Momentum Representation
Momentum representation is the description of a quantum state by its momentum-space wavefunction. This page treats it as a calculation tool: how to transform, normalize, act with operators, and recognize when momentum space simplifies a problem.
For the conceptual statement that and are two representations of the same abstract state, see Momentum-Space Representation and Position and Momentum Representations. Here the focus is Fourier-space mechanics.
Transform Pair
Section titled “Transform Pair”With the site convention in one dimension,
and
The formal plane-wave kernel is
The complex exponential phase must be dimensionless, so the factor of is not optional: is dimensionless. The normalization convention is recorded in Fourier Transform Conventions.
For quick transform pairs and the conversion between -space tables and , see Fourier Transform Tables for QM.
Inner Products and Probability
Section titled “Inner Products and Probability”Plancherel’s theorem gives
Thus a normalized state satisfies
and the probability of measuring momentum in an interval is
For two states,
The theorem behind these identities is Plancherel and Parseval Theorems.
Operator Dictionary
Section titled “Operator Dictionary”The basic one-dimensional operator actions are:
| Abstract operator | Position representation | Momentum representation |
|---|---|---|
| convolution in |
The signs follow from the transform convention. For example,
so
Similarly,
when boundary terms vanish or the identity is interpreted in the appropriate weak sense.
Free Hamiltonian
Section titled “Free Hamiltonian”For a free particle,
Momentum representation diagonalizes this Hamiltonian:
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation becomes
with solution
The position-space packet is recovered by the inverse Fourier transform:
This is the standard Fourier construction of free-particle wave packets.
Potentials Mix Momenta
Section titled “Potentials Mix Momenta”A local potential is simple in position space:
In momentum representation it is generally not multiplication. With the same unitary convention,
where
Thus the Schrödinger equation in momentum space often has the form
The kinetic term is diagonal, while the potential term couples different momenta. This is the position-momentum tradeoff in its most practical form. The theorem behind the integral is Convolution.
Example: Linear Potential
Section titled “Example: Linear Potential”For a potential , multiplication by becomes differentiation in . The Hamiltonian
acts as
This example is useful because it shows that momentum representation can turn spatial multiplication into differential motion in momentum space. Whether that is simpler depends on the problem and boundary conditions.
Wave Number Versus Momentum
Section titled “Wave Number Versus Momentum”Some references use wave number rather than momentum :
If is normalized by
then the corresponding momentum-space wavefunction must satisfy
Therefore
up to the phase convention used for the transform. Treating and as the same function is a common source of normalization errors.
When Momentum Space Helps
Section titled “When Momentum Space Helps”Momentum representation is especially useful for:
- free particles and approximately free asymptotic states;
- translation-invariant Hamiltonians;
- wave packets specified by momentum spread;
- scattering calculations organized by momentum transfer;
- kinetic-energy estimates and Plancherel identities;
- perturbations whose Fourier transform is simpler than their position-space form.
Position representation is often better for hard boundaries, localized measurement questions, and potentials that are simple functions of position. A representation is a computational choice, not a claim about which variables are more real.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Forgetting that is a probability amplitude density, not a probability.
- Dropping the Jacobian when switching between and .
- Using instead of with the convention on this page.
- Leaving a local potential as instead of transforming it properly.
- Treating plane waves as normalizable states rather than generalized momentum eigenfunctions.
- Ignoring operator domains when differentiating momentum-space wavefunctions.
Cross-Links
Section titled “Cross-Links”- Momentum-Space Representation
- Position and Momentum Representations
- Fourier Transform
- Inverse Fourier Transform
- Complex Exponentials
- Plancherel and Parseval Theorems
- Convolution
- Wave Packets
- Fourier Transform Tables for QM
- Free Particle
References
Section titled “References”- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- B. C. Hall, Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Springer, 2013.
- G. B. Folland, Fourier Analysis and Its Applications, American Mathematical Society, 1992.
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Volume II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, 1975.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Derive the momentum-representation action of .
Solution
Start from
Differentiate:
Therefore
Thus acts as in momentum representation.
- Solve the free-particle Schrödinger equation in momentum representation.
Solution
The equation is
For each fixed , this is an ordinary differential equation in time:
Thus
- Show why a local potential becomes a convolution in momentum space.
Solution
Write
and
Multiplying and transforming gives a delta constraint , so
- Let vanish outside and be normalized. What is the probability of measuring momentum in ?
Solution
The probability is
Because is normalized and vanishes outside , this integral is .