral edge is not a normalizable eigenstate: a constant position-space wavefunction is not in .
Geometry and Boundary Conditions
Section titled “Geometry and Boundary Conditions”The word free describes the absence of a bulk potential, not necessarily an unbounded configuration space.
| Configuration space | Typical domain data | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Sobolev domain | Continuous spectrum | |
| Rectangular torus | Periodic boundary conditions | Discrete momentum lattice and traveling waves |
| Finite interval or bounded region | Dirichlet hard walls | Discrete standing-wave spectrum |
| Half-line | Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin condition at the endpoint | Continuous spectrum; some Robin choices also support a boundary state |
| Ring with flux or twist | Quasiperiodic endpoint condition | Shifted discrete momenta |
For a rectangular periodic cell with side lengths ,
and
This finite-volume regulator should not be confused with hard-wall confinement. Periodic boundaries preserve translations on a torus, whereas hard walls break continuous translation symmetry and select standing waves.
Symmetries and Conserved Quantities
Section titled “Symmetries and Conserved Quantities”On full Euclidean space, the Hamiltonian is a function only of . Therefore
Momentum and orbital angular momentum are conserved, although the components of angular momentum do not commute with one another. The model is also invariant under parity and, for a spinless particle with no fields, under time reversal.
The Heisenberg equations are exact:
Hence
Boundaries can remove these symmetries even when the interior differential expression remains unchanged. For example, a hard-wall interval is not invariant under continuous translations.
Physical Interpretation
Section titled “Physical Interpretation”The dispersion relation
has group velocity
This is the classical particle velocity. A one-dimensional plane wave has phase velocity , which is not the packet velocity.
A normalizable free particle need not be delocalized. Localized states are wave packets built from a range of momenta. Because the dispersion is quadratic, different momentum components accumulate phases at different rates, and a generic packet spreads. The exact Gaussian example is developed at Gaussian Wave Packets.
Validity and Nearby Hamiltonians
Section titled “Validity and Nearby Hamiltonians”| Change in physics | Replacement |
|---|---|
| Position-dependent scalar potential | |
| Electromagnetic field | |
| Spin magnetic coupling | Use the Pauli Hamiltonian |
| Relativistic kinematics without spin | requires a different framework |
| Relativistic spin- particle | Use the Dirac Hamiltonian with its field-theory caveats |
| Coupling to an environment | Reduced dynamics generally requires a master equation rather than a state-vector Hamiltonian alone |
The nonrelativistic approximation requires characteristic momenta . Expanding the relativistic energy gives
The free Hamiltonian retains the leading momentum-dependent term after the rest energy is removed.
Canonical Links
Section titled “Canonical Links”- Free Particle is the canonical solution.
- Free Particle in Three Dimensions treats energy shells and three-dimensional propagation.
- Momentum Operator records the generator, domain, and representation conventions.
- Momentum Eigenstates develops the plane-wave basis.
- Gaussian Wave Packets gives a normalized evolving state.
- Wave-Packet Spreading derives the variance growth.
- Free-Particle Propagator: First Encounter gives the position-space kernel.
- Schrödinger Equation is the dynamics formula card.
- Probability Current gives the flux convention used in scattering.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Writing without specifying its domain or boundary conditions.
- Concluding that every system with has a continuous spectrum.
- Treating a full-space plane wave as a normalized physical state.
- Forgetting the two momentum directions associated with one positive energy in one dimension.
- Confusing a periodic simulation cell with an infinite square well.
- Interpreting the phase velocity as the particle velocity.
- Assuming that free motion prevents wave-packet spreading.
- Calling canonical momentum mechanical momentum after electromagnetic minimal coupling is introduced.
- Applying the quadratic dispersion when momenta are not small compared with .
- Treating an energy offset as irrelevant without checking which sectors or thermodynamic quantities are being compared.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”1. Periodic cell
Section titled “1. Periodic cell”A particle moves in a rectangular periodic cell with side lengths . Find the normalized momentum eigenfunctions and their energies.
Solution
Periodicity requires
Writing , the normalized modes are
Their momenta and energies are
Degeneracies depend on the cell shape. A cubic cell has additional permutations and sign symmetries.
2. Exact Heisenberg motion
Section titled “2. Exact Heisenberg motion”Use to derive the Heisenberg equations for and .
Solution
For an operator with no explicit time dependence,
Since the momentum components commute,
so . Using
gives
Integrating yields
3. Global offset versus potential step
Section titled “3. Global offset versus potential step”Explain why adding the same constant everywhere does not change position probabilities for an isolated particle, whereas adding only for changes scattering.
Solution
For a global shift,
and the commuting terms give
Every state acquires the same global phase, so expectation values and outcome probabilities are unchanged.
If the added term is , it is not proportional to the identity. The kinetic energy differs between the two spatial regions, so the local wave numbers differ. Matching the wavefunction and its derivative then produces reflection and transmission. This is a physical Potential Step, not a change of energy origin.
References
Section titled “References”- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
- B. C. Hall, Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, 2013.
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, 1975.