Skip to content

Picture Transformations

A picture transformation is a time-dependent unitary change of variables that moves time dependence between states, observables, and Hamiltonians without changing physical predictions.

This page uses the convention

∣ψP(t)⟩=R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩,AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t),\lvert\psi_P(t)\rangle = R^\dagger(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle, \qquad A_P(t) = R^\dagger(t)A_S(t)R(t),

where R(t)R(t) is unitary. With this convention, the transformed Hamiltonian is

HP(t)=R†(t)HS(t)R(t)−iℏR†(t)R˙(t).H_P(t) = R^\dagger(t)H_S(t)R(t) - i\hbar R^\dagger(t)\dot R(t).

The second term is the common source of sign mistakes. It appears whenever the transformation itself depends on time.

Let the Schrödinger-picture state obey

iℏddt∣ψS(t)⟩=HS(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle = H_S(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle.

Choose a unitary R(t)R(t) and define the transformed state by

∣ψP(t)⟩=R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.\lvert\psi_P(t)\rangle = R^\dagger(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle.

The transformed observable is chosen so that expectation values are unchanged:

AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t).A_P(t)=R^\dagger(t)A_S(t)R(t).

Then

⟨ψP(t)∣AP(t)∣ψP(t)⟩=⟨ψS(t)∣R(t)R†(t)AS(t)R(t)R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩=⟨ψS(t)∣AS(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.\begin{aligned} \langle\psi_P(t)\rvert A_P(t)\lvert\psi_P(t)\rangle &= \langle\psi_S(t)\rvert R(t)R^\dagger(t)A_S(t)R(t)R^\dagger(t) \lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle \\ &= \langle\psi_S(t)\rvert A_S(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle. \end{aligned}

The picture has changed; the prediction has not.

Differentiate the transformed state:

ddt∣ψP⟩=R˙†∣ψS⟩+R†ddt∣ψS⟩.\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \dot R^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle + R^\dagger\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_S\rangle.

Substitute ∣ψS⟩=R∣ψP⟩\lvert\psi_S\rangle=R\lvert\psi_P\rangle and the Schrödinger equation:

iℏddt∣ψP⟩=(iℏR˙†R+R†HSR)∣ψP⟩.i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \left( i\hbar\dot R^\dagger R + R^\dagger H_SR \right) \lvert\psi_P\rangle.

Unitarity gives

R˙†R=−R†R˙,\dot R^\dagger R = -R^\dagger\dot R,

so

HP=R†HSR−iℏR†R˙.H_P = R^\dagger H_SR - i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R.

The first term is the ordinary transformed Hamiltonian. The second term is the generator of the moving picture itself.

Set

R(t)=U(t,t0),R(t)=U(t,t_0),

where U(t,t0)U(t,t_0) is the full time-evolution operator. Then

∣ψH⟩=U†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩=∣ψS(t0)⟩,\lvert\psi_H\rangle = U^\dagger(t,t_0)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle = \lvert\psi_S(t_0)\rangle,

and

AH(t)=U†(t,t0)AS(t)U(t,t0).A_H(t) = U^\dagger(t,t_0)A_S(t)U(t,t_0).

The transformed Hamiltonian vanishes for the state equation:

HHstate=U†HU−iℏU†U˙=0,H_H^{\mathrm{state}} = U^\dagger HU - i\hbar U^\dagger\dot U =0,

because iℏU˙=HUi\hbar\dot U=HU. This is why the Heisenberg state is fixed. The dynamics reappears in the operator equation of motion.

For a split

HS(t)=H0+V(t),H_S(t)=H_0+V(t),

choose

R(t)=U0(t,t0)=e−iH0(t−t0)/ℏ.R(t)=U_0(t,t_0)=e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)/\hbar}.

Then

∣ψI(t)⟩=U0†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩,AI(t)=U0†(t,t0)ASU0(t,t0).\lvert\psi_I(t)\rangle = U_0^\dagger(t,t_0)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle, \qquad A_I(t) = U_0^\dagger(t,t_0)A_SU_0(t,t_0).

The transformed Hamiltonian is

HI(t)=U0†(t,t0)(H0+V(t))U0(t,t0)−iℏU0†(t,t0)U˙0(t,t0)=U0†(t,t0)V(t)U0(t,t0)=VI(t).\begin{aligned} H_I(t) &= U_0^\dagger(t,t_0)\bigl(H_0+V(t)\bigr)U_0(t,t_0) - i\hbar U_0^\dagger(t,t_0)\dot U_0(t,t_0) \\ &= U_0^\dagger(t,t_0)V(t)U_0(t,t_0) = V_I(t). \end{aligned}

The H0H_0 part cancels against the extra generator term. This cancellation is the algebraic heart of the interaction picture.

A rotating frame is another time-dependent picture. Let

R(t)=e−iωtG/ℏ,R(t)=e^{-i\omega tG/\hbar},

where GG generates the rotation. Since

R˙(t)=−iωℏGR(t),\dot R(t) = -\frac{i\omega}{\hbar}GR(t),

the extra term is

−iℏR†R˙=−ωG.-i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R = -\omega G.

If HSH_S commutes with GG, then

HP=HS−ωG.H_P=H_S-\omega G.

For a spin with HS=ω0SzH_S=\omega_0S_z and G=SzG=S_z, a frame rotating about zz has

HP=(ω0−ω)Sz.H_P=(\omega_0-\omega)S_z.

This subtraction is why rotating frames expose detunings in driven two-level systems. More detailed driven-system approximations, such as the rotating-wave approximation, belong outside this page.

The transformed operator is

AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t).A_P(t)=R^\dagger(t)A_S(t)R(t).

Differentiating gives both explicit time dependence and picture-induced time dependence:

dAPdt=R†∂AS∂tR+R˙†ASR+R†ASR˙.\frac{dA_P}{dt} = R^\dagger\frac{\partial A_S}{\partial t}R + \dot R^\dagger A_SR + R^\dagger A_S\dot R.

When RR is chosen to be a time-evolution operator, this becomes the familiar Heisenberg equation. For a general R(t)R(t), it is better to derive the operator equation from the transformed Hamiltonian and the transformed explicit derivative rather than guess signs.

A picture transformation resembles a gauge choice in a limited sense: the mathematical representatives change while physical expectation values remain invariant. The extra Hamiltonian term

−iℏR†R˙-i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R

acts like a connection term associated with the moving frame.

This analogy is useful but should not be overread. A change of quantum picture is not automatically an electromagnetic gauge transformation, and a gauge transformation may also change potentials and wavefunction phases in a problem-specific way.

Some books define the transformed state as R(t)∣ψS(t)⟩R(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle instead of R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩R^\dagger(t)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle. That convention is equally valid, but the transformed operator and Hamiltonian formulas change:

∣ψP⟩=R∣ψS⟩⟹HP=RHSR†+iℏR˙R†.\lvert\psi_P\rangle=R\lvert\psi_S\rangle \quad \Longrightarrow \quad H_P=RH_SR^\dagger+i\hbar\dot R R^\dagger.

Before comparing formulas across sources, identify which side carries the dagger.

  • Transforming states but leaving observables in the old picture.
  • Forgetting the extra term −iℏR†R˙-i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R for time-dependent R(t)R(t).
  • Using the right formula with the opposite convention for R(t)R(t).
  • Treating the interaction picture as approximate before any expansion is truncated.
  • Confusing explicit time dependence in AS(t)A_S(t) with time dependence induced by R(t)R(t).
  • Calling a nonunitary similarity transformation a change of picture without checking the inner product and expectation values.
  • Dropping picture labels in a calculation where several transformed objects appear.
  • P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2002.
  1. Derive the transformed Hamiltonian for the convention ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩\lvert\psi_P\rangle=R^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle.
Solution

Differentiate:

ddt∣ψP⟩=R˙†∣ψS⟩+R†ddt∣ψS⟩.\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \dot R^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle + R^\dagger\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_S\rangle.

Use ∣ψS⟩=R∣ψP⟩\lvert\psi_S\rangle=R\lvert\psi_P\rangle and

iℏddt∣ψS⟩=HS∣ψS⟩.i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_S\rangle=H_S\lvert\psi_S\rangle.

Then

iℏddt∣ψP⟩=(iℏR˙†R+R†HSR)∣ψP⟩.i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \left( i\hbar\dot R^\dagger R + R^\dagger H_SR \right) \lvert\psi_P\rangle.

Since R˙†R=−R†R˙\dot R^\dagger R=-R^\dagger\dot R,

HP=R†HSR−iℏR†R˙.H_P=R^\dagger H_SR-i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R.
  1. Show that choosing R(t)=U(t,t0)R(t)=U(t,t_0) makes the Heisenberg state time independent.
Solution

With R=UR=U,

∣ψP(t)⟩=U†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩.\lvert\psi_P(t)\rangle = U^\dagger(t,t_0)\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle.

But ∣ψS(t)⟩=U(t,t0)∣ψS(t0)⟩\lvert\psi_S(t)\rangle=U(t,t_0)\lvert\psi_S(t_0)\rangle, so

∣ψP(t)⟩=U†(t,t0)U(t,t0)∣ψS(t0)⟩=∣ψS(t0)⟩.\lvert\psi_P(t)\rangle = U^\dagger(t,t_0)U(t,t_0)\lvert\psi_S(t_0)\rangle = \lvert\psi_S(t_0)\rangle.

This fixed state is the Heisenberg state.

  1. Let R(t)=e−iωtG/ℏR(t)=e^{-i\omega tG/\hbar}. Compute the extra term in the transformed Hamiltonian.
Solution

Differentiate:

R˙(t)=−iωℏGR(t).\dot R(t) = -\frac{i\omega}{\hbar}GR(t).

Then

R†R˙=−iωℏG,R^\dagger\dot R = -\frac{i\omega}{\hbar}G,

assuming GG commutes with its own exponential. Therefore

−iℏR†R˙=−ωG.-i\hbar R^\dagger\dot R = -\omega G.
  1. Under a unitary picture transformation, why must observables transform as AP=R†ASRA_P=R^\dagger A_SR if states transform as ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩\lvert\psi_P\rangle=R^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle?
Solution

The expectation value should be invariant:

⟨ψP∣AP∣ψP⟩=⟨ψS∣AS∣ψS⟩.\langle\psi_P\rvert A_P\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \langle\psi_S\rvert A_S\lvert\psi_S\rangle.

Since ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩\lvert\psi_P\rangle=R^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle, one has ⟨ψP∣=⟨ψS∣R\langle\psi_P\rvert=\langle\psi_S\rvert R. Choosing

AP=R†ASRA_P=R^\dagger A_SR

gives

⟨ψP∣AP∣ψP⟩=⟨ψS∣RR†ASRR†∣ψS⟩=⟨ψS∣AS∣ψS⟩.\langle\psi_P\rvert A_P\lvert\psi_P\rangle = \langle\psi_S\rvert RR^\dagger A_SRR^\dagger\lvert\psi_S\rangle = \langle\psi_S\rvert A_S\lvert\psi_S\rangle.