Complex Numbers
A complex number combines two real components into one algebraic object:
Complex numbers are not optional notation in quantum mechanics. States, amplitudes, inner products, and unitary time evolution use their magnitude and phase as independent structures. Probabilities discard an overall phase, but interference detects relative phase.
Cartesian form and equality
Section titled “Cartesian form and equality”The real and imaginary parts are
Two complex numbers are equal exactly when their real and imaginary parts are equal:
The complex plane identifies with the point . The real axis is the horizontal coordinate and the imaginary axis is the vertical coordinate. Addition is therefore ordinary vector addition in this plane.
Arithmetic
Section titled “Arithmetic”For and ,
and
Subtraction is componentwise. Division uses the conjugate of the denominator. If ,
Multiplying numerator and denominator by converts the denominator into a positive real number.
The usual field laws hold: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, multiplication distributes over addition, and every nonzero complex number has a multiplicative inverse.
Complex conjugation
Section titled “Complex conjugation”The conjugate reflects a point across the real axis:
Conjugation obeys
It extracts the Cartesian parts:
Conjugation reverses phase. This reversal is why a complex inner product must conjugate one argument and why probabilities involve an amplitude times its conjugate.
Modulus and distance
Section titled “Modulus and distance”The modulus is
It is the Euclidean distance from the origin. The distance between two complex numbers is .
The squared modulus is
Important properties are
The triangle inequality and its reverse form are
and
These inequalities become norm bounds for complex vectors and wavefunctions.
Polar form and argument
Section titled “Polar form and argument”Every nonzero complex number can be written
The angle is an argument of . It is not unique:
A chosen single-valued representative is the principal argument . A common convention is
That convention introduces a jump across the negative real axis. Other branch choices are possible. The number has no defined argument because it has no direction from the origin.
Cartesian and polar coordinates are related by
In numerical work, the phase should be computed with a two-argument arctangent so the quadrant is retained.
Euler formula
Section titled “Euler formula”Euler’s formula is
It immediately gives
and
The polar form follows:
The analytic definition, derivatives, and oscillatory applications are developed in Complex Exponentials.
Multiplication as scaling and rotation
Section titled “Multiplication as scaling and rotation”Write
Then
Multiplication multiplies magnitudes and adds phases. In the complex plane, multiplication by is a rotation through angle , while multiplication by is a radial scaling.
Division subtracts phase:
This geometry makes phase evolution and interference easier to visualize than Cartesian component arithmetic alone.
Powers and roots
Section titled “Powers and roots”De Moivre’s formula gives
for integer . Equivalently,
If , its distinct th roots are
where
The roots lie equally spaced on a circle. Choosing only the principal argument gives one principal root, not all algebraic roots.
Exponential and logarithm
Section titled “Exponential and logarithm”For ,
The complex exponential is periodic in the imaginary direction:
Consequently, the complex logarithm is multivalued:
A single-valued logarithm requires a branch choice and a branch cut. Fractional powers inherit that choice. Contours, analytic continuation, and branch cuts belong in Complex Analysis Essentials.
Complex amplitudes
Section titled “Complex amplitudes”If a quantum process has amplitude , its probability is
Squaring the amplitude without conjugation generally gives a complex number and is not a probability.
If two indistinguishable alternatives have amplitudes and , the total probability is
The final term is interference. If
then
Only the relative phase enters.
Global and relative phase
Section titled “Global and relative phase”Multiplying a normalized state by a common phase,
does not change expectation values:
Equivalently, the density operator is unchanged:
Relative phase is observable through interference. Consider
and the basis
The probabilities are
The phase is invisible in the original probabilities but visible after changing basis. See Superposition and Relative Phase.
Complex inner products
Section titled “Complex inner products”For vectors , the standard inner product is
It is conjugate-linear in the first argument and linear in the second:
It also obeys conjugate symmetry and positivity:
Without conjugation, the proposed squared norm of would be despite the vector being nonzero. Conjugation produces instead.
The vector-space and bra–ket conventions are developed in Complex Vector Spaces.
Time-evolution phases
Section titled “Time-evolution phases”An energy eigenstate evolves as
For one energy eigenstate this is a global phase. For a superposition,
relative phases change at rates set by energy differences:
Those relative phases generate observable oscillations. The imaginary unit makes the exponential a unit-modulus rotation, which is the scalar prototype of unitary time evolution.
Complex matrices
Section titled “Complex matrices”For a complex matrix , the adjoint is
Hermitian matrices satisfy and represent finite-dimensional observables. Unitary matrices satisfy
and preserve complex inner products. Entrywise conjugation, transposition, and adjunction are different operations and should not be interchanged.
Numerical practice
Section titled “Numerical practice”Complex computations have a few recurring traps:
- compare complex numbers by magnitude of their difference, not by exact floating-point equality;
- use a two-argument arctangent for phase;
- unwrap phases only when continuity along a chosen path is physically intended;
- compute probabilities with , not ;
- distinguish transpose from conjugate transpose;
- avoid subtracting nearly equal phases when a ratio or inner product gives a more stable relative phase.
At a zero of an amplitude, phase is undefined and numerical phase plots can jump arbitrarily. This is geometry, not necessarily a numerical defect.
Common mistakes
Section titled “Common mistakes”- Writing or instead of .
- Dividing complex numbers without conjugating the denominator.
- Confusing with .
- Treating as single-valued without a branch convention.
- Assigning a phase to .
- Keeping only one algebraic root of a complex number.
- Assuming globally without branch qualifications.
- Omitting conjugation from a complex inner product.
- Confusing a global state phase with a relative component phase.
- Treating phase velocity or time-dependent phase as a directly observable probability.
- Using where is required.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Compute in Cartesian and polar form.
Solution
Multiply by the conjugate of the denominator:
Thus the Cartesian form is , the modulus is one, and a polar form is
- Find all cube roots of .
Solution
Write
The roots have modulus and arguments
Therefore,
Cubing any of these gives .
-
Two alternatives have amplitudes
Find the total probability and identify complete constructive and destructive interference.
Solution
The total amplitude is
Hence
Constructive interference occurs at , giving . Destructive interference occurs at , giving .
- Show that multiplying a state by a global phase leaves every transition probability unchanged.
Solution
Let the transformed state be
For any normalized target state ,
Taking the squared modulus gives
The common phase cancels. A phase attached to only one component would generally change interference with the other components.
References
Section titled “References”- T. Needham, Visual Complex Analysis, Oxford University Press, 1997.
- J. W. Brown and R. V. Churchill, Complex Variables and Applications, 9th ed., McGraw–Hill, 2014.
- M. L. Boas, Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 3rd ed., Wiley, 2005.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, World Scientific, 1998.