Infinite Square Well
The infinite square well is the canonical model of boundary quantization. A particle of mass is confined to the interval by impenetrable walls. Inside the well the particle is free; the quantization of energy comes entirely from the boundary conditions.
The potential is
The wavefunction vanishes outside the well and satisfies
The symbol is shorthand for an ideal constraint, not an ordinary real-valued potential to substitute into algebra. The clean mathematical model is the kinetic-energy operator on the interval with Dirichlet endpoint conditions. A very deep finite well approaches this model for low-lying states, but its wavefunctions retain evanescent tails and its spectrum is never literally identical at finite depth.
Hamiltonian And Hilbert Space
Section titled “Hamiltonian And Hilbert Space”The Hilbert space is with inner product
Inside the well, the Hamiltonian is the kinetic-energy operator
with the hard-wall boundary conditions above. The boundary conditions are not optional; they define the domain of the Hamiltonian for this problem.
For the standard self-adjoint realization, the domain consists of sufficiently regular functions whose endpoint values vanish. In Sobolev notation,
Integration by parts then gives
The Hamiltonian is therefore nonnegative. It also has a compact resolvent on this finite interval, so its spectrum consists of discrete eigenvalues tending to infinity.
Stationary Equation
Section titled “Stationary Equation”The time-independent Schrödinger equation inside the well is
For positive energy, write
The general solution inside the well is
The boundary condition at gives . The boundary condition at gives
For a nonzero wavefunction,
The allowed energies are therefore
The cases produce no additional states. At , the solution cannot vanish at both endpoints unless it is zero. At , a hyperbolic-sine solution satisfying the left wall cannot also vanish at the right wall. Positivity of gives the same conclusion immediately.
It is useful to define the natural box scales
Then , as a kinetic-energy scale, and .
Normalized Eigenfunctions
Section titled “Normalized Eigenfunctions”The normalized eigenfunctions are
They satisfy
For , normalization follows from
For , orthogonality can be checked with trigonometric identities. More generally, self-adjointness gives
so distinct-energy eigenfunctions are orthogonal. Each eigenvalue is nondegenerate: once fixes the cosine coefficient, leaves only one sine solution up to normalization and phase.
Orthogonality and Completeness
Section titled “Orthogonality and Completeness”The eigenfunctions form a complete basis for . Boundary values distinguish the Hamiltonian domain from the full Hilbert space; an arbitrary square-integrable state need not possess pointwise endpoint values. Every initial state in the Hilbert space nevertheless has the norm-convergent expansion
Completeness can be expressed distributionally as
For a normalized initial state, Parseval’s identity gives
Time evolution is then
The expansion converges in Hilbert-space norm for every square-integrable initial state. Pointwise convergence at a cusp or discontinuity is a separate Fourier-analysis question, and applying term by term requires stronger regularity than merely having finite norm.
Physical Lessons
Section titled “Physical Lessons”The infinite square well teaches several durable lessons.
Energy is quantized by boundary conditions. The particle is free inside the box, but only wavelengths fitting the interval are allowed:
The ground-state energy is not zero:
Confinement costs kinetic energy. Making smaller raises all energies as .
The th eigenfunction has interior nodes. Higher energy corresponds to shorter wavelength and more oscillation.
The nodes occur at
This realizes the one-dimensional nodal theorem: ordering the nondegenerate bound states by increasing energy, the th state has exactly interior zeros. The adjacent level spacing is
so the spectrum becomes more widely spaced in energy as increases. It is not an equally spaced ladder.
The first three eigenfunctions, offset by their energies. The levels scale as , and the marked interior zeros show the node rule. Wavefunction amplitudes are schematic and are not plotted on the energy scale.
Expectation Values
Section titled “Expectation Values”For every stationary eigenstate,
The second moment and variance are
Formally applying gives
because the real eigenfunction vanishes at both endpoints. The robust kinetic-energy statement is
Thus
Consequently,
Because is an energy eigenstate,
There is an operator-domain subtlety behind the momentum notation. The derivative operator with Dirichlet conditions at both ends is symmetric but not self-adjoint; its self-adjoint interval realizations instead relate endpoint values by a phase. The box Hamiltonian and are well-defined, but an intrinsic sharp momentum observable for the hard-wall interval requires more care than the formal expectation above suggests.
Likewise, writing a sine as two complex exponentials does not mean a release-and-measure experiment yields only the two momenta . Once regarded as a compactly supported full-line wavefunction after the walls are removed, its Fourier transform is a continuous distribution broadened by the finite spatial support. This distinction is developed alongside Hermitian vs Self-Adjoint Operators.
The elementary lesson remains valid: a vanishing first momentum moment does not imply vanishing kinetic energy.
Centered-Well Parity Form
Section titled “Centered-Well Parity Form”For a well of the same width centered at the origin, , the potential is symmetric. Up to an irrelevant sign for individual states, the normalized eigenfunctions can be written
States with odd are parity even, and states with even are parity odd. The energies remain . The centered form is often better for discussing parity and selection rules, while the interval form is convenient for direct boundary-condition calculations. They describe equivalent physics after the shift and harmless state-dependent phase choices.
Superpositions Are Not Stationary
Section titled “Superpositions Are Not Stationary”Each energy eigenstate has a time-independent probability density. A superposition generally does not. For example,
has interference terms oscillating at angular frequency
The probability density can slosh back and forth even though the Hamiltonian is time independent.
For the equal superposition , the real spatial eigenfunctions give
The interference term changes sign over a cycle. Since
the packet center oscillates as
Its energy distribution is time independent:
The density oscillation period is
Exact Revivals
Section titled “Exact Revivals”Because every energy is an integer square times , an arbitrary state revives exactly after
Indeed,
for every . At half this time, the phase is and the initial wavefunction is reconstructed as its mirror image about , up to a global phase. Fractional revival structures can occur at rational fractions of .
For a packet concentrated around a large quantum number , the associated classical round-trip period is approximately
and . The separation of these scales explains why a localized packet can undergo many approximately classical bounces before its fully quantum revival.
Worked Example: A Triangular Initial State
Section titled “Worked Example: A Triangular Initial State”Consider the continuous, symmetric initial wavefunction
Normalization gives
so a convenient phase choice is
The expansion coefficients are
Even vanish because the triangle is even about the center whereas the even- eigenfunctions are parity odd in centered coordinates. The alternating sign of the odd- coefficients reconstructs the cusp at . Normalization is checked by
Its exact evolution is
The coefficient decay also diagnoses regularity. Since ,
is finite, but diverges. The state lies in the energy quadratic-form domain but not in the operator domain of : its first derivative has a jump at the apex, so its second derivative contains a delta distribution. Unitary evolution is still well-defined because the initial wavefunction is an element of the Hilbert space.
Classical Comparison
Section titled “Classical Comparison”Classically, a particle in a box moves at constant speed and bounces off the walls. Quantum mechanically, energy eigenstates are standing waves with no definite direction of motion. A localized wave packet can approximate a bouncing classical particle for suitable states and times, but exact energy eigenstates do not trace classical trajectories. The large- and coarse-graining aspects are discussed in Correspondence Principle.
For one energy eigenstate,
The classical time-averaged position density is uniform, . The quantum density does not converge pointwise to that value as ; its oscillations become increasingly rapid. Against a detector response or test function smooth on scales much larger than , the cosine term averages away. Classical agreement is therefore weak or coarse-grained, not pointwise.
The relative spacing of neighboring energies behaves as
At large , nearby levels are close on the scale of the energy even though their absolute separation grows. Superpositions spanning many nearby levels can then form localized packets with an approximately classical bounce period. Nodes, interference, collapse, and revival remain quantum features beyond that approximation.
Numerical Benchmark
Section titled “Numerical Benchmark”Place interior grid points at , where , and fix the omitted endpoint values to zero. The centered second-difference Hamiltonian is
This matrix has analytic discrete eigenpairs
for . At fixed and increasing ,
The second-order stencil therefore approaches the continuum energy from below with an error. The matrix eigenvectors have Euclidean norm one; sampled continuum wavefunctions are recovered through . A trustworthy implementation should reproduce the low-level ratios, node counts, orthogonality, and this convergence law.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Allowing as a physical eigenstate. It gives the zero wavefunction, not a particle state.
- Treating as an ordinary number rather than defining the Dirichlet interval problem.
- Forgetting the normalization factor .
- Requiring to vanish at a hard wall; only the Dirichlet value vanishes.
- Saying the particle has zero kinetic energy because inside the well.
- Treating finite walls as if they imposed .
- Confusing with .
- Treating with two Dirichlet endpoints as a self-adjoint momentum operator.
- Assuming the two-exponential identity for a sine gives two delta-function outcomes after a release momentum measurement.
- Calling the spectrum equally spaced.
- Expecting to converge pointwise to the classical uniform density at large .
- Assuming every square-integrable expansion lies in the operator domain or has finite energy variance.
- Thinking an energy eigenstate describes a classical particle bouncing between walls.
Where This Is Used
Section titled “Where This Is Used”- Boundary Conditions explains hard-wall conditions.
- Propagators and Boundary Conditions derives the hard-wall spectral and image kernels.
- Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation gives the eigenvalue-problem framework.
- Periodic Functions and Fourier Series compares periodic modes with the sine modes used by hard-wall boxes.
- Sturm–Liouville Theory explains why these eigenfunctions are orthogonal and complete.
- Matrix Diagonalization uses the well as a benchmark for numerical spectra.
- Normalization Conventions relates grid-vector and continuum normalizations.
- Finite Square Well relaxes the infinite-wall idealization.
- Sudden Approximation uses a rapid well expansion to illustrate projection onto a changed boundary-condition basis.
References
Section titled “References”- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Wiley, 1998.
- R. W. Robinett, “Quantum wave packet revivals,” Physics Reports 392, 1–119 (2004), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.11.002.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Normalize on .
Solution
Use
Then
so up to an overall phase.
- Compute the formal differential-operator expectation . Why does this calculation alone not establish a self-adjoint momentum observable for the hard-wall box?
Solution
Use :
Since ,
because .
This vanishing matrix element is a valid formal calculation, but self-adjointness is a statement about an operator and its full domain, not one expectation value. The first-derivative operator with Dirichlet conditions at both endpoints does not have the same domain as its adjoint. Its self-adjoint interval extensions use phase-related endpoint values, which are incompatible with the two hard-wall conditions except for the zero function.
- How does the ground-state energy change if the box length is doubled?
Solution
The ground-state energy is
Replacing by gives . Doubling the box length lowers the ground-state energy by a factor of four.
- Derive and for the standard eigenstate on .
Solution
Using ,
The two integrals are
Therefore
Since ,
- Derive the expansion coefficients of the normalized triangular state on this page. Use them to calculate its mean energy.
Solution
With , reflection about makes the two half-interval contributions equal for odd and opposite for even . Thus even coefficients vanish. For odd ,
Since ,
- Show that at an arbitrary initial state is reconstructed as a mirror image about the center, up to a global phase.
Solution
At half the revival time,
The sine eigenfunctions obey
Hence for every . Applying this relation term by term to the spectral expansion gives
The minus sign is a global phase and has no effect on the probability density.