Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization
Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization is the WKB rule for bound-state energies in a one-dimensional smooth potential well. It says that the classical action over one closed orbit is quantized in units of , with a turning-point correction. For the Core-level semiclassical orientation, see Semiclassical Limit Overview. For a complete application with an analytic action and a converged spectral benchmark, see WKB Bound States in a Smooth Potential.
For a bound orbit between two smooth turning points and ,
the WKB quantization condition is
Equivalently,
The closed integral is over a full classical period in phase space.
Bound-State Matching
Section titled “Bound-State Matching”Inside the well, the WKB wavefunction is oscillatory:
Outside the well, normalizability selects decaying forbidden-region tails. Each tail connects through a turning point to a sine-like allowed-region wave with a phase shift. Compatibility of the left and right matched forms requires the phase accumulated across the well to satisfy
This is equivalent to
Turning-Point Correction
Section titled “Turning-Point Correction”The shift is not put in by hand. It comes from the two smooth turning points. Each contributes a phase of , so together they shift the standing-wave condition by .
This is why the WKB condition differs from the old rule
For smooth one-dimensional wells, the modern WKB rule includes the Maslov correction associated with the turning points.
Harmonic Oscillator Check
Section titled “Harmonic Oscillator Check”For
the turning points are
The closed classical action is
Using the WKB rule gives
so
For the harmonic oscillator, WKB gives the exact energy spectrum. This exactness is special; most potentials receive higher-order corrections.
Large-Quantum-Number Spectra
Section titled “Large-Quantum-Number Spectra”WKB is usually most accurate for highly excited states because the action is large compared with . A useful way to read the rule is
The spacing of high-lying levels is controlled by the classical period. Since
where is the classical period, the energy spacing is approximately
This connects the density of quantum levels to classical motion.
For the undergraduate finite-well counting version of this idea, see Bound-State Counting.
Boundary Caveats
Section titled “Boundary Caveats”The formula above assumes two smooth turning points. It should not be blindly applied to hard-wall boxes, singular potentials, or discontinuous potentials. The infinite square well, for example, is better understood through exact boundary conditions; its walls are not smooth WKB turning points.
When endpoints are singular or when motion occurs on a multidimensional invariant torus, the phase correction must be modified. Those generalizations keep the same action-quantization spirit but require more geometry than the one-dimensional smooth-well rule.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Omitting the turning-point shift for a smooth well.
- Applying the smooth-turning-point formula to hard walls without adjusting the phase.
- Using WKB for the lowest few states without checking accuracy.
- Confusing the half-orbit integral with the closed-orbit integral .
- Treating the old quantum rule as equivalent to WKB without the Maslov correction.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Starting from the closed-orbit rule, derive the half-orbit form for a one-dimensional bound state.
Solution
In one dimension, the closed phase-space orbit goes from to with positive momentum and returns from to with negative momentum. The action over the closed orbit is twice the positive half-orbit integral:
Therefore
is equivalent to
- Use the harmonic oscillator action to recover the oscillator spectrum.
Solution
Substitute into the WKB rule:
Solving for gives
- Why does the smooth-well WKB rule not directly explain the exact infinite-square-well spectrum?
Solution
The infinite square well has hard walls, not smooth turning points where vanishes linearly. The phase correction comes from boundary conditions at abrupt endpoints rather than Airy matching near smooth turning points. The action idea remains useful, but the turning-point phase is different.
References
Section titled “References”- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981.
- A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Dover, 1999.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics,” Reports on Progress in Physics 35, 315-397, 1972.