Skip to content

Orthogonal Polynomials

Orthogonal polynomials are polynomial sequences p0,p1,p2,…p_0,p_1,p_2,\ldots in which pnp_n has degree nn and different degrees are orthogonal with respect to a specified weighted inner product. In quantum mechanics, they appear when separated eigenvalue problems reduce to polynomial factors multiplied by weights, endpoint powers, or exponential envelopes.

This page is the family-level canonical home. The detailed normalization and physics of the main quantum-mechanics families belong to their dedicated pages: Hermite Polynomials, Legendre Polynomials, Associated Legendre Functions, and Laguerre Polynomials.

Let II be an interval and let w(x)>0w(x)>0 be a weight function on II. The weighted inner product is

⟨f,g⟩w=∫If(x)∗g(x)w(x) dx,\langle f,g\rangle_w = \int_I f(x)^*g(x)w(x)\,dx,

when the integral exists. A polynomial sequence {pn}n≥0\{p_n\}_{n\ge0} is orthogonal with respect to ww if

⟨pm,pn⟩w=hnδmn,hn>0.\langle p_m,p_n\rangle_w = h_n\delta_{mn}, \qquad h_n>0.

The norm constants hnh_n depend on the convention used for pnp_n. Changing the leading coefficient or endpoint normalization changes hnh_n but not the orthogonal subspaces.

The weight is not decoration. It is part of the inner product. Forgetting the weight changes the problem.

Separated quantum problems often produce a differential equation plus endpoint conditions. Normalizable solutions are not arbitrary functions; they must have the correct behavior near endpoints and at infinity. After the endpoint behavior is factored out, the remaining finite part is frequently an orthogonal polynomial.

The pattern is:

  1. separate variables;
  2. factor the known singular or asymptotic behavior;
  3. obtain a polynomial differential equation;
  4. impose regularity or square-integrability;
  5. get polynomial termination and discrete labels.

For example:

  • harmonic-oscillator wavefunctions contain Hermite polynomials times a Gaussian;
  • hydrogen radial bound states contain generalized Laguerre polynomials times an exponential and a power of rr;
  • central-potential angular functions contain Legendre or associated Legendre functions;
  • spherical harmonics combine associated Legendre functions with Fourier modes in the azimuthal angle.

The polynomial alone is usually not the physical wavefunction. The weight and envelope carry part of the Hilbert-space measure.

The main families used early in quantum mechanics are:

  • Hermite polynomials on (−∞,∞)(-\infty,\infty) with weight e−x2e^{-x^2};
  • Laguerre polynomials on [0,∞)[0,\infty) with weight xαe−xx^\alpha e^{-x};
  • Legendre polynomials on [−1,1][-1,1] with weight 11;
  • associated Legendre functions for fixed azimuthal label mm, used in spherical harmonics.

Other classical families, such as Chebyshev, Gegenbauer, and Jacobi polynomials, appear in more specialized angular, approximation, and representation-theoretic settings. The common lesson is the same: the interval, weight, endpoint behavior, and normalization convention define the family.

Orthogonal-polynomial families often arise from Sturm–Liouville Theory. In a typical self-adjoint form,

−ddx[p(x)dydx]+q(x)y=λw(x)y,- \frac{d}{dx} \left[ p(x)\frac{dy}{dx} \right] +q(x)y = \lambda w(x)y,

with suitable endpoint conditions. If ymy_m and yny_n correspond to distinct eigenvalues, self-adjointness gives

(λn−λm)∫Iym(x)∗yn(x)w(x) dx=0.(\lambda_n-\lambda_m) \int_I y_m(x)^*y_n(x)w(x)\,dx =0.

Therefore

∫Iym(x)∗yn(x)w(x) dx=0(m≠n).\int_I y_m(x)^*y_n(x)w(x)\,dx=0 \qquad (m\ne n).

This is why orthogonality is not an accident of special-function tables. It follows from the self-adjoint structure of the differential problem.

For singular endpoints or infinite intervals, the same idea persists, but the endpoint hypotheses require care. That is why rigorous statements about completeness and domains belong on the Sturm–Liouville and Hilbert-space pages.

For a positive weight on an interval, multiplication by xx maps a degree-nn polynomial to degree n+1n+1. Orthogonality forces a three-term recurrence. For monic orthogonal polynomials, one may write

xpn(x)=pn+1(x)+anpn(x)+bnpn−1(x),n≥1.xp_n(x) = p_{n+1}(x) +a_n p_n(x) +b_n p_{n-1}(x), \qquad n\ge1.

The reason no lower-degree terms appear is orthogonality. If k<n−1k\lt n-1, then

⟨pk,xpn⟩w=⟨xpk,pn⟩w=0,\langle p_k,xp_n\rangle_w = \langle xp_k,p_n\rangle_w =0,

because xpkxp_k has degree at most n−1n-1 and is orthogonal to pnp_n.

In quantum calculations, recurrence relations are practical tools for matrix elements, selection rules, numerical evaluation, and checking symbolic algebra. They should not be confused with quantum ladder operators unless an operator construction has actually been defined.

Rodrigues Formulas and Generating Functions

Section titled “Rodrigues Formulas and Generating Functions”

Many classical families have Rodrigues formulas, where the nnth polynomial is written as an nnth derivative of a weight-like expression. Schematically,

pn(x)=1cnw(x)dndxn[An(x)w(x)],p_n(x) = \frac{1}{c_n w(x)} \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \left[ A_n(x)w(x) \right],

with family-dependent constants and factors. Rodrigues formulas are useful for proving orthogonality by repeated integration by parts, provided boundary terms vanish.

Generating functions package all degrees into one expression:

G(x,t)=∑n=0∞pn(x)cntn.G(x,t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}p_n(x)c_n t^n.

They are often the quickest way to derive recurrence and derivative identities. The family-specific generating functions belong on the dedicated Hermite, Legendre, and Laguerre pages.

If the polynomials are complete in the relevant weighted space, a suitable function can be expanded as

f(x)=∑n=0∞cnpn(x),f(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n p_n(x),

with coefficients

cn=⟨pn,f⟩whn.c_n = \frac{\langle p_n,f\rangle_w}{h_n}.

This is the same projection principle used for Fourier series and Hilbert-space bases. The convergence statement depends on the function class, the interval, and the weight. It may mean convergence in a weighted L2L^2 norm rather than pointwise convergence.

Worked Example: Expanding a Simple Polynomial

Section titled “Worked Example: Expanding a Simple Polynomial”

Using

P0(x)=1,P2(x)=12(3x2−1),P_0(x)=1, \qquad P_2(x)=\frac12(3x^2-1),

solve for x2x^2 in terms of Legendre polynomials:

3x2−1=2P2(x),3x^2-1=2P_2(x),

so

x2=13P0(x)+23P2(x).x^2 = \frac13 P_0(x) +\frac23 P_2(x).

This small example shows the general idea: an ordinary polynomial can be re-expanded in a basis adapted to a weighted inner product and boundary-value problem.

Mathematical special-function references often normalize polynomials for algebraic convenience:

Pℓ(1)=1,Hn(x)=2nxn+⋯ .P_\ell(1)=1, \qquad H_n(x)=2^n x^n+\cdots.

Quantum mechanics usually needs normalized wavefunctions. That requires the polynomial norm, the envelope, the coordinate measure, and any length scale. For example, a Hermite polynomial becomes a normalized oscillator wavefunction only after multiplication by a Gaussian and the correct oscillator-length factor.

This is why one should not copy a polynomial normalization into a quantum wavefunction without checking the measure. See Gamma and Beta Functions for the normalization integrals that often supply the constants.

  • Omitting the weight function in the orthogonality integral.
  • Treating a polynomial factor as the full wavefunction.
  • Mixing normalization conventions from different references.
  • Assuming pointwise convergence when only weighted L2L^2 convergence is justified.
  • Using recurrence identities outside their stated family and parameter range.
  • Forgetting endpoint conditions when deriving orthogonality by integration by parts.
  • Confusing polynomial degree with a physical quantum number when the labels have been shifted.
  • NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Chapter 18, Orthogonal Polynomials.
  • G. Szego, Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th ed., American Mathematical Society, 1975.
  • T. S. Chihara, An Introduction to Orthogonal Polynomials, Gordon and Breach, 1978.
  • G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy, Special Functions, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, eds., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 7th ed., Academic Press, 2013.
  1. With weight w(x)=1w(x)=1 on [−1,1][-1,1], use Gram-Schmidt on 1,x,x21,x,x^2 to find a degree-two polynomial orthogonal to 11 and xx.
Solution

By parity, x2x^2 is automatically orthogonal to xx on [−1,1][-1,1]. Subtract a multiple of 11:

q2(x)=x2−a.q_2(x)=x^2-a.

Orthogonality to 11 requires

0=∫−11(x2−a) dx=23−2a.0 = \int_{-1}^{1}(x^2-a)\,dx = \frac{2}{3}-2a.

Thus a=1/3a=1/3, so

q2(x)=x2−13.q_2(x)=x^2-\frac13.

Up to normalization, this is the Legendre polynomial P2(x)P_2(x).

  1. Explain why a three-term recurrence has no terms proportional to p0,…,pn−2p_0,\ldots,p_{n-2}.
Solution

The polynomial xpnxp_n has degree n+1n+1, so it can be expanded in p0,…,pn+1p_0,\ldots,p_{n+1}. For k<n−1k\lt n-1,

⟨pk,xpn⟩w=⟨xpk,pn⟩w.\langle p_k,xp_n\rangle_w = \langle xp_k,p_n\rangle_w.

But xpkxp_k has degree at most n−1n-1, so it is a linear combination of p0,…,pn−1p_0,\ldots,p_{n-1} and is orthogonal to pnp_n. Hence those lower coefficients vanish.

  1. Expand x2x^2 in Legendre polynomials P0P_0 and P2P_2.
Solution

Since

P0(x)=1,P2(x)=12(3x2−1),P_0(x)=1, \qquad P_2(x)=\frac12(3x^2-1),

one has

x2=13P0(x)+23P2(x).x^2 = \frac13P_0(x) +\frac23P_2(x).
  1. Why is Hn(x)H_n(x) not itself a normalizable oscillator wavefunction?
Solution

Hn(x)H_n(x) is a polynomial and grows algebraically at infinity, so it is not square-integrable on the real line. The oscillator wavefunction includes a Gaussian envelope:

ψn(x)∝Hn(x/ℓ)e−x2/(2ℓ2).\psi_n(x)\propto H_n(x/\ell) e^{-x^2/(2\ell^2)}.

The Gaussian makes the product square-integrable, and the scale factor fixes the physical units and normalization.

  1. In one sentence, what data define an orthogonal-polynomial family for quantum-mechanics use?
Solution

One must specify the interval, weight function, endpoint or boundary conditions, and normalization convention; the polynomial recurrence alone is not enough to identify the physical basis.