Experiment Index
This index is a routing table for landmark experiments and experimental families. It is designed for quick orientation: what was observed, what quantum concept it supports, where the narrative page lives, and where the modern formalism belongs.
Approximate dates mark landmark papers or experimental periods, not the full lifetime of an idea. The formal lessons are modern reconstructions; original authors often used different language.
Fast Lookup
Section titled “Fast Lookup”| Experiment or family | Approximate date | Physical phenomenon | Quantum concept supported | Canonical or current page | Modern formalism page | Typical level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackbody radiation | 1900-1901 | Thermal radiation spectrum | Quantized energy exchange; failure of classical equipartition | Blackbody Radiation | Energy Eigenstates | undergraduate |
| Photoelectric effect | 1905-1916 | Electron emission threshold and stopping potential | Light-quanta energy transfer; frequency threshold | Photoelectric Effect | Hamiltonians | undergraduate |
| Atomic spectra and Balmer/Rydberg regularities | 1880s-1910s | Sharp emission and absorption lines | Discrete transition frequencies; spectral data needing energy levels | Atomic Spectra | Spectra | undergraduate |
| Rutherford scattering | 1909-1911 | Large-angle alpha scattering | Nuclear atom; failure of diffuse positive-charge models | Rutherford Scattering | Coulomb Potential | undergraduate |
| Franck–Hertz experiment | 1914 | Inelastic electron-atom collisions | Discrete atomic excitation energies | Franck–Hertz Experiment | Transition Probabilities | undergraduate |
| Stern–Gerlach experiment | 1922 | Neutral atomic beam splitting | Discrete angular-momentum-like outcomes; spin-component measurement | Stern–Gerlach Experiment | Spin-1/2 Hilbert Space | undergraduate |
| Compton scattering | 1923 | X-ray wavelength shift in scattering | Photon momentum and relativistic collision kinematics | Compton Scattering | Scattering Amplitude | advanced undergraduate |
| Davisson–Germer electron diffraction | 1927 | Electron diffraction from nickel crystal | Matter waves; wavelength-momentum relation | Davisson–Germer Experiment | Momentum Eigenstates | undergraduate |
| G. P. Thomson electron diffraction | 1927-1928 | Electron diffraction rings from thin films | Matter waves; transmission diffraction geometry | G. P. Thomson Experiment | Momentum Eigenstates | undergraduate |
| Double-slit and electron interference | 1800s; 1961; 1989 | Interference from coherent alternatives | Probability amplitudes; phase; which-way information | Double-Slit Experiment | Probability Amplitudes | undergraduate |
| Bell test experiments | 1970s-1980s | Correlation measurements violating Bell inequalities | Entanglement; limits of local hidden-variable models | Bell Tests | Bell Theorem | advanced undergraduate |
| Quantum Hall discovery | 1980 | Quantized Hall conductance in two-dimensional electron systems | Topological and many-body quantization | Quantum Hall Discovery | Landau Levels | graduate |
| Bose–Einstein condensation in dilute gases | 1995 | Macroscopic occupation of a quantum state | Quantum statistics; many-body coherence | Bose–Einstein Condensation | Identical particles pages to be added | advanced undergraduate |
Primary-Source Anchors
Section titled “Primary-Source Anchors”Use these sources as anchors, not as replacements for modern exposition. Original papers often use notation and interpretive language that predate the final formalism.
| Topic | Primary or near-primary source | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Blackbody radiation | M. Planck, 1901, DOI: 10.1002/andp.19013090310 | Introduces the radiation formula and energy-element reasoning. |
| Light quanta | A. Einstein, 1905, DOI: 10.1002/andp.19053220607 | Connects frequency to energy exchange in light phenomena. |
| Nuclear atom | E. Rutherford, 1911, DOI: 10.1080/14786440508637080 | Interprets large-angle scattering as evidence for a concentrated nucleus. |
| Bohr atom | N. Bohr, 1913, DOI: 10.1080/14786441308634955 | Uses old quantum postulates to explain hydrogen spectral regularities. |
| Sommerfeld model | A. Sommerfeld, 1916 | Extends old quantum theory with action quantization, elliptical orbits, and fine-structure corrections. |
| Stern–Gerlach | W. Gerlach and O. Stern, 1922, DOI: 10.1007/BF01326983 | Gives experimental evidence for directional quantization. |
| Compton scattering | A. H. Compton, 1923, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.21.483 | Treats X-ray scattering with photon energy-momentum kinematics. |
| Matter waves | L. de Broglie, 1924-1925 | Proposes wavelength-momentum relation for material particles. |
| Electron diffraction | C. Davisson and L. H. Germer, 1927, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.30.705; G. P. Thomson and A. Reid, 1927, DOI: 10.1038/119890a0 | Confirms wave-like scattering and transmission diffraction of electrons. |
| Born probability rule | M. Born, 1926, DOI: 10.1007/BF01397477 | Connects wave mechanics to scattering probabilities. |
| EPR correlations | A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, 1935, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 | Sharpens the completeness/locality problem. |
| Bell theorem | J. S. Bell, 1964, DOI: 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 | Converts the EPR debate into experimentally testable inequalities. |
| Aspect-era Bell tests | A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, 1982, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 | Establishes controlled polarization-correlation tests violating Bell inequalities. |
How to Use the Index
Section titled “How to Use the Index”Use the Canonical or current page column when you want the historical story. Use the Modern formalism page column when you want the mathematical rule. For example, Stern–Gerlach belongs historically to spin evidence, while its modern calculation belongs to spin Hilbert spaces and projective measurement.
When a full historical page is not yet written, this index routes to a compact Reference card. Those cards preserve lookup discipline while the narrative volume grows.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating the date as the exact birthday of the modern concept.
- Treating a reference card as a substitute for the full apparatus history.
- Reading modern Hilbert-space language back into every original paper.
- Forgetting that several experiments often support the same formal structure from different sides.
- Treating “quantum concept supported” as “complete proof of the postulates.”
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Evidence Map
- From Evidence to Postulates
- Experiment and Historical Index
- Named Experiments
- What the Formalism Is
References
Section titled “References”- M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., American Institute of Physics, 1989.
- J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg, The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Springer, 1982-2001.
- G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- A reader wants to understand why coherent alternatives require amplitudes. Which index row and formal page should they use?
Solution
Use the double-slit and electron interference row. The historical route is Double-Slit Experiment, and the formal route is Probability Amplitudes.
- A reader wants evidence for discrete spin-component outcomes. Which row is most direct, and what caution should they keep in mind?
Solution
Use the Stern–Gerlach row. The caution is that the original experiment used neutral silver atoms and was historically interpreted before modern electron spin was fully established; the modern spin- account is a later, cleaner reconstruction.
- Why should Bell tests be routed both to an experiment card and to a theorem page?
Solution
The experiment card describes the physical correlation measurements and historical context. The theorem page states the assumptions and mathematical inequality. Both are needed because Bell-test conclusions depend on the experimental setup and on the precise theoretical assumptions behind Bell’s theorem.