Stationary States and Expansions
Stationary states solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation. Expansions in stationary states solve the time-dependent problem when the Hamiltonian is time independent. Once the energy eigenstates are known, time evolution is mostly bookkeeping: each energy component receives its own phase.
For a discrete nondegenerate spectrum, the core formula is
This page explains what the coefficients mean, when the formula is valid, how continuum states change it, and why interference between energy components produces time-dependent physics.
Stationary States
Section titled “Stationary States”For a time-independent Hamiltonian,
defines a stationary spatial wavefunction. The full time-dependent solution is
The density is time independent:
The phase is not absent; it is physically global for a single energy component. The abstract ray-level statement is Stationary States.
Discrete Expansions
Section titled “Discrete Expansions”Suppose the bound-state eigenfunctions satisfy orthonormality
and are complete for the class of states being considered. Then an initial wavefunction can be expanded as
The coefficients are projections:
For a normalized initial state,
The probability of measuring energy is in the nondegenerate case. If the energy is degenerate, the probability for an energy value is the sum of squared amplitudes over a basis of that eigenspace, or equivalently the norm of the projected component.
Time Evolution From Coefficients
Section titled “Time Evolution From Coefficients”Once the coefficients are known, time evolution is
The coefficients are constant for a time-independent Hamiltonian. The phases change. This is why the energy basis is the diagonal basis for dynamics.
If the initial state is one eigenstate, only a global phase appears and probabilities are stationary. If two or more different energies are present, relative phases can affect densities and expectation values.
For a two-component state,
the density contains an interference term oscillating at angular frequency
This is one of the simplest ways time-independent Hamiltonians produce time-dependent probability densities.
Orthonormality And Completeness
Section titled “Orthonormality And Completeness”Orthonormality makes coefficients easy to compute. Completeness is the stronger statement that the eigenfunctions span the states under discussion.
For a purely discrete basis, a formal completeness relation is
This identity means that any suitable wavefunction can be reconstructed from its coefficients. It is a coordinate-space version of a resolution of the identity.
Completeness is model dependent. The infinite square well has a discrete sine basis on the interval. The free particle has continuum plane waves. A finite well has both bound states and continuum states. The general mathematical background is Completeness and Orthonormal Bases and Spectral Theorem, Practical Version.
Continuous Spectra
Section titled “Continuous Spectra”For continuum eigenfunctions labeled by with delta normalization,
an expansion has the form
with coefficient function
The evolved state is
The normalization condition becomes
when the continuum convention is -normalized. If the continuum is labeled by momentum instead, the measure and coefficient function change. The convention must be stated.
Mixed Spectra
Section titled “Mixed Spectra”Many physical one-dimensional Hamiltonians have both bound states and scattering states. A finite attractive well, for example, has discrete bound states below the continuum threshold and continuum states above it.
The schematic expansion is
The time-evolved state is
The normalization splits into discrete and continuous contributions:
for the chosen continuum normalization.
This is why bound-state tables are not a complete basis for systems with continua. They describe only part of the Hilbert space.
Degeneracy
Section titled “Degeneracy”If the energy is degenerate, write eigenfunctions as , where labels independent states with the same energy:
The expansion becomes
and time evolution attaches the same phase to all states within one degenerate eigenspace:
Superpositions inside one degenerate eigenspace are stationary because they share one energy phase. Superpositions across different energies generally are not.
Revivals: First Encounter
Section titled “Revivals: First Encounter”A wave packet can spread and later reconstruct if its energy phases re-align. This is called a revival. The infinite square well gives a clean first example because
At the revival time
each phase satisfies
Thus the full wavefunction returns to its initial shape. Fractional revivals and imperfect revivals are richer topics, but the basic mechanism is already visible: stationary-state phases carry the long-time dynamics.
Practical Workflow
Section titled “Practical Workflow”For a time-independent Hamiltonian:
- Solve the stationary eigenvalue problem with the correct boundary conditions.
- Normalize bound states or state the continuum normalization.
- Check which part of the spectrum is needed: discrete, continuous, or mixed.
- Compute expansion coefficients from inner products.
- Attach phases to each energy component.
- Use the resulting to compute densities, currents, and expectation values.
- Check limiting cases, conserved norm, and energy probabilities.
This is the basic strategy behind many exactly solvable model pages.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating a stationary-state list as complete when continuum states are also present.
- Forgetting that expansion coefficients depend on the normalization convention.
- Attaching the same phase to all terms in a superposition of different energies.
- Dropping degeneracy labels and losing states.
- Thinking a time-independent Hamiltonian makes every probability density time independent.
- Normalizing continuum coefficients as if they were discrete amplitudes.
- Using model eigenfunctions without checking their boundary conditions match the problem.
Where This Is Used
Section titled “Where This Is Used”- Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation derives the stationary eigenvalue problem.
- Normalization Conventions explains the bound-state and continuum normalizations used by coefficients.
- Expectation Values in Wave Mechanics uses evolved wavefunctions to compute averages and variances.
- Infinite Square Well is the first complete discrete-basis example.
- Free Particle and Gaussian Wave Packets use continuum expansions.
- Finite Square Well illustrates mixed bound and continuum structure.
- Energy Eigenstates gives the abstract Hamiltonian-eigenbasis viewpoint.
References
Section titled “References”- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Let be an orthonormal discrete energy basis. Derive from .
Solution
Multiply the expansion by and integrate:
Using orthonormality,
so the sum reduces to .
- A state is , where and have energies and . Write .
Solution
Each energy component gets its own phase:
Only if is this just a common global phase.
- For a continuum expansion with , what is the normalization condition on ?
Solution
For a normalized state and this -normalization convention,
If a different continuum label or normalization is used, the measure and coefficient function must be translated accordingly.
- Show that the infinite square well revival time rephases every stationary component.
Solution
The energies are . Therefore
Every component has its original phase, so any superposition reconstructs.