Relativistic Normalization
A normalization convention changes the numerical value of a momentum-space matrix element. It also changes the measure used to convert that element into a probability. This page carries the factors through state rescaling, box-normalized Dirac waves, and external scattering legs. Relativistic Phase Space owns the mass-shell measure and its Lorentz-invariance derivation.
Required background. Relativistic Phase Space supplies the measure and completeness relation; Free Dirac Spinors supplies the spinor norms. Helpful background. Wigner Classification explains how spin labels and normalized states transform under boosts.
Momentum bases and their measures
Section titled “Momentum bases and their measures”Use , , and . The spin index is discrete. Write the covariant basis as , with
Two useful rescalings are
Their overlaps are respectively and . Consequently the same one-particle identity is
The subscript names a convention, not a nonrelativistic approximation: it is legitimate at any momentum. All three bases are distributional. None has a finite norm as a plane-wave vector in infinite volume.
For , the same packet has -basis coefficient and -basis coefficient . Then
The spin rotation in a Lorentz transformation is unitary on the spin indices; it does not remove these scalar rescaling factors.
Dirac spinors in a finite normalization box
Section titled “Dirac spinors in a finite normalization box”Use a periodic cubic box of volume as a normalization regulator, with . This regulator singles out a frame; physical rates are obtained after its volume cancels and the continuum limit is taken. A positive-frequency mode with one unit of Dirac Hilbert norm is
Because and ,
For a beam directed at a stationary source, the incident number flux is , where . In SI units the group velocity is ; the box wave still has total probability one.
The density of final momentum modes is
Equivalently, continuum normalization corresponds to when the delta distribution is discretized by .
Do not replace by just because . The latter uses the Dirac adjoint and is a Lorentz scalar; it is not the positive Hilbert norm used to normalize a wave in the box. The convention with also fails as a direct massless normalization, whereas remains useful at .
Rescaling an amplitude and its probability
Section titled “Rescaling an amplitude and its probability”Let be an operator whose one-particle momentum kernel is . Basis rescaling gives
For example, the transition amplitude from a normalized packet to a normalized packet is
Substituting , and the expression for gives the same result with two measures . This is an exact change of representation.
An even shorter probability check fixes a normalized initial state and sets . Since ,
These are the same projected transition norm. Inserting into the left-hand measure would count the factor twice.
For a multiparticle amplitude with covariant normalization on every external leg, each external ket or bra contributes its own square root. In a translation-invariant scattering problem define
Using -normalized external states changes the coefficient to
It would be inconsistent to substitute into a cross-section formula derived for without also translating the flux and final-state measures. Spin sums and identical-particle counting are additional operations; neither follows from this square-root rule alone.
A fixed external potential is a different kinematic problem. A static localized source conserves energy but can absorb momentum, so its matrix element normally contains a single energy delta, not a four-momentum delta. The S-matrix bridge places the invariant-amplitude convention in its asymptotic-state setting.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- A scalar packet has constant covariant coefficient on a finite momentum region and vanishes outside. Find its normalization and its -basis coefficient. Does the latter remain constant?
Solution
and on the region. It is generally not constant. Equal coefficient functions in two differently normalized bases describe different packets.
- Rescale massive spinors to . Find their spin sum and the denominator needed for a unit box wave.
Solution
The covariant sum becomes , and . The unit box wave is . It is exactly the earlier wave. Changing the spinor sum while retaining the earlier denominator would change the norm.
- For a amplitude with all four energies equal to in the center-of-momentum frame, how are and related?
Solution
. Its squared modulus is smaller by , compensated by the corresponding normalization factors in the probability and flux. The rescaling is not a dynamical suppression.
References
Section titled “References”- Schwartz, Matthew D. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 2014, chapters 5–6. doi:10.1017/9781139540940. External-state normalization and scattering rates.
- Tong, David. Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. University of Cambridge, 2006, sections 2.4.1 and 5.1. Relativistic normalization and Dirac field normalization.
- Weinberg, Steven. The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume I: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 1995, chapters 2–3. Particle-state conventions and scattering.