Skip to content

Inelastic Scattering Preview

Inelastic scattering is a collision in which the outgoing asymptotic channel has a different internal energy or different channel label from the incoming one. Translational kinetic energy can become rotational, vibrational, electronic, hyperfine, spin, nuclear, or collective excitation energy; the reverse process can release stored internal energy into motion.

The defining distinction is not whether the trajectory bends. Elastic scattering can redirect momentum through a large angle while preserving the internal state. A collision is inelastic when the final asymptotic state carries physically different internal information.

This page connects three canonical subjects without replacing them. Multichannel Scattering Preview owns the channel SS-matrix and Feshbach structure, Fermi’s Golden Rule owns the transition-rate limit, and Bridge to QFT Scattering owns the relativistic translation. The purpose here is to make the kinematics, flux normalization, and experimental meaning of an inelastic cross section explicit.

Let an asymptotic channel label α\alpha specify the separated objects, their internal quantum numbers, and their relative motion. A transition is written

α⟶β.\alpha\longrightarrow\beta.

The terminology is convention dependent at the edges, but the following classification is useful.

ProcessWhat changes asymptotically?Example
elasticdirection or phase, but not the internal channelground-state atom scattered through an angle
inelastic excitationinternal state, with the same particle partitionrotational excitation of a molecule
superelastic de-excitationinternal state releases energy into relative motioncollisionally quenched excited atom
rearrangement or reactiongrouping, species, or particle contentcharge transfer or chemical reaction
breakup or productionnumber of asymptotic fragmentsmolecular dissociation or particle production

In atomic and molecular collision theory, inelastic often means the same constituents in different internal states, while reactive is reserved for a new arrangement. In nuclear and particle physics, inelastic is frequently used more broadly for every nonelastic final channel. A calculation should state which convention its reported inclusive cross section uses.

For a projectile and target with relative coordinate r\mathbf r, a useful free Hamiltonian is

H0=Trel+Hint.H_0 = T_{\mathrm{rel}}+H_{\mathrm{int}}.

Let

Hint∣a⟩=ϵa∣a⟩.H_{\mathrm{int}} \lvert a\rangle = \epsilon_a\lvert a\rangle.

For a fixed two-body partition, the internal energy supplies the channel threshold. More generally, rest energies, binding energies, and the choice of fragments are included in a threshold EathE_a^{\mathrm{th}}. Energy conservation in channel aa reads

E=Eath+ℏ2ka22μa,E = E_a^{\mathrm{th}} + \frac{\hbar^2 k_a^2}{2\mu_a},

where μa\mu_a is the channel reduced mass. The channel is open when E>EathE>E_a^{\mathrm{th}} and closed when E<EathE<E_a^{\mathrm{th}}. A closed channel carries no flux to infinity, although virtual coupling to it can still shift an open-channel amplitude or generate a resonance.

Define the channel Q-value by

Qβα≡Eαth−Eβth.Q_{\beta\alpha} \equiv E_\alpha^{\mathrm{th}} - E_\beta^{\mathrm{th}}.

Then the final relative kinetic energy is

Kβ=Kα+Qβα.K_\beta = K_\alpha+Q_{\beta\alpha}.

With this convention:

  • Qβα<0Q_{\beta\alpha}<0 is endothermic; the collision must supply internal energy.
  • Qβα>0Q_{\beta\alpha}>0 is exothermic; internal or binding energy is released into motion.
  • Qβα=0Q_{\beta\alpha}=0 does not by itself imply an elastic process, because degenerate internal states can still differ.

For an endothermic transition, the channel opens only when

Kα≥−Qβα.K_\alpha \ge -Q_{\beta\alpha}.

Channel thresholds and kinetic-energy intervals for an endothermic inelastic collision

At fixed total energy EE, raising the internal threshold from EαthE_\alpha^{\mathrm{th}} to EβthE_\beta^{\mathrm{th}} reduces the outgoing kinetic energy. The exit channel is open only when its threshold lies below EE. Reversing the thresholds describes an exothermic transition.

Write the interaction as an operator on both relative and internal coordinates,

V=V(r,ξ),V=V(\mathbf r,\xi),

where ξ\xi denotes the target or composite system’s internal variables. Expanding a stationary state in internal eigenstates gives, schematically,

∣Ψ⟩=∑a∣ψa⟩⊗∣a⟩.\lvert\Psi\rangle = \sum_a \lvert\psi_a\rangle \otimes \lvert a\rangle.

The channel-coupling potentials are

Vba(r)=⟨b∣V(r,ξ)∣a⟩.V_{ba}(\mathbf r) = \langle b\rvert V(\mathbf r,\xi) \lvert a\rangle.

Diagonal elements VaaV_{aa} distort motion without changing the internal state. Off-diagonal elements VbaV_{ba} drive transitions. If symmetry forces an off-diagonal matrix element to vanish, that channel is forbidden at the corresponding order even when it is kinematically open.

For a simplified partial-wave problem with one reduced mass, the radial equations have the coupled form

[−ℏ22μd2dr2+ℏ2ℓb(ℓb+1)2μr2]ub(r)+(Ebth−E)ub(r)+∑aVba(r)ua(r)=0.\begin{aligned} &\left[ -\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} \frac{d^2}{dr^2} + \frac{\hbar^2\ell_b(\ell_b+1)} {2\mu r^2} \right]u_b(r) \\ &\quad +(E_b^{\mathrm{th}}-E)u_b(r) \\ &\quad +\sum_a V_{ba}(r)u_a(r) =0. \end{aligned}

This equation makes the mechanism transparent: channel amplitudes exchange probability only where the off-diagonal couplings are appreciable. Full reactive scattering may require different Jacobi coordinates and reduced masses for different arrangements, so one common radial coordinate is then only a schematic guide.

Choose an incoming channel α\alpha. In a coordinate-space normalization convenient for cross sections, the large-distance state has the structure

Ψα(+)∼Φαeikα⋅r+∑β openΦβfβα(Ωβ)eikβrr.\begin{aligned} \Psi_\alpha^{(+)} \sim{}& \Phi_\alpha e^{i\mathbf k_\alpha\cdot\mathbf r} \\ &+ \sum_{\beta\,\mathrm{open}} \Phi_\beta f_{\beta\alpha}(\Omega_\beta) \frac{e^{ik_\beta r}}{r}. \end{aligned}

Here Φa\Phi_a is the internal channel state and fβαf_{\beta\alpha} is the amplitude for the resolved transition α→β\alpha\to\beta. Different dynamical histories leading to the same final channel contribute coherently to fβαf_{\beta\alpha}. Orthogonal final internal channels are distinct records and their probabilities are summed after squaring.

This distinction prevents a common error. If two amplitudes A1A_1 and A2A_2 end in the same state, the probability contains interference:

P∝∣A1+A2∣2.P \propto \lvert A_1+A_2\rvert^2.

If they end in orthogonal states ∣β1⟩\lvert\beta_1\rangle and ∣β2⟩\lvert\beta_2\rangle, an unresolved detector gives

Pinclusive∝∣Aβ1∣2+∣Aβ2∣2.P_{\mathrm{inclusive}} \propto \lvert A_{\beta_1}\rvert^2 + \lvert A_{\beta_2}\rvert^2.

The outgoing spherical wave in channel β\beta carries radial current proportional to

jβ,r=vβr2∣fβα∣2,j_{\beta,r} = \frac{v_\beta}{r^2} \lvert f_{\beta\alpha}\rvert^2,

while the incident plane wave carries current jα=vαj_\alpha=v_\alpha in this normalization. Therefore

dσβ←αdΩβ=vβvα∣fβα(Ωβ)∣2,\frac{d\sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha}}{d\Omega_\beta} = \frac{v_\beta}{v_\alpha} \left| f_{\beta\alpha}(\Omega_\beta) \right|^2,

with

va=ℏkaμa.v_a = \frac{\hbar k_a}{\mu_a}.

For the same reduced mass in both channels, the prefactor is kβ/kαk_\beta/k_\alpha. It is one only in elastic scattering with equal incoming and outgoing speeds. The factor is not an optional convention: it converts amplitude into outgoing flux.

If the incoming channel has degeneracy gαg_\alpha and the experiment does not polarize or resolve internal substates, the reported observable usually averages over initial labels and sums over final labels:

dσβ←αdΩβ=1gαvβvα×∑mα,mβ∣fβmβ,αmα∣2.\begin{aligned} \frac{d\sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha}}{d\Omega_\beta} =& \frac{1}{g_\alpha} \frac{v_\beta}{v_\alpha} \\ &\times \sum_{m_\alpha,m_\beta} \left| f_{\beta m_\beta,\alpha m_\alpha} \right|^2. \end{aligned}

The inclusive inelastic cross section is a sum over the channels counted as inelastic by the stated convention:

σinel,α=∑βopenβ≠α∫dΩβ dσβ←αdΩβ.\sigma_{\mathrm{inel},\alpha} = \sum_{\substack{ \beta\,\mathrm{open} \\ \beta\ne\alpha }} \int d\Omega_\beta\, \frac{d\sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha}}{d\Omega_\beta}.

When the final internal spectrum is continuous, the channel sum becomes an energy integral and one measures distributions such as

d2σdΩ dEf.\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega\,dE_f}.

The detector definition decides which quantum numbers are held fixed, summed, averaged, or integrated. Differential and Total Cross Sections gives the general event-rate interpretation.

In weak coupling, a transition from an incoming continuum state ∣i⟩\lvert i\rangle to final states near ∣f⟩\lvert f\rangle has the golden-rule form

dΓi→f=2πℏ∣⟨f∣V∣i⟩∣2δ(Ef−Ei)dρf.d\Gamma_{i\to f} = \frac{2\pi}{\hbar} \left| \langle f\rvert V\lvert i\rangle \right|^2 \delta(E_f-E_i) d\rho_f.

For one target, a cross section is the transition rate divided by the incident particle flux density:

dσi→f=dΓi→fjin.d\sigma_{i\to f} = \frac{d\Gamma_{i\to f}}{j_{\mathrm{in}}}.

With one incoming plane-wave particle normalized in a volume V\mathcal V,

jin=viV.j_{\mathrm{in}} = \frac{v_i}{\mathcal V}.

The normalization volume cancels against the continuum density of final states. What remains is the same physical structure seen above: a squared transition amplitude, an energy-conserving phase-space factor, and division by incident flux.

The golden rule is the weak-coupling limit, not the complete scattering theory. Repeated interaction and outgoing boundary conditions are resummed by the transition operator

T(E)=V+VG0(+)(E)T(E).T(E) = V + V G_0^{(+)}(E)T(E).

At first Born order, T≈VT\approx V, and the golden-rule matrix element is recovered. Beyond that order, the exact on-shell TT-matrix replaces the bare interaction. In an energy-normalized convention, this connection is summarized schematically by

Sfi=δfi−2πi δ(Ef−Ei)Tfi.S_{fi} = \delta_{fi} - 2\pi i\, \delta(E_f-E_i) T_{fi}.

Factors of ℏ\hbar, momenta, and 2π2\pi move when state normalizations change. T-Matrix fixes the nonrelativistic convention used for exact amplitudes, while Fermi’s Golden Rule states the time-scale assumptions behind the rate limit.

A Two-Level Target in First Born Approximation

Section titled “A Two-Level Target in First Born Approximation”

Consider target states ∣g⟩\lvert g\rangle and ∣e⟩\lvert e\rangle separated by

ϵe−ϵg=Δ>0.\epsilon_e-\epsilon_g = \Delta>0.

Take an interaction

V(r,ξ)=Vd(r)+W(r)O(ξ),V(\mathbf r,\xi) = V_d(\mathbf r) + W(\mathbf r)\mathcal O(\xi),

where VdV_d is diagonal in the target states and O\mathcal O can excite the target. With the Fourier-transform convention

W~(q)=∫d3r e−iq⋅rW(r),\widetilde W(\mathbf q) = \int d^3r\, e^{-i\mathbf q\cdot\mathbf r} W(\mathbf r),

the first Born excitation amplitude is

feg(B)(q)=−μ2πℏ2W~(q)⟨e∣O∣g⟩.f_{eg}^{(\mathrm B)}(\mathbf q) = -\frac{\mu}{2\pi\hbar^2} \widetilde W(\mathbf q) \langle e\rvert\mathcal O\lvert g\rangle.

For equal entrance and exit reduced masses,

ke=kg2−2μΔℏ2.k_e = \sqrt{ k_g^2 - \frac{2\mu\Delta}{\hbar^2} }.

The channel is closed when the expression under the square root is negative. Above threshold,

dσe←g(B)dΩ=kekg∣feg(B)(q)∣2.\frac{d\sigma_{e\leftarrow g}^{(\mathrm B)}}{d\Omega} = \frac{k_e}{k_g} \left| f_{eg}^{(\mathrm B)}(\mathbf q) \right|^2.

Because the outgoing speed differs from the incoming speed, the momentum transfer is not determined by the angle alone:

q2=kg2+ke2−2kgkecos⁡θ.q^2 = k_g^2+k_e^2 - 2k_gk_e\cos\theta.

This elementary model separates three ingredients:

  1. Kinematics: kek_e and the channel threshold.
  2. Spatial resolution: the form factor W~(q)\widetilde W(\mathbf q).
  3. Internal dynamics: the matrix element ⟨e∣O∣g⟩\langle e\rvert\mathcal O\lvert g\rangle.

A selection rule can make the third factor vanish. A rapidly decaying form factor can suppress large momentum transfer even when the transition is symmetry allowed. A channel can therefore be kinematically open yet dynamically weak.

Opening a channel creates nonanalytic energy dependence because

kβ∝E−Eβth.k_\beta \propto \sqrt{E-E_\beta^{\mathrm{th}}}.

For a short-range interaction and a fixed entrance momentum, the Wigner threshold law for an exit partial wave ℓβ\ell_\beta has the form

σβ←α(ℓβ)∝kβ2ℓβ+1.\sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha}^{(\ell_\beta)} \propto k_\beta^{2\ell_\beta+1}.

Thus an ss-wave exit channel turns on as kβk_\beta, whereas a pp-wave exit channel turns on as kβ3k_\beta^3. The centrifugal barrier suppresses higher exit angular momenta near threshold.

This compact law has qualifications:

  • if the entrance channel is simultaneously near its own threshold, entrance powers also matter;
  • Coulomb or other long-range tails modify the short-range law;
  • a nearby bound state or resonance can dominate the smooth threshold scaling;
  • detector resolution can smear the mathematical cusp.

For an exothermic ss-wave process as kα→0k_\alpha\to0, the rate coefficient

Kloss=vασinelK_{\mathrm{loss}} = v_\alpha\sigma_{\mathrm{inel}}

can approach a finite limit even while σinel∝1/kα\sigma_{\mathrm{inel}}\propto1/k_\alpha. A divergent cross section does not then imply a divergent event rate per incident density; the incident speed vanishes at the same time.

Energy conservation decides whether a channel is open. Symmetry decides whether it can couple. Depending on the Hamiltonian, useful conserved quantities include total angular momentum, its projection, parity, total spin, exchange symmetry, and charges.

For example, if the coupling operator is a spherical tensor of rank λ\lambda, angular-momentum addition constrains which internal rotational states can be connected. Parity gives an independent condition. The spatial relative-motion partial wave can exchange angular momentum with the target, so a rule for the target alone is not generally a rule for the complete collision.

The reliable procedure is to apply symmetry to the complete channel state and interaction matrix element,

⟨β∣V∣α⟩,\langle\beta\rvert V\lvert\alpha\rangle,

not to infer a transition from energy conservation alone. Selection Rules in Transition Rates develops the matrix-element logic, and Identical-Particle Scattering treats exchange constraints when the outgoing particles are indistinguishable.

An exclusive measurement specifies the final channel as fully as the apparatus permits: internal level, spin state, emission direction, energy, or fragment identity. An inclusive measurement sums over some or all unobserved final channels.

If a projectile transfers momentum ℏq\hbar\mathbf q and energy ℏω\hbar\omega to a many-body target, a common observable is a double-differential cross section. Schematically,

d2σdΩ dEf∝kfkiS(q,ω),\frac{d^2\sigma}{d\Omega\,dE_f} \propto \frac{k_f}{k_i} S(\mathbf q,\omega),

where the dynamic structure factor has the spectral form

S(q,ω)=∑n∣⟨n∣ρq∣0⟩∣2×δ(ℏω−En+E0).\begin{aligned} S(\mathbf q,\omega) ={}& \sum_n \left| \langle n\rvert \rho_{\mathbf q} \lvert0\rangle \right|^2 \\ &\quad\times \delta \left( \hbar\omega-E_n+E_0 \right). \end{aligned}

This is golden-rule physics written as a target correlation spectrum. The channel sum is now a sum over many-body excitations. Structure Factors owns the normalized many-body spectrum, detailed balance, moments, and probe-specific forward models; Linear Response Preview develops the response viewpoint.

Inclusive sums are also what make unitarity operational. If every open final channel is included, lost elastic probability reappears in inelastic or reactive channels. Observing only one elastic element can give

∣Sαα(ℓ)∣<1\left|S_{\alpha\alpha}^{(\ell)}\right|<1

without violating unitarity of the full SS-matrix. Unitarity derives the channel sum, and Optical Theorem relates the inclusive total cross section to forward elastic scattering.

Time-reversal invariance relates a transition to its inverse. For angle-integrated two-body cross sections, with initial substates averaged and final substates summed, a common detailed-balance relation is

gαkα2σβ←α=gβkβ2σα←β.g_\alpha k_\alpha^2 \sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha} = g_\beta k_\beta^2 \sigma_{\alpha\leftarrow\beta}.

Here gag_a is the channel degeneracy. The two sides are evaluated at the same total energy and with reversed kinematics. External magnetic fields, polarization conventions, identical-particle factors, or time-reversal-violating dynamics require corresponding care. Detailed balance is a strong normalization and phase-space check because it tests both matrix-element reciprocity and channel counting.

The nonrelativistic result already contains the skeleton of a relativistic cross section:

dσ=1incident flux×∣transition amplitude∣2×d(final phase space).\begin{aligned} d\sigma ={}& \frac{1}{\text{incident flux}} \\ &\times \left| \text{transition amplitude} \right|^2 \\ &\times d(\text{final phase space}). \end{aligned}

In quantum field theory, the fixed-particle potential matrix element becomes an invariant amplitude M\mathcal M, the density of states becomes Lorentz-invariant multiparticle phase space dΦnd\Phi_n, and particle production is a natural inelastic channel. Schematically,

dσ=1F∣M∣2‾dΦn.d\sigma = \frac{1}{\mathcal F} \overline{\lvert\mathcal M\rvert^2} d\Phi_n.

The bar denotes the required spin sums and averages, and F\mathcal F is the relativistic flux factor. The logic survives; the normalization and kinematics change.

  1. List the asymptotic channels and state exactly what each label contains.
  2. Record every threshold EathE_a^{\mathrm{th}} and reduced mass μa\mu_a.
  3. At the chosen total energy, classify channels as open or closed and compute each kak_a and vav_a.
  4. Apply exact conservation laws and symmetry selection rules before doing dynamics.
  5. Compute the relevant coupling matrix elements or on-shell TβαT_{\beta\alpha}.
  6. Convert amplitudes to cross sections with the outgoing-to-incoming velocity ratio.
  7. Sum, average, or integrate over final and initial labels exactly as the experiment does.
  8. Check threshold scaling, unitarity, and detailed balance where applicable.
  • Calling every change of direction inelastic.
  • Forgetting to define whether rearrangement and breakup are included in σinel\sigma_{\mathrm{inel}}.
  • Setting vβ/vα=1v_\beta/v_\alpha=1 when internal excitation changes the outgoing speed.
  • Adding probabilities for two pathways that end in the same coherent final state.
  • Adding amplitudes for orthogonal final internal states that should be summed incoherently.
  • Treating a closed channel as dynamically irrelevant rather than merely unable to carry asymptotic flux.
  • Applying the golden rule near strong coupling, a sharp resonance, or substantial initial-state depletion.
  • Confusing the sign of the Q-value; state the convention before using endothermic or exothermic.
  • Ignoring spin averages, degeneracies, identical-particle factors, or detector acceptance.
  • Interpreting ∣Sαα∣<1|S_{\alpha\alpha}|<1 as failure of unitarity instead of elastic flux entering other open channels.

A projectile with reduced mass μ\mu scatters from a two-level target whose excited state lies an energy Δ\Delta above the ground state. The incoming relative wave number is kik_i. Find the outgoing wave number for excitation, the threshold condition, and the kinematic factor multiplying ∣feg∣2|f_{eg}|^2.

Solution

Energy conservation gives

ℏ2ki22μ=Δ+ℏ2kf22μ.\frac{\hbar^2k_i^2}{2\mu} = \Delta + \frac{\hbar^2k_f^2}{2\mu}.

Therefore

kf=ki2−2μΔℏ2.k_f = \sqrt{ k_i^2 - \frac{2\mu\Delta}{\hbar^2} }.

The excitation channel is open only if

ℏ2ki22μ≥Δ.\frac{\hbar^2k_i^2}{2\mu} \ge \Delta.

For equal reduced masses, the differential cross section is

dσe←gdΩ=kfki∣feg∣2.\frac{d\sigma_{e\leftarrow g}}{d\Omega} = \frac{k_f}{k_i} |f_{eg}|^2.

The kinematic factor vanishes at threshold, although a singular or resonant amplitude can modify the naive smooth turn-on.

An outgoing channel has asymptotic radial wave

ψβ=fβα(Ω)eikβrr.\psi_\beta = f_{\beta\alpha}(\Omega) \frac{e^{ik_\beta r}}{r}.

Use probability currents to derive the channel differential cross section.

Solution

At leading order in 1/r1/r, the outgoing radial current is

jβ,r=ℏkβμβ∣fβα∣2r2=vβ∣fβα∣2r2.j_{\beta,r} = \frac{\hbar k_\beta}{\mu_\beta} \frac{|f_{\beta\alpha}|^2}{r^2} = v_\beta \frac{|f_{\beta\alpha}|^2}{r^2}.

The flux crossing area r2dΩr^2d\Omega per unit time is

dRβ=vβ∣fβα∣2dΩ.dR_\beta = v_\beta |f_{\beta\alpha}|^2 d\Omega.

Dividing by the incident plane-wave current jα=vαj_\alpha=v_\alpha gives

dσβ←αdΩ=vβvα∣fβα∣2.\frac{d\sigma_{\beta\leftarrow\alpha}}{d\Omega} = \frac{v_\beta}{v_\alpha} |f_{\beta\alpha}|^2.

In the two-level model, let

W(r)=W0e−r2/(2a2).W(r) = W_0e^{-r^2/(2a^2)}.

Find W~(q)\widetilde W(\mathbf q) and describe the angular dependence of the first Born excitation cross section.

Solution

The three-dimensional Gaussian transform factorizes into three one-dimensional integrals:

W~(q)=(2π)3/2a3W0e−a2q2/2.\widetilde W(\mathbf q) = (2\pi)^{3/2} a^3W_0 e^{-a^2q^2/2}.

Thus

dσe←g(B)dΩ∝kekge−a2q2×∣⟨e∣O∣g⟩∣2.\begin{aligned} \frac{d\sigma_{e\leftarrow g}^{(\mathrm B)}}{d\Omega} \propto{}& \frac{k_e}{k_g} e^{-a^2q^2} \\ &\times \left| \langle e\rvert\mathcal O\lvert g\rangle \right|^2. \end{aligned}

Because

q2=kg2+ke2−2kgkecos⁡θ,q^2 = k_g^2+k_e^2-2k_gk_e\cos\theta,

large-angle scattering generally requires larger momentum transfer and is exponentially suppressed when aa is large compared with the relevant wavelength. Internal excitation also changes kek_e, so the elastic identity q=2ksin⁡(θ/2)q=2k\sin(\theta/2) does not apply.

Two dynamical paths lead to the same final channel with amplitudes A1A_1 and A2A_2. Two other paths lead to orthogonal final channels with amplitudes B1B_1 and B2B_2. What does an unresolved detector count in each case?

Solution

For the same final channel, amplitudes add before squaring:

PA=∣A1+A2∣2=∣A1∣2+∣A2∣2+2Re⁡(A1A2∗).\begin{aligned} P_A &= |A_1+A_2|^2 \\ &= |A_1|^2+|A_2|^2 \\ &\quad +2\operatorname{Re}(A_1A_2^*). \end{aligned}

For orthogonal final channels, tracing or summing over the unobserved channel label removes the cross term:

PB=∣B1∣2+∣B2∣2.P_B = |B_1|^2+|B_2|^2.

Detector nonresolution does not make orthogonal records coherent. Interference requires indistinguishable alternatives ending in the same quantum state, or in final states with nonzero overlap.

Near an endothermic threshold, suppose the entrance momentum is finite and the short-range transition amplitude is smooth. Determine the energy dependence for exit ss and pp waves.

Solution

Let

ε=E−Eβth>0.\varepsilon = E-E_\beta^{\mathrm{th}}>0.

Then kβ∝ε1/2k_\beta\propto\varepsilon^{1/2}. The Wigner law gives

σ(ℓβ)∝kβ2ℓβ+1.\sigma^{(\ell_\beta)} \propto k_\beta^{2\ell_\beta+1}.

For ℓβ=0\ell_\beta=0,

σ(s)∝ε1/2.\sigma^{(s)} \propto \varepsilon^{1/2}.

For ℓβ=1\ell_\beta=1,

σ(p)∝ε3/2.\sigma^{(p)} \propto \varepsilon^{3/2}.

Long-range interactions or nearby poles can change these powers or dominate the observed line shape.

For one incoming channel α\alpha, suppose the full open-channel partial-wave SS-matrix is unitary and

Sαα(ℓ)=ηℓe2iδℓ.S_{\alpha\alpha}^{(\ell)} = \eta_\ell e^{2i\delta_\ell}.

Show that the summed transition probability into all other open channels is 1−ηℓ21-\eta_\ell^2, and find the corresponding inelastic partial cross section in the standard flux-normalized convention.

Solution

Unitarity of the incoming column gives

∑β∣Sβα(ℓ)∣2=1.\sum_\beta \left| S_{\beta\alpha}^{(\ell)} \right|^2 =1.

Separating the elastic term,

∑β≠α∣Sβα(ℓ)∣2=1−∣Sαα(ℓ)∣2=1−ηℓ2.\sum_{\beta\ne\alpha} \left| S_{\beta\alpha}^{(\ell)} \right|^2 = 1- \left| S_{\alpha\alpha}^{(\ell)} \right|^2 = 1-\eta_\ell^2.

The summed inelastic partial cross section is therefore

σinel(ℓ)=πkα2(2ℓ+1)(1−ηℓ2).\sigma_{\mathrm{inel}}^{(\ell)} = \frac{\pi}{k_\alpha^2} (2\ell+1) (1-\eta_\ell^2).

The elastic element can have magnitude below one while the complete open-channel SS-matrix remains unitary.

  • J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Wiley, 1972.
  • M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, Collision Theory, Wiley, 1964.
  • C. J. Joachain, Quantum Collision Theory, North-Holland, 1975.
  • R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd ed., Springer, 1982.
  • N. F. Mott and H. S. W. Massey, The Theory of Atomic Collisions, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1965.
  • E. P. Wigner, “On the Behavior of Cross Sections Near Thresholds,” Physical Review 73, 1002–1009 (1948), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.73.1002.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • G. L. Squires, Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012.