Exercises and Problems
This page is a problem index for Core Formalism. It collects the main skills readers should be able to perform after studying the volume and gives representative solved problems for self-checking.
The problems here are intentionally compact. Longer derivations and topic-specific exercises remain on their canonical teaching pages. Before using this page as an exam-style review, read the Dependency Graph of the Formalism and keep Common Checks and Sanity Tests nearby.
Skill Map
Section titled “Skill Map”| Problem group | Core skills | Preparation pages |
|---|---|---|
| State vectors and basis changes | normalize states, compute components, translate bases | State Vectors, Change of Basis |
| Born rule calculations | identify projectors, compute probabilities, handle phases | Born Rule, Probability in Different Bases |
| Expectation values, variances, and covariances | compute averages, spreads, correlations, and reality checks | Expectation Values, Variance and Standard Deviation, Correlations and Covariance |
| Commutators and uncertainty | evaluate commutators, interpret compatibility and spreads | Commutators, General Uncertainty Relations |
| Projective measurements | use projectors, degeneracy, and state update | Projective Measurement, State Update Rule |
| Time evolution | use Hamiltonians and unitary evolution | Hamiltonians, Unitary Time Evolution |
| Tensor products and entanglement | identify product states, compute local predictions | Tensor Products, Entangled States |
| Density matrices | check positivity, traces, purity, reduced states | Density Operators, Reduced Density Matrices |
| Postulates and conceptual questions | identify assumptions, scope, and interpretation boundaries | Minimal Postulates, What the Postulates Do Not Say |
Problem Metadata
Section titled “Problem Metadata”Each representative problem states:
- Level: undergraduate, graduate bridge, or conceptual review.
- Skills: compact tags such as
basis-change,born-rule,density-matrix, orpostulates. - Solution status: full solution or guided solution.
When adding new problems, keep them tied to canonical pages and avoid duplicating long derivations that already live elsewhere.
Representative Problems
Section titled “Representative Problems”1. Basis Components of a Qubit
Section titled “1. Basis Components of a Qubit”Level: undergraduate
Skills: basis-change, state-vector, normalization
Solution status: full solution
Let
Compute the components of in the basis and check normalization.
Solution
The new components are inner products with the new basis:
Normalization is preserved:
2. Born Rule in Two Bases
Section titled “2. Born Rule in Two Bases”Level: undergraduate
Skills: born-rule, relative-phase, basis-change
Solution status: full solution
Let
Find the probabilities for measuring or , and the probability for the outcome in the basis.
Solution
In the basis,
For the outcome,
Expanding the squared magnitude gives
The relative phase does not affect the probabilities, but it does affect interference in the basis.
3. Expectation Value and Variance
Section titled “3. Expectation Value and Variance”Level: undergraduate
Skills: expectation-value, variance, pauli-matrices
Solution status: full solution
For the same state as Problem 2, compute and .
Solution
Since and ,
Also , so . Therefore
4. Commutator and Uncertainty Check
Section titled “4. Commutator and Uncertainty Check”Level: undergraduate
Skills: commutator, uncertainty, operator-algebra
Solution status: full solution
Use . In the state , compute the Robertson lower bound for , and compare it with the actual product.
Solution
The Robertson bound gives
In , , so the lower bound is .
Since and ,
The product is , so the bound is saturated.
5. Degenerate Projective Measurement
Section titled “5. Degenerate Projective Measurement”Level: undergraduate
Skills: projectors, measurement-update, degeneracy
Solution status: full solution
Let be an orthonormal basis. A measurement has outcome on the subspace spanned by and outcome on the subspace spanned by . For
find and the selective post-measurement state after observing .
Solution
The projector for outcome is
Applying it gives
Thus
The normalized selective state is
The relative coherence inside the degenerate outcome subspace is preserved by the ideal Lüders update.
6. Two-Level Time Evolution
Section titled “6. Two-Level Time Evolution”Level: undergraduate
Skills: unitary-evolution, hamiltonian, born-rule
Solution status: full solution
Let
Compute the probability of finding the system in at time .
Solution
The evolution operator is
Since ,
The return amplitude is
Therefore
7. Product State or Entangled State
Section titled “7. Product State or Entangled State”Level: undergraduate
Skills: tensor-product, product-state, entanglement
Solution status: full solution
Classify the two states:
Which one factors into subsystem states?
Solution
The first state factors:
It is a product state. The Bell state does not factor into a state of times a state of ; it has Schmidt rank and is entangled.
8. Density-Matrix Positivity
Section titled “8. Density-Matrix Positivity”Level: undergraduate
Skills: density-matrix, positivity, purity
Solution status: full solution
For real , consider
For which values of is this a valid density matrix? When is it pure?
Solution
The matrix is Hermitian and has trace one for every real . Its eigenvectors are the and states, with eigenvalues
Positivity requires both eigenvalues to be nonnegative, so
The state is pure when one eigenvalue is and the other is , which occurs at or . Equivalently, only for .
9. Postulates and Scope
Section titled “9. Postulates and Scope”Level: conceptual review
Skills: postulates, measurement-context, scope
Solution status: full solution
Someone writes: “The state tells us what value an observable already has before measurement.” Identify what is wrong and replace the sentence with a formalism-safe version.
Solution
The statement treats the state as assigning pre-existing sharp values to all observables. The standard formalism instead uses the state together with a specified measurement to assign probabilities.
A safer version is:
Given a state and a specified measurement, the Born rule assigns probabilities to possible outcomes. If the state is an eigenstate of the measured observable, one outcome can be sharp; otherwise the formalism generally gives a probability distribution.
This answer separates the state, the observable or measurement, and the probability rule. It also avoids adding an interpretation that is not part of the minimal postulates.
Building a Review Set
Section titled “Building a Review Set”For a balanced Core Formalism review, choose:
- one state-normalization or basis-change problem;
- one Born-rule problem in a non-measurement basis;
- one expectation-value and variance problem;
- one commutator or uncertainty problem;
- one projective-measurement update problem;
- one unitary time-evolution problem;
- one tensor-product or entanglement problem;
- one density-operator or partial-trace problem;
- one conceptual postulates question.
After solving, run the Common Checks and Sanity Tests on every answer. If an answer fails a check, use Common Mistakes in the Formalism to diagnose the likely failure mode.
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Dependency Graph of the Formalism
- Common Checks and Sanity Tests
- Common Mistakes in the Formalism
- Glossary for Core Formalism
- Representation Translation Table
- Symbol Map
References
Section titled “References”- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer, 1995.