Skip to content

Atomic Orbitals

An atomic orbital is a one-electron wavefunction used to describe the spatial state of an electron bound to a nucleus. In the exact nonrelativistic hydrogenic problem, orbitals are stationary eigenfunctions of the point-Coulomb Hamiltonian. In many-electron atoms and molecules, the same word is also used for approximate one-electron functions inside a larger many-body description.

This page treats the clean hydrogenic meaning. It explains the s,p,d,…s,p,d,\ldots notation, probability-density interpretation, real and complex orbital bases, nodal surfaces, and common visualization traps. Many-electron and chemical-orbital uses should be read as later applications of this one-electron prototype, not as part of the exact hydrogen solution.

For a spinless one-electron Coulomb problem, the bound-state wavefunctions separate as

ψnℓm(r,θ,ϕ)=Rnℓ(r)Yℓm(θ,ϕ).\psi_{n\ell m}(r,\theta,\phi) = R_{n\ell}(r)Y_\ell^m(\theta,\phi).

The quantum numbers obey

n=1,2,…,ℓ=0,1,…,n−1,m=−ℓ,…,ℓ.n=1,2,\ldots, \qquad \ell=0,1,\ldots,n-1, \qquad m=-\ell,\ldots,\ell.

The radial factor RnℓR_{n\ell} is described in Radial Wavefunctions. The angular factor is a spherical harmonic. Together they define a spatial orbital.

The shell-level angular organization of these labels is summarized in Hydrogen Atom Angular Structure.

An orbital is not a classical path. It is a wavefunction, and its physical probability density is

ρnℓm(r)=∣ψnℓm(r)∣2=∣Rnℓ(r)∣2∣Yℓm(θ,ϕ)∣2.\rho_{n\ell m}(\mathbf r) = \lvert\psi_{n\ell m}(\mathbf r)\rvert^2 = \lvert R_{n\ell}(r)\rvert^2 \lvert Y_\ell^m(\theta,\phi)\rvert^2.

For the ideal Coulomb Hamiltonian, ψnℓm\psi_{n\ell m} is stationary up to the phase factor e−iEnt/ℏe^{-iE_nt/\hbar}. The density ∣ψ∣2\lvert\psi\rvert^2 is then time-independent.

The spectroscopic letter names the orbital angular-momentum quantum number ℓ\ell.

Letterℓ\ellNumber of mm valuesAngular character
ss0011spherical angular factor
pp1133one angular nodal surface in a real basis
dd2255two angular nodal surfaces in a real basis
ff3377three angular nodal surfaces in a real basis

The shell label combines nn with the letter. Thus 1s1s means n=1,ℓ=0n=1,\ell=0, 2p2p means n=2,ℓ=1n=2,\ell=1, and 3d3d means n=3,ℓ=2n=3,\ell=2. The mm label still matters: for example, the 2p2p subshell contains three independent spatial orbitals.

The number of spatial orbitals in a fixed ℓ\ell subshell is

2ℓ+1.2\ell+1.

If electron spin is included without spin-dependent interactions, each spatial orbital can be paired with two spin states. The word orbital by itself usually refers only to the spatial wavefunction unless a spin-orbital convention has been explicitly introduced.

Probability Densities and Radial Probability

Section titled “Probability Densities and Radial Probability”

The three-dimensional probability for the electron to lie in a region Ω\Omega is

∫Ω∣ψ(r)∣2 d3r.\int_\Omega \lvert\psi(\mathbf r)\rvert^2\,d^3r.

In spherical coordinates,

d3r=r2sin⁡θ dr dθ dϕ.d^3r=r^2\sin\theta\,dr\,d\theta\,d\phi.

After integrating over angles, the radial probability density is

Pnℓ(r)=r2∣Rnℓ(r)∣2.P_{n\ell}(r) = r^2\lvert R_{n\ell}(r)\rvert^2.

This radial density is not the same object as the full three-dimensional density. For example, the hydrogen 1s1s wavefunction is largest at r=0r=0, but the radial probability density is maximal at one Bohr radius because of the r2r^2 volume factor.

Orbital pictures usually show an isosurface of ∣ψ∣2\lvert\psi\rvert^2 or a surface enclosing a chosen probability such as 90 or 95 percent. The boundary in such a picture is a visualization convention, not a hard edge of the atom.

Schematic s, p, and d orbital lobes with nodal surfaces

Schematic real-orbital shapes and nodal surfaces. The shaded lobes represent relative sign or phase of the wavefunction, not separate charged objects; probabilities come from ∣ψ∣2\lvert\psi\rvert^2.

The separated functions YℓmY_\ell^m are complex angular-momentum eigenfunctions. They are simultaneous eigenfunctions of L^2\hat{\mathbf L}^2 and L^z\hat L_z:

L^2Yℓm=ℏ2ℓ(ℓ+1)Yℓm,L^zYℓm=ℏmYℓm.\hat{\mathbf L}^2Y_\ell^m = \hbar^2\ell(\ell+1)Y_\ell^m, \qquad \hat L_zY_\ell^m = \hbar mY_\ell^m.

Complex orbitals are therefore natural when the zz component of angular momentum is being measured or when axial symmetry selects a preferred axis.

Real orbital pictures are different bases in the same degenerate ℓ\ell subspace. For the pp orbitals, one common convention is

pz∝Y10,px∝Y1−1−Y112,py∝i(Y1−1+Y11)2.p_z\propto Y_1^0, \qquad p_x\propto \frac{Y_1^{-1}-Y_1^1}{\sqrt{2}}, \qquad p_y\propto \frac{i(Y_1^{-1}+Y_1^1)}{\sqrt{2}}.

Overall signs and phases depend on the spherical-harmonic convention, but the three-dimensional subspace is the same. The real orbitals px,py,pzp_x,p_y,p_z are convenient for visualizing nodal planes and directional bonding. They are not all eigenstates of L^z\hat L_z.

This distinction is harmless in the ideal hydrogenic problem because all mm states with fixed nn and ℓ\ell are degenerate. A linear combination inside the degenerate subspace is still a stationary state. If an external magnetic field selects a zz axis, however, the complex mm eigenstates often become the better basis.

A node is a place where the wavefunction vanishes. Hydrogenic orbitals have radial nodes from Rnℓ(r)R_{n\ell}(r) and angular nodes from Yℓm(θ,ϕ)Y_\ell^m(\theta,\phi) or from real linear combinations of spherical harmonics.

For hydrogenic bound states,

number of radial nodes=n−ℓ−1.\text{number of radial nodes} = n-\ell-1.

The number of angular nodal surfaces is

ℓ.\ell.

The total number of nodes is therefore

n−1.n-1.

Representative examples are:

StateRadial nodesAngular nodesTotal nodes
1s1s000000
2s2s110011
2p2p001111
3p3p111122
3d3d002222

For complex YℓmY_\ell^m states, the angular-node geometry is not always the same as the familiar real-orbital sketches. The node count is a property of the chosen wavefunction, while the degenerate subspace itself can be represented in many equivalent bases.

Orbital diagrams are useful, but they are compressed representations of a wavefunction. Several conventions are usually hidden:

  • The plotted surface is an isosurface or probability-containing surface chosen by the author.
  • Color or shading usually indicates the sign or phase of ψ\psi, not electric charge.
  • The density is ∣ψ∣2\lvert\psi\rvert^2, so a sign change across a node is not itself visible in the probability density.
  • Real-orbital shapes depend on a chosen basis in a degenerate subspace.
  • Rotating the coordinate axes rotates the orbital labels.
  • Complex orbitals carry phase variation that cannot be fully shown with simple positive and negative lobes.
  • Hydrogenic orbitals are exact one-electron stationary states only in the ideal central Coulomb model.

The phrase electron cloud is acceptable as a qualitative image for probability density, but it should not be read as a classical smear of charge following a hidden orbit. In nonrelativistic wave mechanics, the orbital is the state assignment, and measured positions are sampled according to ∣ψ∣2\lvert\psi\rvert^2.

In many-electron atoms, an orbital usually means a one-electron function appearing in an approximation such as Hartree, Hartree-Fock, or density-functional theory. Those orbitals are not exact one-electron eigenfunctions of a two-body Coulomb problem, because the electrons interact with one another.

The hydrogenic notation remains influential because it supplies a basis and a vocabulary: s,p,d,…s,p,d,\ldots label angular behavior, radial nodes organize shells, and real combinations help visualize directional structure. But the interpretation changes. In a many-electron system, the many-body state and its antisymmetry carry the physical content, while orbitals are basis functions, variational objects, or effective one-particle quantities depending on the method.

  • Treating orbitals as classical trajectories.
  • Thinking an orbital picture shows a hard surface where the atom ends.
  • Confusing ∣Rnℓ(r)∣2\lvert R_{n\ell}(r)\rvert^2 with the radial probability density r2∣Rnℓ(r)∣2r^2\lvert R_{n\ell}(r)\rvert^2.
  • Assuming real px,py,pzp_x,p_y,p_z orbitals are L^z\hat L_z eigenstates.
  • Forgetting that different real orbital pictures can be different bases for the same degenerate subspace.
  • Interpreting positive and negative lobes as positive and negative charge.
  • Applying exact hydrogenic formulas unchanged to many-electron atoms.
  1. Count the number of spatial orbitals in a dd subshell.
Solution

A dd subshell has ℓ=2\ell=2. The number of magnetic quantum numbers is

2ℓ+1=2(2)+1=5.2\ell+1 = 2(2)+1 = 5.

So there are five independent spatial dd orbitals.

  1. Determine the node counts for a 3p3p hydrogenic orbital.
Solution

For 3p3p, n=3n=3 and ℓ=1\ell=1. The radial node count is

n−ℓ−1=3−1−1=1.n-\ell-1 = 3-1-1 = 1.

The angular node count is

ℓ=1.\ell=1.

Therefore a 3p3p orbital has two nodes in total: one radial node and one angular nodal surface.

  1. Explain why pxp_x is not an eigenstate of L^z\hat L_z.
Solution

In a common convention,

px∝Y1−1−Y112.p_x\propto \frac{Y_1^{-1}-Y_1^1}{\sqrt{2}}.

The two terms have different L^z\hat L_z eigenvalues:

L^zY1−1=−ℏY1−1,L^zY11=ℏY11.\hat L_zY_1^{-1}=-\hbar Y_1^{-1}, \qquad \hat L_zY_1^1=\hbar Y_1^1.

Since pxp_x is a superposition of two different mm values, applying L^z\hat L_z does not return a single constant times pxp_x. Thus pxp_x is not an L^z\hat L_z eigenstate, even though it is a valid stationary state in the ideal degenerate hydrogenic subspace.

  1. Why can two drawings of a pp orbital look rotated but describe the same physics in a central potential?
Solution

For a central potential, no direction in space is preferred. The three pp states span one ℓ=1\ell=1 angular-momentum subspace. Choosing pxp_x, pyp_y, and pzp_z is choosing a real basis tied to chosen coordinate axes. Rotating the axes rotates the basis, but it does not change the subspace or the energy in the ideal central potential.

  • D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, Springer, 1957.