Skip to content

Symbols and Conventions

This page is the rapid lookup and translation layer for notation in many-body and statistical quantum mechanics. It answers questions such as “Is NN a number or an operator?”, “Does k\mathbf k mean momentum or wave number?”, and “Which factors of NsN_s, 2π2\pi, ℏ\hbar, and kBk_{\mathrm B} are in this formula?”

The deeper explanatory home is Core Objects and Notation. Sitewide choices for bras, operators, density matrices, Fourier transforms, spin, and units live in the Conventions Overview. This page repeats only the minimum data needed for lookup and translation.

A specialized article may override any default below when another convention is standard for that subject. The override must be stated near the first affected formula and used consistently.

A reusable calculation is not specified by its Hamiltonian alone. Before interpreting a formula, recover the following data:

ItemQuestions that must be answerable
degrees of freedomparticles, sites, modes, spins, bands, flavors, or fields?
state spacefixed-particle Hilbert space, Fock space, symmetry sector, or truncated basis?
statistics and algebrabosonic commutators, fermionic anticommutators, spin algebra, or an effective algebra?
indiceswhich labels denote sites, particles, modes, components, and eigenstates?
state or ensemblepure state, mixed state, microcanonical, canonical, or grand canonical?
geometrydimension, lattice, physical volume, boundary conditions, and metric if relevant?
normalizationstate, field, Fourier-transform, structure-factor, and trace normalization?
orderingordinary, normal, time, imaginary-time, contour, or out-of-time ordering?
unitsare ℏ\hbar, kBk_{\mathrm B}, lattice spacing, mass, or a coupling set to one?
limitswhich variables become large, small, continuous, or late, and in which order?

The essential rule is:

A symbol identifies an object only together with its index domain, units, normalization, and local definition.

For example, NN can denote a particle-number eigenvalue, the number of sites, the number of field components, or the control parameter of a large-NN limit. Those meanings are not interchangeable.

ObjectDefault notationInterpretation
scalar parameterTT, μ\mu, tt, JJa number with stated units
spatial vectorr\mathbf r, k\mathbf k, q\mathbf qboldface marks a spatial vector
operatorHH, AA, SiαS_i^\alphahats are omitted when operator status is unambiguous
ambiguous number operatorN^\hat Nthe hat distinguishes it from NN or ⟨N^⟩\langle\hat N\rangle
pure state$\Psi\rangle$
density operatorρ\rhopositive and trace one for a normalized state
identityII or IHI_{\mathcal H}subscript names the space when needed
complex conjugatez∗z^*scalar conjugation
adjointA†A^\daggerHilbert-space adjoint
transposeATA^{\mathsf T}basis-dependent transpose
expectation value⟨A⟩\langle A\ranglestate or ensemble must be recoverable

Bold symbols are reserved for geometric vectors, not merely for collections of components. An arrow notation such as k⃗\vec k may appear in cited literature, but a page should not alternate between k⃗\vec k and k\mathbf k without reason.

These are defaults, not universal laws:

IndexUsual domainCommon role
i,j,ℓi,j,\elllattice siteslocal operators and hopping links
a,ba,borbitals, bands, species, or Cartesian componentsmust be declared locally
σ,σ′\sigma,\sigma'↑,↓\uparrow,\downarrow or an internal setspin or pseudospin component
α,β\alpha,\betainternal or Cartesian componentsflavor, spin component, or tensor index
n,mn,mintegers or eigenstate labelsenergy level, occupation, or Matsubara integer
k,q\mathbf k,\mathbf qreciprocal-space grid or continuumwave vector and transferred wave vector
p,qp,qgeneric one-particle modesnot necessarily momentum
A,BA,Bsubsystems or observablesdistinguish by typography and context
ssspin projection, species, or contour branchdefine before use

Repeated indices are not summed automatically unless an article declares an Einstein convention. Lattice and mode sums are normally written explicitly. Cartesian tensor formulas may use implicit summation after saying so.

Composite labels compress several indices. For example,

1≡(r1,σ1,t1)1 \equiv (\mathbf r_1,\sigma_1,t_1)

is acceptable in a Green-function derivation only after the measure associated with ∫d1\int d1 has also been defined.

SymbolDefault meaning
NNnumber of particles or a fixed particle-number eigenvalue
N^\hat Ntotal particle-number operator
NsN_snumber of lattice sites
MMnumber of retained one-particle modes or orbitals
NfN_fnumber of flavors or field components
VVphysical volume
LLlinear system size
ddspatial dimension
aalattice spacing
nnparticle density N/VN/V
ν\nufilling N/NsN/N_s

For an isotropic hypercubic lattice with compatible periodic counting,

Ns=(La)d.N_s = \left( \frac{L}{a} \right)^d.

Density and filling answer different questions:

n=NV,ν=NNs.\begin{aligned} n &= \frac{N}{V}, \\ \nu &= \frac{N}{N_s}. \end{aligned}

The filling is dimensionless. The density has units of inverse volume. A continuum limit usually changes aa, NsN_s, and the couplings together; it is not obtained by replacing NsN_s with VV in a lattice formula.

For anisotropic boxes, use L1,…,LdL_1,\ldots,L_d and state

V=∏a=1dLaV = \prod_{a=1}^{d}L_a

rather than concealing the shape in one length LL.

A pure-state and density-operator expectation are

⟨A⟩Ψ=⟨Ψ∣A∣Ψ⟩,⟨A⟩ρ=Tr⁡(ρA).\begin{aligned} \langle A\rangle_\Psi &= \langle\Psi|A|\Psi\rangle, \\ \langle A\rangle_\rho &= \operatorname{Tr}(\rho A). \end{aligned}

The subscript may be omitted only when the state or ensemble remains unambiguous. A change from a ground-state expectation to a thermal or disorder-averaged expectation must be visible.

The principal equilibrium symbols are:

SymbolMeaning
β\betainverse temperature 1/(kBT)1/(k_{\mathrm B}T)
ZZcanonical partition function
Ξ\Xigrand partition function
ρβ\rho_\betacanonical Gibbs state
ρβ,μ\rho_{\beta,\mu}grand-canonical Gibbs state
KKgrand Hamiltonian H−μN^H-\mu\hat N when declared
X‾\overline{X} or [X]dis[X]_{\mathrm{dis}}disorder average, never a thermal average by default

The canonical and grand-canonical states are

ρβ=e−βHZ,Z=Tr⁡e−βH,ρβ,μ=e−βKΞ,K=H−μN^.\begin{aligned} \rho_\beta &= \frac{e^{-\beta H}}{Z}, & Z &= \operatorname{Tr}e^{-\beta H}, \\ \rho_{\beta,\mu} &= \frac{e^{-\beta K}}{\Xi}, & K &= H-\mu\hat N. \end{aligned}

Here βH\beta H and βμN^\beta\mu\hat N are dimensionless. If KK is called a Hamiltonian, remember that physical real-time evolution is generated by HH, not automatically by KK. The Ensemble Formula Sheet owns the thermodynamic derivative identities and their assumptions.

Use distinct notation for nested averages. In a disordered thermal system, for example,

⟨A⟩J‾\overline{ \langle A\rangle_J }

means: compute the thermal or quantum expectation for one realization JJ, then average over realizations. Reversing those operations generally defines a different object.

SymbolDefault roleRequired declaration
bi,bi†b_i,b_i^\daggerbosonic mode operatorsthe mode or site indexed by ii
ci,ci†c_i,c_i^\daggerfermionic mode operatorsthe mode, site, spin, and ordering convention
ai,ai†a_i,a_i^\daggerstatistics-neutral placeholderthe algebra must be stated first
nin_imode or site occupation operatorspecies sums and allowed eigenvalues
N^\hat Ntotal number operatorwhich species it counts
ψσ(r)\psi_\sigma(\mathbf r)continuum field operatorstatistics, normalization, and components
SiαS_i^\alphaspin operatorspin representation and units
σiα\sigma_i^\alphaPauli operatordimensionless; not the same as SiαS_i^\alpha
HHphysical Hamiltoniandegrees of freedom, parameters, and sector

Bosonic and fermionic mode algebras are, respectively,

[bi,bj†]=δij,[bi,bj]=0,{ci,cj†}=δij,{ci,cj}=0.\begin{aligned} [b_i,b_j^\dagger] &= \delta_{ij}, & [b_i,b_j] &= 0, \\ \{c_i,c_j^\dagger\} &= \delta_{ij}, & \{c_i,c_j\} &= 0. \end{aligned}

For either statistics,

ni=ai†ai,N^=∑ini,n_i = a_i^\dagger a_i, \qquad \hat N = \sum_i n_i,

but the occupation spectrum depends on the algebra. An occupation number is an eigenvalue of nin_i, not the probability that the mode exists.

Continuum fields obey a delta-normalized algebra. The nonvanishing equal-time bracket is

[ψσ(r),ψσ′†(r′)]∓=δσσ′δ(d)(r−r′),\big[ \psi_\sigma(\mathbf r), \psi_{\sigma'}^\dagger(\mathbf r') \big]_{\mp} = \delta_{\sigma\sigma'} \delta^{(d)}(\mathbf r-\mathbf r'),

where the upper commutator choice applies to bosons and the lower anticommutator choice to fermions. Because fields are operator-valued distributions, products at the same point may require a regulator or lattice definition.

For spin 1/21/2,

Siα=ℏ2σiα,α∈{x,y,z}.S_i^\alpha = \frac{\hbar}{2} \sigma_i^\alpha, \qquad \alpha\in\{x,y,z\}.

Consequently,

Si⋅Sj=ℏ24σi⋅σj.\mathbf S_i\cdot\mathbf S_j = \frac{\hbar^2}{4} \boldsymbol\sigma_i\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma_j.

If a source sets ℏ=1\hbar=1 and calls S=σ/2\mathbf S=\boldsymbol\sigma/2 “dimensionless spin,” its exchange constant is tied to that choice. Translate the operator and the coupling together. Do not replace SαS^\alpha by σα\sigma^\alpha while leaving all numerical coefficients unchanged.

Raising and lowering operators are

Si±=Six±iSiy.S_i^\pm = S_i^x \pm iS_i^y.

Some sources instead define σ±=(σx±iσy)/2\sigma^\pm=(\sigma^x\pm i\sigma^y)/2. The factor of 1/21/2 is part of the definition, not a cosmetic choice.

For NsN_s sites at positions rj\mathbf r_j, the default symmetric discrete transform is

ckσ=1Ns∑je−ik⋅rjcjσ,cjσ=1Ns∑keik⋅rjckσ.\begin{aligned} c_{\mathbf k\sigma} &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_s}} \sum_j e^{-i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r_j} c_{j\sigma}, \\ c_{j\sigma} &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_s}} \sum_{\mathbf k} e^{i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r_j} c_{\mathbf k\sigma}. \end{aligned}

This preserves the canonical mode algebra without an extra volume factor. The allowed k\mathbf k grid is fixed by the lattice vectors and boundary conditions.

For continuum fields in dd dimensions,

ψσ(r)=∫ddk(2π)d/2eik⋅rakσ,akσ=∫ddr(2π)d/2e−ik⋅rψσ(r).\begin{aligned} \psi_\sigma(\mathbf r) &= \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r} a_{\mathbf k\sigma}, \\ a_{\mathbf k\sigma} &= \int \frac{d^dr}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{-i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r} \psi_\sigma(\mathbf r). \end{aligned}

Here k\mathbf k is wave number and

p=ℏk\mathbf p = \hbar\mathbf k

is physical momentum. A source using ddp/(2πℏ)dd^dp/(2\pi\hbar)^d has made a different but equivalent choice. Translate the integration measure, delta function, and operator normalization together.

For a periodic box, the continuum replacement is

1V∑k⟶∫ddk(2π)d.\frac{1}{V} \sum_{\mathbf k} \longrightarrow \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}.

The arrow describes a limit under stated regularity assumptions. It is not an exact identity for a finite box.

For real time, the default transform pair for an ordinary function is

A(ω)=∫−∞∞dt eiωtA(t),A(t)=∫−∞∞dω2πe−iωtA(ω).\begin{aligned} A(\omega) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt\, e^{i\omega t} A(t), \\ A(t) &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{d\omega}{2\pi} e^{-i\omega t} A(\omega). \end{aligned}

With this sign convention, the Heisenberg operator is

A(t)=eiHt/ℏAe−iHt/ℏ.A(t) = e^{iHt/\hbar} A e^{-iHt/\hbar}.

A source may reverse both exponential signs. Translate the transform pair before comparing pole locations or response conventions.

Two imaginary-time unit conventions occur frequently:

ConventionIntervalEvolution operatorMatsubara quantity
time-valued τ\tau0≤τ<βℏ0\le\tau<\beta\hbareτH/ℏe^{\tau H/\hbar}angular frequency in inverse time
inverse-energy τ\tau0≤τ<β0\le\tau<\betaeτHe^{\tau H}energy-valued frequency, usually with ℏ=1\hbar=1

For time-valued τ\tau, the angular frequencies are

ωnB=2πnβℏ,ωnF=(2n+1)πβℏ.\begin{aligned} \omega_n^{\mathrm B} &= \frac{2\pi n}{\beta\hbar}, \\ \omega_n^{\mathrm F} &= \frac{(2n+1)\pi}{\beta\hbar}. \end{aligned}

The bosonic or fermionic label follows the periodicity of the correlator, not necessarily the microscopic statistics of every operator appearing in it. The dedicated Matsubara-frequency page owns the derivation and endpoint subtleties.

Correlation, Response, and Ordering Symbols

Section titled “Correlation, Response, and Ordering Symbols”
SymbolUsual roleWhat still must be stated
CAB(t)C_{AB}(t)generic correlationordering, state, and connectedness
CABcC_{AB}^{\mathrm c}connected correlationsubtraction convention
GGGreen functionfields, sign, factor of ii or ℏ\hbar, and ordering
GR,GAG^{\mathrm R},G^{\mathrm A}retarded and advanced Green functionsFourier sign and bracket convention
G>,G<G^>,G^<greater and lesser Green functionsoperator order and statistics sign
GTG^{\mathsf T} or GTG^{\mathrm T}time-ordered Green functionavoid confusing superscript with transpose
χABR\chi_{AB}^{\mathrm R}retarded response or susceptibilityperturbation sign and normalization
S(q,ω)S(\mathbf q,\omega)dynamic structure factorFourier and volume normalization
T\mathcal Treal-time orderingequal-time prescription
Tτ\mathcal T_\tauimaginary-time orderingbosonic or fermionic exchange sign
θ(t)\theta(t)step functionvalue at t=0t=0 if it matters

A generic unordered correlator and its connected part are

CAB(t)=⟨A(t)B(0)⟩,CABc(t)=CAB(t)−⟨A(t)⟩⟨B(0)⟩.\begin{aligned} C_{AB}(t) &= \langle A(t)B(0)\rangle, \\ C_{AB}^{\mathrm c}(t) &= C_{AB}(t) - \langle A(t)\rangle \langle B(0)\rangle. \end{aligned}

One common retarded-response convention is

χABR(t)=−iℏθ(t)⟨[A(t),B(0)]⟩.\chi_{AB}^{\mathrm R}(t) = -\frac{i}{\hbar} \theta(t) \langle[A(t),B(0)]\rangle.

This formula is not a universal definition independent of the perturbation. If the source writes the perturbation as H′(t)=+f(t)BH'(t)=+f(t)B rather than H′(t)=−f(t)BH'(t)=-f(t)B, the response sign changes.

SymbolQuantityStandard relation or warning
UU or EEinternal energy⟨H⟩\langle H\rangle
SthS_{\mathrm{th}}thermodynamic entropycarries units of kBk_{\mathrm B}
SvNS_{\mathrm{vN}}von Neumann entropydimensionless with natural logarithm
SAS_Asubsystem entropypartition and logarithm base must be stated
FFHelmholtz free energynatural variables T,V,NT,V,N
Ω\Omegagrand potentialnatural variables T,V,μT,V,\mu
μ\muchemical potentialenergy per particle added at fixed entropy and volume
PPpressuredo not confuse with parity or a projector
CVC_Vheat capacityspecify fixed variables and whether total or specific
κT\kappa_Tisothermal compressibilitynormalization varies with density convention

For the same density operator,

Sth=kBSvN,S_{\mathrm{th}} = k_{\mathrm B} S_{\mathrm{vN}},

but thermodynamic entropy and entanglement entropy answer different physical questions. A lowercase density such as f=F/Vf=F/V or a per-site quantity such as F/NsF/N_s should be introduced explicitly; lowercase is not an automatic “per particle” instruction.

Partial derivatives must display their held-fixed variables when more than one thermodynamic interpretation is possible. For example,

P=−(∂F∂V)T,N.P = -\left( \frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \right)_{T,N}.
NotationMeaning
f∼gf\sim gf/gf/g approaches a stated nonzero constant, often one
f∝gf\propto gequality up to an unspecified multiplicative constant
f≃gf\simeq gapproximate equality in a declared regime
f=O(g)f=O(g)asymptotic upper-order statement
f=o(g)f=o(g)f/g→0f/g\to0
x≪yx\ll ya controlled or physically stated scale separation
x→x0x\to x_0a limit, not an ordinary assignment

The thermodynamic limit for a continuum fluid is

N,V→∞,NV=nfixed,N,V\to\infty, \qquad \frac{N}{V}=n \quad\text{fixed},

while a lattice limit takes Ns→∞N_s\to\infty with filling, shape, and coupling scaling specified.

Orders of limits may be physical data. In general,

lim⁡t→∞lim⁡Ns→∞CNs(t)≠lim⁡Ns→∞lim⁡t→∞CNs(t).\lim_{t\to\infty} \lim_{N_s\to\infty} C_{N_s}(t) \neq \lim_{N_s\to\infty} \lim_{t\to\infty} C_{N_s}(t).

The first can describe late-time behavior after a continuum spectrum emerges; the second probes the exact long-time behavior of each finite system before increasing its size. Write both limits when the distinction matters.

AbbreviationMeaningTypical consequence
OBCopen boundary conditionsedges and standing-wave modes
PBCperiodic boundary conditionsdiscrete crystal momenta and translation symmetry
APBCantiperiodic boundary conditionsshifted momentum grid
TBCtwisted boundary conditionsflux or stiffness probe through a phase θ\theta

For a one-dimensional lattice,

cj+Ns=cj(PBC),cj+Ns=eiθcj(twist).\begin{aligned} c_{j+N_s} &= c_j &&\text{(PBC)}, \\ c_{j+N_s} &= e^{i\theta}c_j &&\text{(twist)}. \end{aligned}

Boundary conditions affect the allowed momentum grid, symmetry sectors, finite-size degeneracies, and sometimes fermion-parity bookkeeping. They are not a numerical afterthought.

Orientation and derivation pages keep ℏ\hbar and kBk_{\mathrm B} explicit unless suppressing them materially clarifies an advanced calculation. The declarations

ℏ=1,kB=1,a=1\hbar=1, \qquad k_{\mathrm B}=1, \qquad a=1

are three independent choices.

  • ℏ=1\hbar=1 identifies energy with angular frequency and momentum with wave number.
  • kB=1k_{\mathrm B}=1 gives temperature energy units.
  • a=1a=1 measures lengths in lattice spacings and wave numbers in inverse lattice spacings.

To restore constants, first use dimensions and then verify the generating equation. Typical replacements include

e−iHt⟶e−iHt/ℏ,e−βH⟶e−H/(kBT),k⟶pℏ.\begin{aligned} e^{-iHt} &\longrightarrow e^{-iHt/\hbar}, \\ e^{-\beta H} &\longrightarrow e^{-H/(k_{\mathrm B}T)}, \\ \mathbf k &\longrightarrow \frac{\mathbf p}{\hbar}. \end{aligned}

Dimensional analysis alone may not recover every Fourier normalization or coupling convention. Check the canonical commutator, anticommutator, or partition-function exponent after translating.

SymbolFrequent meaningsPreferred repair on one page
NNparticles, sites, flavors, large-NN rankuse NsN_s, NfN_f, or a descriptive subscript
LLlength, site count, Liouvillianuse NsN_s and L\mathcal L for the latter two
SSentropy, spin, action, structure factoruse SthS_{\mathrm{th}}, S\mathbf S, S\mathcal S, and S(q)S(\mathbf q)
Ω\Omegagrand potential, volume, angular frequencyuse VV for volume and ω\omega for frequency
Δ\Deltagap, order parameter, detuning, finite differenceadd Δgap\Delta_{\mathrm{gap}}, Δsc\Delta_{\mathrm{sc}}, or prose
Γ\Gammarate, linewidth, hybridization, vertexattach arguments or a descriptive subscript
GGGreen function, Gibbs free energy, conductanceuse GRG^{\mathrm R}, GGibbsG_{\mathrm{Gibbs}}, or context-specific notation
χ\chisusceptibility, field, spinorexpose arguments and indices
TTtemperature, ordering, transposeuse T\mathcal T and T\mathsf T for the latter two
PPpressure, parity, projector, probabilityuse Π\Pi for a projector or a descriptive subscript
σ\sigmaspin index, Pauli matrix, conductivitydistinguish index position, σ\boldsymbol\sigma, and σ(ω)\sigma(\omega)
JJexchange, hopping, current, disorder realizationuse tt for hopping and label currents explicitly

Overloading across separate pages is manageable. Overloading inside one derivation is a source of false identities. The sitewide Notation Collisions page gives a broader repair guide.

Consider the finite-lattice density structure factor

S(q,ω)=12πNs∫−∞∞dt eiωt×∑jℓe−iq⋅(rj−rℓ)×⟨δnj(t)δnℓ(0)⟩,δnj=nj−⟨nj⟩.\begin{aligned} S(\mathbf q,\omega) &= \frac{1}{2\pi N_s} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dt\, e^{i\omega t} \\ &\quad\times \sum_{j\ell} e^{-i\mathbf q\cdot(\mathbf r_j-\mathbf r_\ell)} \\ &\quad\times \langle \delta n_j(t) \delta n_\ell(0) \rangle, \\ \delta n_j &= n_j-\langle n_j\rangle. \end{aligned}

The formula is interpretable because its convention data are visible:

  1. jj and ℓ\ell are site indices, while NsN_s is the site count.
  2. q\mathbf q is a reciprocal-space wave vector fixed by the boundary conditions.
  3. The 1/Ns1/N_s normalization makes the quantity intensive away from Bragg scaling.
  4. The 1/(2π)1/(2\pi) factor belongs to the chosen forward time transform.
  5. The correlator is unordered and built from connected density fluctuations.
  6. The expectation brackets still require a declared state or ensemble.
  7. njn_j may include one species or a species sum; the model must say which.

Another source may omit 1/(2π)1/(2\pi), normalize by particle number NN, or use e−iωte^{-i\omega t}. None of those choices is automatically wrong. A comparison must translate all three choices before applying a sum rule or comparing spectral weights.

Before publishing a many-body formula, check that the page states:

  • whether NN, NsN_s, and N^\hat N are numbers or operators;
  • every index domain and every implicit sum;
  • bosonic, fermionic, spin, or effective operator algebra;
  • the state, ensemble, and any disorder average;
  • whether HH or K=H−μN^K=H-\mu\hat N appears in imaginary-time evolution;
  • the Fourier-transform signs and normalization;
  • wave number k\mathbf k versus momentum p\mathbf p;
  • factors of ℏ\hbar, kBk_{\mathrm B}, aa, VV, and NsN_s set to one;
  • boundary conditions and momentum grid;
  • operator ordering and equal-time prescription;
  • connected versus full correlations;
  • extensive, per-site, per-particle, or density normalization;
  • every approximation regime and order of limits.
  1. Using NN for particles and sites. Replace the site count by NsN_s and define the filling ν=N/Ns\nu=N/N_s.
  2. Calling k\mathbf k momentum after setting ℏ=1\hbar=1. State whether it is wave number and restore p=ℏk\mathbf p=\hbar\mathbf k when dimensions matter.
  3. Changing one Fourier factor. Measures, delta functions, inverse transforms, and mode algebras must change together.
  4. Using SαS^\alpha and σα\sigma^\alpha interchangeably. For spin 1/21/2, they differ by ℏ/2\hbar/2.
  5. Hiding the ensemble. An unsubscripted bracket is safe only when the state remains fixed throughout the argument.
  6. Confusing HH and the grand Hamiltonian. K=H−μN^K=H-\mu\hat N organizes grand-canonical weights; it is not automatically the physical generator of real time.
  7. Treating ∼\sim as prose for “approximately.” State the limiting ratio or use ≃\simeq with a regime.
  8. Taking limits silently. Finite size, continuum, zero temperature, large-NN, and late time can fail to commute.
  • A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Dover (2003) — operator, Green-function, and many-particle notation.
  • G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed., Springer (2000) — real- and imaginary-time Green functions and response conventions.
  • J. W. Negele and H. Orland, Quantum Many-Particle Systems, Westview Press (1998) — fields, thermal traces, and imaginary-time methods.
  • A. Altland and B. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press (2010) — continuum, lattice, and field-theory translations.
  • P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics, Cambridge University Press (2015) — lattice models, spin notation, and many-body scales.
  • R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale, Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Elsevier (2011) — ensemble and thermodynamic notation.

A paper writes “take N→∞N\to\infty at half filling” for a spin-1/21/2 fermion lattice with one orbital per site. Rewrite the statement so that particle number, site count, and filling cannot be confused. State what half filling means in this model.

Solution

Write the lattice thermodynamic limit as

Ns→∞,ν=NNs=1fixed.N_s\to\infty, \qquad \nu = \frac{N}{N_s} = 1 \quad\text{fixed}.

There are two spin orbitals per site, so the maximum filling is ν=2\nu=2. Half filling therefore means one fermion per site on average, N=NsN=N_s, not N=Ns/2N=N_s/2.

2. Fourier normalization and the mode algebra

Section titled “2. Fourier normalization and the mode algebra”

Assume fermionic site operators obey {cj,cℓ†}=δjℓ\{c_j,c_\ell^\dagger\}=\delta_{j\ell}. Using

ck=1Ns∑je−ikrjcj,c_k = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_s}} \sum_j e^{-ik r_j}c_j,

show that {ck,ck′†}=δkk′\{c_k,c_{k'}^\dagger\}=\delta_{kk'} on the compatible periodic momentum grid.

Solution

Direct substitution gives

{ck,ck′†}=1Ns∑jℓe−ikrjeik′rℓ{cj,cℓ†}=1Ns∑jei(k′−k)rj.\begin{aligned} \{c_k,c_{k'}^\dagger\} &= \frac{1}{N_s} \sum_{j\ell} e^{-ikr_j} e^{ik'r_\ell} \{c_j,c_\ell^\dagger\} \\ &= \frac{1}{N_s} \sum_j e^{i(k'-k)r_j}. \end{aligned}

Discrete Fourier orthogonality on the periodic grid yields

1Ns∑jei(k′−k)rj=δkk′,\frac{1}{N_s} \sum_j e^{i(k'-k)r_j} = \delta_{kk'},

which proves the claim. Moving the normalization factor to only one transform is possible, but the inverse transform and the orthogonality relation must then be changed consistently.

Translate

H=JS∑⟨ij⟩Si⋅SjH = J_S \sum_{\langle ij\rangle} \mathbf S_i\cdot\mathbf S_j

for spin 1/21/2 into Pauli-operator notation. Give the relation between the coefficient JσJ_\sigma multiplying σi⋅σj\boldsymbol\sigma_i\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma_j and JSJ_S.

Solution

Using Si=(ℏ/2)σi\mathbf S_i=(\hbar/2)\boldsymbol\sigma_i,

H=JSℏ24∑⟨ij⟩σi⋅σj.H = \frac{J_S\hbar^2}{4} \sum_{\langle ij\rangle} \boldsymbol\sigma_i\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma_j.

Therefore

Jσ=ℏ24JS.J_\sigma = \frac{\hbar^2}{4} J_S.

If a source defines dimensionless spin operators s=σ/2\mathbf s=\boldsymbol\sigma/2, then its coefficient convention differs again. The operator definition and coupling must be translated as one unit.

An advanced calculation sets ℏ=kB=1\hbar=k_{\mathrm B}=1 and writes

ρ=e−(H−μN^)/TΞ,A(t)=eiHtAe−iHt.\begin{aligned} \rho &= \frac{e^{-(H-\mu\hat N)/T}}{\Xi}, \\ A(t) &= e^{iHt}Ae^{-iHt}. \end{aligned}

Restore ℏ\hbar and kBk_{\mathrm B}.

Solution

The thermal exponent must be dimensionless, so

ρ=exp⁡ ⁣[−(H−μN^)/(kBT)]Ξ.\rho = \frac{ \exp\!\left[-(H-\mu\hat N)/(k_{\mathrm B}T)\right] }{\Xi}.

Real-time evolution requires an action divided by ℏ\hbar:

A(t)=eiHt/ℏAe−iHt/ℏ.A(t) = e^{iHt/\hbar} A e^{-iHt/\hbar}.

No factor of ℏ\hbar belongs in the equilibrium Gibbs exponent because kBTk_{\mathrm B}T already has energy units.

Explain why the statements “a finite isolated system has an exactly discrete spectrum” and “a thermodynamic correlation function decays irreversibly” need not contradict one another.

Solution

At fixed finite NsN_s, exact unitary dynamics has a discrete set of energy differences. Correlators can show recurrences, and an infinite-time limit may retain finite-size structure. Taking Ns→∞N_s\to\infty first can produce a continuous set of frequencies and dephasing on all fixed observation times. Thus

lim⁡t→∞lim⁡Ns→∞CNs(t)\lim_{t\to\infty} \lim_{N_s\to\infty} C_{N_s}(t)

can differ from

lim⁡Ns→∞lim⁡t→∞CNs(t).\lim_{N_s\to\infty} \lim_{t\to\infty} C_{N_s}(t).

The apparent contradiction came from suppressing the order of limits.