Commutators and Conservation Laws
The basic quantum conservation test is a commutator test. For the Core Formalism derivation of the expectation-value formula, see Conservation Laws. For a closed system with Hamiltonian , an observable with no explicit time dependence is conserved when
This page explains the relation between symmetry, commutators, and constants of motion. For the first-order derivation of the commutator action itself, see Infinitesimal Transformations. For the broader symmetry-conservation framing, see Quantum Noether Principle. For practical tests, see Constants of Motion.
The classical counterpart is the Poisson-bracket test , reviewed in Poisson Brackets.
Expectation-Value Equation
Section titled “Expectation-Value Equation”For an observable in closed-system dynamics,
If has no explicit time dependence, this reduces to
Therefore implies is constant in every state evolving under .
Operator Equation
Section titled “Operator Equation”In the Heisenberg picture,
If has no explicit time dependence and commutes with the Hamiltonian, then
This is a stronger statement than conservation of one expectation value in one state: the observable is a constant of motion.
Symmetry Generator Implies Conservation
Section titled “Symmetry Generator Implies Conservation”Suppose a continuous unitary symmetry is generated by :
If the Hamiltonian is invariant under this symmetry, then
for all . Differentiating at gives
Equivalently, , so is conserved when it has no explicit time dependence.
Free Particle Momentum Conservation
Section titled “Free Particle Momentum Conservation”For a free particle in one dimension,
Since commutes with any function of ,
Momentum is conserved. This is the operator statement behind translation invariance.
Central Potential Angular Momentum Conservation
Section titled “Central Potential Angular Momentum Conservation”For a three-dimensional central potential,
the Hamiltonian is rotationally invariant. Consequently,
for each component of orbital angular momentum. It follows that and a chosen component, usually , can be used to label energy eigenstates.
Energy Conservation
Section titled “Energy Conservation”If the Hamiltonian itself has no explicit time dependence, then
Energy conservation in closed quantum mechanics is therefore the conservation law associated with time-translation symmetry.
What Conservation Does Not Mean
Section titled “What Conservation Does Not Mean”Conservation of does not mean every state has a sharp value of . It means the distribution of is constant under time evolution when commutes with . A superposition of eigenstates can remain a superposition while the probabilities for measuring each eigenvalue remain fixed.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Checking in one state and concluding as an operator.
- Forgetting the explicit term.
- Assuming conservation means the state is an eigenstate of the conserved quantity.
- Confusing a conserved expectation value in a special state with a symmetry of the Hamiltonian.
- Ignoring domain subtleties for unbounded operators.
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Commutators
- Poisson Brackets
- Conservation Laws
- Commutator Dynamics
- One-Parameter Unitary Groups
- Generators
- Infinitesimal Transformations
- Quantum Noether Principle
- Constants of Motion
- From Quantum Generators to Noether Currents
- Symmetry Constraints on Hamiltonians
- Exact Symmetry
- Explicit Symmetry Breaking
- Heisenberg Equations of Motion
- Ehrenfest Theorem
- Commutator Table
References
Section titled “References”- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Let . Use to determine when momentum is conserved.
Solution
Since ,
Momentum is conserved when this vanishes as an operator, which requires on the region considered. Thus the potential is constant there.
- If , what can be said about the probabilities of measuring the eigenvalues of ?
Solution
When has no explicit time dependence and commutes with , the projectors onto eigenspaces of also commute with under the usual spectral assumptions. The probabilities for the corresponding outcomes are constant under time evolution.