Expectation Values in Wave Mechanics
Expectation values translate the abstract formula into integrals over wavefunctions. In wave mechanics this translation is practical: it tells how to compute average position, momentum, energy, widths, and consistency checks for model solutions.
For a normalized one-dimensional wavefunction and an operator acting in position representation,
provided is in the domain needed by and the integral exists.
The abstract probability interpretation belongs to Expectation Values. This page is the coordinate-space working version.
Position Moments
Section titled “Position Moments”The position operator acts by multiplication:
Therefore
Higher position moments are similarly direct:
On a finite interval, replace the integration limits by the interval. In three dimensions,
In curvilinear coordinates the measure must be included. In spherical coordinates, .
Momentum Expectation
Section titled “Momentum Expectation”In one-dimensional position representation,
Thus
The formula is compact, but it has domain assumptions. The derivative must exist in the appropriate weak or ordinary sense, and the boundary behavior must make the operator symmetric on the chosen domain.
For a real bound-state wavefunction that vanishes or decays at the endpoints,
This is a common reason one-dimensional stationary bound states in real potentials often have zero average momentum even though their kinetic energy is not zero.
Energy Expectation
Section titled “Energy Expectation”For a one-dimensional Hamiltonian
the energy expectation is
It is often useful to separate kinetic and potential contributions:
where
If boundary terms vanish, integration by parts gives
This form makes the kinetic-energy cost of rapid spatial variation visible. It is one of the simplest ways to understand why confinement raises energy.
Boundary Terms And Hermiticity Checks
Section titled “Boundary Terms And Hermiticity Checks”Derivative operators require boundary checks. For the momentum operator on an interval ,
The boundary term must vanish for to be symmetric on the chosen domain. On a periodic domain, it can vanish because endpoint values match. On an infinite line, it can vanish because normalizable wavefunctions decay sufficiently fast. On an interval with hard walls, and vanish at the endpoints.
For the kinetic-energy operator, integration by parts produces a different boundary term:
A more symmetric self-adjointness check compares both and . The point for wave-mechanics calculations is practical: do not drop boundary terms unless the domain justifies doing so.
Variance And Standard Deviation
Section titled “Variance And Standard Deviation”The variance of an observable is
For position,
For momentum,
with
These quantities measure the spread of ideal measurement outcomes in the state, not instrument error bars. The abstract statistical definition is Variance and Standard Deviation.
Uncertainty Check
Section titled “Uncertainty Check”For normalized one-dimensional states with finite variances and suitable domains,
In wave mechanics this inequality is a useful diagnostic. If a proposed localized packet has both extremely small and extremely small , either the calculation is wrong or the state is not in the assumed domain. The detailed derivation is Position-Momentum Uncertainty.
The free-particle Gaussian packet is the model example where the bound can be saturated at an initial time. See Gaussian Wave Packets for the dynamical version.
Example: Infinite Square Well Symmetry
Section titled “Example: Infinite Square Well Symmetry”For the infinite square well on ,
The probability density is symmetric about , so
The wavefunction can be chosen real and vanishes at both endpoints, so
But the kinetic energy is nonzero:
This example is a useful warning: zero average momentum does not mean zero kinetic energy. Momentum spread, not average momentum, controls kinetic energy in a standing wave.
Three-Dimensional And Radial Expectations
Section titled “Three-Dimensional And Radial Expectations”In three dimensions, the expectation value of an operator is
For a central-potential state
radial expectations of functions use
when the angular part is normalized. If , the same expectation is
Confusing and changes expectation values as well as normalization.
Numerical Expectations
Section titled “Numerical Expectations”On a uniform grid with spacing , the continuum integral is approximated by
For multiplication by ,
If a numerical eigenvector is normalized as , then it is not necessarily the sampled continuum wavefunction . The grid weight must be tracked before comparing numerical and analytic expectation values.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating as a single-measurement outcome rather than an ensemble average.
- Forgetting to normalize the wavefunction before computing expectations.
- Dropping boundary terms from derivative operators without checking the domain.
- Using on a wavefunction that is not differentiable enough.
- Confusing with zero kinetic energy.
- Forgetting the radial measure when using .
- Forgetting the grid spacing in numerical expectation values.
Where This Is Used
Section titled “Where This Is Used”- Wavefunctions and Probability Density supplies the density interpretation behind position expectations.
- Hamiltonians in Coordinate Space supplies the differential operators whose expectations are computed here.
- Boundary Conditions explains when boundary terms vanish.
- Infinite Square Well and Quantum Harmonic Oscillator provide first exact-model applications.
- Numerical Notebooks Index points to grid-based checks where normalization weights matter.
- Expectation Value gives the compact reference-card version.
References
Section titled “References”- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Show that a normalized real wavefunction on with has .
Solution
For real ,
Thus
because .
- Derive the positive kinetic-energy form for a hard-wall interval.
Solution
Start from
Integrating by parts gives
For hard-wall wavefunctions , the boundary term vanishes. Therefore
- If a radial state is written with , express in terms of .
Solution
For normalized ,
Since , the radial expectation is