Poincaré Group
The Poincaré group combines spacetime translations with Lorentz transformations. It is the symmetry group of Minkowski spacetime with no preferred origin. Its quantum representations explain why mass and spin label free relativistic particles, and why a finite-component covariant wavefunction is different from the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space of its momentum states. This page introduces the group and its invariants without attempting the full classification of representations.
Required background. Lorentz Transformations supplies boosts and rotations; the Energy–Momentum Relation supplies the mass shell. We also assume familiarity with Hermitian generators of unitary symmetries.
Translations and Lorentz transformations form a semidirect product
Section titled “Translations and Lorentz transformations form a semidirect product”A Poincaré transformation acts on coordinates as
Apply first and second. Substitution gives
The inverse is . Translations form an abelian normal subgroup, but they do not commute with general Lorentz transformations: the latter rotate or boost the translation vector. This is the meaning of the semidirect product for the connected group. There are four translation parameters and six Lorentz parameters.
As a concrete example, first translate a point by and then apply an boost. The effective translation in the boosted coordinates is
Reversing the order would leave the translation vector . The group multiplication therefore cannot be replaced by independent addition of the two translation vectors.
Generators and their algebra
Section titled “Generators and their algebra”Continuous spacetime symmetries act projectively on quantum rays; passing to the covering group permits a unitary representation on the Hilbert space, including half-integer spin. Work on a common invariant domain where the following commutators are defined. Let denote translation generators, angular momentum, and boost generators with units of action. Choose signs so that and for the antisymmetric Lorentz generators, with
In this convention the spatial algebra is
and the energy–momentum relations are
Here in the three-vector equations means a Euclidean Cartesian component, not the lowered spacetime component . With this choice, a passive boost is represented by , while a right-handed rotation uses . Reversing the definition of reverses both its parameter sign and the displayed mixed commutators.
The negative sign in distinguishes boosts from rotations and encodes the rotation generated by non-collinear boosts. The commutator says that a boost generally changes the energy of a state. Poincaré invariance does not mean that the Hamiltonian commutes with boosts.
Mass and spin as invariants
Section titled “Mass and spin as invariants”The first Casimir operator is
It commutes with all generators. On a massive irreducible one-particle representation its value is . The second invariant is built from the Pauli–Lubanski vector,
The explicit components in this convention are and . For a massive particle in its rest frame and . Consequently
The nonnegative integer or half-integer is the spin. In the rest frame, the subgroup preserving the standard momentum is the rotation group; its double cover supplies the familiar spin states.
For massless finite-helicity representations, and . These two numbers alone do not distinguish different helicities. One needs the action of the massless little group, the subgroup preserving a reference null momentum. Continuous-spin representations also exist mathematically; excluding them requires a restriction beyond merely writing . This is why the full Wigner classification is more than the dispersion relation plus a chosen number of wavefunction components.
Covariant components and unitary particle states
Section titled “Covariant components and unitary particle states”A Dirac amplitude has four components at each spacetime point. A one-particle state, however, carries a continuous momentum label and a spin label. A normalizable state is a superposition over momenta, so its Hilbert space is infinite dimensional even when the spin space is finite dimensional.
Lorentz boosts on the covariant spinor components are not unitary in the ordinary Euclidean component norm. This does not contradict unitarity on the particle Hilbert space: momentum arguments, integration measure, and spin transformations participate together. The invariant mass-shell measure is one part of that construction. The covariant Dirac equation displays the component intertwining relation.
The group algebra is a kinematic constraint, not a complete interaction theory. A prescribed external field can break translation or boost symmetry, so the external-field Hamiltonian need not realize every free-particle symmetry. Lorentz covariance of equations with transformed backgrounds is different from invariance of one fixed background.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Using the displayed commutators, verify that .
Solution
Since , the first term gives . The second gives . They cancel, as required for the invariant mass.
- For , compute the massive eigenvalue. Can the same formula at distinguish a scalar from a massless spinor?
Solution
. Substituting sets it to zero for both finite-helicity examples and loses the helicity information. Massless representations have no rest frame; their little-group analysis is distinct.
- Explain why an electrostatic potential centered at one spatial point can preserve rotations but break translations, even though the Dirac equation is written covariantly.
Solution
A central potential depends only on distance from its center and is unchanged by rotations about that center. Translating the state while leaving the potential fixed changes its potential energy. Transforming both the state and the source gives a covariant description of a different background; it is not a symmetry of the original fixed background.
References
Section titled “References”- S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 1995, chapter 2 — the Poincaré algebra and one-particle states.
- E. P. Wigner, “On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group,” Annals of Mathematics 40, 149–204, 1939, doi:10.2307/1968551 — classification by momentum orbits and little groups.