Green Function for Scattering
The scattering Green function answers a sharply posed question: what stationary wave is produced at by a source at , with radiation allowed to escape rather than arrive from infinity?
For a free particle in three dimensions, the answer is the outgoing kernel
where
Its spherical factor is not imposed after the calculation. It is the coordinate-space imprint of the boundary value
This page is the canonical home for the scattering-specific chain from the resolvent prescription to an outgoing far field and then to the amplitude. Energy Green Function owns the general coordinate-kernel definition and source normalization. Scattering States and Boundary Conditions owns the radiation condition, and Lippmann–Schwinger Equation owns the exact state equation.
Convention Ledger
Section titled “Convention Ledger”Unless stated otherwise, consider relative motion with
and stationary time dependence
Wave-number states are delta normalized:
The coordinate scattering solution will instead be written with a unit-amplitude incident wave,
This distinction matters. The kernel itself is independent of how an external scattering state is normalized, but the relation between and a continuum-normalized -matrix element is not.
Why an Infinitesimal Is Needed
Section titled “Why an Infinitesimal Is Needed”At a complex energy outside the spectrum,
is an ordinary resolvent. At , however, lies in the continuous spectrum of . The formal equation
has homogeneous solutions at the same energy, so the source does not determine a unique solution until an asymptotic condition is supplied.
The two boundary values are
For the time convention above, is outgoing and is incoming. The limit is not an operator-norm limit on all of . It is understood through localized test states, distributions, or suitable weighted spaces. This is the content behind the limiting absorption principle used in mathematical scattering theory.
The scalar distribution identity
gives
Thus the prescription separates two roles:
- the principal-value term is the dispersive response from virtual, off-shell propagation;
- the delta term is supported on the free energy shell and supplies the radiative imaginary part.
In particular,
Dropping before taking the boundary value erases exactly the term that distinguishes outgoing from incoming waves.
Coordinate-Space Kernel
Section titled “Coordinate-Space Kernel”Let
In the delta-normalized wave-number basis,
After the angular integral, the outgoing boundary value becomes
Evaluating the radial transform with the prescribed boundary value gives
whereas
These normalizations can be checked without repeating the Fourier integral. Since
and
both kernels satisfy
For a real free Hamiltonian,
The outgoing kernel is symmetric under exchange of its spatial arguments, but it is not Hermitian by itself. Its adjoint is the incoming boundary value.
How the Sign Becomes a Direction
Section titled “How the Sign Becomes a Direction”For a spherical wave
the leading radial probability current is
With time dependence, carries probability outward and carries it inward. The same distinction is expressed by the Sommerfeld conditions
and
with the source coordinate held fixed. For a scattering state, the outgoing condition applies to the scattered remainder, not to the incident plane wave.
Far-Field Factorization
Section titled “Far-Field Factorization”Suppose a localized source is supported inside , and place the observer at . The exact source-to-observer distance is
The denominator and phase therefore have different accuracy requirements:
while neglecting the quadratic phase requires
The usual far-field, or Fraunhofer, regime is consequently
Defining the observed on-shell wave vector
the outgoing kernel factorizes as
The dependence on the distant observer is now entirely in and . The remaining source integral becomes the angular scattering amplitude.
A point inside a localized interaction region contributes an outgoing wave over the distance . In the far zone, , so the source-dependent phase becomes with .
From a Distributed Source to the Amplitude
Section titled “From a Distributed Source to the Amplitude”For a local short-range potential, the outgoing Lippmann–Schwinger equation in the unit-incident-amplitude convention is
The product
is an effective source. Every point in the interaction region radiates through the same outgoing kernel, and the measured far field is their coherent sum.
Using the factorized kernel gives
where
and
This amplitude formula is exact under the stated potential-scattering and short-range assumptions. The outgoing Green function does not make a Born approximation. That approximation begins only when the exact wave inside the source is replaced by the incident plane wave.
The far-field step also explains why the observable amplitude is on shell. The Green function contains every intermediate wave vector in its Fourier integral, but a distant free outgoing wave at fixed energy has magnitude . The detector direction chooses only .
With unit incident amplitude,
The flux derivation and its interference subtleties belong to Probability Current and Flux.
Relation to the T-matrix
Section titled “Relation to the T-matrix”For the delta-normalized wave-number states in the convention ledger,
where the state on the right now carries delta normalization. Converting from that state to the unit-amplitude coordinate solution gives
The factor differs in other state normalizations. T-Matrix owns the full normalization ledger, shell structure, unitarity relation, and operator identities.
Free and Full Green Functions
Section titled “Free and Full Green Functions”The kernel used to radiate the source in the Lippmann–Schwinger equation is the free Green function. The full outgoing Green function is
The resolvent identities give
These formulas assign distinct jobs:
- propagates between interactions with the chosen free radiation condition;
- contains one or arbitrarily many interactions;
- is the complete response of the interacting Hamiltonian.
Taking a distant endpoint of an external factor produces the same far-field on-shell projection derived above. Poles and cuts of the full resolvent then encode bound states, thresholds, and resonances; their canonical treatment is Bound States and Scattering Poles.
Partial-Wave Form
Section titled “Partial-Wave Form”For a central problem, define
and let be the angle between and . The addition theorem gives
Regular spherical Bessel functions appear at the smaller radius, while the outgoing spherical Hankel function appears at the larger radius. Replacing by gives the incoming kernel. This is the Green-function version of choosing an outgoing radial solution in each angular-momentum channel; see Partial-Wave Expansion.
Dimension Changes the Far Field
Section titled “Dimension Changes the Far Field”The inverse of the same free Schrödinger operator has dimension-dependent asymptotics. For :
| Dimension | Outgoing free kernel | Far-field decay |
|---|---|---|
| one | constant magnitude | |
| two | ||
| three |
Cross-section dimensions and amplitude conventions change with the spatial dimension. A three-dimensional formula for cannot be carried into a one- or two-dimensional calculation by changing only the measure.
Finite Broadening Is Not the Limit
Section titled “Finite Broadening Is Not the Limit”Numerical calculations often replace by a finite , with . Define
choosing the branch with positive imaginary part. For small ,
The nominally outgoing wave then behaves as
A finite regulator therefore adds an absorption length. It can smooth a discrete numerical spectrum and suppress reflections, but it is not the exact radiation condition. A convergence study must compare , the energy resolution, the box size, and the distance over which the outgoing wave is measured.
The kernel is also singular at . Integral-equation solvers should treat that known singularity analytically or with a quadrature designed for it rather than sampling it as an ordinary smooth function.
Limits of the Free-Kernel Argument
Section titled “Limits of the Free-Kernel Argument”Threshold
Section titled “Threshold”At , the oscillatory Sommerfeld condition degenerates and the distinction between and disappears at leading order. Zero-energy resonances and large scattering lengths require a separate threshold limit. The limits and need not commute.
Long-range interactions
Section titled “Long-range interactions”For an unscreened Coulomb potential, the exact asymptotic state contains a logarithmic phase and is not a plane wave plus a short-range spherical wave. One should use Coulomb-distorted reference states or a Coulomb Green function. See Coulomb Scattering.
Several channels
Section titled “Several channels”In a multichannel problem, each open channel has its own real wave number and outgoing kernel. A closed channel has and decays exponentially instead of carrying asymptotic flux. The Green function becomes a matrix in channel space, and velocity factors enter observable cross sections.
Nonlocal or absorptive interactions
Section titled “Nonlocal or absorptive interactions”For a nonlocal interaction, the source is
but the free kernel still carries that source to the far field. If is complex, the outgoing prescription remains meaningful, although elastic probability need not be conserved because the effective interaction represents loss into omitted channels.
QFT Propagator Bridge
Section titled “QFT Propagator Bridge”The nonrelativistic fixed-energy kernel has momentum denominator
A relativistic scalar Feynman propagator, in a common convention, has
Both formulas use analytic boundary prescriptions, but they are not the same object:
- is a one-particle resolvent boundary value at fixed energy and selects outgoing spatial radiation;
- is a spacetime vacuum correlation function whose pole prescription implements time ordering;
- a retarded relativistic propagator uses a different placement of the energy poles;
- LSZ reduction extracts scattering amplitudes from pole residues of time-ordered correlation functions rather than from a potential source integral.
The propagator of a nonrelativistic quantum field,
is algebraically closer to the resolvent, but its energy is integrated in diagrams and its normalization follows field-theory conventions. The careful translation is developed in Green Functions and Bridge to QFT Scattering.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating as an ordinary inverse at a continuum energy.
- Dropping before it has selected a boundary value.
- Calling outgoing without stating the time and Fourier conventions.
- Applying the Sommerfeld condition to the total incident-plus-scattered wave.
- Using but ignoring the stronger phase condition .
- Replacing the exact source wave by a plane wave without naming the Born approximation.
- Mixing unit-amplitude coordinate waves with delta-normalized -matrix states.
- Assuming is Hermitian rather than recognizing that its adjoint is .
- Interpreting a finite as a harmless infinitesimal even when its absorption length is comparable to the numerical domain.
- Using a free short-range kernel for unscreened Coulomb asymptotics.
- Taking the three-dimensional decay and cross-section formula into another spatial dimension.
- Equating an outgoing Schrödinger resolvent with a Feynman propagator.
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Energy Green Function
- Resolvent Operator
- Retarded and Advanced Green Functions
- Scattering States and Boundary Conditions
- Lippmann–Schwinger Equation
- Scattering Amplitude
- T-Matrix
- Born Series
- Probability Current and Flux
- Partial-Wave Expansion
- Coulomb Scattering
- Scattering Convention Dictionary
- Green Functions
References
Section titled “References”- B. A. Lippmann and J. Schwinger, “Variational principles for scattering processes. I”, Physical Review 79, 469–480 (1950).
- J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover (2006).
- R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, 2nd ed., Dover (2002).
- C. J. Joachain, Quantum Collision Theory, 3rd ed., North-Holland (1983).
- E. N. Economou, Green’s Functions in Quantum Physics, 3rd ed., Springer (2006).
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. III: Scattering Theory, Academic Press (1979).
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §10.17, “Asymptotic Expansions for Large Argument” and §10.73, “Physical Applications”.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Read the direction from the current
Section titled “Read the direction from the current”For
compute the leading radial current and identify which sign is outgoing for time dependence .
Solution
The radial current is
The derivative of is real and cancels between the two terms. The phase derivative gives
The plus sign carries positive radial flux and is outgoing. The minus sign carries negative radial flux and is incoming.
Control the far-field approximation
Section titled “Control the far-field approximation”Let and . Expand through order and identify the two dimensionless errors in replacing the outgoing kernel by its factorized far-field form.
Solution
Write
Expanding the square root gives
Replacing by has relative error . Dropping the quadratic term from has phase error . Both must be small.
Verify the resolvent jump in coordinate space
Section titled “Verify the resolvent jump in coordinate space”Use the explicit three-dimensional kernels to compute
and verify that it equals
Solution
The explicit kernels give
In the wave-number basis,
The radial delta function fixes , yielding
Multiplication by reproduces the kernel difference.
Interpret a finite regulator
Section titled “Interpret a finite regulator”For , replace by with . Show that the outgoing wave is attenuated over the length to leading order.
Solution
The complex wave number is
Expanding the square root gives
Since ,
Therefore
with .
Translate the amplitude normalization
Section titled “Translate the amplitude normalization”Let have unit incident amplitude. The corresponding delta-normalized state has coordinate wavefunction
Show that
becomes
in the delta-normalized basis.
Solution
Using
and
one finds
The integral is therefore times the -matrix element. Since
the stated relation follows.