Skip to content

Spin Measurements

A spin measurement is a measurement of a chosen spin component. For spin-1/21/2, measuring along a unit axis n^\hat{\mathbf n} means measuring

Sn^=n^⋅S=ℏ2n^⋅σ.S_{\hat n} = \hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\mathbf S = \frac{\hbar}{2}\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma.

The possible outcomes are

±ℏ2.\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}.

The axis is part of the measurement specification. There is no axis-independent measurement of “the spin value” for spin-1/21/2; there are measurements of SzS_z, SxS_x, Sn^S_{\hat n}, and so on.

This page applies the projective measurement formalism to spin. The physical Stern–Gerlach analyzer model is treated in Stern–Gerlach Revisited, and the general measurement rules are treated in Projective Measurement.

In the standard SzS_z basis,

∣↑⟩=∣+z⟩,∣↓⟩=∣−z⟩,\lvert\uparrow\rangle=\lvert+z\rangle, \qquad \lvert\downarrow\rangle=\lvert-z\rangle,

with

Sz∣↑⟩=ℏ2∣↑⟩,Sz∣↓⟩=−ℏ2∣↓⟩.S_z\lvert\uparrow\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\lvert\uparrow\rangle, \qquad S_z\lvert\downarrow\rangle = -\frac{\hbar}{2}\lvert\downarrow\rangle.

The corresponding projectors are

P+z=∣↑⟩⟨↑∣=12(I+σz),P_{+z} = \lvert\uparrow\rangle\langle\uparrow\rvert = \frac12(I+\sigma_z),

and

P−z=∣↓⟩⟨↓∣=12(I−σz).P_{-z} = \lvert\downarrow\rangle\langle\downarrow\rvert = \frac12(I-\sigma_z).

For a normalized state

∣ψ⟩=α∣↑⟩+β∣↓⟩,\lvert\psi\rangle = \alpha\lvert\uparrow\rangle +\beta\lvert\downarrow\rangle,

the Born probabilities are

p(+z)=∣α∣2,p(−z)=∣β∣2.p(+z)=\lvert\alpha\rvert^2, \qquad p(-z)=\lvert\beta\rvert^2.

These are not probabilities for the particle to be “really up” or “really down” before measurement in a classical hidden-variable sense. They are the probabilities assigned by the state and the specified projective measurement.

Let

n^=(sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ,sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ,cos⁡θ)\hat{\mathbf n} = (\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta)

be a unit vector. The spin component along n^\hat{\mathbf n} is

Sn^=ℏ2n^⋅σ.S_{\hat n} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma.

Because

(n^⋅σ)2=I,(\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)^2=I,

the eigenvalues of n^⋅σ\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma are ±1\pm1, and the eigenvalues of Sn^S_{\hat n} are ±ℏ/2\pm\hbar/2.

The projectors are

P±(n^)=12(I±n^⋅σ).P_\pm^{(\hat n)} = \frac12 \left( I\pm\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right).

They obey the projective-measurement identities

P+(n^)+P−(n^)=I,P_+^{(\hat n)}+P_-^{(\hat n)}=I, P±(n^)P±(n^)=P±(n^),P_\pm^{(\hat n)}P_\pm^{(\hat n)} = P_\pm^{(\hat n)},

and

P+(n^)P−(n^)=0.P_+^{(\hat n)}P_-^{(\hat n)}=0.

Thus {P+(n^),P−(n^)}\{P_+^{(\hat n)},P_-^{(\hat n)}\} is the two-outcome projective measurement associated with the spin component Sn^S_{\hat n}.

For a pure state ∣ψ⟩\lvert\psi\rangle, the probability of outcome ±\pm along n^\hat{\mathbf n} is

p±=⟨ψ∣P±(n^)∣ψ⟩.p_\pm = \langle\psi|P_\pm^{(\hat n)}|\psi\rangle.

If the state is the +a^+\hat{\mathbf a} eigenstate, where γ\gamma is the angle between a^\hat{\mathbf a} and n^\hat{\mathbf n}, then

p+=12(1+a^⋅n^)=cos⁡2γ2,p_+ = \frac12 \left( 1+\hat{\mathbf a}\cdot\hat{\mathbf n} \right) = \cos^2\frac{\gamma}{2},

and

p−=sin⁡2γ2.p_- = \sin^2\frac{\gamma}{2}.

For example, ∣+z⟩|+z\rangle measured along xx has γ=π/2\gamma=\pi/2, so both outcomes have probability 1/21/2.

For a spin-1/21/2 density operator,

ρ=12(I+r⋅σ),\rho = \frac12 \left( I+\mathbf r\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right),

where ∣r∣≤1\lvert\mathbf r\rvert\leq1, the measurement probabilities are

p±=Tr⁡(ρP±(n^))=12(1±r⋅n^).p_\pm = \operatorname{Tr} \left( \rho P_\pm^{(\hat n)} \right) = \frac12 \left( 1\pm\mathbf r\cdot\hat{\mathbf n} \right).

This is the compact Bloch-sphere form of the Born rule. The component of the Bloch vector along the analyzer axis controls the bias; transverse components affect other axes but not this outcome probability directly.

The expectation value is

⟨Sn^⟩=ℏ2r⋅n^.\langle S_{\hat n}\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\mathbf r\cdot\hat{\mathbf n}.

Thus a state can have zero expectation value along an axis while still giving two possible outcomes ±ℏ/2\pm\hbar/2.

If the outcome ++ along n^\hat{\mathbf n} occurs in an ideal selective projective measurement, a pure state updates as

∣ψ⟩⟶P+(n^)∣ψ⟩p+.\lvert\psi\rangle \longrightarrow \frac{ P_+^{(\hat n)}\lvert\psi\rangle }{ \sqrt{p_+} }.

Similarly, outcome −- gives

∣ψ⟩⟶P−(n^)∣ψ⟩p−.\lvert\psi\rangle \longrightarrow \frac{ P_-^{(\hat n)}\lvert\psi\rangle }{ \sqrt{p_-} }.

For density operators, the update is

ρ⟶P±(n^)ρP±(n^)Tr⁡(ρP±(n^)).\rho \longrightarrow \frac{ P_\pm^{(\hat n)}\rho P_\pm^{(\hat n)} }{ \operatorname{Tr} \left( \rho P_\pm^{(\hat n)} \right) }.

This is a conditional state assignment after a specified outcome. It is not a full microscopic model of a detector.

If the measurement is performed but the outcome is not recorded, the nonselective update is

ρ⟶P+(n^)ρP+(n^)+P−(n^)ρP−(n^).\rho \longrightarrow P_+^{(\hat n)}\rho P_+^{(\hat n)} + P_-^{(\hat n)}\rho P_-^{(\hat n)}.

In Bloch-vector language, this keeps only the component of r\mathbf r along n^\hat{\mathbf n}:

r⟶(r⋅n^)n^.\mathbf r \longrightarrow (\mathbf r\cdot\hat{\mathbf n})\hat{\mathbf n}.

The measurement removes coherence between the two eigenspaces of Sn^S_{\hat n}.

Spin measurements along different axes are generally incompatible. For two unit vectors a^\hat{\mathbf a} and b^\hat{\mathbf b},

[Sa^,Sb^]=iℏSa^×b^.[S_{\hat a},S_{\hat b}] = i\hbar S_{\hat{\mathbf a}\times\hat{\mathbf b}}.

If the axes are not parallel, the commutator is generally nonzero. A state prepared with definite SzS_z is therefore not generally definite in SxS_x.

For spin-1/21/2,

∣+z⟩=12(∣+x⟩+∣−x⟩).\lvert+z\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \lvert+x\rangle+\lvert-x\rangle \right).

An xx measurement of a +z+z state gives equal probabilities. If one outcome is selected, the post-measurement state is an xx eigenstate, and a later zz measurement again has equal probabilities. This is the spin version of the general Sequential Measurements rule.

Repeated measurement along the same axis is deterministic in the ideal projective model. If a measurement of Sn^S_{\hat n} gives ++ and is immediately repeated, the second measurement gives ++ with probability 11 because the state has been updated into the +n^+\hat{\mathbf n} eigenspace.

Changing the axis changes the measurement. A useful three-step example is:

  1. prepare ∣+z⟩|+z\rangle;
  2. measure SxS_x and select +x+x;
  3. measure SzS_z again.

The final SzS_z measurement gives

p(+z)=p(−z)=12.p(+z)=p(-z)=\frac12.

The intermediate SxS_x selection prepares a new state. It does not merely reveal a value while leaving the original SzS_z certainty intact.

An ideal Stern–Gerlach analyzer oriented along n^\hat{\mathbf n} is the standard physical picture for the measurement {P+(n^),P−(n^)}\{P_+^{(\hat n)},P_-^{(\hat n)}\}. The apparatus correlates the two spin projectors with two spatial output paths.

This page owns the compact measurement formulas. Stern–Gerlach Revisited owns the analyzer model, path separation, sequential-analyzer interpretation, and historical caveats.

  • Saying “measure spin” without specifying the axis.
  • Using ∣α∣2|\alpha|^2 and ∣β∣2|\beta|^2 for every axis instead of only the chosen basis.
  • Forgetting that P±(n^)P_\pm^{(\hat n)} changes when the analyzer axis changes.
  • Treating the post-measurement state as the same as the pre-measurement state after a selective outcome.
  • Assuming that definite SzS_z implies definite SxS_x.
  • Confusing expectation value ⟨Sn^⟩\langle S_{\hat n}\rangle with a single-shot outcome.
  • Treating the projective update rule as a complete physical detector model.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer, 1995.
  • M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  1. A state is ∣ψ⟩=(∣↑⟩+i∣↓⟩)/2\lvert\psi\rangle=(\lvert\uparrow\rangle+i\lvert\downarrow\rangle)/\sqrt2. Find the probabilities for an SzS_z measurement.
Solution

In the SzS_z basis,

α=12,β=i2.\alpha=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}, \qquad \beta=\frac{i}{\sqrt2}.

Therefore

p(+z)=∣α∣2=12,p(−z)=∣β∣2=12.p(+z)=\lvert\alpha\rvert^2=\frac12, \qquad p(-z)=\lvert\beta\rvert^2=\frac12.
  1. Use the Bloch-vector formula to find the probabilities for measuring along z^\hat z when r=(1,0,0)\mathbf r=(1,0,0).
Solution

For measurement along z^\hat z,

p±=12(1±r⋅z^).p_\pm = \frac12 \left( 1\pm\mathbf r\cdot\hat z \right).

Here r⋅z^=0\mathbf r\cdot\hat z=0, so

p+=p−=12.p_+=p_-=\frac12.
  1. Verify that P±(n^)=(I±n^⋅σ)/2P_\pm^{(\hat n)}=(I\pm\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)/2 are orthogonal projectors.
Solution

Use

(n^⋅σ)2=I.(\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)^2=I.

Then

(P±(n^))2=14(I±n^⋅σ)2=12(I±n^⋅σ)=P±(n^).\left( P_\pm^{(\hat n)} \right)^2 = \frac14 \left( I\pm\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right)^2 = \frac12 \left( I\pm\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right) = P_\pm^{(\hat n)}.

Also,

P+(n^)P−(n^)=14[I−(n^⋅σ)2]=0.P_+^{(\hat n)}P_-^{(\hat n)} = \frac14 \left[ I- (\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma)^2 \right] = 0.
  1. A spin is prepared in ∣+z⟩|+z\rangle, then SxS_x is measured and the +x+x outcome is selected. What are the probabilities for a later SzS_z measurement?
Solution

After selecting +x+x, the state is ∣+x⟩|+x\rangle. In the SzS_z basis,

∣+x⟩=12(∣+z⟩+∣−z⟩).|+x\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( |+z\rangle+|-z\rangle \right).

Therefore the later SzS_z probabilities are

p(+z)=12,p(−z)=12.p(+z)=\frac12, \qquad p(-z)=\frac12.