Skip to content

Hydrogen Fine Structure Revisited

The Dirac equation in an attractive point Coulomb field has an exact bound-state spectrum whose weak-coupling expansion reproduces hydrogen fine structure. Solving the coupled first-order radial equations fixes more than an energy formula: it determines the allowed angular labels, the relation between spinor components, and the boundary condition at the point source. Here the nucleus is infinitely heavy, the electron couples minimally, and nuclear size, recoil, and radiative effects are excluded.

Required background. Hamiltonian Form supplies the Dirac operator, Orbital Plus Spin supplies coupled angular functions, and The Hydrogen Atom supplies the nonrelativistic Coulomb comparison. Helpful background. Relativistic Corrections to Hydrogen derives the separate perturbative matrix elements.

Point-Coulomb Hamiltonian and angular labels

Section titled “Point-Coulomb Hamiltonian and angular labels”

Let mm be the electron mass and write

a=Zα>0,M=mc2,V(r)=−aℏcr.\begin{aligned} a&=Z\alpha>0,\qquad M=mc^2,\\ V(r)&=-\frac{a\hbar c}{r}. \end{aligned}

The stationary equation in the Dirac basis is

(cα⋅p+βM+V)Ψ=EΨ.\left(c\boldsymbol\alpha\cdot\mathbf p +\beta M+V\right)\Psi=E\Psi.

The energy EE includes the rest energy. For the main derivation take 0<a<3/20<a<\sqrt3/2, where the standard point-source operator has a unique self-adjoint closure from its minimal domain away from the origin. The stronger point-Coulomb regime is qualified below. The eventual low-energy expansion additionally requires a≪1a\ll1.

Choose normalized spinor spherical harmonics Ωκmj\Omega_{\kappa m_j} satisfying

(σ⋅L+ℏ)Ωκmj=−κℏ Ωκmj,(\boldsymbol\sigma\cdot\mathbf L+\hbar) \Omega_{\kappa m_j} =-\kappa\hbar\,\Omega_{\kappa m_j},

and fix their relative phase by

σ⋅r^ Ωκmj=−Ω−κmj.\boldsymbol\sigma\cdot\widehat{\mathbf r}\, \Omega_{\kappa m_j} =-\Omega_{-\kappa m_j}.

The nonzero integer κ\kappa encodes the upper-component orbital angular momentum:

Angular branchκ\kappaUpper orbital label
j=ℓ+12j=\ell+\tfrac12−(ℓ+1)-(\ell+1)ℓ=−κ−1\ell=-\kappa-1
j=ℓ−12j=\ell-\tfrac12ℓ\ellℓ=κ\ell=\kappa

In either case j=∣κ∣−1/2j=|\kappa|-1/2. The lower component has orbital label ℓ′=2j−ℓ\ell'=2j-\ell. The complete spinor is a J2,JzJ^2,J_z eigenstate and generally contains two different orbital L2L^2 eigenvalues.

If an angular Dirac operator is used, our dimensionless convention is KD=−β(Σ⋅L/ℏ+1)K_{\rm D}=-\beta(\boldsymbol\Sigma\cdot\mathbf L/\hbar+1). It has eigenvalue κ\kappa. Some references define the opposite sign; translating κ\kappa is necessary before comparing radial equations.

Separate the spinor as

Ψκmj(r)=1r(G(r)ΩκmjiF(r)Ω−κmj),\Psi_{\kappa m_j}(\mathbf r) =\frac1r \begin{pmatrix} G(r)\Omega_{\kappa m_j}\\ iF(r)\Omega_{-\kappa m_j} \end{pmatrix},

with radial normalization

∫0∞(∣G(r)∣2+∣F(r)∣2) dr=1.\int_0^\infty \left(|G(r)|^2+|F(r)|^2\right)\,dr=1.

The angular phase above implies

σ⋅p[GrΩκ]=iℏr(G′+κrG)Ω−κ.\boldsymbol\sigma\cdot\mathbf p \left[\frac{G}{r}\Omega_\kappa\right] =\frac{i\hbar}{r} \left(G'+\frac{\kappa}{r}G\right)\Omega_{-\kappa}.

Substituting into the two Dirac blocks gives

G′+κrG=E+M−VℏcF,F′−κrF=M−E+VℏcG.\begin{aligned} G'+\frac{\kappa}{r}G &=\frac{E+M-V}{\hbar c}F,\\ F'-\frac{\kappa}{r}F &=\frac{M-E+V}{\hbar c}G. \end{aligned}

Both the explicit ii in the lower component and the phase of the harmonics matter for these signs. Littlejohn (2021) gives a compatible separation after translating his radial symbols and units.

For a bound state, ∣E∣<M|E|<M. Define

λ=M2−E2ℏc,τ=M−EM+E.\lambda=\frac{\sqrt{M^2-E^2}}{\hbar c}, \qquad \tau=\sqrt{\frac{M-E}{M+E}}.

At large radius, normalizability selects the decaying exponential e−λre^{-\lambda r} and F/G→−τF/G\to-\tau. Near the origin, inserting G,F∝rsG,F\propto r^s gives

(s+κ−aas−κ)(G0F0)=0.\begin{pmatrix} s+\kappa&-a\\ a&s-\kappa \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}G_0\\F_0\end{pmatrix}=0.

Thus s=±γs=\pm\gamma with γ=κ2−a2\gamma=\sqrt{\kappa^2-a^2}. The usual atomic boundary condition selects the +γ+\gamma branch. This refers to reduced radial functions: the full spinor behaves as rγ−1r^{\gamma-1}, so “regular branch” need not mean a bounded four-spinor at r=0r=0.

Polynomial termination and the energy sign

Section titled “Polynomial termination and the energy sign”

Set ρ=2λr\rho=2\lambda r and write

G=ργe−ρ/2∑j=0∞gjρj,F=ργe−ρ/2∑j=0∞fjρj.\begin{aligned} G&=\rho^\gamma e^{-\rho/2} \sum_{j=0}^\infty g_j\rho^j,\\ F&=\rho^\gamma e^{-\rho/2} \sum_{j=0}^\infty f_j\rho^j. \end{aligned}

Here the summation index jj is only a polynomial index, not the angular momentum label in the preceding sections. Let xj=(gj,fj)Tx_j=(g_j,f_j)^{\mathsf T} and x−1=0x_{-1}=0. The radial equations yield

Ajxj=Bxj−1,A_jx_j=Bx_{j-1},

where

Aj=(γ+j+κ−aaγ+j−κ),A_j= \begin{pmatrix} \gamma+j+\kappa&-a\\ a&\gamma+j-\kappa \end{pmatrix}, B=12(11/ττ1).B=\frac12 \begin{pmatrix} 1&1/\tau\\ \tau&1 \end{pmatrix}.

The indicial equation is det⁡A0=0\det A_0=0. Up to normalization, take

g0=1,f0=γ+κa.g_0=1,\qquad f_0=\frac{\gamma+\kappa}{a}.

For j>0j>0, det⁡Aj=j(j+2γ)\det A_j=j(j+2\gamma), so the recurrence uniquely generates the regular solution. The rank-one matrix BB has image spanned by w=(1,τ)Tw=(1,\tau)^{\mathsf T} and satisfies Bw=wBw=w. Define

ν=aEM2−E2−γ.\nu=\frac{aE}{\sqrt{M^2-E^2}}-\gamma.

A direct two-by-two inverse gives

BAj−1w=j−νj(j+2γ)w.BA_j^{-1}w =\frac{j-\nu}{j(j+2\gamma)}w.

For a generic nonterminating regular series, the large-order recurrence produces the growing confluent-hypergeometric exponential, which defeats the prefactor e−ρ/2e^{-\rho/2}. Normalizable regular solutions terminate. For degree N≥1N\geq1, termination is BxN=0Bx_N=0 and occurs at ν=N\nu=N. Degree zero needs the separate condition Bx0=0Bx_0=0, considered next.

The quantization condition is

N+γ=aEM2−E2,N+\gamma=\frac{aE}{\sqrt{M^2-E^2}},

and therefore

ENκ=M[1+a2(N+κ2−a2)2]−1/2.E_{N\kappa} =M\left[ 1+\frac{a^2}{(N+\sqrt{\kappa^2-a^2})^2} \right]^{-1/2}.

The unsquared equation selects E>0E>0: its left side is positive and a>0a>0. Appending an independent minus sign after squaring would introduce spurious attractive Coulomb bound states. The negative continuum of the Dirac operator still exists; charge conjugation also changes the external-charge problem.

The lowest degree and allowed principal shells

Section titled “The lowest degree and allowed principal shells”

For N=0N=0, the candidate energy is E=Mγ/∣κ∣E=M\gamma/|\kappa|, and τ=a/(∣κ∣+γ)\tau=a/(|\kappa|+\gamma). If κ<0\kappa<0, then

f0=−τ,Bx0=0,f_0=-\tau,\qquad Bx_0=0,

so the constant polynomial is allowed. For κ>0\kappa>0, instead f0=1/τf_0=1/\tau, which does not lie in the kernel of BB. Thus

N≥0,N=0 ⟹ κ<0.N\geq0,\qquad N=0\ \Longrightarrow\ \kappa<0.

Define the principal quantum number by n=N+∣κ∣n=N+|\kappa|. Its allowed angular labels are

κ=−n,…,−1,+1,…,n−1.\kappa=-n,\ldots,-1,\quad +1,\ldots,n-1.

Both signs occur when ∣κ∣<n|\kappa|<n. At ∣κ∣=n|\kappa|=n, only the negative sign occurs. In particular, n=1n=1 permits κ=−1\kappa=-1 and the 1S1/21S_{1/2} state, but no 1P1/21P_{1/2} state. Gallone and Michelangeli (2018) give an independent spectral statement of this sign-dependent restriction.

Each allowed κ\kappa has 2j+1=2∣κ∣2j+1=2|\kappa| magnetic substates. Summing them gives 2n22n^2 states in the principal shell. The degree NN is often called a radial quantum number; it should not be identified without qualification with the number of nodes of the upper radial component.

For κ=−1\kappa=-1, N=0N=0,

E1S=M1−a2,γ=1−a2,λ=mcaℏ.\begin{aligned} E_{1S}&=M\sqrt{1-a^2},\\ \gamma&=\sqrt{1-a^2},\qquad \lambda=\frac{mc a}{\hbar}. \end{aligned}

The reduced radial functions are

G(r)=N(2λr)γe−λr,F(r)=−a1+γG(r).\begin{aligned} G(r)&=\mathcal N(2\lambda r)^\gamma e^{-\lambda r},\\ F(r)&=-\frac{a}{1+\gamma}G(r). \end{aligned}

Writing τ=a/(1+γ)\tau=a/(1+\gamma), normalization gives

N=[2λ(1+τ2)Γ(2γ+1)]1/2.\mathcal N =\left[ \frac{2\lambda}{(1+\tau^2)\Gamma(2\gamma+1)} \right]^{1/2}.

This pair satisfies both first-order radial equations. The lower-component probability is

Plower=τ21+τ2=1−1−a22=a24+O(a4).\begin{aligned} P_{\rm lower} &=\frac{\tau^2}{1+\tau^2} =\frac{1-\sqrt{1-a^2}}{2}\\ &=\frac{a^2}{4}+O(a^4). \end{aligned}

It is small at weak coupling, as required by the Pauli limit. It is not the probability of occupying a negative-energy eigenstate: this entire stationary solution has the positive bound energy E1SE_{1S}.

Set k=j+1/2=∣κ∣k=j+1/2=|\kappa|. The exact energy depends on n−k+k2−a2n-k+\sqrt{k^2-a^2}, and its expansion is

Enj=M−Ma22n2+Ma4[38n4−12n3(j+12)]+O(Ma6).\begin{aligned} E_{nj} ={}&M-\frac{Ma^2}{2n^2}\\ &+Ma^4\left[ \frac{3}{8n^4}-\frac{1}{2n^3(j+\tfrac12)} \right]\\ &+O(Ma^6). \end{aligned}

This agrees with the independent kinetic, spin–orbit, and Darwin matrix elements on Relativistic Corrections to Hydrogen. That page owns their detailed cancellation and the worked n=2n=2 decomposition. For fixed n,jn,j, both allowed signs of κ\kappa have equal exact point-Dirac energies. For example, 2S1/22S_{1/2} and 2P1/22P_{1/2} are degenerate in this model.

The atomic fine-structure hierarchy separates this result from recoil, nuclear-size, hyperfine, and radiative effects. In particular, the Lamb shift is absent from the minimal fixed-source Dirac equation. An exact solution of that equation is not an exact prediction of the physical hydrogen spectrum.

The point-origin boundary beyond weak coupling

Section titled “The point-origin boundary beyond weak coupling”

The reduced radial norm uses drdr. The r−γr^{-\gamma} branch becomes square integrable when γ<1/2\gamma<1/2. For 3/2<a<1\sqrt3/2<a<1, this occurs in the κ=±1\kappa=\pm1 channels, and square integrability alone no longer specifies the operator. The usual formula above continues to describe the distinguished self-adjoint extension, selecting the r+γr^{+\gamma} boundary behavior. The alternative branch has a divergent radial Coulomb-form integral. Gallone and Michelangeli (2018) explain the domain dependence of the spectrum.

This extension must not be called a Friedrichs extension of the full Dirac operator, which is not bounded below. The conditions for a real exponent, a unique self-adjoint closure, and physical pair production are different. For instance, the formal 1S1S energy tends to zero as a→1−a\to1^-, not to the negative continuum edge −M-M. Finite-nucleus supercritical resonances and pair creation require a different physical and spectral analysis.

Allowed n = 2 states. Enumerate κ\kappa, NN, and the upper-component spectroscopic labels, then count the states including mjm_j.

Solution

The allowed values are κ=−1,+1,−2\kappa=-1,+1,-2. They give respectively (N,label)=(1,2S1/2)(N,\text{label})=(1,2S_{1/2}), (1,2P1/2)(1,2P_{1/2}), and (0,2P3/2)(0,2P_{3/2}). The multiplicities are 2,2,42,2,4, summing to 8=2n28=2n^2. The excluded κ=+2,N=0\kappa=+2,N=0 would incorrectly add a 2D3/22D_{3/2} state.

The ground-state lower component. Show that ⟨β⟩=1−a2\langle\beta\rangle=\sqrt{1-a^2} for the ground state.

Solution

The upper and lower probabilities sum to one, and β\beta has eigenvalues +1+1 and −1-1 on their respective blocks. Hence

⟨β⟩=1−2Plower=1−a2=E1Smc2.\langle\beta\rangle =1-2P_{\rm lower} =\sqrt{1-a^2} =\frac{E_{1S}}{mc^2}.

This is consistent with differentiating the exact energy with respect to mc2mc^2 at fixed Coulomb coupling.

Why the origin criterion changes. Use the reduced radial norm to determine when r−γr^{-\gamma} is locally integrable. Explain why this is not the condition γ>0\gamma>0.

Solution

The integral is ∫0εr−2γ dr\int_0^\varepsilon r^{-2\gamma}\,dr. It is finite only for γ<1/2\gamma<1/2; at γ=1/2\gamma=1/2 it diverges logarithmically. A real positive exponent merely requires a<∣κ∣a<|\kappa|. For ∣κ∣=1|\kappa|=1, the additional integrable branch appears at a>3/2a>\sqrt3/2, before the exponent ceases to be real at a=1a=1.

  • Gallone, Matteo, and Alessandro Michelangeli. “Discrete spectra for critical Dirac–Coulomb Hamiltonians.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 59, 062108 (2018). doi:10.1063/1.5011305. arXiv:1710.11389.
  • Littlejohn, Robert G. “Solutions of the Dirac Equation and Their Properties.” Physics 221B, Notes 50, University of California, Berkeley, academic year 2021–22 (2021). Lecture notes.
  • Thaller, Bernd. The Dirac Equation. Springer (1992). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02753-0.