Wigner Symbols Quick Reference
This page is a compact reference for Wigner , , and symbols. Use it to identify which symbol belongs in a calculation, check selection rules, and avoid importing signs from the wrong convention.
For the conceptual treatment, use Recoupling and Wigner Symbols. For a table-style summary, use Wigner Symbols. For the representation-theory formulation, use Wigner 3j, 6j, and 9j Symbols.
Symbol Roles
Section titled “Symbol Roles”| Symbol | What it answers | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| How a two-angular-momentum coupling is written in symmetric notation | Clebsch–Gordan conversion, tensor operators, angular integrals | |
| How two coupling orders for three angular momenta are related | recoupling, spin–orbit and hyperfine matrix elements, intermediate-coupling bases | |
| How two binary pairings of four angular momenta are related | multi-particle angular momentum, atomic and nuclear recoupling |
These symbols are kinematic angular-momentum coefficients. They do not by themselves determine energies, rates, or dynamics.
Convention
Section titled “Convention”This volume uses the Condon–Shortley convention unless a page explicitly declares otherwise. The relation to Clebsch–Gordan coefficients is
Equivalently,
The phase factor is part of the convention. Dropping it is the most common way to turn a correct table lookup into a wrong coefficient.
Three-j Selection Rules
Section titled “Three-j Selection Rules”A symbol is written
It vanishes unless all of the following are satisfied:
with cyclic variants of the triangle condition, and
A useful special case is
Selection rules are necessary conditions. They are not a guarantee that an allowed-looking symbol is nonzero.
Six-j Recoupling
Section titled “Six-j Recoupling”A symbol changes the coupling order for three angular momenta. The two bases
and
are related by
The symbol is independent of . It depends only on the angular-momentum labels because it compares two ways of organizing the same total- irreducible space.
For
the necessary triangular triples are
Nine-j Recoupling
Section titled “Nine-j Recoupling”A symbol compares two binary coupling schemes for four angular momenta. One common relation is
For a symbol, rows and columns encode allowed triangular couplings in the displayed pairing scheme. A symbol is often compact, but two successive recouplings may be clearer in a derivation.
Relation to Tensor Operators
Section titled “Relation to Tensor Operators”The Wigner–Eckart theorem commonly uses a symbol:
This form separates magnetic quantum-number algebra from the reduced matrix element. When the state has several coupled angular momenta and the operator acts on one part of the system, symbols often appear because one must recouple to expose the angular momentum being acted on.
Use Irreducible Spherical Tensors for tensor conventions and Wigner–Eckart Theorem for the theorem.
Safe Workflow
Section titled “Safe Workflow”- Write the physical coupling scheme in words.
- Add parentheses to show the actual order of coupling.
- Decide whether the problem is a two-body coefficient, a three-body recoupling, or a four-body pairing change.
- Apply magnetic and triangle zero tests before using a table.
- Check the phase convention and ordering of entries.
- Insert the symbol only after the basis convention is fixed.
The workflow matters because the same numbers in a different order can represent a different recoupling problem.
Which Page Should I Open?
Section titled “Which Page Should I Open?”| Task | Best starting page |
|---|---|
| Convert between Clebsch–Gordan and notation | Clebsch–Gordan Quick Reference |
| Understand recoupling conceptually | Recoupling and Wigner Symbols |
| Check Wigner symbol selection rules | Wigner Symbols |
| Use Wigner symbols as representation coefficients | Wigner 3j, 6j, and 9j Symbols |
| Apply tensor-operator matrix elements | Wigner–Eckart Theorem |
| Work with rotation matrices | Wigner D-Matrices |
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating a symbol as numerically identical to a Clebsch–Gordan coefficient.
- Forgetting the phase factor in the conversion formula.
- Reading a or entry without first specifying the coupling scheme.
- Assuming selection rules are sufficient for nonzero values.
- Mixing Condon–Shortley conventions from one table with different state phases from another.
- Expecting and symbols to depend on .
- Using a compact expression when the calculation would be clearer as two recouplings.
References
Section titled “References”- A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1957.
- D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, World Scientific, 1988.
- D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1993.
- E. P. Wigner, Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra, Academic Press, 1959.
- R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum: Understanding Spatial Aspects in Chemistry and Physics, Wiley, 1988.
Quick Checks
Section titled “Quick Checks”- Why must
vanish?
Solution
The lower labels of a symbol must sum to zero. Here
so the symbol vanishes.
- Which symbol changes from to ?
Solution
This is a change of coupling order for three angular momenta, so the natural object is a Wigner symbol:
- Why do symbols not depend on ?
Solution
A symbol compares two ways of coupling the same angular momenta to the same total . Rotational symmetry makes the recoupling coefficient the same for every member of the multiplet. The dependence on magnetic labels is already handled by Clebsch–Gordan coefficients or symbols.