Hydrogenic Ions
Hydrogenic ions are one-electron Coulomb systems with nuclear charge . They include hydrogen, , , , and any idealized one-electron ion with a point nucleus. They are not neutral many-electron atoms; the word hydrogenic means “hydrogen-like one-electron Coulomb problem.”
The main result is simple: after the reduced mass and nuclear charge are inserted, the dimensionless Schrödinger problem is the same as hydrogen. Lengths scale like , energies scale like , and finite nuclear mass replaces by the reduced mass.
Hamiltonian
Section titled “Hamiltonian”For an electron of mass bound to a nucleus of charge and mass , the relative-coordinate Hamiltonian is
where
is the electron-nucleus reduced mass. The subscript is a reminder that different nuclei have different masses, even when the electron is the same.
This is the same attractive Coulomb potential problem as hydrogen, with and left explicit. Spin, relativistic corrections, finite nuclear size, and quantum-electrodynamic effects are not part of this nonrelativistic model.
Length Scale
Section titled “Length Scale”Define the charge-, reduced-mass Bohr scale
If denotes the infinite-nuclear-mass hydrogen Bohr radius,
then
For heavy nuclei, is close to , so the dominant scaling is
Thus orbitals are roughly half the size of hydrogen orbitals with the same quantum numbers, and orbitals are roughly one third the size. The reduced-mass factor gives a smaller isotope-dependent correction.
Energy Scale
Section titled “Energy Scale”The corresponding energy scale is
Using the infinite-nuclear-mass Rydberg energy , this can be written as
The ideal nonrelativistic bound-state energies are
The leading scaling is
This is why one-electron ions become much more tightly bound as increases.
Wavefunction Scaling
Section titled “Wavefunction Scaling”The angular functions are unchanged:
The radial functions have the same dimensionless shape as hydrogen, but their radial argument is measured in units of . If , then a normalized radial wavefunction has the schematic scaling
where is the same dimensionless function for every point-Coulomb one-electron ion.
For the ground state,
The radial probability density
is maximal at
Thus the most probable ground-state radius scales approximately as for heavy nuclei.
Examples
Section titled “Examples”Ignoring small reduced-mass corrections, the ground-state binding energies and length scales are:
| Ion | Nuclear charge | Ground-state energy | Ground-state radius scale |
|---|---|---|---|
These are nonrelativistic point-nucleus estimates. Real spectroscopic values include reduced-mass corrections and, at higher precision, relativistic, radiative, and nuclear-size effects.
Transition Scaling
Section titled “Transition Scaling”For a transition from to , the photon energy in the ideal model is
At fixed quantum numbers, transition frequencies scale as
and wavelengths scale approximately as
For example, the transition with the same labels as a hydrogen Lyman transition has roughly four times the photon energy and one quarter the wavelength, before reduced-mass corrections.
Degeneracy and Corrections
Section titled “Degeneracy and Corrections”The ideal spinless point-Coulomb spectrum still depends only on , not on or :
For each fixed , the spatial degeneracy remains
This is the same special Coulomb degeneracy described in Degeneracy of the Hydrogen Atom. It is not removed by changing or by replacing with .
Corrections grow in importance as increases. Relativistic effects scale roughly with powers of , where is the fine-structure constant. For high- hydrogenic ions, the nonrelativistic Schrödinger model is no longer enough for precision work; one must use relativistic and finite-nuclear-size treatments. The nonrelativistic formulas here remain the clean scaling baseline.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Calling neutral helium a hydrogenic ion. is hydrogenic; neutral helium has two electrons.
- Forgetting that is one-electron, while is two-electron.
- Scaling energies as instead of .
- Scaling lengths as instead of .
- Ignoring reduced mass when comparing isotopes or precision spectra.
- Assuming the nonrelativistic point-nucleus model remains quantitatively accurate for very large .
- Treating the degeneracy as a generic central-potential result rather than a special Coulomb result.
Where This Is Used
Section titled “Where This Is Used”- Coulomb Potential defines the -dependent length and energy scales used here.
- Hydrogen Atom gives the solution whose dimensionless form is being rescaled.
- Radial Wavefunctions gives the dimensionless radial shapes and node structure that scale with .
- Atomic Orbitals explains why the same orbital notation applies after the hydrogenic length rescaling.
- Continuum States of the Coulomb Problem explains how positive-energy Coulomb states scale with and reduced mass.
- Degeneracy of the Hydrogen Atom explains why the ideal one-electron Coulomb spectrum remains independent of .
- Units and Constants states the charge convention used in the nuclear potential.
References
Section titled “References”- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, Springer, 1957.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Ignoring reduced-mass corrections, estimate the ground-state energy and most probable ground-state radius of .
Solution
For , . The ground-state energy scales as
Therefore
The most probable ground-state radius scales as
so for it is approximately .
- Compare a hydrogen and transition with the same labels, ignoring reduced-mass corrections.
Solution
For , . Transition energies scale as , so the photon energy is approximately
times the corresponding hydrogen photon energy. Since wavelength is inversely proportional to photon energy,
- Show that reduced mass changes both the length and energy scales.
Solution
The length scale is
so increasing decreases . The energy scale is
so increasing increases the binding-energy scale. Thus heavier reduced mass makes a hydrogenic ion smaller and more tightly bound, all else equal.