Skip to content

Experiment Index

This index is a routing table for landmark experiments and experimental families. It is designed for quick orientation: what was observed, what quantum concept it supports, where the narrative page lives, and where the modern formalism belongs.

Approximate dates mark landmark papers or experimental periods, not the full lifetime of an idea. The formal lessons are modern reconstructions; original authors often used different language.

Experiment or familyApproximate datePhysical phenomenonQuantum concept supportedCanonical or current pageModern formalism pageTypical level
Blackbody radiation1900-1901Thermal radiation spectrumQuantized energy exchange; failure of classical equipartitionBlackbody RadiationEnergy Eigenstatesundergraduate
Photoelectric effect1905-1916Electron emission threshold and stopping potentialLight-quanta energy transfer; frequency thresholdPhotoelectric EffectHamiltoniansundergraduate
Atomic spectra and Balmer/Rydberg regularities1880s-1910sSharp emission and absorption linesDiscrete transition frequencies; spectral data needing energy levelsAtomic SpectraSpectraundergraduate
Rutherford scattering1909-1911Large-angle alpha scatteringNuclear atom; failure of diffuse positive-charge modelsRutherford ScatteringCoulomb Potentialundergraduate
Franck–Hertz experiment1914Inelastic electron-atom collisionsDiscrete atomic excitation energiesFranck–Hertz ExperimentTransition Probabilitiesundergraduate
Stern–Gerlach experiment1922Neutral atomic beam splittingDiscrete angular-momentum-like outcomes; spin-component measurementStern–Gerlach ExperimentSpin-1/2 Hilbert Spaceundergraduate
Compton scattering1923X-ray wavelength shift in scatteringPhoton momentum and relativistic collision kinematicsCompton ScatteringScattering Amplitudeadvanced undergraduate
Davisson–Germer electron diffraction1927Electron diffraction from nickel crystalMatter waves; wavelength-momentum relationDavisson–Germer ExperimentMomentum Eigenstatesundergraduate
G. P. Thomson electron diffraction1927-1928Electron diffraction rings from thin filmsMatter waves; transmission diffraction geometryG. P. Thomson ExperimentMomentum Eigenstatesundergraduate
Double-slit and electron interference1800s; 1961; 1989Interference from coherent alternativesProbability amplitudes; phase; which-way informationDouble-Slit ExperimentProbability Amplitudesundergraduate
Bell test experiments1970s-1980sCorrelation measurements violating Bell inequalitiesEntanglement; limits of local hidden-variable modelsBell TestsBell Theoremadvanced undergraduate
Quantum Hall discovery1980Quantized Hall conductance in two-dimensional electron systemsTopological and many-body quantizationQuantum Hall DiscoveryLandau Levelsgraduate
Bose–Einstein condensation in dilute gases1995Macroscopic occupation of a quantum stateQuantum statistics; many-body coherenceBose–Einstein CondensationIdentical particles pages to be addedadvanced undergraduate

Use these sources as anchors, not as replacements for modern exposition. Original papers often use notation and interpretive language that predate the final formalism.

TopicPrimary or near-primary sourceWhy it matters
Blackbody radiationM. Planck, 1901, DOI: 10.1002/andp.19013090310Introduces the radiation formula and energy-element reasoning.
Light quantaA. Einstein, 1905, DOI: 10.1002/andp.19053220607Connects frequency to energy exchange in light phenomena.
Nuclear atomE. Rutherford, 1911, DOI: 10.1080/14786440508637080Interprets large-angle scattering as evidence for a concentrated nucleus.
Bohr atomN. Bohr, 1913, DOI: 10.1080/14786441308634955Uses old quantum postulates to explain hydrogen spectral regularities.
Sommerfeld modelA. Sommerfeld, 1916Extends old quantum theory with action quantization, elliptical orbits, and fine-structure corrections.
Stern–GerlachW. Gerlach and O. Stern, 1922, DOI: 10.1007/BF01326983Gives experimental evidence for directional quantization.
Compton scatteringA. H. Compton, 1923, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.21.483Treats X-ray scattering with photon energy-momentum kinematics.
Matter wavesL. de Broglie, 1924-1925Proposes wavelength-momentum relation for material particles.
Electron diffractionC. Davisson and L. H. Germer, 1927, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.30.705; G. P. Thomson and A. Reid, 1927, DOI: 10.1038/119890a0Confirms wave-like scattering and transmission diffraction of electrons.
Born probability ruleM. Born, 1926, DOI: 10.1007/BF01397477Connects wave mechanics to scattering probabilities.
EPR correlationsA. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, 1935, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777Sharpens the completeness/locality problem.
Bell theoremJ. S. Bell, 1964, DOI: 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195Converts the EPR debate into experimentally testable inequalities.
Aspect-era Bell testsA. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, 1982, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91Establishes controlled polarization-correlation tests violating Bell inequalities.

Use the Canonical or current page column when you want the historical story. Use the Modern formalism page column when you want the mathematical rule. For example, Stern–Gerlach belongs historically to spin evidence, while its modern calculation belongs to spin Hilbert spaces and projective measurement.

When a full historical page is not yet written, this index routes to a compact Reference card. Those cards preserve lookup discipline while the narrative volume grows.

  • Treating the date as the exact birthday of the modern concept.
  • Treating a reference card as a substitute for the full apparatus history.
  • Reading modern Hilbert-space language back into every original paper.
  • Forgetting that several experiments often support the same formal structure from different sides.
  • Treating “quantum concept supported” as “complete proof of the postulates.”
  • M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., American Institute of Physics, 1989.
  • J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg, The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Springer, 1982-2001.
  • G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  1. A reader wants to understand why coherent alternatives require amplitudes. Which index row and formal page should they use?
Solution

Use the double-slit and electron interference row. The historical route is Double-Slit Experiment, and the formal route is Probability Amplitudes.

  1. A reader wants evidence for discrete spin-component outcomes. Which row is most direct, and what caution should they keep in mind?
Solution

Use the Stern–Gerlach row. The caution is that the original experiment used neutral silver atoms and was historically interpreted before modern electron spin was fully established; the modern spin-1/21/2 account is a later, cleaner reconstruction.

  1. Why should Bell tests be routed both to an experiment card and to a theorem page?
Solution

The experiment card describes the physical correlation measurements and historical context. The theorem page states the assumptions and mathematical inequality. Both are needed because Bell-test conclusions depend on the experimental setup and on the precise theoretical assumptions behind Bell’s theorem.