Bilinear Covariants
Spinor components depend on a basis; bilinears organize their content into quantities with definite spacetime transformation laws. In four dimensions, scalar, pseudoscalar, vector, axial-vector, and antisymmetric tensor bilinears account for the sixteen independent matrix structures. The factor of in the pseudoscalar and the order of in the axial vector are consequential conventions.
Required background. The Covariant Dirac Equation fixes spinor covariance; Gamma-Matrix Conventions fixes the matrix signs; Free Dirac Spinors supplies normalized on-shell examples. Use below.
The sixteen bilinear structures
Section titled “The sixteen bilinear structures”For a commuting Dirac wavefunction, define
| Name | Definition | Independent components |
|---|---|---|
| Scalar | 1 | |
| Pseudoscalar | 1 | |
| Vector | 4 | |
| Axial vector | 4 | |
| Tensor | 6 |
The symbols in this table label bilinears, not the Lorentz-spinor transformation matrix or the parity operator. Off-diagonal transition bilinears use the same matrix structures but need not be real.
Why is this list complete? Complex matrices form a sixteen-dimensional space, and these matrices are linearly independent. The trace pairings establish that independence. In addition to the scalar and vector traces in the convention ledger,
Pairings between the different sectors vanish. Each sector’s trace pairing is nondegenerate, so no nontrivial linear combination vanishes. This completeness underlies expansions of interaction vertices and spin density matrices. It does not mean the sixteen bilinear values of a single spinor are freely independent numbers; they obey additional nonlinear relations.
Lorentz transformation of the bilinears
Section titled “Lorentz transformation of the bilinears”For a proper orthochronous transformation, and . Thus
The gamma intertwiner gives the vector law directly: . Taking the commutator of two transformed gamma matrices gives the tensor law,
The oriented four-gamma product defining is unchanged under the proper group. Hence is a scalar and a vector under that group. Their “pseudo” and “axial” character becomes visible under orientation-reversing transformations such as parity. Likewise is a scalar, while is only one component of a vector, not a Lorentz scalar.
Reality uses the Dirac adjoint
Section titled “Reality uses the Dirac adjoint”Define the Dirac adjoint of a matrix by . Then
For one has . Therefore all five diagonal bilinear types in the table are real for commuting wavefunctions. Bare instead obeys , so is purely imaginary. This explains the factor in .
No extra belongs in the axial vector with this convention. Also , so reversing that order reverses the axial bilinear. Tables from different sources must be translated at their definitions.
Parity distinguishes polar and axial objects
Section titled “Parity distinguishes polar and axial objects”For the standard spinor parity action with , the diagonal bilinear transforms through . The intrinsic phase cancels. Comparing the transformed quantity at with the original at gives
| Component | Parity sign |
|---|---|
| , | , |
| , | , |
| , | , |
For example, gives the pseudoscalar sign; the extra spatial-vector sign cancels it for , giving an even spatial axial vector. These are transformation properties. A dynamics containing an external parity-breaking background need not have parity as a symmetry.
Spin information in an on-shell state
Section titled “Spin information in an on-shell state”Take a massive state normalized by . If its rest two-spinor satisfies , , define the polarization four-vector
It obeys and . Direct evaluation at rest, followed by Lorentz covariance, gives
The vector current is independent of the spin orientation, while the axial bilinear carries it. At rest and , . Also : inserting the on-shell slash on either side and anticommuting it through gives the negative of the same bilinear for . This diagonal result does not make all transition pseudoscalars vanish.
The polarization vector with has no direct massless rest-frame limit. Use helicity and chiral spinors for that case rather than substituting into this massive parameterization.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- For a rest spin-up state , compute , and .
Solution
, , , and . The current is future timelike while the polarization bilinear is spacelike. They encode different information.
- If is an arbitrary matrix in this two-dimensional subspace, recover by traces.
Solution
and . The minus sign follows from , not from a different spacetime metric convention.
- Show using the displayed boosted polarization.
Solution
Writing ,
because . The result constrains polarization to the rest-frame spatial subspace transported with the particle.
References
Section titled “References”- C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, McGraw–Hill, 1980 — bilinear classification and polarized spinors.
- M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press, 2014, doi:10.1017/9781139540940 — gamma-matrix traces and spinor matrix elements.
- B. Thaller, The Dirac Equation, Springer, 1992 — spinor transformations and observables.