Skip to content

Resolvent Operator

The resolvent of a Hamiltonian HH is the operator-valued function

R(z)=(zI−H)−1,R(z) = (zI-H)^{-1},

defined for complex numbers zz where the inverse exists. Physicists often also write

G(z)=(z−H)−1,G(z)=(z-H)^{-1},

leaving the identity operator implicit. The resolvent is the basic energy-domain Green-function object: it packages spectral information, boundary prescriptions, and inverse-operator intuition in one operator-valued function.

Let HH be a self-adjoint Hamiltonian on a Hilbert space. A complex number zz belongs to the resolvent set of HH if zI−HzI-H has a bounded inverse defined on the Hilbert space. For such zz,

R(z)=(zI−H)−1.R(z)=(zI-H)^{-1}.

The spectrum is the complement of the resolvent set:

σ(H)=C∖ρ(H).\sigma(H) = \mathbb C\setminus\rho(H).

For self-adjoint HH, the spectrum lies on the real axis. Therefore every nonreal zz lies in the resolvent set.

If

H=∑nEnPnH=\sum_n E_nP_n

is a finite-dimensional spectral decomposition, then

R(z)=∑nPnz−En,z≠En.R(z) = \sum_n \frac{P_n}{z-E_n}, \qquad z\ne E_n.

In an eigenbasis, the resolvent is diagonal:

R(z)=(1z−E10⋯01z−E2⋯⋮⋮⋱).R(z) = \begin{pmatrix} \dfrac{1}{z-E_1} & 0 & \cdots\\ 0 & \dfrac{1}{z-E_2} & \cdots\\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{pmatrix}.

This is the simplest way to remember the construction: the resolvent applies the scalar function fz(E)=1/(z−E)f_z(E)=1/(z-E) to the Hamiltonian.

For a general self-adjoint Hamiltonian, the spectral theorem writes

H=∫Rλ dEH(λ),H=\int_{\mathbb R}\lambda\,dE_H(\lambda),

where EHE_H is the projection-valued spectral measure. The resolvent is then

R(z)=∫R1z−λ dEH(λ),z∉σ(H).R(z) = \int_{\mathbb R} \frac{1}{z-\lambda}\,dE_H(\lambda), \qquad z\notin\sigma(H).

This is the functional calculus applied to the function

fz(λ)=1z−λ.f_z(\lambda)=\frac{1}{z-\lambda}.

For states ∣ϕ⟩|\phi\rangle and ∣ψ⟩|\psi\rangle, the matrix element is

⟨ϕ∣R(z)∣ψ⟩=∫R1z−λ dμϕ,ψ(λ),\langle\phi|R(z)|\psi\rangle = \int_{\mathbb R} \frac{1}{z-\lambda}\, d\mu_{\phi,\psi}(\lambda),

where

dμϕ,ψ(λ)=⟨ϕ∣dEH(λ)∣ψ⟩.d\mu_{\phi,\psi}(\lambda) = \langle\phi|dE_H(\lambda)|\psi\rangle.

This is why the resolvent is a spectral probe: it is a transform of the spectral measure.

For self-adjoint HH and nonreal z=E+iηz=E+i\eta,

∥R(z)∥≤1∣η∣.\|R(z)\| \le \frac{1}{|\eta|}.

More generally,

∥R(z)∥=1dist⁡(z,σ(H))\|R(z)\| = \frac{1}{\operatorname{dist}(z,\sigma(H))}

for self-adjoint HH. The resolvent becomes large when zz approaches the spectrum. This is the analytic version of the physical statement that spectral values are where the inverse becomes singular.

If EkE_k is an isolated eigenvalue with spectral projector PkP_k, then near z=Ekz=E_k,

R(z)=Pkz−Ek+Rreg(z),R(z) = \frac{P_k}{z-E_k} +R_{\rm reg}(z),

where Rreg(z)R_{\rm reg}(z) is regular near EkE_k. The pole locates the bound-state energy, and the residue is the projector onto the bound-state subspace.

For a nondegenerate bound state,

Pk=∣k⟩⟨k∣.P_k=|k\rangle\langle k|.

For a degenerate bound state, PkP_k projects onto the whole degenerate eigenspace. This residue viewpoint is the operator version of extracting states from Green-function poles.

For continuous spectrum, the resolvent usually has no isolated pole at a real continuum energy. Instead, one studies boundary values from the upper or lower half-plane:

R±(E)=lim⁡ϵ→0+(E−H±iϵ)−1.R^\pm(E) = \lim_{\epsilon\to0^+} (E-H\pm i\epsilon)^{-1}.

These limits may exist only in a weak, distributional, or weighted-space sense, depending on the problem. The sign of iϵi\epsilon selects a boundary prescription, such as outgoing or incoming scattering behavior. Taking coordinate matrix elements produces the kernels studied in Energy Green Function.

For a continuous spectral density, the imaginary part of a boundary value often carries density-of-states information. A schematic finite-volume version is

−1πIm⁡Tr⁡R(E+i0)=∑nδ(E−En),-\frac{1}{\pi}\operatorname{Im} \operatorname{Tr}R(E+i0) = \sum_n\delta(E-E_n),

with continuum versions requiring the correct trace, volume normalization, and limiting procedure.

The resolvent satisfies the identity

R(z)−R(w)=(w−z)R(z)R(w),R(z)-R(w) = (w-z)R(z)R(w),

whenever zz and ww lie in the resolvent set. In scalar form, this is just

1z−λ−1w−λ=w−z(z−λ)(w−λ).\frac{1}{z-\lambda} - \frac{1}{w-\lambda} = \frac{w-z}{(z-\lambda)(w-\lambda)}.

The identity is a workhorse in spectral theory and perturbation theory because it compares inverses at different spectral parameters.

A related identity for two Hamiltonians HH and H0H_0 is

R(z)−R0(z)=R(z)(H−H0)R0(z),R(z)-R_0(z) = R(z)(H-H_0)R_0(z),

where

R(z)=(z−H)−1,R0(z)=(z−H0)−1.R(z)=(z-H)^{-1}, \qquad R_0(z)=(z-H_0)^{-1}.

This is the algebraic ancestor of the scattering-state construction in Lippmann–Schwinger Equation Preview.

The resolvent is related to the time-evolution operator by a one-sided transform. For Im⁡z>0\operatorname{Im}z\gt0,

R(z)=1iℏ∫0∞dt eizt/ℏe−iHt/ℏ.R(z) = \frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_0^\infty dt\, e^{izt/\hbar} e^{-iHt/\hbar}.

The convergence comes from the positive imaginary part of zz. Boundary values such as E+i0E+i0 retain a memory of this time direction and prescription.

This formula explains why energy-domain Green functions and time-domain propagators are related while still being different objects. The resolvent is not the time-evolution operator; it is a transformed inverse with a spectral parameter.

  • Forgetting the identity operator in zI−HzI-H.
  • Evaluating the resolvent directly on the spectrum without an i0i0 or other prescription.
  • Treating continuous-spectrum boundary values as ordinary bounded operators without checking the functional setting.
  • Confusing resolvent poles with arbitrary peaks in a plotted response function.
  • Dropping degeneracy: the residue at a degenerate eigenvalue is a projector onto a subspace, not a single vector.
  • Replacing the time-evolution operator by the resolvent without performing the appropriate transform.
  • M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, revised and enlarged ed., Academic Press, 1980.
  • G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., American Mathematical Society, 2014.
  • B. C. Hall, Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, 2013.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover, 2006.
  1. For a two-level Hamiltonian H=E1P1+E2P2H=E_1P_1+E_2P_2, compute R(z)R(z).
Solution

Apply the scalar function fz(E)=1/(z−E)f_z(E)=1/(z-E) to each spectral value:

R(z)=P1z−E1+P2z−E2,z≠E1,E2.R(z) = \frac{P_1}{z-E_1} + \frac{P_2}{z-E_2}, \qquad z\ne E_1,E_2.
  1. Prove the resolvent identity R(z)−R(w)=(w−z)R(z)R(w)R(z)-R(w)=(w-z)R(z)R(w).
Solution

Use R(z)=(z−H)−1R(z)=(z-H)^{-1} and R(w)=(w−H)−1R(w)=(w-H)^{-1}. Then

R(z)−R(w)=R(z)[(w−H)−(z−H)]R(w).R(z)-R(w) = R(z)\bigl[(w-H)-(z-H)\bigr]R(w).

The bracket equals w−zw-z, so

R(z)−R(w)=(w−z)R(z)R(w).R(z)-R(w) = (w-z)R(z)R(w).
  1. Show from the spectral representation that an isolated eigenvalue produces a pole in the resolvent.
Solution

If EkE_k is isolated, split the spectral decomposition into its projector PkP_k and the rest:

R(z)=Pkz−Ek+∑n≠kPnz−EnR(z) = \frac{P_k}{z-E_k} + \sum_{n\ne k}\frac{P_n}{z-E_n}

in the finite-dimensional model, or the analogous spectral-integral decomposition in the general case. The second term is regular near EkE_k if no other spectrum lies there, while the first term has a simple pole with residue PkP_k.

  1. Verify the time-evolution transform for a single energy eigenstate with energy EE and Im⁡z>0\operatorname{Im}z\gt0.
Solution

On an eigenstate, the integral becomes

1iℏ∫0∞dt ei(z−E)t/ℏ.\frac{1}{i\hbar} \int_0^\infty dt\, e^{i(z-E)t/\hbar}.

Since Im⁡z>0\operatorname{Im}z\gt0, the exponential decays. The integral is

∫0∞dt ei(z−E)t/ℏ=iℏz−E.\int_0^\infty dt\, e^{i(z-E)t/\hbar} = \frac{i\hbar}{z-E}.

Multiplying by 1/(iℏ)1/(i\hbar) gives

1z−E,\frac{1}{z-E},

which is the scalar resolvent eigenvalue.